do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11689 – ADQCVF / NEXT / SOTHEBY’S)
Date: 2024-09-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: arts, auction sale, broker, economic concentration, holding company, investment company, mass media, merger control, motor car, telecommunications








C_202405757EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5757


24.9.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11689 – ADQCVF / NEXT / SOTHEBY’S)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5757)

On 17 September 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11689. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5757/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114645
Date: 2024-09-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, State aid, control of State aid, viticulture








C_202405556EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5556


17.9.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114645
(C/2024/5556)








Date of adoption of the decision


12.7.2024




Aid number


SA.114645




Member State


France




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Modifications du régime SA.108775 (2023/N) d’aides à l’arrachage sanitaire préventif de vignes dans le cadre d’un programme visant à dédensifier et enrayer la flavescence dorée dans le vignoble de Gironde




Legal basis


Décret n° 2023-1055 du 18 novembre 2023 portant création d’un dispositif d’aide en faveur de l’arrachage sanitaire préventif de vignes dans le département de la Gironde ; Arrêté du 18 novembre 2023 relatif aux modalités d’attribution et de mise en œuvre du mécanisme de stabilisation budgétaire de l’aide à l’arrachage sanitaire préventif dans le département de la Gironde




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Closing capacity




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 38 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 38 000 000  EUR




Intensity


64,0 %




Duration


Until 31.12.2025




Economic sectors


Growing of grapes




Name and address of the granting authority







Direction départementale des territoires et de la mer (‘DDTM’ de la Gironde




n/a








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5556/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-607/24 P: Appeal brought on 17 September 2024 by W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 17 July 2024 in Case T-50/23, W.B. Studio v EUIPO – E.Land Italy (BF BELFE)
Date: 2024-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, animal skin, clothing, fancy leather goods and glove-making industry, footwear industry, leather, personal effects, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_202501624EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1624


24.3.2025






Appeal brought on 17 September 2024 by W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 17 July 2024 in Case T-50/23, W.B. Studio v EUIPO – E.Land Italy (BF BELFE)


(Case C-607/24 P)

(C/2025/1624)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. (represented by: V. Piccarreta and A. Mocchi, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), E.Land Italy Srl
By order of 11 February 2025, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1624/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.108170
Date: 2024-09-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Poland, State aid, audiovisual industry, control of State aid, film industry, music, programmes industry, recording








C_202405563EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5563


17.9.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.108170
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5563)








Date of adoption of the decision


7.5.2024




Aid number


SA.108170




Member State


Poland




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Program dofinansowania przez Polski Instytut Sztuki Filmowej przedsięwzięć z zakresu kinematografii




Legal basis


Ustawa z dnia 30 czerwca 2005 r. o kinematografii (tekst jednolity: Dz. U. 2005 Nr 132 poz. 1111 ze zmianami) ; Rozporządzenie Ministra Kultury z dnia 27 października 2005 r. w sprawie udzielania przez Polski Instytut Sztuki Filmowej dofinansowania przedsięwzięć z zakresu kinematografii (tekst jednolity: Dz.U. 2005 nr 219 poz. 1870 ze zmianami); Zarządzenie Ministra Kultury w sprawie nadania tatute Polskiemu Instytutowi Sztuki Filmowej (M.P. 2005 nr 52 poz. 722 ze zmianami)




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Culture




Form of aid


Direct grant, Guarantee, Loan/ Repayable advances




Budget


Annual budget: 468 000 000  PLN




Intensity


90,0 %




Duration


Until 8.5.2030




Economic sectors


Motion picture, video and television programme production, sound recording and music publishing activities




Name and address of the granting authority







Polski Instytut Sztuki Filmowej




ul. Leona Kruczkowskiego 2, 00-412 Warszawa








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5563/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-subsidy measures
Date: 2024-09-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, Egypt, countervailing charge, glass fibre, import (EU), originating product








C_202405525EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5525


17.9.2024






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-subsidy measures
(C/2024/5525)









1.


As provided for in Article 18(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.




2.   Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for an expiry review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.








4.


This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Certain woven and/or stitched glass fibre fabrics


The People’s Republic of China
Egypt


Countervailing duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/776 of 12 June 2020 imposing definitive countervailing duties on imports of certain woven and/or stitched glass fibre fabrics originating in the People's Republic of China and Egypt and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/492 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain woven and/or stitched glass fibre fabrics originating in the People's Republic of China and Egypt (OJ L 189, 15.6.2020, p. 1)


16.6.2025










(1)  
            OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 55, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/1037/oj.

(2)  
            TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu


(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5525/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Guideline (EU) 2024/1211 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2024 on the Eurosystem’s provision of reserve management services in euro to central banks and countries located outside the euro area and to international organisations (ECB/2024/13) (Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1211, 3 May 2024)
Date: 2024-09-17
Institutions: European Central Bank
Subjects: Eurosystem, central bank, disclosure of information, exchange of information, foreign-exchange reserves, international organisation, non-participating country (euro area), participating country (euro area), provision of services, reserve currency








L_202490563EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/90563


17.9.2024






Corrigendum to Guideline (EU) 2024/1211 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2024 on the Eurosystem’s provision of reserve management services in to central banks and countries located outside the euro area and to international organisations (ECB/2024/13)

(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1211, 3 May 2024
)


In the title:
for:


                  ‘Guideline (EU) 2024/1211 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2024 on the Eurosystem’s provision of reserve management services in to central banks and countries located outside the euro area and to international organisations (ECB/2024/13)’,

read:


                  ‘Guideline (EU) 2024/1211 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2024 on the Eurosystem’s provision of reserve management services in euro to central banks and countries located outside the euro area and to international organisations (ECB/2024/13)‘.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/guideline/2024/1211/corrigendum/2024-09-17/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-480/24: Action brought on 17 September 2024 – Le Pen v Parliament
Date: 2024-09-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, Secretary General of an Institution, allowances and expenses, debt, parliamentary allowance, principle of legal certainty, right to justice








C_202406446EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6446


4.11.2024






Action brought on 17 September 2024 – Le Pen v Parliament


(Case T-480/24)

(C/2024/6446)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Jean-Marie Le Pen (Rueil-Malmaison, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


hold that the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 8 July 2024 was adopted in breach of the principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations;










—


hold that the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 8 July 2024 was adopted in breach of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights;










—


annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 8 July 2024, notified to his representatives on 18 July 2024, making a claim for payment against the applicant for an amount of EUR 303 200,99 in respect of sums unduly paid in respect of budget line 400 and stating reasons for the recovery of those sums;










—


annul debit note No 7040001694 of 9 July 2024;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs in their entirety.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging breach of the principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations. The applicant criticises the contested decision for not taking into account the decision on disjoinder issued on 3 July 2024 by the Paris Criminal Court having regard to the state of his health. In his view, the contested decision can be criticised in so far as it does not take into account the fact that the applicant will not be aware of the purpose, significance or scope of the proceedings brought before the General Court and will not be able to effectively prepare for or follow them.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to a fair trial.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6446/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-608/24 P: Appeal brought on 17 September 2024 by W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 17 July 2024 in Case T-54/23, W.B. Studio v EUIPO – E.Land Italy (BF BELFE)
Date: 2024-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, animal skin, clothing, fancy leather goods and glove-making industry, footwear industry, leather, personal effects, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_202501625EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1625


24.3.2025






Appeal brought on 17 September 2024 by W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 17 July 2024 in Case T-54/23, W.B. Studio v EUIPO – E.Land Italy (BF BELFE)


(Case C-608/24 P)

(C/2025/1625)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. (represented by: V. Piccarreta and A. Mocchi, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), E.Land Italy Srl
By order of 11 February 2025, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1625/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 16 September 2024
Date: 2024-09-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202405024EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5024


17.9.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            16 September 2024
         
(C/2024/5024)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1126 




JPY


Japanese yen


155,66 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4621 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84278 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3195 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9394 




ISK


Iceland króna


152,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7800 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,128 




HUF


Hungarian forint


393,83 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2708 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9744 




TRY


Turkish lira


37,8040 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6492 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5109 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6723 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7958 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4407 




KRW


South Korean won


1 467,42 




ZAR


South African rand


19,6277 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8953 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 095,99 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7858 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,094 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,983 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1772 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,4029 




INR


Indian rupee


93,3020 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5024/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11614 – CVC / COMARCH)
Date: 2024-09-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, information technology applications, investment company, merger control, software








C_202405700EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5700


23.9.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11614 – CVC / COMARCH)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5700)

On 17 September 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11614. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5700/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-606/24, Ministerul Finanțelor: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 17 September 2024 – XY and Others v Ministerul Finanțelor
Date: 2024-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: case-law, economic stabilisation, general budget, higher court, independence of the judiciary, pay, preliminary issue, socioeconomic conditions








C_202501402EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1402


10.3.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 17 September 2024 – XY and Others v Ministerul Finanțelor


(Case C-606/24, Ministerul Finanțelor)

(C/2025/1402)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul București

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: XY and Others

Defendant: Ministerul Finanțelor

Question referred

Is the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU (read in conjunction with Article 2 TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights) to be interpreted as meaning that the principle of the independence of judges precludes national legislation introducing an obligation for adjudicating panels, which hear and determine cases concerning the establishment and/or payment of the salary entitlements or salary-related entitlements of staff paid from public funds, to request that the Înalta Curte de Casație şi Justiție (High Court of Cassation and Justice), in all cases which they are called to decide, give a preliminary ruling on points of law not previously dealt with by that court, thereby diminishing the ability of the judges hearing the cases in question to decide those cases independently, solely on the ground that inconsistent judicial practice may have a negative impact on the consolidated general budget and the socio-economic stability of the country?


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1402/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-602/24, W.: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 17 September 2024 – W. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w W.
Date: 2024-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, customs document, customs formalities, export (EU), intra-EU trade, supplier, supply, tax exemption, taxpayer, transport document








C_202500139EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/139


13.1.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 17 September 2024 – W. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w W.


(Case C-602/24, W.)

(C/2025/139)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: W. sp. z o.o.

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w W.

Questions referred







1.


Should Article 146(1)(b) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) be interpreted to mean that a supply of goods declared by the taxable person (supplier) as an intra-Community supply of goods should be regarded as a supply for export in the event that the person acquiring the goods has exported them outside the European Union rather than to another Member State?










2.


For the purpose of applying the exemption referred to in Article 146(1)(b) of Directive 2006/112/EC in the situation referred to in the first question, is it relevant if the person acquiring the goods has exported them outside the European Union in the absence of an agreement with the taxable person (supplier) or common arrangements with the latter, and instead on the basis of an independent decision and without the knowledge of the taxable person (supplier)?










3.


For the purpose of applying the exemption referred to in Article 146(1)(b) of Directive 2006/112/EC in the situation referred to in the first question, is it relevant if the export of the goods outside the European Union results from the findings of the tax authorities based on customs documents, and the content of the transport documents held by the taxable person (supplier) is inconsistent with these findings?






(1)  
            OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/139/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)