do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-579/22 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 September 2024 – Anglo Austrian AAB AG in liquidation v European Central Bank, Belegging-Maatschappij Far-East BV (Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Directive 2013/36/EU – Access to the activity of credit institutions – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Scope of the ECB’s powers – Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – Division of powers between the ECB and the national authorities – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing – Findings of the General Court of the European Union with regard to national law – Examination of a potential distortion of national law)
Date: 2024-09-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, EU banking union, banking supervision, credit institution, money laundering, national law, powers of the institutions (EU), principle of proportionality, rights of the defence, trade licence








C_202406223EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6223


28.10.2024






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 September 2024 – Anglo Austrian AAB AG in liquidation v European Central Bank, Belegging-Maatschappij ‘Far-East’ BV


(Case C-579/22 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Economic and monetary policy - Directive 2013/36/EU - Access to the activity of credit institutions - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) - Withdrawal of authorisation - Scope of the ECB’s powers - Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 - Division of powers between the ECB and the national authorities - Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing - Findings of the General Court of the European Union with regard to national law - Examination of a potential distortion of national law)
(C/2024/6223)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Anglo Austrian AAB AG in liquidation (represented by: O. Behrends, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant at first instance: Belegging-Maatschappij ‘Far-East’ BV (represented by: O. Behrends, Rechtsanwalt)

Defendant at first instance: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Yoo, V. Hümpfner and R. Tutsch, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Anglo Austrian AAB AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB);










3.


Orders Belegging-Maatschappij ‘Far-East’ BV to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 398, 17.10.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6223/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-709/22, Syndyk Masy Upadłości A: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu – Poland) – Syndyk Masy Upadłości A v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 273 and 395 – Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 – Fight against VAT fraud – Split payment mechanism – VAT account of an insolvent taxable person – Transfer at the request of the insolvency administrator of funds deposited on the VAT account)
Date: 2024-09-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, bank deposit, financial solvency, invoicing, payment, tax offence, taxpayer








C_202406224EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6224


28.10.2024






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu – Poland) – Syndyk Masy Upadłości A v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu


(Case C-709/22,
                (1)
Syndyk Masy Upadłości A)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 273 and 395 - Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 - Fight against VAT fraud - Split payment mechanism - VAT account of an insolvent taxable person - Transfer at the request of the insolvency administrator of funds deposited on the VAT account)
(C/2024/6224)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Syndyk Masy Upadłości A

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu

Interested party: Rzecznik Małych i Średnich Przedsiębiorców

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 273 and 395 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, and Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 of 18 February 2019 authorising Poland to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 226 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax,
must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which provides that the amount of value added tax (VAT) deposited on a separate VAT account, which a supplier has with a banking institution, may be used only for limited purposes, namely, in particular, the payment of the VAT due to the tax authority or the payment of VAT on invoices received from suppliers of goods or services.


(1)  
            OJ C 104, 20.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6224/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-476/24: Action brought on 12 September 2024 – Manders v Parliament
Date: 2024-09-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Ombudsman, candidate, election, equal treatment, fundamental rights, indemnification








C_202407175EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7175


9.12.2024






Action brought on 12 September 2024 – Manders v Parliament


(Case T-476/24)

(C/2024/7175)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Antonius J. M. Manders (Helmond, Netherlands) (represented by: R. van Dalen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the last indent of Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2021/1163 (1) null and void or non-binding;










—


order the European Parliament to take a decision on derogation and admit the applicant to the procedure for the election of the European Ombudsman;










—


should the European Parliament refuse to take the said decision, determine reasonable compensation in respect of the damage suffered.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law. The applicant argues that the last indent of Article 11(2) of Regulation 2021/1163 makes it impossible for him to be nominated as candidate for the position of European Ombudsman and that his fundamental rights as they are set out in the EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union are thereby affected. The applicant alleges inter alia violation of the prohibition of discrimination (Article 21 of the Charter) and breach of the principle of equal treatment (Article 2 TEU).


(1)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2021/1163 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (Statute of the European Ombudsman) and repealing Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7175/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.108810
Date: 2024-09-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, State aid, control of State aid, processing industry








C_202405476EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5476


12.9.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.108810
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5476)








Date of adoption of the decision


24.5.2024




Aid number


SA.108810




Member State


France




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Régime d’aides en faveur de la décarbonation des procédés de production industriels grâce à l’électrification, ainsi qu’en faveur des mesures d’efficacité énergétique




Legal basis


1) Articles L.131-3 et R.131-2 et R.131-3 of the Code de l’environnement, establishing the competences of the ADEME; 2) Decision n°14-3-4 of 23 October 2014, modified by the board of directors of ADEME; 3) Finance Law for 2022 of 30 December 2022; 4) Finance Law for 2023 of 30 December 2023.




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Environmental protection




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 4 000 000 000  EUR




Intensity


30,0 %




Duration


Until 31.12.2025




Economic sectors


MANUFACTURING




Name and address of the granting authority







Direction générale des entreprises (DGE)




61, boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75703 Paris Cedex 13








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5476/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11641 – KKR / SUPERSTRUCT)
Date: 2024-09-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Australia, Europe, cultural event, economic concentration, insurance, investment company, merger control, performing arts








C_202405670EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5670


19.9.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11641 – KKR / SUPERSTRUCT)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5670)

On 12 September 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11641. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5670/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-566/23 P: Judgment of the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) of 12 September 2024 – Vincenzo D’Agostino, Dafin Srl v European Central Bank (Appeal – Action for damages – Statement by the President of the European Central Bank (ECB) at a press conference – Alleged damage arising from that statement – Decline in stock market indices – No infringement of rules of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Setting monetary policy objectives – Division of powers between the decision-making bodies of the ECB – Misuse of powers)
Date: 2024-09-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: abuse of power, damages, division of powers, financial loss, loss, operation of the Institutions, president of an institution, press release, price of securities, single monetary policy








C_202406235EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6235


28.10.2024






Judgment of the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) of 12 September 2024 – Vincenzo D’Agostino, Dafin Srl v European Central Bank


(Case C-566/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Action for damages - Statement by the President of the European Central Bank (ECB) at a press conference - Alleged damage arising from that statement - Decline in stock market indices - No infringement of rules of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Setting monetary policy objectives - Division of powers between the decision-making bodies of the ECB - Misuse of powers)
(C/2024/6235)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellants: Vincenzo D’Agostino, Dafin Srl (represented by: M. De Siena, avvocata)

Defendant at first instance: European Central Bank (represented by: O. Heinz, M. Szablewska, M. Ioannidis and L. Cardone, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Vincenzo D’Agostino and Dafin Srl to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 959, 27.11.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6235/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11646 – CVC / CINVEN / PARTNER IN PET FOOD)
Date: 2024-09-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, pet food








C_202405756EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5756


24.9.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11646 – CVC / CINVEN / PARTNER IN PET FOOD)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5756)

On 12 September 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11646. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5756/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11629 – GEOGAS / NYK / DIF / MARIGOLD / FLS JV)
Date: 2024-09-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: carriage of goods, economic concentration, energy transport, holding company, international trade, international transport, investment company, logistics, maritime transport, merger control








C_202405683EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5683


23.9.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11629 – GEOGAS / NYK / DIF / MARIGOLD / FLS JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5683)

On 12 September 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11629. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5683/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-122/24, Oblastna direktsia na MVR – Veliko Tarnovo: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna – Bulgaria) – LM v Direktor na Oblastna direktsia na MVR – Veliko Tarnovo (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-09-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, driving licence, narcotic, police checks, road safety, transport regulations








C_202407298EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7298


16.12.2024






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna – Bulgaria) – LM v Direktor na Oblastna direktsia na MVR – Veliko Tarnovo


(Case C-122/24,
                (1)
Oblastna direktsia na MVR – Veliko Tarnovo)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/7298)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad – Varna

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: LM

Defendant: Direktor na Oblastna direktsia na MVR – Veliko Tarnovo

Operative part of the order

The request for preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Administrative Court, Varna, Bulgaria), by decision of 31 January 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  Date lodged: 14.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7298/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-557/23, SPAR Magyarország: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Törvényszék – Hungary) – SPAR Magyarország Kft. v Bács-Kiskun Vármegyei Kormányhivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – National legislation laying down regulated prices for certain agricultural products and the obligation to offer for sale a specific quantity of those products – Fines)
Date: 2024-09-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, agricultural product, common organisation of markets, imposed price, price of agricultural produce, regulation of agricultural production








C_202406234EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6234


28.10.2024






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Törvényszék – Hungary) – SPAR Magyarország Kft. v Bács-Kiskun Vármegyei Kormányhivatal


(Case C-557/23,
                (1)
SPAR Magyarország)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products - Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 - National legislation laying down regulated prices for certain agricultural products and the obligation to offer for sale a specific quantity of those products - Fines)
(C/2024/6234)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Szegedi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: SPAR Magyarország Kft.

Defendant: Bács-Kiskun Vármegyei Kormányhivatal

Operative part of the judgment

Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2021/2117 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021,
must be interpreted as precluding a national measure which, on grounds of emergency, first, requires a trader to offer for sale certain agricultural products falling within the scope of that regulation, at a regulated price and in an average daily quantity recorded in the trader’s stock, and, secondly, provides for the mandatory imposition of a fine in the event of infringement of the obligations laid down by that national measure.


(1)  
            OJ C 751, 20.11.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6234/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)