do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11516 – FERTINAGRO / AMEROPA / AMEROPA BIOTECH)
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: agricultural holding, agricultural production, cereal-growing, chemical product, economic concentration, fertiliser industry, logistics, merger control, petrochemicals, wholesale selling








C_202405584EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5584


18.9.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11516 – FERTINAGRO / AMEROPA / AMEROPA BIOTECH)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5584)

On 10 September 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11516. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5584/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-210/24: Order of the General Court of 10 September 2024 – the airscreen company v EUIPO – Moviescreens Rental (AIRSCREEN)
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building, building technique, cinema, pump, registered trade mark, screen, trade-mark law








C_202406273EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6273


28.10.2024






Order of the General Court of 10 September 2024 – the airscreen company v EUIPO – Moviescreens Rental (AIRSCREEN)


(Case T-210/24)
                (1)

(C/2024/6273)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/3485, 10.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6273/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 9 September 2024
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202405019EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5019


10.9.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            9 September 2024
         
(C/2024/5019)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1043 




JPY


Japanese yen


158,53 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4616 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84365 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,4550 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9376 




ISK


Iceland króna


152,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,9405 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,051 




HUF


Hungarian forint


395,95 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2780 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9743 




TRY


Turkish lira


37,5989 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6596 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4979 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6101 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8004 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4428 




KRW


South Korean won


1 485,48 




ZAR


South African rand


19,7659 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8589 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 083,30 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8274 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,354 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,474 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,2000 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,9879 




INR


Indian rupee


92,7110 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5019/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-475/24: Action brought on 10 September 2024 – FD v EIF
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrative transparency, competition (EU), equal treatment, principle of legal certainty, recruitment








C_202406444EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6444


4.11.2024






Action brought on 10 September 2024 – FD v EIF


(Case T-475/24)

(C/2024/6444)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: FD (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Investment Fund

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the EIF’s decision of 2 January 2024 not to select the applicant past the pre-selection stage in the framework of four recruitment procedures (Head of Secondary Sales, Valuations & Co-Investments; Head of GreenTech; Head of Portfolio Risk Management & Surveillance; Head of Resource Planning COP coordination & Performance Monitoring);










—


annul the EIF’s decision dated 19 July 2024 rejecting the applicant’s request for administrative review of 1 March 2024;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment, a breach of the principle of legal certainty and a breach of the procedural framework.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of equal treatment, a breach of the principles of transparency and legal certainty and a breach of the procedure.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6444/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Special report 13/2024: Absorption of funds from the Recovery and Resilience Facility – Progressing with delays and risks remain regarding the completion of measures and therefore the achievement of RRF objectives
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU Member State, EU aid, EU financial instrument, EU financing arrangements, coronavirus disease, economic recovery, economic reform, epidemic, investment, structural adjustment








C_202405471EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5471


10.9.2024






Special report 13/2024:

            ‘Absorption of funds from the Recovery and Resilience Facility – Progressing with delays and risks remain regarding the completion of measures and therefore the achievement of RRF objectives’
         
(C/2024/5471)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 13/2024: ‘Absorption of funds from the Recovery and Resilience Facility – Progressing with delays and risks remain regarding the completion of measures and therefore the achievement of RRF objectives’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2024-13



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5471/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.113739
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Romania, State aid, control of State aid, energy production, hydrogen, renewable energy








C_202405452EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5452


10.9.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.113739
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5452)








Date of adoption of the decision


1.7.2024




Aid number


SA.113739




Member State


Romania




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Schemă de ajutor de stat având ca obiectiv sprijinirea investiţiilor în construirea de capacităţi pentru producția de hidrogen verde în instalații de electroliză




Legal basis


OME nr. 653 / 2022




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Energy




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


 




Intensity


 




Duration


8.8.2022 - 31.12.2024




Economic sectors


 




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministerul Energiei




Strada Academiei 39-41








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5452/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-469/24: Action brought on 10 September 2024 – Lorenz Switzerland v EUIPO – Wawelskie Alkohole Łukasz Bylica (Piekarnia i Kawiarnia Lajkonik)
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beer, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law








C_202406268EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6268


28.10.2024






Action brought on 10 September 2024 – Lorenz Switzerland v EUIPO – Wawelskie Alkohole Łukasz Bylica (Piekarnia i Kawiarnia Lajkonik)


(Case T-469/24)

(C/2024/6268)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Lorenz Switzerland AG (Appenzell, Switzerland) (represented by: T. Wittwer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wawelskie Alkohole Łukasz Bylica (Wieliczka, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark Piekarnia i Kawiarnia Lajkonik – European Union trade mark No 10 861 334
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 July 2024 in Case R 1916/2023-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul of the contested decision ; or










—


annul of the contested decision and reject the application for revocation of 15 July 2022 against EU trademark registration No. 10 861 334
                  ‘Piekarnia i Kawiarnia Lajkonik’ ;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs incurred before the Court and in the revocation and appeal proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 19(1) of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6268/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11709 – CKI / CKA / TARGET WIND FARMS AND ASSETS)
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, economic concentration, electrical energy, energy production, hotel industry, investment company, merger control, property development, transport infrastructure, waste management, wind energy








C_202405567EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5567


16.9.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11709 – CKI / CKA / TARGET WIND FARMS AND ASSETS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5567)

On 10 September 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11709. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5567/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-65/24, SwiftSuit Legal Tech: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien – Austria) – SwiftSuit Legal Tech GmbH v WIENER LINIEN GmbH & Co KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Article 2(2)(b) – Prohibition of indirect discrimination based on racial or ethnic origin – Public transport travel cards available to students, the price of which depends on their place of residence – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: equal treatment, ethnic discrimination, public transport, racial discrimination, residence, student, ticket, transport price








C_202406068EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6068


21.10.2024






Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien – Austria) – SwiftSuit Legal Tech GmbH v WIENER LINIEN GmbH & Co KG


(Case C-65/24,
                (1)
SwiftSuit Legal Tech)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin - Directive 2000/43/EC - Article 2(2)(b) - Prohibition of indirect discrimination based on racial or ethnic origin - Public transport travel cards available to students, the price of which depends on their place of residence - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/6068)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: SwiftSuit Legal Tech GmbH

Defendant: WIENER LINIEN GmbH & Co KG

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien (Regional Court for Civil Matters, Vienna, Austria), made by decision of 26 January 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  Date lodged: 30.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6068/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-470/24: Action brought on 10 September 2024 – ITB v EUIPO (TRADEPRO)
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, maintenance, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_202406269EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6269


28.10.2024






Action brought on 10 September 2024 – ITB v EUIPO (TRADEPRO)


(Case T-470/24)

(C/2024/6269)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: ITB GmbH (Kamp-Lintfort, Germany) (represented by: M. Heinrich, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark TRADEPRO – Application No 18 877 893
         

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 July 2024 in Case R 414/2024-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order that the trade mark be registered.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6269/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-588/24, Imballaggi Piemontesi: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 10 September 2024 – Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, competence of the institution, competition law, limitation of legal proceedings, restriction on competition, right to an effective remedy








C_202406921EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6921


25.11.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 10 September 2024 – Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)


(Case C-588/24, Imballaggi Piemontesi)

(C/2024/6921)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant and appellant: Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl

Defendant and respondent: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)

Questions referred

Do Articles 41 and 47 of the [Charter] and Article 46 of the [European Convention on Human Rights] preclude rules such as national rules which, in the area of the monitoring of agreements restricting competition, for the purposes of the exercise of powers to impose penalties and without prejudice to the exercise of the enforcement powers, do not expressly provide that the time period for concluding proceedings set by the Italian Competition Authority in the statement of objections is mandatory, allowing that authority to extend that time period unilaterally, by justified extension measures, when circumstances arise that call for an objective or subjective extension of the assessment?


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6921/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-468/24: Action brought on 10 September 2024 – FB v Parliament
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: equal treatment, principle of proportionality, staff regulations (EU), survivor's benefit








C_202407035EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7035


2.12.2024






Action brought on 10 September 2024 – FB v Parliament


(Case T-468/24)

(C/2024/7035)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: FB (represented by: M. Casado García Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the present application admissible;










—


annul the contested decision of 13 November 2023 and, where necessary, annul the decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 30 January 2024;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law.
The applicant raises a single plea in law to challenge principally the legality of that decision. That plea is divided into two parts:






1.


The first part, alleging infringement of Article 17 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations and failure to observe the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination;










2.


The second part, alleging failure to observe the principle of proportionality.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7035/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11658 – HMLYS II HOLDINGS LIMITED / XIAMEN C&D COMMODITIES / JV)
Date: 2024-09-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: China, biofuel, economic concentration, health care, investment company, joint venture, merger control, supply chain, tourism, trade event, urban construction








C_202405565EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5565


13.9.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11658 – HMLYS II HOLDINGS LIMITED / XIAMEN C&D COMMODITIES / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5565)

On 10 September 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11658. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5565/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)