do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-344/21, Groupe AA and Others: Order of the President of the Court of 5 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Paris – France) – AA and Others v Allianz Bank SA and Others
Date: 2024-09-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, civil liability proceedings, control of State aid, economic concentration, financial institution, infringement of EU law, interest rate subsidy, merger control, principle of legal certainty, securities








C_202407311EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7311


16.12.2024






Order of the President of the Court of 5 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Paris – France) – AA and Others v Allianz Bank SA and Others


(Case C-344/21,
                (1)
Groupe AA and Others)

(C/2024/7311)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 338, 23.8.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7311/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-580/24, Tsachkov: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 5 September 2024 – Criminal proceedings against LY
Date: 2024-09-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, arrest, detention before trial, extradition








C_202406920EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6920


25.11.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 5 September 2024 – Criminal proceedings against LY


(Case C-580/24, Tsachkov)
                (1)

(C/2024/6920)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Person sought in proceedings for the execution of a European arrest warrant

LY

Question referred

Is a national law which provides that, when the executing judicial authority adopts a decision to recognise a European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of criminal proceedings and to surrender the person sought, it must also mandatorily issue a decision ordering the arrest of that person, following which the person sought will remain detained in prison until such time as he or she is surrendered, consistent with Article 12 and Article 23(5) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA? (2)



(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6920/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-83/23, H GmbH (Direct right to a VAT refund): Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof – Germany) – H GmbH v Finanzamt M (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – VAT unduly invoiced and paid – Correction of the invoice – Liquidation of the supplier – Refund to the supplier of the VAT – Refusal of the tax authority to refund the VAT directly to the purchaser – Priority for the right to a VAT refund – Risk of a double refund of the VAT – Risk of loss of tax revenue)
Date: 2024-09-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, establishment, invoicing, liquidation, tax law, tax rebate, taxable income








C_202406059EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6059


21.10.2024






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof – Germany) – H GmbH v Finanzamt M


(Case C-83/23,
                (1)
H GmbH (Direct right to a VAT refund))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Harmonisation of fiscal legislation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - VAT unduly invoiced and paid - Correction of the invoice - Liquidation of the supplier - Refund to the supplier of the VAT - Refusal of the tax authority to refund the VAT directly to the purchaser - Priority for the right to a VAT refund - Risk of a double refund of the VAT - Risk of loss of tax revenue)
(C/2024/6059)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: H GmbH

Defendant: Finanzamt M

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2010/45/EU of 13 July 2010, read in the light of the principles of effectiveness and neutrality of value added tax (VAT),
must be interpreted as meaning that the recipient of a service may not request directly from the tax authority of the Member State in whose territory it is established, the refund of the VAT which it paid to the supplier of that service – which invoiced in error the national VAT of that Member State instead of the VAT legally due in another Member State and paid it to the tax authorities of the first Member State – where those tax authorities have already refunded the VAT to the supplier, which has gone into liquidation, of the service.


(1)  
            OJ C 205, 12.6.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6059/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)