do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Removal from the register): Order of the President of the Court of 4 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main – Germany) – KJ v KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, Direktion für Deutschland (Case C-547/24, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines)
Date: 2024-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, consumer protection, judicial proceedings, national law, traveller








C_202406239EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6239


28.10.2024






Order of the President of the Court of 4 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main – Germany) – KJ v KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, Direktion für Deutschland


(Case C-547/24,
                (1)
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines)

(Removal from the register)
(C/2024/6239)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: KJ

Defendant: KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, Direktion für Deutschland

Operative part of the order

Case C-547/24 is removed from the Register of the Court.


(1)  Date lodged: 13.8.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6239/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-462/24: Action brought on 4 September 2024 – SHS v EUIPO (Pure Steel+)
Date: 2024-09-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building industry, hand tool, machinery, metal product, metals, metalworking, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vehicle








C_202406110EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6110


21.10.2024






Action brought on 4 September 2024 – SHS v EUIPO (Pure Steel+)


(Case T-462/24)

(C/2024/6110)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: SHS – Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH & Co. KGaA (Dillingen, Germany) (represented by: J. Meyer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Pure Steel+ – Application for registration No 18 830 288
         

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 June 2024 in Case R 190/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the obligation to state reasons;










—


Infringement of the principle of ex officio examination.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6110/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-51/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – OSR Enterprises v EUIPO – Möckel and Gramann (evolver) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark evolver – Partial revocation – Genuine use of a mark – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Late submission of documents – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-09-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet, business management, electronic commerce, electronic publishing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202406089EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6089


21.10.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – OSR Enterprises v EUIPO – Möckel and Gramann (evolver)


(Case T-51/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark evolver - Partial revocation - Genuine use of a mark - Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Late submission of documents - Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2024/6089)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: OSR Enterprises AG (Cham, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Lüken and J. Grensemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Śliwińska and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, interveners before the General Court: Mathias Möckel (Chemnitz, Germany), Torsten Gramann, (Chemnitz) (represented by: M. Hirsch and F. Bauer, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 November 2022 (Case R 1302/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders OSR Enterprises AG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 104, 20.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6089/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-73/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – Tertianum v EUIPO – DPF (TERTIANUM) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark TERTIANUM – International registration of the earlier figurative mark Tertianum WOHNEN UND LEBEN IM DRITTEN ALTER – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Nature of use – Proof of genuine use)
Date: 2024-09-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, business management, consultancy, health service, nursing care, property leasing, provision of services, registered trade mark, tourism, trade-mark law








C_202406090EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6090


21.10.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – Tertianum v EUIPO – DPF (TERTIANUM)


(Case T-73/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark TERTIANUM - International registration of the earlier figurative mark Tertianum WOHNEN UND LEBEN IM DRITTEN ALTER - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Nature of use - Proof of genuine use)
(C/2024/6090)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Tertianum AG (Dübendorf, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Fröhlich and M. Hartmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: DPF AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 November 2022 (Case R 1706/2021-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Tertianum AG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 121, 3.4.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6090/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11647 – GONVARRI / HIDRIA)
Date: 2024-09-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, handling, industrial product, iron and steel product, merger control, motor vehicle industry, piping, provision of services, tube, vehicle parts








C_202405486EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5486


10.9.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11647 – GONVARRI / HIDRIA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5486)

On 4 September 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11647. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5486/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-694/22: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – CMT v EUIPO – Camomilla (CAMOMILLA italia) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CAMOMILLA italia – Earlier EU word mark CAMOMILLA – Relative ground for refusal – Comparison of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Power of the Court to alter decisions)
Date: 2024-09-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202406088EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6088


21.10.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – CMT v EUIPO – Camomilla (CAMOMILLA italia)


(Case T-694/22)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark CAMOMILLA italia - Earlier EU word mark CAMOMILLA - Relative ground for refusal - Comparison of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Power of the Court to alter decisions)
(C/2024/6088)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: CMT Compagnia manifatture tessili Srl (CMT Srl) (Naples, Italy) (represented by: P. Marzano, G. Rubino and F. Cordova, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. L. Capostagno and R. Raponi, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Camomilla Srl (Assago, Italy) (represented by: M. Mussi and H. Chiappetta, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 August 2022 (Case R 1738/2021-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 August 2022 (Case R 1738/2021-2) in so far as it finds that there is a likelihood of confusion regarding ‘Clothing (excluding bathrobes)’ in Class 25 and alters that decision in such a way as to reject the application for a declaration of invalidity of the mark registered under number 9 287 038 in respect of those goods;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.






(1)  
            OJ C 7, 9.1.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6088/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Types of gas and supply pressures used by appliances burning gaseous fuels on the territory of Romania
Date: 2024-09-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: Romania, gas, gas appliance, gas supply, natural gas, technical specification, technical standard




C_202405441EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5441


4.9.2024






Types of gas and supply pressures used by appliances burning gaseous fuels on the territory of Romania
(C/2024/5441)











Gas Family


2nd Family


3rd Family




Gas group


E


P (*1)



B/P (*1)





Gross calorific value (GCV)


[MJ/m3]


minimum


32,809 


86,000 


98,000 




maximum


52,151 


93,000 


132,500 




Wobbe index


[MJ/m3]


minimum


41,694 


74,540 


78,000 




maximum


57,799 


76,000 


93,000 




C1+C2+C3+C4+C5 content


% vol.


minimum


84,347 


99,500 


36,660 




maximum


99,860 


100,000 


68,200 




N2+CO2 content


% vol.


minimum


0,084 


0,000 


0,000 




maximum


12,334 


0,200 


0,000 




CO content


% vol.


minimum


-


0,000 


0,000 




maximum


-


0,000 


0,200 




Unsaturated HC content


% vol.


minimum


-


0,000 


0,000 




maximum


-


10,000 


61,130 




H content


% vol.


minimum


-


0,000 


0,000 




maximum


-


0,010 


0,000 




Information on toxic components contained in the gaseous fuel


% vol.


minimum


-


-


-




maximum


-


-


-




Supply pressure at the point of delivery


mbar


nominal


20 


29 


29 




minimum


15 


20 


20 




maximum


25 


35 


35 




Admissible pressure loss in the end-user gas installation


mbar


nominal


5 


5 


5 




minimum


5 


5 


5 




maximum


5 


5 


5 




The reference conditions for Wobbe index and gross calorific value are as follows:






(a)


combustion reference temperature: 15 °C;










(b)


volume measurement reference temperature: 15 °C;










(c)


volume measurement reference pressure: 1 013,25 mbar.






(*1)  The information was communicated to ANRE by holders of LPG supply licences in 2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5441/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-370/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – Al-Assad v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Family membership criterion – Plea of illegality – Requirement that any limitation must be provided for by law – Error of assessment – Right to property)
Date: 2024-09-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, family, freezing of assets, international sanctions, natural person, ownership








C_202406093EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6093


21.10.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – Al-Assad v Council


(Case T-370/23)
                (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Syria - Freezing of funds and economic resources - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list - Family membership criterion - Plea of illegality - Requirement that any limitation must be provided for by law - Error of assessment - Right to property)
(C/2024/6093)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Samer Kamal Al-Assad (Latakia, Syria) (represented by: W. Woll, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: T. Haas, acting as Agent, and by E. Raoult, lawyer)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of (i) Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2023/847 of 24 April 2023 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2023 L 109 I, p. 26) and (ii) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/844 of 24 April 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2023 L 109 I, p. 1), in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Samer Kamal Al-Assad to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 296, 21.8.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6093/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-347/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – EvivaMed Distribution v EUIPO – Galenica (VIVORA) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark VIVORA – Earlier word mark VERFORA – Partial rejection of the application for registration – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-09-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, health service, medical device, medical training, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, scientific research, trade-mark law, veterinary medicine








C_202406092EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6092


21.10.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – EvivaMed Distribution v EUIPO – Galenica (VIVORA)


(Case T-347/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark VIVORA - Earlier word mark VERFORA - Partial rejection of the application for registration - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/6092)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: EvivaMed Distribution GmbH (Wenzenbach, Germany) (represented by: K. Landes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Galenica AG (Bern, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Tenkhoff and T. Herzog, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment in part and the alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 April 2023 (Case R 1556/2022-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders EvivaMed Distribution GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Galenica AG;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 278, 7.8.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6092/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 3 September 2024
Date: 2024-09-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202405015EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5015


4.9.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            3 September 2024
         
(C/2024/5015)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1035 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,26 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4595 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84085 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3720 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9409 




ISK


Iceland króna


153,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7660 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,071 




HUF


Hungarian forint


393,38 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2783 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9735 




TRY


Turkish lira


37,4947 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6394 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4951 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6050 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7839 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4453 




KRW


South Korean won


1 481,23 




ZAR


South African rand


19,8345 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8614 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 171,01 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8195 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,427 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,833 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,2056 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,8785 




INR


Indian rupee


92,6690 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5015/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-59/22: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – Conserve Italia and Conserves France v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for canned vegetables – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Gravity and duration of the infringement – Fine – Basic amount – Additional amount for deterrence – Legal upper limit of the fine – Concept of an undertaking – Concept of an association of undertakings – Relevant turnover – Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
Date: 2024-09-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: cartel, control of restrictive practices, exchange of information, group of companies, market-sharing agreement, preserved product, price agreement, sanction (EU), trade information, vegetable








C_202406085EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6085


21.10.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – Conserve Italia and Conserves France v Commission


(Case T-59/22)
                (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for canned vegetables - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Fine - Basic amount - Additional amount for deterrence - Legal upper limit of the fine - Concept of an ‘undertaking’ - Concept of an ‘association of undertakings’ - Relevant turnover - Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
(C/2024/6085)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicants: Conserve Italia – Consorzio Italiano fra cooperative agricole Soc. coop. agr. (San Lazzaro di Savena, Italy) and Conserves France (Tarascon, France) (represented by: L. Di Via, M. Petite, L. Tresoldi and E. Belli, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Baches Opi and C. Sjödin, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action, brought on the basis of the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2021) 8259 final of 19 November 2021 relating to proceedings under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40127 – Canned vegetables), as well as a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed in Article 2 of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Conserve Italia – Consorzio Italiano fra cooperative agricole Soc. coop. agr. and Conserves France to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.






(1)  
            OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6085/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)