do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-574/24, Flutter Entertainment: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 27 August 2024 – Flutter Entertainment plc v KJ
Date: 2024-08-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, claim, damages, game of chance, loss, online game, parent company, private international law, subsidiary, trade licence








C_202407019EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7019


2.12.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 27 August 2024 – Flutter Entertainment plc v KJ


(Case C-574/24, Flutter Entertainment)

(C/2024/7019)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Flutter Entertainment plc

Defendant: KJ

Question referred

Is Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of an action for damages based on tortious liability in respect of incurred gambling losses which is brought against an ultimate parent company whose subsidiary, as a jointly and severally liable co-perpetrator, offered online games of chance in Austria without a license, the place where the damage occurred is determined by:






(a)


the place from which the player effects credit transfers from his or her bank account to the player account maintained by the subsidiary,










(b)


the place where the subsidiary maintains the player account in which deposits from the player, winnings, losses and bonuses are entered,










(c)


the place from which the player places bets via that player account which ultimately result in a loss,










(d)


the player’s place of residence as the location of his or her claim to payment of the credit balance in his or her player account,










(e)


the location of the player’s main assets?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (‘Rome II’) (OJ 2007 L 199, p. 40).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7019/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-573/24, NiZzA: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Oldenburg (Germany) lodged on 27 August 2024 – B v Niedersächsischer Zweckverband zur Approbationserteilung (NiZzA)
Date: 2024-08-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: physician, professional experience, professional qualifications, recognition of vocational training qualifications








C_202406919EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6919


25.11.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Oldenburg (Germany) lodged on 27 August 2024 – B v Niedersächsischer Zweckverband zur Approbationserteilung (NiZzA)


(Case C-573/24, NiZzA)

(C/2024/6919)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Oldenburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: B

Defendant: Niedersächsischer Zweckverband zur Approbationserteilung (NiZzA)

Question referred

Is Article 3(3) of Directive 2005/36/EC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the recognition, by a Member State, of the evidence of formal medical qualifications issued by a third country, and certification, by that Member State, of attesting at least three years’ professional experience in the territory of the Member State must be recognised by another Member State as equivalent to the evidence of formal qualifications referred to in Annex V, point 5.1.1. of Directive 2005/36/EC, and that the other Member State must therefore, by virtue of the principle of automatic recognition set out in Article 21(1) of Directive 2005/36/EC, for the purposes of access to and pursuit of the professional activities, give evidence, within the meaning of Article 3(3) of Directive 2005/36/EC, the same effect in its territory as the evidence of formal qualifications which it itself issues?


(1)  Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6919/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-571/24, Kreis Bergstraße: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (Germany) lodged on 27 August 2024 – YO, CT v Federal Republic of Germany
Date: 2024-08-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: age of majority, asylum seeker, family migration, family reunification, refugee, right of asylum, young person








C_202406244EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6244


28.10.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (Germany) lodged on 27 August 2024 – YO, CT v Federal Republic of Germany


(Case C-571/24, Kreis Bergstraße)

(C/2024/6244)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants and appellants: YO and CT

Defendant and respondent: Federal Republic of Germany

Joined party: Kreis Bergstraße

Questions referred







1.


Does the time limit of three months from the grant of refugee status, to which, in accordance with the judgment of the European Court of Justice of 12 April 2018 (C-550/16, paragraph 61), (1) an application for family reunification made on the basis of Article 10(3)(a) of Directive 2003/86/EC (2) must be subject in the case where the sponsor was under 18 years of age at the time when he or she entered the territory of a Member State and applied for asylum in that State but reaches the age of majority during the asylum procedure, apply unchanged even if that time limit had already expired at the time of the judgment of 12 April 2018 but the then practice of the administrative authorities and the case-law of the supreme court in such matters in that Member State offered no realistic prospect for a refugee having already reached the age of majority to be able to make a successful application for family reunification?










2.


If Question 1 is to be answered in the negative, does that time limit start to run from a later date in such cases or does a longer time limit apply in those circumstances?






(1)  EU:C:2018:248.

(2)  Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6244/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-774/23 Gebeco: Order of the President of the Court of 27 August 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Simmern/Hunsrück – Germany) – DN v Gebeco GmbH & Co. KG
Date: 2024-08-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: claim, consumer, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, package travel, residence, travel agency, traveller








C_202406419EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6419


4.11.2024






Order of the President of the Court of 27 August 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Simmern/Hunsrück – Germany) – DN v Gebeco GmbH & Co. KG


(Case C-774/23 Gebeco)
                (1)

(C/2024/6419)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/2137.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6419/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 26 August 2024
Date: 2024-08-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202404815EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4815


27.8.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            26 August 2024
         
(C/2024/4815)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1163 




JPY


Japanese yen


160,94 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4610 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84645 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,4030 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9460 




ISK


Iceland króna


153,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7785 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,034 




HUF


Hungarian forint


395,23 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2815 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9756 




TRY


Turkish lira


37,9737 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6496 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5076 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7023 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8008 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4546 




KRW


South Korean won


1 481,16 




ZAR


South African rand


19,8317 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9512 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 236,51 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8531 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,524 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,926 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1332 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,4092 




INR


Indian rupee


93,6635 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4815/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11641 – KKR / SUPERSTRUCT) – Candidate case for simplified procedure
Date: 2024-08-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Australia, Europe, cultural event, economic concentration, insurance, investment company, merger control, performing arts








C_202405286EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5286


27.8.2024






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11641 – KKR / SUPERSTRUCT)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5286)


1.   
On 21 August 2024, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Dance Bidco S.à r.l. (‘Dance Bidco’, USA), controlled by KKR & Co. Inc. (‘KKR’, USA),










—


LMF Holdco S.à r.l. (Luxembourg) and HV Holding S.à r.l. (together, the ‘Target’, Luxembourg), controlled by Providence Holdco International GP Ltd (‘Providence’, Cayman Islands).




KKR will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Target.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


KKR is a global investment firm that offers alternative asset management as well as capital markets and insurance solutions,










—


Target indirectly controls Superstruct Holding S.à r.l. (together with its subsidiaries, ‘Superstruct’). Superstruct is a live entertainment business which owns and operates music festivals in Europe and Australia and provides services to music festivals and live events including accommodation solutions, staging and production services.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified treatment for certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11641 – KKR / SUPERSTRUCT
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5286/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-347/24, Team Service: Order of the President of the Court of 27 August 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio – Italy) – Team Service Soc. Cons. arl v Ferservizi SpA, in relation to CNS – Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Soc. Coop., CNCP – Consorzio Nazionale Cooperative Pluriservizi Attività 360 Soc. Coop., Security Service Srl.
Date: 2024-08-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, public procurement, public sector, services contract, tendering








C_202406928EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6928


25.11.2024






Order of the President of the Court of 27 August 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio – Italy) – Team Service Soc. Cons. arl v Ferservizi SpA, in relation to CNS – Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Soc. Coop., CNCP – Consorzio Nazionale Cooperative Pluriservizi Attività 360 Soc. Coop., Security Service Srl.


(Case C-347/24,
                (1)
Team Service)

(C/2024/6928)
Language of the case: Italian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/4845.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6928/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Removal from the register: Order of the Court of 27 August 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State – Netherlands) – Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, S&A, AA&A and M (Case C-551/23, Cassen)
Date: 2024-08-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: border control, cruel and degrading treatment, international protection, right of asylum








C_202407297EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7297


16.12.2024






Order of the Court of 27 August 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State – Netherlands) – Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, S&A, AA&A and M


(Case C-551/23,
                (1)
Cassen)
                (2)



(Removal from the register)


(C/2024/7297)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, S&A, AA&A

Other party: M

Operative part of the order

Case C-551/23 is removed from the Register of the Court.


(1)  Date lodged: 30.8.2023.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7297/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11635 – ADRILL / ADH / GORDON)
Date: 2024-08-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: drilling, economic concentration, hydrocarbon, investment company, measuring equipment, merger control, offshore drilling, oilfield, provision of services








C_202405380EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5380


30.8.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11635 – ADRILL / ADH / GORDON)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5380)

On 27 August 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11635. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5380/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-448/24: Action brought on 27 August 2024 – JSherwood v EUIPO – INA International (JSherWood wear it with pride)
Date: 2024-08-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, clothing, footwear industry, leather, protective equipment, registered trade mark, sports equipment, textile product, trade-mark law








C_202405851EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5851


7.10.2024






Action brought on 27 August 2024 – JSherwood v EUIPO – INA International (JSherWood wear it with pride)


(Case T-448/24)

(C/2024/5851)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: JSherwood sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: E. Delert-Wiącek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: INA International Ltd (Calgary, Canada)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark JSherWood wear it with pride – Application for registration No 18 626 167
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 June 2024 in Case R 2004/2023-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


grant the demands presented, that is, reject the opposition in its entirety;










—


in the alternative, refer the case back to EUIPO for reconsideration;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5851/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)