do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.11159 – JD SPORTS / GROUPE COURIR)
Date: 2024-08-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, clothing, economic concentration, electronic commerce, footwear industry, merger control, retail trade, sports equipment, sports facilities, wholesale trade








C_202405051EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5051


13.8.2024






Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.11159 – JD SPORTS / GROUPE COURIR)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5051)

On 21 June 2024, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) (‘Merger Regulation’).
On 7 August 2024, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.


(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/4267, 2 July 2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4267/oj.

(2)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5051/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-420/24: Action brought on 13 August 2024 – Corning v EUIPO – Centro Ottico Megavision (PYREX)
Date: 2024-08-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, optical industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202405508EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5508


23.9.2024






Action brought on 13 August 2024 – Corning v EUIPO – Centro Ottico Megavision (PYREX)


(Case T-420/24)

(C/2024/5508)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Corning Inc. (Corning, New York, United States) (represented by: R. de Beer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Centro Ottico Megavision Srl (Codigoro, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PYREX – Application for registration No 18 340 713
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2024 in Case R 2025/2023-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


remit the case to EUIPO so that it can alter the decision on the substance of the case;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division, the Board of Appeal and the General Court.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5508/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-427/24: Action brought on 13 August 2024 – Crédit agricole and Others v SRB
Date: 2024-08-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank resolution, company in difficulties, credit institution, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU)








C_202405654EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5654


30.9.2024






Action brought on 13 August 2024 – Crédit agricole and Others v SRB


(Case T-427/24)

(C/2024/5654)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Crédit agricole SA (Montrouge, France) and 48 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and C. Duriez, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


annul, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, Decision SRB/ES/2024/20 of 11 June 2024 concerning the re-adoption of the decision on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), in so far as it concerns the applicants;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on five pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-422/24, Société Générale and SG Option Europe v SRB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5654/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 12 August 2024
Date: 2024-08-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202404806EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4806


13.8.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            12 August 2024
         
(C/2024/4806)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0925 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,25 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4628 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85554 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,4935 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9491 




ISK


Iceland króna


151,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7745 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,178 




HUF


Hungarian forint


393,25 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3058 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9767 




TRY


Turkish lira


36,6293 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6560 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4998 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5157 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8110 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4474 




KRW


South Korean won


1 497,58 




ZAR


South African rand


19,9047 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8439 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 444,00 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8682 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,611 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,527 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,9998 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,5660 




INR


Indian rupee


91,7375 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4806/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-423/24: Action brought on 13 August 2024 – Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v SRB
Date: 2024-08-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan








C_202405650EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5650


30.9.2024






Action brought on 13 August 2024 – Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v SRB


(Case T-423/24)

(C/2024/5650)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel (Paris, France) and 26 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and C. Duriez, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:






—


annul, under Article 263 TFEU, Decision No SRB/ES/2024/20 of 11 June 2024 concerning the readoption of the decision on the calculation of the ex ante 2021 contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (‘SRB’) in so far as it concerns the applicants;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law, which are essentially identical or similar to those put forward in case T-422/24, Société générale and SG Option Europe v SRB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5650/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11616 – KPS / INNOMOTICS)
Date: 2024-08-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: aluminium, economic concentration, electric machinery, industrial production, investment company, machinery, merger control, metallurgical industry, mining industry, provision of services








C_202405251EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5251


21.8.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11616 – KPS / INNOMOTICS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5251)

On 13 August 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11616. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5251/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-426/24: Action brought on 13 August 2024 – Banque postale v SRB
Date: 2024-08-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU)








C_202405653EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5653


30.9.2024






Action brought on 13 August 2024 – Banque postale v SRB


(Case T-426/24)

(C/2024/5653)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: La Banque postale (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and C. Duriez, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, Decision SRB/ES/2024/20 of 11 June 2024 concerning the re-adoption of the decision on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) in so far as it concerns the applicant;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-422/24, Société générale and SG Option Europe v SRB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5653/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-592/23, Volkswagen (Precon): Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 13 August 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – LK, AK v Volkswagen AG
Date: 2024-08-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air quality, anti-pollution device, approval, combustion gases, commercial vehicle, light-duty vehicle, motor vehicle, motor vehicle pollution, technical specification, technical standard








C_202406418EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6418


4.11.2024






Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 13 August 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – LK, AK v Volkswagen AG


(Case C-592/23,
                (1)
Volkswagen (Precon))

(C/2024/6418)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/624.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6418/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-546/24, Killybegs Fishing Enterprises e.a.: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (Ireland) made on 13 August 2024 – PN, Killybegs Fishing Enterprises Ltd., Killybegs seafoods Unlimited, Killybegs Fishermen’s Organisation Ltd. v Sea Fisheries Protection Authority
Date: 2024-08-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: authorised catch, common fisheries policy, derogation from EU law, fishery product, fishing controls, weight and size








C_202406912EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6912


25.11.2024






Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (Ireland) made on 13 August 2024 – PN, Killybegs Fishing Enterprises Ltd., Killybegs seafoods Unlimited, Killybegs Fishermen’s Organisation Ltd. v Sea Fisheries Protection Authority


(Case C-546/24, Killybegs Fishing Enterprises e.a.)

(C/2024/6912)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: PN, Killybegs Fishing Enterprises Ltd., Killybegs seafoods Unlimited, Killybegs Fishermen’s Organisation Ltd.

Defendant: Sea Fisheries Protection Authority

Question referred

1. Where a Member State has exercised its right to derogate in Article 61(1) from the provisions of Article 60(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009
             (1) (as amended) establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy in accordance with the terms of a control plan approved by the Commission of the European Union, are the competent authorities of that Member precluded from requiring that any quantity of fisheries products first landed in that Member State is weighed in the presence of officials of that authority before being transported elsewhere from the place of landing in accordance with the provisions of Article 60(6) of that Regulation?


(1)  
            OJ 2009, L 343, p.1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6912/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-37/23: Order of the General Court of 13 August 2024 – Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) and Others v Commission (Action for annulment – State aid – Tax exemption for income generated by interest and intellectual property royalties – Advance tax rulings in favour of multinational undertakings – Decision to extend the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU – Act not open to challenge – Aid measure implemented on the date of the decision – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-08-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Gibraltar, State aid, United Kingdom, admissibility, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, intellectual property, interest, multinational enterprise, tax exemption








C_202406100EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6100


21.10.2024






Order of the General Court of 13 August 2024 – Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) and Others v Commission


(Case T-37/23)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Tax exemption for income generated by interest and intellectual property royalties - Advance tax rulings in favour of multinational undertakings - Decision to extend the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU - Act not open to challenge - Aid measure implemented on the date of the decision - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/6100)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd (Singapore), MJN Global Holdings BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands), Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. (Chicago, Illinois, United States) (represented by: C. Quigley KC, M. Whitehouse and P. Halford, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants: Government of Gibraltar (represented by: K. Nordlander and K. Van der Putten, lawyers)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Commission Decision C(2022) 7665 final of 31 October 2022 on State aid SA.34914 (2013/C) implemented by the United Kingdom in respect of the Gibraltar Corporate Income Tax Regime, a summary of which was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ 2023 C 52, p. 10).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible;










2.


Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd, MJN Global Holdings BV and Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. shall pay the costs;










3.


The Government of Gibraltar shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6100/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)