do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates – 8 August 2024
Date: 2024-08-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202404802EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4802


9.8.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            8 August 2024
         
(C/2024/4802)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0930 




JPY


Japanese yen


159,74 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4619 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86093 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,4955 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9368 




ISK


Iceland króna


151,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,8825 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,273 




HUF


Hungarian forint


396,10 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3190 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9767 




TRY


Turkish lira


36,6133 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6677 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5021 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5168 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8230 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4474 




KRW


South Korean won


1 503,86 




ZAR


South African rand


20,0993 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8393 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 378,97 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8912 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,738 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,577 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1544 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,0402 




INR


Indian rupee


91,7590 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4802/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11636 – CVC / WALDAKT / RESURS)
Date: 2024-08-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: bank deposit, consultancy, consumer credit, economic concentration, financial services, insurance, investment company, merger control








C_202405182EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5182


21.8.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11636 – CVC / WALDAKT / RESURS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5182)

On 9 August 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11636. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5182/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Judgment of the court of 9 August 2024 in Case E-12/23 – Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA v the Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Climate and Environment (Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 12(2a) – Obligation to surrender emission allowances – National insolvency law – Emissions trading system (ETS) – Greenhouse gases – Climate change)
Date: 2024-08-09
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: EU emission allowance, European Economic Area, Norway, air transport, composition, financial solvency, greenhouse gas, judicial proceedings, liquidation, tradeable emission permit








C_202407126EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7126


28.11.2024







            JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
         
of 9 August 2024
         
in Case E-12/23
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA v the Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Climate and Environment


(Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 12(2a) – Obligation to surrender emission allowances – National insolvency law – Emissions trading system (ETS) – Greenhouse gases – Climate change)


(C/2024/7126)

In Case E-12/23, Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA v the Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Climate and Environment (Staten v/Klima og miljødepartementet) – Request to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by Oslo District Court (Oslo tingrett), concerning the interpretation of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President (Judge-Rapporteur), Bernd Hammermann and Michael Reiertsen, Judges, gave judgment on 9 August 2024, the operative part of which is as follows:
Article 12(2a) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union must be interpreted as precluding national legislation from providing that the obligation to surrender emissions allowances may be settled by dividend in a compulsory debt settlement in connection with the restructuring of an insolvent company.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7126/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11607 – GOLDMAN SACHS / GROUPE CRYSTAL)
Date: 2024-08-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, financial services, investment bank, merger control








C_202405187EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5187


21.8.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11607 – GOLDMAN SACHS / GROUPE CRYSTAL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5187)

On 9 August 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11607. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5187/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-542/24, Maski: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku (Poland) lodged on 9 August 2024 – A. B.
Date: 2024-08-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: appeal, civil proceedings, discretionary power, independence of the judiciary, judge, judicial review, right to an effective remedy, right to justice








C_202406910EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6910


25.11.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku (Poland) lodged on 9 August 2024 – A. B.


(Case C-542/24, Maski)
                (1)

(C/2024/6910)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: A. B.

Respondent: Skarb Państwa – Państwowe Gospodarstwo Leśne Lasy Państwowe Nadleśnictwo C.

Question referred

Do Article 2, the second subparagraph of Article 19(1), and Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union, in conjunction with the first and second paragraphs of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, guaranteeing an effective remedy before a tribunal and the right to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law, preclude a provision of national law under which it is a rule that, following an appeal, the court of second instance must examine a case in civil proceedings in a single-judge formation, and not in a professional collegiate formation (three professional judges), and a derogation from that rule, in all but a few statutory exceptions, in view of the complexity of the case or the precedent which it sets – consisting in the designation of a formation of three professional judges rather than a single judge – may be made only by way of an unchallengeable order of the president of the court, adopted at his or her discretion, irrespective of the substantive assessment of the judge designated to adjudicate in the case in a single-judge formation and not amenable to review?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6910/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-417/24: Action brought on 9 August 2024 – ET v BEI
Date: 2024-08-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrative procedure, administrative transparency, bonus payment, indemnification, interest, servant (EU), staff regulations








C_202405975EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5975


14.10.2024






Action brought on 9 August 2024 – ET v BEI


(Case T-417/24)

(C/2024/5975)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ET (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul European Investment Bank’s decision of 11 January 2024 to recover part of the individual awards received by the applicant for years 2019, 2020 and 2021, i.e. EUR 37 817,23;










—


annul, in so far as necessary, European Investment Bank’s decision of 16 July 2024 rejecting the applicant’s request for administrative review of 6 February 2024;










—


order the defendant to pay a financial compensation for the applicant’s moral harm, which can be evaluated, ex aequo et bono to the sum of EUR 15 000;










—


order the defendant to repay the sum recovered increased by a default interest at the European Central Bank rate plus 2 points;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 16.3 of the EIB Staff Rules.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty of good administration, transparency and duty of care.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5975/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)