do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
Date: 2024-08-05
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: alloy, aluminium, chemical product, chromium, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, metal coating, oxide








C_202404758EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4758


5.8.2024






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
                (1)
)


(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/4758)


Decision granting an authorisation














Reference of the decision
 (2)




Date of decision




Substance name




Holder of the authorisation




Authorisation number




Authorised use




Date of expiry of review period




Reasons for the decision





C(2024) 5269


29 July 2024


chromium trioxide (EC No 215-607-8; CAS No 1333-82-0)


Liebherr-Aerospace Lindenberg GmbH, Pfänderstrasse 50-52, 88161 Lindenberg, Germany


REACH/24/34/0


Industrial use for functional chrome plating of actuation and landing gear systems for the aviation industry


7 February 2034


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.




REACH/24/34/1


Industrial use for surface treatment of aluminium alloys for applications in the aerospace industries unrelated to functional chrome plating






(1)  
            OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4758/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-405/24: Action brought on 5 August 2024 – Al Dibs v Council
Date: 2024-08-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, principle of proportionality, right to justice, right to property, rights of the defence








C_202405831EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5831


7.10.2024






Action brought on 5 August 2024 – Al Dibs v Council


(Case T-405/24)

(C/2024/5831)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties


Applicant: Samer Al Dibs (Beirut, Lebanon) (represented by: St. Koev, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


consider the action to be admissible and well founded in its entirety;










—


declare that the contested acts may be annulled in part;










—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1510 of 27 May 2024 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (1) in so far as it adds Mr Samer Al Dibs to the list contained in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP referred to above, and










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1517 of 27 May 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, (2) in so far as it adds Mr Samer Al Dibs to the list contained in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 referred to above;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay all the applicant’s legal costs, expenses, fees and other expenditure linked to his defence.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging material infringement of the rights of the defence and the right to a fair trial;










2.


Second plea in law, alleging failure to fulfil the obligation to state reasons;










3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to effective judicial protection.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging an error of assessment on the part of the Council of the European Union;










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to property, of the principle of proportionality and of the freedom to conduct a business;










6.


Sixth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to a normal life;










7.


Seventh plea in law, alleging a serious infringement of the right to the protection of reputation.






(1)  ОJ L 2024/1510.

(2)  ОJ L 2024/1517.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5831/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)