do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11593 – CLEARLAKE / FRANCISCO PARTNERS / SOFTWARE INTEGRITY GROUP OF SYNOPSYS)
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, information security, investment company, merger control, service, software








C_202405005EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5005


8.8.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11593 – CLEARLAKE / FRANCISCO PARTNERS / SOFTWARE INTEGRITY GROUP OF SYNOPSYS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5005)

On 1 August 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11593. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5005/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information concerning the entry into force of the Sustainable Investment Facilitation Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Angola
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Angola, agreement (EU), investment








L_202402131EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/2131


1.8.2024






Information concerning the entry into force of the Sustainable Investment Facilitation Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Angola

The Sustainable Investment Facilitation Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Angola (1), enters into force on 1 September 2024, in accordance with Article 57(1) of the Agreement, as the Parties notified each other of the completion of their internal legal procedures on 5 March 2024 and 4 July 2024 respectively.


(1)  
            OJ L, 2024/830, 8.3.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree/2024/830/oj.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/info/2024/2131/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-399/24: Action brought on 1 August 2024 – Collectif des maires anti-pesticides and Others v Commission
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: herbicide, market approval, plant health control, powers of the institutions (EU), precautionary principle








C_202405828EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5828


7.10.2024






Action brought on 1 August 2024 – Collectif des maires anti-pesticides and Others v Commission


(Case T-399/24)

(C/2024/5828)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Collectif des maires anti-pesticides (Sceaux, France), Comité de recherche et d’information indépendantes sur le génie génétique (Criigen) (Paris, France), Agir pour l’environnement (Paris) (represented by: C. Lepage, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


declare the application admissible and well-founded;










—


annul the European Commission’s decision rejecting the applicants’ application to intervene and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2660 of 28 November 2023 renewing the approval of the active substance glyphosate in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011; (1)











—


order the Commission to pay the costs pursuant to Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging numerous irregularities vitiating the procedure followed by the Commission;










2.


Second plea in law, alleging an error of law vitiating the contested decisions;










3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the cautionary principle;










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission disregarded its own competence and unlawfully delegated to the Member States the responsibility of addressing all the risks associated with the authorisation.






(1)  OJ L, 2023/2660.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5828/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.110308
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, State aid, carriage of goods, control of State aid, rail transport








C_202404797EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4797


1.8.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.110308
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/4797)








Date of adoption of the decision


22.7.2024




Aid number


SA.110308




Member State


Italy




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Modifica di un regime di aiuti di Stato a sostegno del trasporto combinato nella provincia di Bolzano




Legal basis


Deliberazione n. 903 della Giunta Provinciale di Bolzano del 17 ottobre 2023




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Coordination of transport




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 9 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2025




Economic sectors


Freight rail transport




Name and address of the granting authority







Provincia autonoma di Bolzano, Ripartizione Mobilità




Palazzo 3b, Piazza Silvius Magnago, 3 - 39100 Bolzano








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4797/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11204 – BUNGE / VITERRA)
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: agricultural trade, cereals, cotton, economic concentration, fats, merger control, oil crop, processed food product, sugar, wholesale trade








C_202504957EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4957


8.9.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11204 – BUNGE / VITERRA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4957)

On 1 August 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11204. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4957/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-401/24: Action brought on 1 August 2024 – BDSwiss v EUIPO (BDSwiss)
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, broker, financial services, option contract, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202405829EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5829


7.10.2024






Action brought on 1 August 2024 – BDSwiss v EUIPO (BDSwiss)


(Case T-401/24)

(C/2024/5829)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: BDSwiss AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: J.-A. Fortmeyer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International application to extend European Union word mark BDSwiss to Brazil, China, Canada, Japan, the United Arab Emirates, the United States, Türkiye, Singapore and the Russian Federation – Application No 12 708 749_01

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 May 2024 in Case R 206/2024-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


refer the applicant’s international application to extend the protection of the contested European Union word mark to Brazil, China, Canada, Japan, the United Arab Emirates, the United States, Türkiye, Singapore and the Russian Federation for services in Class 36 to WIPO;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 184(5)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5829/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1746 of 24 June 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L, 2024/1746, 24.6.2024)
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








L_202490485EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/90485


1.8.2024






Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1746 of 24 June 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1746, 24 June 2024
)







1.


On page 54, in entry number 1807, under the heading ‘Identifying information’:











for:





                           ‘Tax Identification Number: 771500884353/771500884353’,












read:





                           ‘Tax Identification Number: 771500884353’.











2.


On page 79, in entry number 435, under the heading ‘Identifying information’:











for:





                           ‘Tel.: 8 800 600 20 85’,












read:





                           ‘Tel.: +7 800 600 20 85’.











3.


On page 96, in entry number 452, under the heading ‘Identifying information’:











for:





                           ‘Fax: 996-59-10’,












read:





                           ‘Fax: + 7 (495) 996-59-10’.











4.


On page 99, in entry number 455, under the heading ‘Identifying information’:











for:





                           ‘Place of registration: 67811 Amurskaya oblast, Belogorskiy Rayon, Vozhaevka, Russian Federation’,












read:





                           ‘Place of registration: 676811 Amurskaya oblast, Belogorskiy Rayon, Vozhaevka, Russian Federation’.











5.


On page 106, in entry number 462, under the heading ‘Identifying information’:











for:





                           ‘Tel.: 8 (87239) 2-22-77; 2-23-03’,












read:





                           ‘Tel.: + 7 (87239) 2-22-77; + 7 (87239) 2-23-03’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2024/1746/corrigendum/2024-08-01/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-400/24: Action brought on 1 August 2024 – Mercedes-Benz Group v EUIPO (Representation of a motor vehicle driving uphill)
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, pneumatic tyre, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vehicle parts








C_202405336EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5336


9.9.2024






Action brought on 1 August 2024 – Mercedes-Benz Group v EUIPO (Representation of a motor vehicle driving uphill)


(Case T-400/24)

(C/2024/5336)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Mercedes-Benz Group AG (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: P. Kohl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for an EU figurative mark representing a motor vehicle driving uphill – Application No 18 805 110
         

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2024 in Case R 2056/2023-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in opposition and appeal proceedings.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5336/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11504 – ICIG / EVONIK SUPERABSORBER COMPANIES)
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, merger control, pharmaceutical industry








C_202405857EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5857


26.9.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11504 – ICIG / EVONIK SUPERABSORBER COMPANIES)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5857)

On 1 August 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11504. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5857/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114766
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy, State aid, animal production, aquaculture, control of State aid, crop production, fishing industry, hunting, service








C_202404796EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4796


1.8.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114766
(C/2024/4796)








Date of adoption of the decision


11.7.2024




Aid number


SA.114766




Member State


Italy




Region


Friuli-Venezia Giulia




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TCTF: Regime Quadro per i settori agricolo, forestale e della pesca ed acquacoltura nel rispetto del Quadro temporaneo di crisi (Reintroduzione del regime SA.102522 (2022/N))




Legal basis


Legge regionale (Regional law) 01 aprile 2020, n. 5 ‘Ulteriori misure urgenti per far fronte all’emergenza epidemiologica da COVID-19 e alle conseguenze del conflitto russo-ucraino nel comparto agricolo eagroalimentare’ (art. 12, commi 2 bis e 2 ter).




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Direct grant, Loan/ Repayable advances




Budget


 




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2024




Economic sectors


Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities, Fishing and aquaculture




Name and address of the granting authority







Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia - Direzione centrale risorse agroalimentari, forestali e ittiche - Direttore centrale Ing. Maurizio Urizio




Via Sabbadini 31 - 33100 Udine








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4796/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11605 – ICG / DGS)
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: digital transformation, economic concentration, information security, information technology industry, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_202405014EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5014


12.8.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11605 – ICG / DGS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5014)

On 1 August 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11605. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5014/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11457 – HPE / JUNIPER)
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: artificial intelligence, computer equipment, computer network, economic concentration, merger control, multinational enterprise, service, software, technology, transmission network








C_202407475EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7475


18.12.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11457 – HPE / JUNIPER)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7475)

On 1 August 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11457. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7475/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-530/24, Tipico: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 1 August 2024 – DK v Tipico Co. Ltd
Date: 2024-08-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, damages, digital contract, freedom to provide services, game of chance, infringement of EU law, sport, termination of a contract, trade licence








C_202406631EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6631


11.11.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 1 August 2024 – DK v Tipico Co. Ltd


(Case C-530/24, Tipico)

(C/2024/6631)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant and appellant on a point of law: DK

Defendant and respondent on a point of law: Tipico Co. Ltd

Questions referred







1.


Does the freedom to provide services of a gaming and betting operator established in another Member State of the European Union preclude a sports betting contract governed by private law and concluded over the internet without the authorisation required under national law from being regarded as null and void where the operator has applied in Germany for authorisation to organise sports betting and the licensing procedure to which that application is subject has been conducted in breach of EU law?










2.


Does the freedom to provide services of a gaming and betting operator established in another Member State of the European Union preclude the national prior authorisation scheme governing the organisation of online sports betting from being regarded as a rule conferring legal protection, with the possible consequence of liability for damages, where the operator has applied in Germany for authorisation to organise sports betting and the licensing procedure to which that application is subject has been conducted in breach of EU law?






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6631/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)