do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates – 26 July 2024
Date: 2024-07-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202404254EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4254


29.7.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            26 July 2024
         
(C/2024/4254)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0860 




JPY


Japanese yen


167,84 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4626 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84378 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,7325 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9594 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,9370 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,370 




HUF


Hungarian forint


390,95 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2740 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9718 




TRY


Turkish lira


35,7984 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6559 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5009 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4782 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8427 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4594 




KRW


South Korean won


1 505,15 




ZAR


South African rand


19,8121 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8750 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 694,04 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0580 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,377 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,112 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1170 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,9254 




INR


Indian rupee


90,9495 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4254/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-51/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2024 – Validity Foundation – Mental Disability Advocacy Centre v European Commission (Appeal – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(3) – Access to documents drawn up by an institution for internal use or relating to a matter where a decision has not been taken by that institution – Documents relating to a draft call for proposals co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Decision refusing access to documents originating from a Member State – Decision granting access to those documents, adopted after the action for annulment of the decision refusing access was brought – No interest in bringing proceedings)
Date: 2024-07-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Regional Development Fund, Hungary, access to EU information, administrative transparency, distribution of EU funding, independence of people with disabilities, integration of people with disabilities








C_202405773EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5773


7.10.2024






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2024 – Validity Foundation – Mental Disability Advocacy Centre v European Commission


(Case C-51/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Article 4(3) - Access to documents drawn up by an institution for internal use or relating to a matter where a decision has not been taken by that institution - Documents relating to a draft call for proposals co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) - Decision refusing access to documents originating from a Member State - Decision granting access to those documents, adopted after the action for annulment of the decision refusing access was brought - No interest in bringing proceedings)
(C/2024/5773)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Validity Foundation – Mental Disability Advocacy Centre (represented by: M.R. Oyarzabal Arigita, abogada, and B. Van Vooren, advocaat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Validity Foundation – Mental Disability Advocacy Centre to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 189, 30.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5773/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-713/22, LivaNova: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – LivaNova plc v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Presidenza dei Consiglio dei Ministri (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Companies – Divisions of public limited liability companies – Sixth Directive 82/891/EEC – Article 3(3)(b) – Division by the formation of new companies – Concept of liability … not allocated by the draft terms of division – Joint and several liability of those new companies for liabilities resulting from the conduct of the company being divided prior to that division)
Date: 2024-07-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, demerger, environmental liability, liability, private limited company, public limited company








C_202405595EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5595


30.9.2024






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – LivaNova plc v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Presidenza dei Consiglio dei Ministri


(Case C-713/22,
                (1)
LivaNova)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Companies - Divisions of public limited liability companies - Sixth Directive 82/891/EEC - Article 3(3)(b) - Division by the formation of new companies - Concept of ‘liability … not allocated by the draft terms of division’ - Joint and several liability of those new companies for liabilities resulting from the conduct of the company being divided prior to that division)
(C/2024/5595)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: LivaNova plc

Respondents: Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Presidenza dei Consiglio dei Ministri

Intervener: SNIA SpA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(3)(b) of Sixth Council Directive 82/891/EEC of 17 December 1982 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the [EEC] Treaty, concerning the division of public limited liability companies
must be interpreted as meaning that the rule on the joint and several liability of recipient companies laid down in that provision applies not only to defined liabilities, not allocated by the draft terms of division, but also to undefined liabilities such as the costs of clean-up and environmental damage, which were established, evaluated or consolidated subsequent to the division concerned in so far as they result from conduct of the company being divided prior to the division.


(1)  
            OJ C 45, 6.2.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5595/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Joined Cases C-112/22 and C-223/22, CU and ND (Social assistance – indirect discrimination): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli – Italy) – Criminal proceedings against CU (C-112/22), ND (C-223/22) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents – Directive 2003/109/EC – Article 11(1)(d) – Equal treatment – Social security, social assistance and social protection measures – Residency condition of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must be consecutive – Indirect discrimination)
Date: 2024-07-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU national, Italy, discrimination on the basis of nationality, foreign national, free movement of workers, residence permit, right of asylum, subsistence level income








C_202405588EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5588


30.9.2024






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli – Italy) – Criminal proceedings against CU (C-112/22), ND (C-223/22)


(Joined Cases C-112/22 and C-223/22,
                (1)
CU and ND (Social assistance – indirect discrimination))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents - Directive 2003/109/EC - Article 11(1)(d) - Equal treatment - Social security, social assistance and social protection measures - Residency condition of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must be consecutive - Indirect discrimination)
(C/2024/5588)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Napoli

Parties in the main proceedings

CU (C-112/22),
ND (C-223/22)

Intervening parties: Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Napoli (C-112/22 and C-223/22), Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze (C-112/22 and C-223/22), Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (C-223/22).

Operative part of the judgment

Article 11(1)(d) of Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents, read in the light of Article 34 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which makes access for third-country nationals who are long-term residents to a social security, social assistance or social protection measure conditional on the requirement, which also applies to nationals of that Member State, of having resided in that Member State for at least 10 years, the final 2 years of which must be consecutive, and which provides for a criminal penalty for any false declaration regarding that residency condition.


(1)  
            OJ C 237, 20.6.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5588/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
C-39/23, Keva and Others: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen – Sweden) – Keva, Landskapet Ålands pensionsfond, Kyrkans Centralfond v Skatteverket (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends received by pension funds governed by public law – Difference in treatment between resident and non-resident pension funds governed by public law – Exemption only of resident pension funds governed by public law – Comparability of situations – Whether justified – Need to safeguard the objective pursued by social policy – Need to preserve a balanced allocation of the power of taxation of the Member States)
Date: 2024-07-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, administration headquarters, capital gains tax, equal treatment, free movement of capital, investment income, pension fund, pension scheme, public institution








C_202405772EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5772


7.10.2024






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen – Sweden) – Keva, Landskapet Ålands pensionsfond, Kyrkans Centralfond v Skatteverket


(C-39/23,
                (1)
Keva and Others)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 63 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Taxation of dividends received by pension funds governed by public law - Difference in treatment between resident and non-resident pension funds governed by public law - Exemption only of resident pension funds governed by public law - Comparability of situations - Whether justified - Need to safeguard the objective pursued by social policy - Need to preserve a balanced allocation of the power of taxation of the Member States)
(C/2024/5772)
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Keva, Landskapet Ålands pensionsfond, Kyrkans Centralfond

Defendant: Skatteverket

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which dividends distributed by resident companies to non-resident pension institutions governed by public law are subject to a withholding tax, whereas dividends distributed to resident pension funds governed by public law are exempt from such a withholding tax.


(1)  
            OJ C 121, 3.4.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5772/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-174/23, Twenty First Capital: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – France) – HJ, IK, LM v Twenty First Capital SAS (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2011/61/EU – Alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) – Operating conditions – Article 13 – AIFM remuneration policies and practices – Scope ratione temporis – Article 61 – Transitional provisions)
Date: 2024-07-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: UCITS fund, alternative investment, approximation of laws, financial market, manager, national implementing measure, remuneration of work








C_202405775EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5775


7.10.2024






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – France) – HJ, IK, LM v Twenty First Capital SAS


(Case C-174/23,
                (1)
Twenty First Capital)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Directive 2011/61/EU - Alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) - Operating conditions - Article 13 - AIFM remuneration policies and practices - Scope ratione temporis - Article 61 - Transitional provisions)
(C/2024/5775)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: HJ, IK, LM

Defendant: Twenty First Capital SAS

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 61(1) of Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on Alternative Investment Fund Managers and amending Directives 2003/41/EC and 2009/65/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009 and (EU) No 1095/2010
must be interpreted as meaning that:






—


the Member States were under an obligation to require alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) performing activities under that directive before 22 July 2013 to comply fully with the obligations relating to remuneration policies and practices stemming from Article 13(1) of that directive from the date on which their authorisation was obtained, provided that they had submitted an application for authorisation within one year from 22 July 2013.














2.


Article 61(1) of Directive 2011/61
must be interpreted as meaning that:






—


the phrase ‘shall take all necessary measures to comply with national law stemming from this Directive’ requires that AIFMs performing activities before 22 July 2013 refrain from taking measures which are liable seriously to compromise the achievement of the objective of Directive 2011/61.










(1)  
            OJ C 223, 26.6.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5775/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1141/23: Order of the General Court of 29 July 2024 – Schöffel Sportbekleidung v EUIPO – BV (Schöffel Ich bin raus.) (EU trademark – Revocation of the contested decision – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2024-07-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, leather, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_202405419EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5419


16.9.2024






Order of the General Court of 29 July 2024 – Schöffel Sportbekleidung v EUIPO – BV (Schöffel Ich bin raus.)


(Case T-1141/23)
                (1)

(EU trademark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/5419)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Schöffel Sportbekleidung GmbH (Schwabmünchen, Germany) (represented by: P. Klein, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: BV

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 October 2023 (Case R 237/2023-1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/974, 29.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5419/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11571 – KÜHNE HOLDING / AENOVA)
Date: 2024-07-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: carriage of goods, catering industry, economic concentration, food supplement, holding company, logistics, merger control, pharmaceutical industry, real estate business








C_202405003EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5003


8.8.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11571 – KÜHNE HOLDING / AENOVA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5003)

On 29 July 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11571. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5003/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-591/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 July 2024 – Ryanair DAC, Laudamotion GmbH v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany, Republic of Austria, Austrian Airlines AG (Appeal – State aid – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Austrian air transport market – Aid granted by the Republic of Austria to an airline amid the COVID-19 pandemic – Subordinated loan to Austrian Airlines AG – Decision by the European Commission not to raise objections – Aid to make good the damage suffered by a single undertaking – Principles of proportionality and of non-discrimination – Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services)
Date: 2024-07-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, State aid, aid to undertakings, airline, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, equal treatment, freedom to provide services, principle of proportionality, right of establishment








C_202405587EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5587


30.9.2024






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 July 2024 – Ryanair DAC, Laudamotion GmbH v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany, Republic of Austria, Austrian Airlines AG


(Case C-591/21 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Article 107(2)(b) TFEU - Austrian air transport market - Aid granted by the Republic of Austria to an airline amid the COVID-19 pandemic - Subordinated loan to Austrian Airlines AG - Decision by the European Commission not to raise objections - Aid to make good the damage suffered by a single undertaking - Principles of proportionality and of non-discrimination - Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services)
(C/2024/5587)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Ryanair DAC, Laudamotion GmbH (represented initially by: V. Blanc, F. C. Laprévote, E. Vahida, avocats, I. G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, dikigoros, D. Pérez de Lamo and S. Rating, abogados, and subsequently by F. C. Laprévote, E. Vahida, avocats, I. G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, dikigoros, D. Pérez de Lamo and S. Rating, abogados)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and F. Tomat, acting as Agents), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and P. L. Krüger, acting as Agents), Republic of Austria (represented by: A. Posch, J. Schmoll and E. Samoilova, acting as Agents), Austrian Airlines AG (represented by: A. Zellhofer, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Ryanair DAC and Laudamotion GmbH to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Austria and Austrian Airlines AG to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 462, 15.11.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5587/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-393/24: Action brought on 29 July 2024 – Robertet v EUIPO – RB Distribution (HOMM THE SOUND OF NATURE)
Date: 2024-07-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetics industry, electronic commerce, petroleum product, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law








C_202405334EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5334


9.9.2024






Action brought on 29 July 2024 – Robertet v EUIPO – RB Distribution (HOMM THE SOUND OF NATURE)


(Case T-393/24)

(C/2024/5334)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Robertet, Inc. (Mount Olive, New Jersey, United States) (represented by: O. Nilgen and T. Wittmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: RB Distribution Srl (Castel Maggiore, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark HOMM THE SOUND OF NATURE – Application for registration No 18 602 382
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 May 2024 in Case R 2046/2023-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5334/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)