do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to the notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/403/23 – Administrators (AD 7) in the following fields: 1. Crisis management 2. Migration and internal security (Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/3224, 28 May 2024)
Date: 2024-07-17
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), crisis management, migration, public safety, recruitment








C_202490051EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3224


17.7.2024






Corrigendum to the notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/403/23 – Administrators (AD 7) in the following fields: 1. Crisis management 2. Migration and internal security

(
Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/3224, 28 May 2024
)


On page 3, point (f) of Section 4.3.1:
for:






‘(f)



By 4 September 2024 at 12:00 (midday), Brussels time, candidates will have to upload to their EPSO account (and link to their application) the scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form. An explanation on how to do this is available on the EPSO website (4)*.’,




read:






‘(f)



By 31 December 2024 at 12:00 (midday), Brussels time, all candidates (including the existing candidates) will have to upload to their EPSO account (and link to their application) the scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form. An explanation on how to do this is available on the EPSO website (4)*.’.




On page 3, point (g) of Section 4.3.1 is deleted.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3224/corrigendum/2024-07-17/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-232/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – LW v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Reports procedure – Appraisal report for 2020 – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability)
Date: 2024-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, indemnification, staff assessment








C_202405235EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5235


2.9.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – LW v Commission


(Case T-232/23)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Reports procedure - Appraisal report for 2020 - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Liability)
(C/2024/5235)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: LW (represented by: I. Bogdan Petre, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Baeckelmans and L. Hohenecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, LW, seeks the annulment of her appraisal report of 20 July 2021 for the 2020 period; the annulment, in so far as is necessary, of the decision of the appeal assessor of 13 July 2022 that confirmed the contested appraisal report and of the decision of the appointing authority of 24 January 2023 that rejected the applicant’s complaint, as well as compensation for the non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders LW, in addition to bearing her own costs, to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  
            OJ C 261, 24.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5235/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-361/24: Action brought on 17 July 2024 – Reckitt Benckiser Finish v EUIPO (Device of a cleaning capsule)
Date: 2024-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, polishing and scouring preparations, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202405123EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5123


26.8.2024






Action brought on 17 July 2024 – Reckitt Benckiser Finish v EUIPO


(Device of a cleaning capsule)


(Case T-361/24)

(C/2024/5123)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Reckitt Benckiser Finish BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: J.-C. Rebling, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark (Device of a cleaning capsule) – Application for registration No 18 805 771
         

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 May 2024 in Case R 2561/2023-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement and improper application of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5123/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-496/24, Stichting de Thuiskopie: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 17 July 2024 – Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding, Stichting de Thuiskopie v HP Nederland B.V., Dell B.V., Stichting Overlegorgaan Blanco Informatiedragers
Date: 2024-07-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: audiovisual production, broadcasting, copyright, film production, reprography








C_202406242EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6242


28.10.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 17 July 2024 – Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding, Stichting de Thuiskopie v HP Nederland B.V., Dell B.V., Stichting Overlegorgaan Blanco Informatiedragers


(Case C-496/24, Stichting de Thuiskopie)

(C/2024/6242)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding, Stichting de Thuiskopie

Respondents: HP Nederland B.V., Dell B.V., Stichting Overlegorgaan Blanco Informatiedragers

Questions referred







1.


Can a reproduction with the characteristics described above in paragraph 2.3, (i)-(iii) (offline streaming copy), having regard also to the three-step test (Article 5(5) of the Copyright Directive), (1) be regarded as a ‘reproduction … made by a natural person for private use, and for ends that are neither directly or indirectly commercial’ as referred to in Article 5(2)(b) of the Copyright Directive?










2.


Do the objectives of the Copyright Directive, including a high level of copyright protection, a fair balance between the interests of the rightholder and the interests of the user, and a coherent and technologically neutral application by the Member States of the exceptions and limitations, preclude a national regulation under which the private copying exception does not also include offline streaming copies?










3.


Is it relevant to the answer to one or more of the preceding questions whether the rightholders receive compensation per offline streaming copy made, or whether they receive compensation based on the number of times an offline streaming copy is played by the user of the streaming service?






(1)  Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6242/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to the notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/402/23 – Administrators (AD 6) in the following fields: 1. Microeconomics/macroeconomics 2. Financial economics 3. Industrial economics (Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/3223, 28 May 2024)
Date: 2024-07-17
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), economics, economics profession, industrial economy, job vacancy, macroeconomics, microeconomics, recruitment








C_202490047EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series














17.7.2024






Corrigendum to the notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/402/23 – Administrators (AD 6) in the following fields: 1. Microeconomics/macroeconomics 2. Financial economics 3. Industrial economics

(
Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/3223, 28 May 2024
)


On page 3, point (f) of Section 4.3.1:

for:







‘(f)



By 4 September 2024 at 12:00 (midday), Brussels time, candidates will have to upload to their EPSO account (and link to their application) the scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form. An explanation on how to do this is available on the EPSO website (4)*.’,





read:







‘(f)



By 31 December 2024 at 12:00 (midday), Brussels time, all candidates (including the existing candidates) will have to upload to their EPSO account (and link to their application) the scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form. An explanation on how to do this is available on the EPSO website (4)*.’.




On page 3, point (g) of Section 4.3.1 is deleted.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3223/corrigendum/2024-07-17/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-420/22: Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – BNP Paribas v SRB (2022 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
Date: 2024-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank resolution, credit institution, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU)








C_202405324EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5324


9.9.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – BNP Paribas v SRB (2022 ex ante contributions)


(Case T-420/22)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period - Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Error of law - Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
(C/2024/5324)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: BNP Paribas (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and C. Duriez, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: K.-P. Wojcik, J. Kerlin, C. Flynn and C. De Falco, acting as Agents, and by F. Louis, P. Gey and H.-G. Kamann, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Etienne, M. Menegatti and G. Bartram, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: E. d’Ursel, J. Haunold and A. Westerhof Löfflerová, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), in so far as it concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund in so far as it concerns BNP Paribas;










2.


Maintains the effects of Decision SRB/ES/2022/18, in so far as it concerns BNP Paribas, until the SRB has taken the measures necessary to implement the present judgment, which must occur within a reasonable period that cannot exceed six months from the day on which the present judgment becomes final;










3.


Orders the SRB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by BNP Paribas;










4.


Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 311, 16.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5324/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-142/22: Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions – Obligation to state reasons – Effective judicial protection – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – SRB’s discretion – Plea of illegality – Commission’s discretion – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
Date: 2024-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, discretionary power, equal treatment, financing plan, fund (EU), principle of proportionality, right to an effective remedy








C_202405232EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5232


2.9.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB


(Case T-142/22)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions - Obligation to state reasons - Effective judicial protection - Equal treatment - Principle of proportionality - SRB’s discretion - Plea of illegality - Commission’s discretion - Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
(C/2024/5232)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Landesbank Baden-Württemberg (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: J. Kerlin, T. Wittenberg and D. Ceran, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann and P. Gey, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2021/82 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 15 December 2021 on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund concerning Landesbank Baden-Württemberg.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Decision SRB/ES/2021/82 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 15 December 2021 on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund concerning Landesbank Baden-Württemberg;










2.


Maintains the effects of Decision SRB/ES/2021/82 until the entry into force, within a reasonable period which cannot exceed six months from the date of delivery of the present judgment, of a new decision of the SRB fixing the ex ante contribution to the Single Resolution Fund of Landesbank Baden-Württemberg for the 2017 contribution period;










3.


Orders the SRB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Landesbank Baden-Württemberg.






(1)  
            OJ C 198, 16.5.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5232/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-394/22: Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – Banque postale v SRB (2022 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
Date: 2024-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank resolution, credit institution, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU)








C_202405322EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5322


9.9.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – Banque postale v SRB (2022 ex ante contributions)


(Case T-394/22)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period - Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Error of law - Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
(C/2024/5322)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Banque postale (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and C. Duriez, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: K.-P. Wojcik, J. Kerlin, C. Flynn and C. De Falco, acting as Agents, and by F. Louis, P. Gey and H.-G. Kamann, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Etienne, M. Menegatti and G. Bartram, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: E. d’Ursel, J. Haunold and A. Westerhof Löfflerová, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), in so far as it concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund in so far as it concerns Banque postale;










2.


Maintains the effects of Decision SRB/ES/2022/18, in so far as it concerns Banque postale, until the SRB has taken the measures necessary to implement the present judgment, which must occur within a reasonable period that cannot exceed six months from the day on which the present judgment becomes final;










3.


Orders the SRB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Banque postale;










4.


Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 311, 16.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5322/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-50/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – W.B. Studio v EUIPO – E.Land Italy (BELFE) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BELFE – Genuine use of the mark – Partial revocation – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (b), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Affixing of the trade mark to goods or to the packaging thereof in the European Union solely for export purposes – Proof of genuine use – No purely internal use – Article 19 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
Date: 2024-07-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, animal skin, clothing, fancy leather goods and glove-making industry, footwear industry, leather, personal effects, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_202405233EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5233


2.9.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – W.B. Studio v EUIPO – E.Land Italy (BELFE)


(Case T-50/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark BELFE - Genuine use of the mark - Partial revocation - Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (b), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Affixing of the trade mark to goods or to the packaging thereof in the European Union solely for export purposes - Proof of genuine use - No purely internal use - Article 19 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
(C/2024/5233)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. (Milan, Italy) (represented by: V. Piccarreta, G. Romanelli and A. Mocchi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: E.Land Italy Srl (Milan) (represented by: M. Francetti and M. Cristofori, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 November 2022 (Case R 869/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 104, 20.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5233/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.109768
Date: 2024-07-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Malta, State aid, audiovisual industry, control of State aid, culture, film industry, programmes industry








C_202404520EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4520


17.7.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.109768
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/4520)








Date of adoption of the decision


14.6.2024




Aid number


SA.109768




Member State


Malta




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Screen Malta Financial Incentives Regulations




Legal basis


Malta Film Commission Act (CAP 478 of the Laws of Malta) - Screen Malta Financial Incentives Regulations - Screen Malta Financial Incentives Cash Rebate Guidelines




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Culture




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 500 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 100 000 000  EUR




Intensity


50,0 %




Duration


Until 29.10.2028




Economic sectors


Motion picture, video and television programme activities




Name and address of the granting authority







Malta Film Commission




St. Rocco Street, Kalkara, Malta








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4520/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)