do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates – 15 July 2024
Date: 2024-07-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202404127EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4127


16.7.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            15 July 2024
         
(C/2024/4127)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0907 




JPY


Japanese yen


172,34 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4614 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84045 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5375 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9755 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7460 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,422 




HUF


Hungarian forint


391,48 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2495 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9692 




TRY


Turkish lira


36,0554 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6088 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4879 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5133 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7904 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4640 




KRW


South Korean won


1 508,27 




ZAR


South African rand


19,8324 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9206 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 654,29 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0952 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,711 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,472 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,9335 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,4041 




INR


Indian rupee


91,1680 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4127/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-181/24, Genmab: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – Genmab A/S (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Medicinal product for human use – Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (SPC) – Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 – Conditions for granting – Article 3(d) – First marketing authorisation (MA) – Medicinal products containing the same active ingredient being granted several MAs – Withdrawal of the prior MA)
Date: 2024-07-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: drug surveillance, market approval, medicinal product








C_202405965EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5965


14.10.2024






Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – Genmab A/S


(Case C-181/24,
                (1)
Genmab)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Medicinal product for human use - Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (SPC) - Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 - Conditions for granting - Article 3(d) - First marketing authorisation (MA) - Medicinal products containing the same active ingredient being granted several MAs - Withdrawal of the prior MA)
(C/2024/5965)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Genmab A/S

Intervening party: Szellemi Tulajdon Nemzeti Hivatala

Operative part of the order

Article 3(d) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/933 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019
         
must be interpreted as precluding the marketing authorisation submitted in support of an application for a supplementary protection certificate for a product from being regarded as the first marketing authorisation, within the meaning of that provision, if a prior marketing authorisation was granted for that same product but was withdrawn before the application for the supplementary protection certification was submitted.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/3059.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5965/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114353
Date: 2024-07-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, Guadeloupe, Martinique, State aid, control of State aid, crop production, mixed farm, permanent crop








C_202404518EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4518


16.7.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114353
(C/2024/4518)








Date of adoption of the decision


13.6.2024




Aid number


SA.114353




Member State


France




Region


Guadeloupe, Martinique




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TCTF: Aide exceptionnelle à la trésorerie au bénéfice des producteurs de banane dessert dans les départements/régions de Martinique et de Guadeloupe touchés par les conséquences de l’agression de la Russie contre l’Ukraine




Legal basis


Projet de circulaire du Ministère de l’agriculture et de la souveraineté alimentaire relatif à la mise en œuvre de l’aide exceptionnelle à la trésorerie au bénéfice des planteurs de bananes dessert dans les départements/régions de Martinique et de Guadeloupe touchés par les conséquences de l’agression de la Russie contre l’Ukraine




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 11 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2024




Economic sectors


Growing of perennial crops, Mixed farming




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté alimentaire




3 rue Barbet de Jouy 75007 PARIS








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4518/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2024/1856 of 28 June 2024 amending Regulation (EU) 2024/257 fixing for 2024, 2025 and 2026 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, and Regulation (EU) 2023/194 fixing for 2023 such fishing opportunities (OJ L, 2024/1856, 1.7.2024)
Date: 2024-07-16
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU waters, catch by species, catch quota, conservation of fish stocks, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_202490419EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/90419


16.7.2024






Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2024/1856 of 28 June 2024 amending Regulation (EU) 2024/257 fixing for 2024, 2025 and 2026 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, and Regulation (EU) 2023/194 fixing for 2023 such fishing opportunities
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1856, of 1 July 2024
)

On page 9, Annex I, Part I, point (4), Table 103, second column (concerning zone)







for:





                           ‘Zone: 3a; United Kingdom, Union waters of 2a, 3b, 3c, 3d and 4; Norwegian waters 2a and 4a (MAC/2A34-N.)’,












read:





                           ‘Zone: 3a; United Kingdom, Union waters of 2a, 3b, 3c; 3d and 4; Norwegian waters 2a and 4a (MAC/2A34-N.)’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1856/corrigendum/2024-07-16/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-356/24: Action brought on 16 July 2024 – Republic of Lithuania v Commission
Date: 2024-07-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU financial instrument, EU financing arrangements, cost-benefit analysis, economic recovery, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, tax exemption, tax law








C_202405424EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5424


16.9.2024






Action brought on 16 July 2024 – Republic of Lithuania v Commission


(Case T-356/24)

(C/2024/5424)
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: S. Grigonis, V. Kazlauskaitė-Švenčionienė and K. Dieninis)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Commission Implementing Decision C(2024) 3171 final on the reduction of the amount of the first instalment of the non-repayable support for Lithuania;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.








1.


First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision infringes Article 24(8) of Regulation (EU) 2021/241 (1), the principles of proportionality and legal certainty as well as the principle of fiscal autonomy of Member States, on the ground that the Commission erred in concluding that the requirement that, based on the publication of a cost-benefit analysis, draft amendments to the relevant tax laws are to be drafted and submitted to the parliament has not been satisfactorily complied with.












2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision infringes Article 24(8) of Regulation (EU) 2021/241 as well as the principle of legal certainty on the ground that the Commission erred in concluding that the requirement to publish a cost-benefit analysis of existing tax exemptions and of special tax regimes that are not effective and (or) no longer reflect the priorities of the State(s) and (or) do not comply with the Green Deal, has not been satisfactorily complied with.












3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision infringes Article 24(8) of Regulation (EU) 2021/241 as well was the principles of legal certainty, legitimate expectations and proportionality, on the ground that in order to calculate the amount of the reduction in the financial contribution, the Commission unlawfully and incorrectly applied the methodology set out in its communication of 21 February 2023 (2) and disproportionately reduced the amount of the financial contribution.






(1)  Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 February 2021 establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility (OJ 2021 L 57, p. 17).

(2)  Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 21 February 2023 – Recovery and Resilience Facility: Two years on. A unique instrument at the heart of the EU’s green and digital transformation (COM(2023) 99 final).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5424/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-62/18: Order of the General Court of 16 July 2024 – Aeris Invest v SRB (Access to documents – Documents held by the SRB concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español – Decision of the SRB Appeal Panel relating to a confirmatory decision by the SRB refusing access – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Exceptions to the right of public access to documents – Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Presumption of confidentiality – Misuse of powers – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2024-07-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, access to EU information, company in difficulties, confidentiality, credit institution, provision of documents








C_202405237EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5237


2.9.2024






Order of the General Court of 16 July 2024 – Aeris Invest v SRB


(Case T-62/18)
                (1)

(Access to documents - Documents held by the SRB concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español - Decision of the SRB Appeal Panel relating to a confirmatory decision by the SRB refusing access - Plea of illegality - Obligation to state reasons - Exceptions to the right of public access to documents - Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Presumption of confidentiality - Misuse of powers - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2024/5237)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Aeris Invest Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and M. Varela Suárez, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: A. Lapresta Bienz, H. Ehlers, M. Fernández Rupérez and J. Rius Riu, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Banco Santander, SA (Santander, Spain) (represented by: J. Rodríguez Cárcamo and A. Rodríguez Conde, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the partial annulment of the decision of the Appeal Panel of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 28 November 2017 in Case 43/2017, concerning an appeal against the confirmatory decision of the SRB refusing it access to documents concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, SA.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Aeris Invest Sàrl shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and by Banco Santander, SA.






(1)  
            OJ C 123, 9.4.2018.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5237/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.104413
Date: 2024-07-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, State aid, carriage of goods, control of State aid, rail transport








C_202404516EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4516


16.7.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.104413
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/4516)








Date of adoption of the decision


7.5.2024




Aid number


SA.104413




Member State


Denmark




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Reintroduction of a State aid scheme for rail freight transport




Legal basis


Executive order 1475 of 2 December 2022




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Coordination of transport




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 111 200 000  DKK




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2027




Economic sectors


Freight rail transport




Name and address of the granting authority


Banedanmark
Carsten Niebuhrs Gade 43, 1577 København V




Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4516/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-355/24: Action brought on 16 July 2024 – EM v Europol
Date: 2024-07-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, damages, disciplinary proceedings, equal treatment, harassment at work, rights of the defence, staff regulations (EU)








C_202405639EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5639


30.9.2024






Action brought on 16 July 2024 – EM v Europol


(Case T-355/24)

(C/2024/5639)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: EM (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of 11 October 2023 rejecting the request for assistance submitted under Article 90(1) and Article 24 of the Staff Regulations; (1)











—


annul, to the extent necessary, the decision rejecting the complaint dated 12 April 2024, in so far as it supplements or amends the decision of 11 October 2023;










—


order the defendant to pay compensation to the applicant in respect of the loss resulting from the excessive duration of the procedure assessed ex aequo et bono at EUR 10 000;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs of the case.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of the definition of harassment and the existence of contradictions between the statement of reasons and the findings of the investigation report.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging irregularities in connection with the conduct of the administrative investigation and the commission of errors in the assessment of the facts submitted and of the information provided to the investigators.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the adversarial principle and of the right to be heard.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the reasonable time principle.






(1)  Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, established by Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (OJ English Special Edition 1968 (I), p. 30).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5639/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
Date: 2024-07-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, chromium, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, medical device, oxide








C_202404378EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4378


16.7.2024






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
                (1)
)


(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/4378)


Decision granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2024) 4583


9 July 2024


chromium trioxide (EC No 215-607-8; CAS No 1333-82-0)


KaVo Dental GmbH, Bismarckring 39, 88400 Biberach, Germany








 


REACH/24/17/0












 


Chromium trioxide based functional chrome plating of dental instruments applied by professionals for dental treatment






19 October 2032


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.






(1)  
            OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu)



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4378/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-494/24 P: Appeal brought on 16 July 2024 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 15 May 2024 in Case T-471/22 Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union
Date: 2024-07-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, entrepreneur, evidence, infringement of EU law, international sanctions, natural person








C_202405224EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5224


2.9.2024






Appeal brought on 16 July 2024 by Issam Anbouba against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 15 May 2024 in Case T-471/22 Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union


(Case C-494/24 P)

(C/2024/5224)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties


Appellant: Issam Anbouba (represented by: St. Koev, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


annul in part the judgment of the General Court of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 15 May 2024, in Case T-471/22 (1), Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union and










—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1035 (2) of 25 May 2023 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1027 (3) of 25 May 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, in so far as Mr Issam Anbouba was added to the list of persons subject to sanctions, or refer the case back to the General Court on this point for a ruling on the substance;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the present proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court.





Grounds of appeal and main arguments









1.




Error of law on the part of the General Court, consisting in a breach of EU law,
 in so far as it considered that the Council was entitled to presume that he is a leading business person and to identify the founders of Cham Holding to include them, on that basis, on the Council’s lists;












2.




Error of law on the part of the General Court, consisting in a breach of the rules of administration of evidence
, in so far as it failed to examine evidence adduced by the appellant and in so far as it gave unjustified priority to evidence submitted by the Council and to parts of that evidence.












3.




Error of law on the part of the General Court, consisting in a breach of the rules of procedure to the detriment of the appellant’s interests,
 in so far as it did not take into consideration evidence submitted by the appellant and in so far as it gave unjustified priority to evidence submitted by the Council and to parts of that evidence.






(1)  EU:T:2024:315

(2)  
            OJ 2023 L 139, p. 49.

(3)  
            OJ 2023 L 139, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5224/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)