do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-351/24: Action brought on 12 July 2024 – Devin v EUIPO – Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DEVIN)
Date: 2024-07-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202405117EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5117


26.8.2024






Action brought on 12 July 2024 – Devin v EUIPO – Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DEVIN)


(Case T-351/24)

(C/2024/5117)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Devin EAD (Devin, Bulgaria) (represented by: B. Van Asbroeck, G. de Villegas and R. Meys, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Haskovo, Bulgaria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark DEVIN – European Union trade mark No 9 408 865
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 May 2024 in Case R 2535/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


alter the contested decision, in order to annul the appealed decision of the Cancellation Division;










—


order that the trade mark at issue remains registered for all goods in Class 32;










—


in the alternative, order that the trade mark at issue remains registered for the following goods in Class 32: mineral water; seltzer mineral water; spring water; table water; flavoured water; fruit-flavoured beverages; waters [beverages]; seltzer waters; soda water;










—


order the defendant to bear its own costs and pay those of the applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear its own costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) in conjunction with Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and with Article 27(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;










—


Infringement of the principles of equal treatment, legal certainty and legitimate expectations.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5117/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11499 – ALSO / SWS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure
Date: 2024-07-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Czechia, Slovakia, economic concentration, electronics, household electrical appliance, information technology, information technology industry, merger control, retail selling, telecommunications equipment, wholesale selling








C_202404510EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4510


12.7.2024






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11499 – ALSO / SWS)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/4510)


1.   
On 3 July 2024, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


ALSO Holding AG (‘ALSO’, Switzerland), controlled by Droege Group AG (Germany),










—


SWS, a.s. (‘SWS’, Czech Republic).




ALSO will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of SWS.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


ALSO is active in Europe in the wholesale of products in the fields of information and communication technology, consumer electronics, printing consumables, and related services, and to a more limited extent in the retailing of information and communication technology products and consumer electronics,










—


SWS is mainly active in the wholesale of products in the fields of information and communication technology, consumer electronics and printing consumables in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified treatment for certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11499 – ALSO / SWS
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4510/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2024-07-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Portugal, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing








C_202404506EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4506


12.7.2024






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(C/2024/4506)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


19.6.2024




Duration


19.6.2024 – 31.12.2024




Member State


Portugal




Stock or Group of stocks


SBR/09-




Species


Red seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo)




Zone


Union and international waters of 9




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


6/TQ194






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4506/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-139/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2024 – WebGroup Czech Republic v Commission (Interim relief – Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Very large online platforms – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests)
Date: 2024-07-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Internet site, archives, digital single market, pornography








C_202405105EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5105


26.8.2024






Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2024 – WebGroup Czech Republic v Commission


(Case T-139/24 R)

(Interim relief - Digital services - Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 - Very large online platforms - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case - Urgency - Weighing up of interests)
(C/2024/5105)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: WebGroup Czech Republic, a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Pinto de Lemos Fermiano Rato and A. Kontosakou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P.-J. Loewenthal and J. Szczodrowski, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2023) 8850 final of 20 December 2023 designating XVideos as a very large online platform in accordance with Article 33(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council in so far as that decision imposes on the applicant an obligation to make publicly available the repository provided for in Article 39(1) and (2) of that regulation.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5105/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11579 – CVC / PON / URUS)
Date: 2024-07-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: agricultural product, economic concentration, farming sector, genetic engineering, investment company, merger control, retail trade, service, two-wheeled vehicle, vehicle








C_202404654EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4654


19.7.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11579 – CVC / PON / URUS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/4654)

On 12 July 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11579. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4654/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11500 – RENAULT / PLUG POWER / HYVIA)
Date: 2024-07-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, fuel cell, hydrogen, hydrogen production, light-duty vehicle, merger control, motor car, motor vehicle industry, supply








C_202404551EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4551


17.7.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11500 – RENAULT / PLUG POWER / HYVIA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/4551)

On 12 July 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11500. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4551/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-490/24, Stichting Koskea: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 12 July 2024 – Stichting Koskea, as administrator of ED v Nationale Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij N.V., trading as Reaal Schadeverzekering N.V.
Date: 2024-07-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: compulsory insurance, motor vehicle insurance, third-party insurance, transport accident








C_202406078EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6078


21.10.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 12 July 2024 – Stichting Koskea, as administrator of ED v Nationale Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij N.V., trading as Reaal Schadeverzekering N.V.


(Case C-490/24, Stichting Koskea)

(C/2024/6078)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Stichting Koskea, as administrator of ED

Defendant: Nationale Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij N.V., trading as Reaal Schadeverzekering N.V.

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 12(1) of codified Directive 2009/103 (1) to be interpreted as requiring compulsory insurance to cover liability for the (initial) driver’s damage in a case where a passenger interferes with the steering of the motor vehicle and an accident occurs as a result of that intervention?










2.


If the first question is answered in the affirmative, do certain requirements arise from EU law that the national court must take into account when determining whether a driver, within the meaning of Article 12(1) of Directive 2009/103, has lost the capacity of driver in the circumstances of the case and in entitled to claim passenger protection under the general rule?






(1)  Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability (OJ 2009 L 263, p. 11).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6078/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
DRAFT The Union's annual budget for the 2025 financial year - General Introduction - General statement of expenditure - General statement of revenue - Statement of revenue and expenditure by section
Date: 2024-07-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Budget, European Commission
Subjects: EU expenditure, budgetary resources, draft budget (EU), financial year, general budget (EU)

EN 

  EN 

   EUROPEAN COMMISSION  Brussels, 12.7.2024  COM(2024) 300 final 2024/0176 (BUD)    DRAFT The Union's annual budget for the 2025 financial year  - General Introduction                  - General statement of expenditure                  - General statement of revenue                  - Statement of revenue and expenditure by section  
 
 
DOCUMENTS 

DRAFT  
The Union's annual budget 
for the 2025 financial year 

—   General introduction 

—   General statement of expenditure 

—   General statement of revenue 

—   Statement of revenue and expenditure by section:  

—   Section 1:   European Parliament 

—    Section 2:   European Council and Council 

—    Section 3:   European Commission 

—    Section 4:   Court of Justice of the European Union 

—    Section 5:   European Court of Auditors 

—    Section 6:   European Economic and Social Committee 

—    Section 7:   European Committee of the Regions 

—    Section 8:   European Ombudsman 

—    Section 9:   European Data Protection Supervisor 

—    Section 10: European External Action Service  

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/budget/www/index-en.htm
Corrigendum to the Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11544 – PFEIFER & LANGEN IHKG GROUP / LATRAPS / ASNS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/4425, 10 July 2024)
Date: 2024-07-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Latvia, agricultural cooperative, agricultural production, beverage industry, crop production, economic concentration, food production, merger control, plant breeding, sugar industry








C_202490048EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4425


12.7.2024






Corrigendum to the Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11544 – PFEIFER & LANGEN IHKG GROUP / LATRAPS / ASNS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure

(
Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/4425, 10 July 2024
)


On page 1, point 1:
for:






‘—


Pfeifer & Langen GmbH & Co. KG (‘Pfeifer & Langen’, Germany)










—


ASNS Ingredient SIA (‘ASNS’, Latvia)










—


Lauksaimniecības pakalpojumu kooperatīvā sabiedrība (‘LATRAPS’, Latvia), currently controlled by ASNS.




Pfeifer & Langen and ASNS will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of LATRAPS.’,
read:






‘—


Pfeifer & Langen GmbH & Co. KG (‘Pfeifer & Langen’, Germany)










—


Lauksaimniecības pakalpojumu kooperatīvā sabiedrība (‘LATRAPS’, Latvia),










—


ASNS Ingredient SIA (‘ASNS’, Latvia), currently controlled by LATRAPS.




Pfeifer & Langen and LATRAPS acquire, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation, joint control of ASNS.’.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4425/corrigendum/2024-07-12/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-352/24: Action brought on 12 July 2024 – CeramicSpeed Sport v EUIPO – Golec (OSPW System)
Date: 2024-07-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, bearing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, two-wheeled vehicle








C_202405118EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5118


26.8.2024






Action brought on 12 July 2024 – CeramicSpeed Sport v EUIPO – Golec (OSPW System)


(Case T-352/24)

(C/2024/5118)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: CeramicSpeed Sport A/S (Holstebro, Denmark) (represented by: K. Kvistgaard-Aaholm, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Marcin Golec (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark OSPW System – International registration designating the European Union No 1 381 429
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 May 2024 in Case R 1782/2023-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision to the extent that it partly invalidated the trade mark at issue;










—


alter the contested decision to uphold the appealed decision of the Cancellation Division;










—


order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and the Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5118/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-617/23: Order of the President of the Court of 12 July 2024 – European Commission v Republic of Cyprus
Date: 2024-07-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to a profession, discretionary power, engineer, infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, recognition of vocational training qualifications, right of establishment, town-planning profession








C_202405970EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5970


14.10.2024






Order of the President of the Court of 12 July 2024 – European Commission v Republic of Cyprus


(Case C-617/23)
                (1)

(C/2024/5970)
Language of the case: Greek
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C C/2023/966.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5970/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-350/24: Action brought on 12 July 2024 – Compass-Datenbank v Commission
Date: 2024-07-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, infringement of EU law








C_202405241EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5241


2.9.2024






Action brought on 12 July 2024 – Compass-Datenbank v Commission


(Case T-350/24)

(C/2024/5241)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Compass-Datenbank GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: F. Galla, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims the following:






—


The Court should declare that the Commission, as the defendant, infringed EU law by failing to process the confirmatory application submitted by the applicant Compass-Datenbank GmbH on 17 August 2023 for the reuse of the documents of the ‘European Central Platform’.










—


The Court should also declare that the Commission, as the defendant, must pay the applicant, Compass-Datenbank GmbH, its procedural costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant alleges infringement by the defendant of the time limit laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 for the processing of confirmatory applications and brings an action pursuant to paragraph 3 of that provision.
As an Austrian provider of business information, the applicant had submitted an application for the reuse of the contents of the ‘European Central Platform’ (ECP) in accordance with Decision 2011/833/EU (1) and Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001. (2)

After the defendant stated that it did not have any documents that corresponded to the request, the applicant submitted a detailed and reasoned confirmatory application for the reuse of the documents in question. The defendant did not respond to that request within the specified time limits.


(1)  Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ 2011 L 330, p. 39).

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5241/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)