do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates – 10 July 2024
Date: 2024-07-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202404124EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4124


11.7.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            10 July 2024
         
(C/2024/4124)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0825 




JPY


Japanese yen


174,79 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4603 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84518 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,4075 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9723 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,6070 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,379 




HUF


Hungarian forint


392,68 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2555 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9734 




TRY


Turkish lira


35,5705 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6056 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4758 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4554 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7804 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4605 




KRW


South Korean won


1 498,46 




ZAR


South African rand


19,5581 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8763 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 557,93 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0883 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,118 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,343 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,8435 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,2904 




INR


Indian rupee


90,4015 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4124/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11576 – KKR / NEXEYE)
Date: 2024-07-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Austria, Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, economic concentration, investment company, medical device, merger control, optical industry, retail trade








C_202404652EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4652


19.7.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11576 – KKR / NEXEYE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/4652)

On 11 July 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11576. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4652/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.113164
Date: 2024-07-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, Hesse, State aid, animal production, control of State aid, crop production, hunting, service








C_202404422EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4422


11.7.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.113164
(C/2024/4422)








Date of adoption of the decision


13.5.2024




Aid number


SA.113164




Member State


Germany




Region


Hessen




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Hessen: Pheromoneinsatz im Weinbau - E.1




Legal basis


Hessisches Programm für Agrarumwelt- und Landschaftspflege-Maßnahmen HALM 2




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Aid for agri-environment-climate commitments




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 4 550 000  EUR
Annual budget: 650 000  EUR




Intensity


100,0 %




Duration


Until 31.12.2030




Economic sectors


Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities




Name and address of the granting authority







Regierungspräsidium Darmstadt




Regierungspräsidium Darmstadt - Dezernat Weinbau; Wallufer Straße 19; 65343 Eltville








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4422/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-488/24, Kigas: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 11 July 2024 – D.V. v Kigas MB
Date: 2024-07-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carriage of goods, consumer information, customs duties, customs formalities, international transport, provision of services








C_202406077EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6077


21.10.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 11 July 2024 – D.V. v ‘Kigas’ MB


(Case C-488/24, Kigas)

(C/2024/6077)
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law and applicant at first instance: D.V.

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law and defendant at first instance:
            ‘Kigas’ MB

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2011/83, (1) which requires the trader to provide the consumer with information on the characteristics of the services, be interpreted as meaning that the trader that provides an international carriage service to the consumer is under an obligation to inform the consumer of the customs procedures applicable to the carriage? If Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2011/83 must be interpreted as imposing an obligation on the trader to inform the consumer of the customs procedures applicable to international carriage, is it sufficient for the trader to state that the sender (the consumer) must take charge of the documents necessary for the customs procedures and pay the customs duties, or must the trader provide detailed information (a list) on the specific documents to be presented to the customs authorities and the applicable rates (amounts) of the customs duties?










2.


Does the obligation on the trader, laid down in Article 5(1)(c) of Directive 2011/83, to provide the consumer with information on the price of the goods or services inclusive of taxes, or where the nature of the goods or services is such that the price cannot reasonably be calculated in advance, the manner in which the price is to be calculated, as well as, where applicable, all additional freight, delivery or postage charges or, where those charges cannot reasonably be calculated in advance, the fact that such charges may be payable, entail an obligation on the trader that provides the international carriage service to inform the consumer of the customs duties (the rates and amounts of the duties) applicable to the specific carriage?






(1)  Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6077/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to the notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/411/23 – Administrators (AD 7) in the following fields: 1. Nuclear safeguards inspectors 2. Policy officers in the area of nuclear energy (Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/2265, 22 March 2024)
Date: 2024-07-11
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), job vacancy, nuclear energy, nuclear safety, recruitment








C_202490045EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series














11.7.2024






Corrigendum to the notice amending the notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/411/23 – Administrators (AD 7) in the following fields: 1. Nuclear safeguards inspectors 2. Policy officers in the area of nuclear energy

(
Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/2265, 22 March 2024
)


On page 2, point (f) of Section 4.3.1:
for:






‘(f)



By 18 June 2024 at 12:00 (midday), Brussels time, candidates will have to upload to their EPSO account (and link to their application) the scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form. An explanation on how to do this is available on the EPSO website (*).’,




read:






‘(f)



By 29 November 2024 at 12:00 (midday), Brussels time, all candidates (including the existing candidates) will have to upload to their EPSO account (and link to their application) the scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form. An explanation on how to do this is available on the EPSO website (*).’.




On page 3, point (g) of Section 4.3.1 is deleted.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2265/corrigendum/2024-07-11/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-598/22, Società Italiana Imprese Balneari: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Società Italiana Imprese Balneari Srl v Comune di Rosignano Marittimo, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia del demanio – Direzione regionale Toscana e Umbria, Regione Toscana (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Concessions in respect of State-owned coastal land – Expiry and renewal – National rules providing that fixed structures built on State-owned land are to be transferred to the State for no consideration – Restriction – None)
Date: 2024-07-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: coastal region, freedom to provide services, maritime transport, principle of proportionality, right of establishment, service concession, transfer of property








C_202405195EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5195


2.9.2024






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Società Italiana Imprese Balneari Srl v Comune di Rosignano Marittimo, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia del demanio – Direzione regionale Toscana e Umbria, Regione Toscana


(Case C-598/22,
                (1)
Società Italiana Imprese Balneari)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 49 TFEU - Concessions in respect of State-owned coastal land - Expiry and renewal - National rules providing that fixed structures built on State-owned land are to be transferred to the State for no consideration - Restriction - None)
(C/2024/5195)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Società Italiana Imprese Balneari Srl

Respondents: Comune di Rosignano Marittimo, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia del demanio – Direzione regionale Toscana e Umbria, Regione Toscana

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 TFEU
must be interpreted as not precluding a national rule which provides that, upon the expiry of a concession to occupy State-owned land and unless otherwise stipulated in the concession agreement, the concessionaire is required to transfer immediately, for no consideration and without compensation, the fixed structures which it has erected on the land that is subject to the concession, even in the event that the concession is renewed.


(1)  
            OJ C 463, 5.12.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5195/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-196/23, Plamaro: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña – Spain) – CL and Others v DB, acting in the capacity of sole successor to FC, Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – Article 1(1)(a) and Article 2 – Obligation to inform and consult workers’ representatives – Scope – Termination of employment contracts on the ground of the employer’s retirement – Articles 27 and 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
Date: 2024-07-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: collective dismissal, labour law, retired person, unfair dismissal, workers' representation








C_202405201EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5201


2.9.2024






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña – Spain) – CL and Others v DB, acting in the capacity of sole successor to FC, Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA)


(Case C-196/23,
                (1)
Plamaro)
                (2)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 98/59/EC - Collective redundancies - Article 1(1)(a) and Article 2 - Obligation to inform and consult workers’ representatives - Scope - Termination of employment contracts on the ground of the employer’s retirement - Articles 27 and 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
(C/2024/5201)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: CL, GO, GN, VO, TI, HZ, DN, DL

Defendants: DB, acting in the capacity of sole successor to FC, Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA)

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 1(1) and Article 2 of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies, read together,
must be interpreted as precluding a national law pursuant to which the termination of the employment contracts of a number of workers greater than that provided for in that Article 1(1), as a result of the retirement of the employer, is not classified as a ‘collective redundancy’ and does not give rise to the obligation to inform and consult the workers’ representatives provided for in that Article 2.










2.


EU law must be interpreted as not requiring a national court, hearing proceedings between individuals, to disapply a national law, such as that referred to in point 1 of the present operative part, in the event that it is contrary to the provisions of Article 1(1) and Article 2 of Directive 98/59.






(1)  
            OJ C 304, 28.8.2023.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5201/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-265/23, Volieva: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad – Sliven – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against DM and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Fight against organised crime – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Articles 47 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Excessive length of the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings – Substantive infringements of procedural rules, but which are capable of being remedied, affecting the indictment – Right of the accused person to have the criminal proceedings against him or her brought to an end)
Date: 2024-07-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: charge, criminal proceedings, fight against crime, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, organised crime, right to an effective remedy, right to justice








C_202405202EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5202


2.9.2024






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad – Sliven – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against DM and Others


(Case C-265/23,
                (1)
Volieva)
                (2)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Fight against organised crime - Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Articles 47 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU - Excessive length of the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings - Substantive infringements of procedural rules, but which are capable of being remedied, affecting the indictment - Right of the accused person to have the criminal proceedings against him or her brought to an end)
(C/2024/5202)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Okrazhen sad – Sliven

Parties in the main proceedings

DM, AV, WO, AQ

intervening party: Okrazhna prokuratura – Sliven

Operative part of the judgment

Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime and, in particular, Article 4 thereof, read in conjunction with Articles 47 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and with the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU,
must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which removes, in the course of criminal proceedings brought against an accused person, the right of that person to have those proceedings brought to an end where substantial infringements of procedural rules affecting the indictment, but which are capable of being remedied, have not been remedied.


(1)  
            OJ C 252, 17.7.2023.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5202/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-489/24, Safita: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 11 July 2024 – Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, X
Date: 2024-07-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative procedure, international protection, right of asylum








C_202405789EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5789


7.10.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 11 July 2024 – Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, X


(Case C-489/24, Safita)
                (1)

(C/2024/5789)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, X

Questions referred







1.


May the determining authority apply point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) of the Asylum Procedures Directive (2) repeatedly and consecutively?










2.


If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative:






a.


Under what conditions may the determining authority apply point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) of the Asylum Procedures Directive repeatedly and consecutively, and is the total duration of the period over which the determining authority may apply that provision repeatedly and consecutively subject to any restrictions?










b.


In answering the question whether the determining authority was permitted to extend the time limit for making its decision following, and consecutive to, a previous decree extending that time limit, to what extent can or must the court take account of the increase in the number of asylum applications, including relative to the period preceding the previous decree extending the time limit, and the determining authority’s efforts (if any) to improve the shortfall in its decision-making capacity in order to ensure – against the backdrop of Article 4(1) of the Asylum Procedures Directive – an adequate and complete examination of asylum applications?










(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5789/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-582/23: Order of the General Court of 11 July 2024 – Communauté d’Agglomération du Boulonnais v Commission (Action for annulment – State aid – Tax exemptions for operators of French ports – Complaint – Act not open to challenge – Purely confirmatory act – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-07-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, State aid, control of State aid, harbour installation, port administration, tax exemption








C_202405104EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5104


26.8.2024






Order of the General Court of 11 July 2024 – Communauté d’Agglomération du Boulonnais v Commission


(Case T-582/23)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Tax exemptions for operators of French ports - Complaint - Act not open to challenge - Purely confirmatory act - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/5104)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Communauté d’Agglomération du Boulonnais (Boulogne-sur-Mer, France) (represented by: P. Schiele, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and C.-M Carrega, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 18 July 2023 by which the Commission rejected the applicant’s complaint dated 11 April 2023 which characterised the exemption from the land tax on companies and the levy on the added value of companies, granted to the managing bodies of ports under Articles 1449 and 1586 ter of the code général des impôts français (French General Tax Code), as unlawful State aid.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


La Communauté d’agglomération du Boulonnais shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/666, 13.11.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5104/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)