do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to the notice amending the notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/410/23 — Administrators (AD 7) in the field of transport (Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/1805, 1 March 2024)
Date: 2024-07-10
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: administrator, common transport policy, competition (EU), job vacancy, recruitment








C_202490043EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series














10.7.2024






Corrigendum to the notice amending the notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/410/23 — Administrators (AD 7) in the field of transport

(
Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/1805, 1 March 2024
)


On page 3, point (f) of Section 4.3.1:
for:






‘(f)



By 4 June 2024 at 12:00 (midday), Brussels time, candidates will have to upload to their EPSO account (and link to their application) the scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form. An explanation on how to do this is available on the EPSO website (*).’,




read:






‘(f)



By 4 October 2024 at 12:00 (midday), Brussels time, all candidates (including the existing candidates) will have to upload to their EPSO account (and link to their application) the scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form. An explanation on how to do this is available on the EPSO website (*).’.




On page 3, point (g) of Section 4.3.1 is deleted.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1805/corrigendum/2024-07-10/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114355
Date: 2024-07-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, State aid, animal production, control of State aid, crop production, hunting, service








C_202404401EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4401


10.7.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114355
(C/2024/4401)








Date of adoption of the decision


7.6.2024




Aid number


SA.114355




Member State


Netherlands




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TCTF: Scheme for subsidy additional financing for eco-activities in the context of the crisis caused by Russia’s aggression against Ukraine (First amendment to SA.112447 (2024/N))




Legal basis


Artikel 3 van de Kaderwet EZK- en LNV-subsidies, artikel 27 Uitvoeringsregeling GLB 2023




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


 




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2024




Economic sectors


Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities




Name and address of the granting authority







Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit




Postbus 20401, 2500 EK Den Haag








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4401/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-473/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – Bartex Bartol v EUIPO – Grupa Chorten (duch puszczy) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark duch puszczy – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 16(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
Date: 2024-07-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202405101EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5101


26.8.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – Bartex Bartol v EUIPO – Grupa Chorten (duch puszczy)


(Case T-473/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark duch puszczy - Absolute ground for invalidity - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 16(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
(C/2024/5101)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Bartex Bartol sp. z o.o sp. k. (Nowy Tomyśl, Poland) (represented by: A. Gierczak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Grupa Chorten sp. z o.o. (Białystok, Poland) (represented by: A. Brudnoch, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 May 2023 (Case R 1450/2022-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Bartex Bartol sp. z o.o. sp. k. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Grupa Chorten sp. z o.o.;










3.


Declares that the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 329, 18.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5101/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to the notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/412/24 — Administrators in the following fields: 1. Data and statistics (AD 6) 2. Macroeconomic statistics (AD 7) (Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/3680, 11 June 2024)
Date: 2024-07-10
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EU statistics, administrator, competition (EU), data collection, job vacancy, macroeconomics, recruitment








C_202490046EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3680


10.7.2024






Corrigendum to the notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/412/24 — Administrators in the following fields: 1. Data and statistics (AD 6) 2. Macroeconomic statistics (AD 7)

(
Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/3680, 11 June 2024
)


On page 4, point (iii) of Section 3.3.2(a):
for:






‘(iii)


Have a level of education corresponding to completed university studies of at least three years, attested by a diploma in a field other than those referred to in point 3.3.1(a)(i), followed by a minimum of eight years of relevant professional experience.’,




read:






‘(iii)


Have a level of education corresponding to completed university studies of at least three years, attested by a diploma in a field other than those referred to in point 3.3.2(a)(i), followed by a minimum of eight years of relevant professional experience.’.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3680/corrigendum/2024-07-10/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-624/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – RS v EIB (Civil service – EIB staff – Fixed-term contract – No conversion into contract of indefinite duration – Conversion of contracts – Criteria – Manifest error of assessment – Prior notice – Conflict of interest – Action for annulment and for damages)
Date: 2024-07-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, damages, data protection, full-time employment, protection of privacy, right to information, rights of the defence, temporary employment, termination of employment, work contract








C_202405094EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5094


26.8.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – RS v EIB


(Case T-624/22)
                (1)

(Civil service - EIB staff - Fixed-term contract - No conversion into contract of indefinite duration - Conversion of contracts - Criteria - Manifest error of assessment - Prior notice - Conflict of interest - Action for annulment and for damages)
(C/2024/5094)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: RS (represented by: B. Maréchal, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo, A. García Sánchez and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By his action based on Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 20 December 2021 not to convert his employment contract into a contract of indefinite duration and, second, compensation for the harm which he claims to have suffered as a result. He also seeks annulment of the letter of the EIB of 20 December 2021 confirming the decision not to convert the contract.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders RS to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 15, 16.1.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5094/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-123/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – Ecocert India v Commission (Agriculture – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 – Imports into the European Union of organic products from third countries – Recognition of third countries – Execution of controls and certification of products by control bodies – Decision to withdraw an establishment from the list of recognised control bodies for India appearing in the list of recognised third countries – Competence of the Commission – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations)
Date: 2024-07-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: India, consumer protection, equal treatment, food inspection, import (EU), organic certification, organic farming, organic product, principle of proportionality, quality control of agricultural products








C_202405090EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5090


26.8.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – Ecocert India v Commission


(Case T-123/22)
                (1)

(Agriculture - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 - Imports into the European Union of organic products from third countries - Recognition of third countries - Execution of controls and certification of products by control bodies - Decision to withdraw an establishment from the list of recognised control bodies for India appearing in the list of recognised third countries - Competence of the Commission - Rights of the defence - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations)
(C/2024/5090)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ecocert India Pte Ltd (Gurugram, India) (represented by: Y. Martinet, D. Todorova and J. Sohm, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes and B. Hofstötter, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Article 1 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2325 of 16 December 2021 establishing, pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the list of third countries and the list of control authorities and control bodies that have been recognised under Article 33(2) and (3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 for the purpose of importing organic products into the Union (OJ 2021 L 465, p. 8), in so far as that provision, in conjunction with Annex I to that regulation, removes the applicant from the list of control bodies recognised for India by the competent Indian authority, appearing in the list of recognised third countries, accredited to carry out controls and issue certificates of inspection authorising the placing on the EU market of organic products imported from that country.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ecocert India Pte Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5090/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-485/24, Locatrans: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – Chambre sociale (France) lodged on 10 July 2024 – Locatrans Sarl v ES
Date: 2024-07-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: labour dispute, private international law, work contract, workplace








C_202406241EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6241


28.10.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – Chambre sociale (France) lodged on 10 July 2024 – Locatrans Sarl v ES


(Case C-485/24, Locatrans)

(C/2024/6241)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation – Chambre sociale

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Locatrans Sarl

Respondent: ES

Question referred

Are Articles 3 and 6 of the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations, opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980, (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, in the case where the employee carries out the same activities for his employer in more than one Contracting State, the full duration of the employment relationship should, in order to determine the law which would be applicable in the absence of a choice made by the parties, be taken into account in order to determine the place where the person concerned habitually carried out his work or should the most recent period of work be taken into account where the employee, having worked for a certain time in one place, then carries out his activities in a lasting manner in a different place which is clearly intended by the parties to become a new habitual place of work?


(1)  80/934/EEC: Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980 (OJ 1980 L 266, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6241/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-540/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – France v SRB (Economic and monetary policy – Banking Union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities – Decision of the SRB not to grant a waiver – Appeal before the Appeal Panel of the SRB – Dismissal – Condition that there is no impediment to the prompt transfer of own funds – SRB’s margin of discretion – Legal certainty – Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2024-07-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank resolution, financial requirements, financial solvency, group of companies, principle of legal certainty








C_202405093EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5093


26.8.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – France v SRB


(Case T-540/22)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Banking Union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities - Decision of the SRB not to grant a waiver - Appeal before the Appeal Panel of the SRB - Dismissal - Condition that there is no impediment to the prompt transfer of own funds - SRB’s margin of discretion - Legal certainty - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2024/5093)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: French Republic (represented by: T. Stéhelin, E. Timmermans and B. Travard, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: H. Ehlers, M. Fernández Rupérez, and L. Forestier, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann and F. Louis, lawyers)

Re:

By its application under Article 263 TFEU, the French Republic seeks the annulment of Decision No 3/2021 of the Appeal Panel of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 8 June 2022, dismissing the action brought against Decision SRB/EES/2021/44, of 4 November 2021, determining the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the application;










2.


Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 398, 17.10. 2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5093/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-541/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – Laura Food v EUIPO – Bella Tawziaa II (Thé Vert de China AL ASSAD HBOUB R3505 Chaara 4011) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Thé Vert de Chine AL ASSAD HBOUB R3505 Chaara 4011 – Earlier EU figurative mark Grand Lion 4011 B552 – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-07-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, tea, trade-mark law








C_202405102EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5102


26.8.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – Laura Food v EUIPO – Bella Tawziaa II (Thé Vert de China AL ASSAD HBOUB R3505 Chaara 4011)


(Case T-541/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Thé Vert de Chine AL ASSAD HBOUB R3505 Chaara 4011 - Earlier EU figurative mark Grand Lion 4011 B552 - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/5102)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Laura Food Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: C. Bercial Arias, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Bella Tawziaa II SLU (Marbella, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 June 2023 (Case R 2017/2022-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 June 2023 (Case R 2017/2022-2) in so far as it annulled the decision of the Opposition Division of 20 September 2022 relating to the EU figurative trade mark Thé Vert de Chine AL ASSAD HBOUB R3505 Chaara 4011 in respect of ‘tea’ falling within Class 30 of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended.










2.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and those of Laura Food Srl.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/224, 23.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5102/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11246 – ROLEX / BUCHERER)
Date: 2024-07-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: clock and watch industry, economic concentration, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, luxury products industry, merger control, precious stones








C_202500463EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/463


20.1.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11246 – ROLEX / BUCHERER)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/463)

On 10 July 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11246. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/463/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-323/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – PH and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Opposition of the ECB to the acquisition of qualifying holdings in a credit institution – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Direct concern – Inadmissibility in part – Reputation and professional competence of the proposed acquirer – Financial soundness – Compliance with prudential requirements – Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing – Proportionality)
Date: 2024-07-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, Germany, bank, banking supervision, capital increase, law of banking, money laundering, principle of proportionality, shareholding, terrorism financing








C_202405092EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5092


26.8.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – PH and Others v ECB


(Case T-323/22)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Opposition of the ECB to the acquisition of qualifying holdings in a credit institution - Action for annulment - Interest in bringing proceedings - Direct concern - Inadmissibility in part - Reputation and professional competence of the proposed acquirer - Financial soundness - Compliance with prudential requirements - Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing - Proportionality)
(C/2024/5092)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: PH, PI, PJ and Socrates Capital Ltd (Toronto, Canada) (represented by: D. Hillemann, C. Fischer and T. Ehls, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Yoo, S. Letocart and V. Hümpfner, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agent)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 22 March 2022 by which it opposed the acquisition by PH, PI and PJ of a qualifying holding in HKB Bank GmbH and the exceedance of 50 % of the capital and voting rights in the latter.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders PH, PI, PJ and Socrates Capital Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB);










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 318, 22.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5092/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)