do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-338/24: Action brought on 4 July 2024 – Mobility Trader v EUIPO – Cala and Ruiz (hey car select)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, browser, electronic commerce, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law, vehicle rental








C_202405112EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5112


26.8.2024






Action brought on 4 July 2024 – Mobility Trader v EUIPO – Cala and Ruiz (hey car select)


(Case T-338/24)

(C/2024/5112)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Mobility Trader Holding GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Rehaag and C. Goldstein, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gestión e intermediación Cala and Ruiz SL (Móstoles, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark hey car select – International registration designating the European Union No 1 547 231
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2024 in Case R 1094/2023-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


amend the contested decision to the effect that the opposition be dismissed;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5112/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-179/23, Credidam: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție – Romania) – Centrul Român pentru Administrarea Drepturilor Artiștilor Interpreți (Credidam) v Guvernul României, Ministerul Finanțelor (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable transactions – Supply of services for consideration – Management fees collected by a collective management organisation for copyright and related rights for the collection, distribution and payment of remuneration due to rightholders – Remuneration not forming part of a taxable transaction)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, copyright, organisation, pay, provision of services








C_202404936EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4936


19.8.2024






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție – Romania) – Centrul Român pentru Administrarea Drepturilor Artiștilor Interpreți (Credidam) v Guvernul României, Ministerul Finanțelor


(Case C-179/23,
                (1)
Credidam)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Taxable transactions - Supply of services for consideration - Management fees collected by a collective management organisation for copyright and related rights for the collection, distribution and payment of remuneration due to rightholders - Remuneration not forming part of a taxable transaction)
(C/2024/4936)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Centrul Român pentru Administrarea Drepturilor Artiștilor Interpreți (Credidam)

Defendants: Guvernul României, Ministerul Finanțelor

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1)(c), Article 24(1) and Article 25(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax
must be interpreted as meaning that a collective management organisation for copyright and related rights supplies services, within the meaning of those provisions, where, first, it collects, distributes and pays, by law, to rightholders the remuneration owed to them by certain users defined by law and, secondly, it deducts from that remuneration a management fee which is due to it by those rightholders and which is intended to cover the costs incurred by that activity, in the event that the remuneration thus collected on behalf of those rightholders does not constitute consideration for services supplied, within the meaning of that directive, by those rightholders for the benefit of those users.


(1)  
            OJ C 235, 3.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4936/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-288/24, Stegmon: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin – Germany) – Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin v M.R. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Criminal proceedings – Pre-trial detention of the accused person – Consequence of a reference for a preliminary ruling on the main proceedings – Refusal by the referring court to continue the proceedings on the substance of the case until the response of the Court of Justice has been received – Principle of proceeding expeditiously in criminal proceedings particularly in cases involving detention – Recusal of the Chair of the panel hearing the application for legitimate suspicion of conflict of interests)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: conflict of interest, criminal proceedings, detention before trial, judge, preliminary ruling procedure








C_202404946EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4946


19.8.2024






Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin – Germany) – Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin v M.R.


(Case C-288/24,
                (1)
Stegmon)
                (2)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Criminal proceedings - Pre-trial detention of the accused person - Consequence of a reference for a preliminary ruling on the main proceedings - Refusal by the referring court to continue the proceedings on the substance of the case until the response of the Court of Justice has been received - Principle of proceeding expeditiously in criminal proceedings particularly in cases involving detention - Recusal of the Chair of the panel hearing the application for legitimate suspicion of conflict of interests)
(C/2024/4946)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Berlin

Criminal proceedings against

M.R.

Other party: Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin

Operative part of the order







1.


Article 267 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes, in criminal proceedings subject to a duty to proceed expeditiously on account of the accused person having been imprisoned, a national court which has made a request for a preliminary ruling from continuing the main proceedings pending the Court’s reply to that question, by carrying out procedural steps which have a connection with the questions referred for a preliminary ruling.










2.


Article 267 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes a recusal in respect of a judge from being obtained on the sole ground that that judge is awaiting the decision of the Court in relation to the request for a preliminary ruling which that judge has brought before it where the main proceedings concern a person in custody.






(1)  Date lodged: 24.4.2024.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4946/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-425/22, MOL: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria – Hungary) – MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. v Mercedes-Benz Group AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Jurisdiction in tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the damage occurred – Cartel declared contrary to Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Subsidiaries established in different Member States – Direct damage exclusively suffered by subsidiaries – Action for damages from the parent company – Concept of economic unit)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cartel, damages, economic concentration, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, nationality of legal persons, parent company, restriction on competition, subsidiary








C_202404927EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4927


19.8.2024






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria – Hungary) – MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. v Mercedes-Benz Group AG


(Case C-425/22,
                (1)
MOL)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters - Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Article 7(2) - Jurisdiction in tort, delict or quasi-delict - Place where the damage occurred - Cartel declared contrary to Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area - Subsidiaries established in different Member States - Direct damage exclusively suffered by subsidiaries - Action for damages from the parent company - Concept of ‘economic unit’)
(C/2024/4927)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Kúria

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt.

Defendant: Mercedes-Benz Group AG

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of the ‘place where the harmful event occurred’ does not cover the registered office of a parent company bringing an action for damages for harm suffered solely by its subsidiaries on account of anticompetitive conduct of a third party, which constitutes a breach of Article 101 TFEU, even if it is claimed that that parent company and those subsidiaries form part of the same economic unit.


(1)  
            OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4927/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-430/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 – SN v European Parliament (Appeal – European Parliament – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, servant (EU)








C_202404939EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4939


19.8.2024






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 – SN v European Parliament


(Case C-430/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - European Parliament - Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid)
(C/2024/4939)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: SN (represented by: P. Eleftheriadis, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker, N. Görlitz and T. Lazian, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders SN to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament.






(1)  
            OJ C 314, 4.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4939/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-314/18: Order of the General Court of 4 July 2024 – Hashem and Assi v SRB
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, Spain, bank, bond, company in difficulties, financial solvency, indemnification, interest, investment, share








C_202404981EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4981


19.8.2024






Order of the General Court of 4 July 2024 – Hashem and Assi v SRB


(Case T-314/18)
                (1)

(C/2024/4981)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4981/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114100
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Romania, State aid, control of State aid, crop production








C_202404280EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4280


4.7.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114100
(C/2024/4280)








Date of adoption of the decision


29.5.2024




Aid number


SA.114100




Member State


Romania




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TCTF: Sprijinirea întreprinderilor care își desfășoară activitatea în domeniul producției primare de produse agricole vegetale (First amendment to SA.111997 (2024/N))




Legal basis


Decret privind promulgarea Legii pentru aprobarea Ordonanței Guvernului nr. 5/2024 privind instituirea unei scheme de ajutor de stat pentru sprijinirea întreprinderilor care își desfășoară activitatea în domeniul producției primare de produse agricole vegetale, ca urmare a agresiunii Rusiei împotriva Ucrainei (PL-x 77/26.02.2024)




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 357 000 000  RON




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 30.6.2024




Economic sectors


Growing of non-perennial crops




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministerul Agriculturii și Dezvoltării Rurale




Blvd. Carol I; nr. 2-4; Sector 3; București








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4280/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-5/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 – European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v KD (Appeal – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Staff report – Obligation to state reasons – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Action for annulment and for damages)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: indemnification, servant (EU), staff assessment








C_202404933EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4933


19.8.2024






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 – European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v KD


(Case C-5/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Staff report - Obligation to state reasons - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Action for annulment and for damages)
(C/2024/4933)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented initially by G. Predonzani and K. Tóth, and subsequently by K. Tóth, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: KD (represented by: D.-A. Pappa, dikigoros, and by A. Pappas and S. Pappas, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 216, 19.6.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4933/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 3 July 2024
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202404118EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4118


4.7.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            3 July 2024
         
(C/2024/4118)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0758 




JPY


Japanese yen


174,18 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4587 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84680 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3710 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9718 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,4583 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,194 




HUF


Hungarian forint


395,08 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3018 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9773 




TRY


Turkish lira


35,0501 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6123 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4703 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4033 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7717 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4593 




KRW


South Korean won


1 495,26 




ZAR


South African rand


19,9050 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8247 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 619,72 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0783 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,218 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,546 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,0813 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,6577 




INR


Indian rupee


89,8360 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4118/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Spain, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing








C_202404390EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4390


4.7.2024






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(C/2024/4390)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


18.3.2024




Duration


18.3.2024 – 31.12.2024




Member State


Spain




Stock or Group of stocks


BUM/ATLANT




Species


Blue marlin (Makaira nigricans)




Zone


Atlantic Ocean




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


4/TQ257






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4390/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114099
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Romania, State aid, aid to agriculture, animal production, control of State aid








C_202404282EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4282


4.7.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114099
(C/2024/4282)








Date of adoption of the decision


29.5.2024




Aid number


SA.114099




Member State


Romania




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TCTF: Susținerea activității crescătorilor din sectorul suin și avicol (First amendment to SA.112165 (2024/N))




Legal basis


Decret privind promulgarea Legii pentru aprobarea Ordonanței Guvernului nr. 12/2024 privind instituirea unei scheme de ajutor de stat pentru susținerea activității crescătorilor din sectoarele suin și avicol, în perioada 1 august 2022 - 31 august 2023, în contextul crizei provocate de agresiunea Rusiei împotriva Ucrainei (PL-x 83/26.02.2024)




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 44 356 400  RON




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 30.6.2024




Economic sectors


Animal production




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministerul Agriculturii și Dezvoltării Rurale




Blvd. Carol I; nr. 2-4; Sector 3; București








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4282/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-736/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 – Portuguese Republic v European Commission (Appeal – State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Granting of tax advantages to undertakings – Aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic – Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final – Decision taken by the European Commission pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1(b)(i) and (ii) – Definitions of existing aid and new aid – Implementation of existing aid in breach of a condition ensuring compatibility of the aid with the internal market)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Madeira, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, reimbursement of aid, tax relief








C_202404931EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4931


19.8.2024






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 – Portuguese Republic v European Commission


(Case C-736/22 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Madeira Free Zone - Granting of tax advantages to undertakings - Aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic - Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final - Decision taken by the European Commission pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) TFEU - Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Article 1(b)(i) and (ii) - Definitions of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ - Implementation of existing aid in breach of a condition ensuring compatibility of the aid with the internal market)
(C/2024/4931)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Appellant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: P. Barros da Costa, L. Borrego and A. Soares de Freitas, acting as Agents, and by M. Gorjão Henriques and A. Saavedra, advogados)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: I. Barcew, G. Braga da Cruz and P. Caro de Sousa, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 94, 13.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4931/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)