do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-760/22, FP and Others (Trial by videoconference): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against FP, QV, IN, YL, VD, JF, OL (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Right to be present at the trial – Possibility for an accused person to participate in the hearings in his or her trial by videoconference)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: criminal proceedings, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, legal hearing, rights of the defence, video communications








C_202404932EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4932


19.8.2024






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against FP, QV, IN, YL, VD, JF, OL


(Case C-760/22,
                (1)
FP and Others (Trial by videoconference))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Directive (EU) 2016/343 - Right to be present at the trial - Possibility for an accused person to participate in the hearings in his or her trial by videoconference)
(C/2024/4932)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Parties in the main proceedings

FP, QV, IN, YL, VD, JF, OL

Intervening party: Sofiyska gradska prokuratura

Operative part of the judgment

Article 8(1) of Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings must be interpreted as not precluding an accused person from being able, at his or her express request, to participate in the hearings in his or her trial by videoconference, provided that the right to a fair trial is guaranteed.


(1)  
            OJ C 71, 27.2.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4932/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-70/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 – Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Judgment annulling the decision in part and fixing a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine initially imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Decision of the European Commission on the outstanding balance of the fine – Due date for payment of a fine, the amount of which has been fixed by the EU judicature, in the exercise of its unlimited jurisdiction)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cartel, control of restrictive practices, deadline for payment, judicial review, restriction on competition, sanction (EU), steel








C_202404934EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4934


19.8.2024






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 – Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission


(Case C-70/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for prestressing steel - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) - Judgment annulling the decision in part and fixing a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine initially imposed - Application of payments made on a provisional basis - Decision of the European Commission on the outstanding balance of the fine - Due date for payment of a fine, the amount of which has been fixed by the EU judicature, in the exercise of its unlimited jurisdiction)
(C/2024/4934)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellants: Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: O. Duys and N. Tkatchenko, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Keidel, L. Mantl and P. Rossi, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH, Westfälische Drahtindustrie Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Pampus Industriebeteiligungen GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 121, 3.4.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4934/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positionsat its meeting on 4 July 2024 concerning a draft decision in case AT.40577—VIFOR (IV IRON PRODUCTS) – Meeting by Video Conference — via Skype for Business – Rapporteur: Slovakia
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: EU competition policy, European Economic Area, control of restrictive practices, dominant position, health risk, iron, medicinal product, product safety








C_202406860EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6860


15.11.2024






Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positionsat its meeting on 4 July 2024 concerning a draft decision in case AT.40577—VIFOR (IV IRON PRODUCTS)
Meeting by Video Conference — via ‘Skype for Business’
         
Rapporteur: Slovakia
(C/2024/6860)


1.   

The Advisory Committee (16 Member States) shares the Commission’s concerns expressed in its draft Decision under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.



2.   

The Advisory Committee (16 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the proceedings can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, as described in the draft Decision.



3.   

The Advisory Committee (16 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the offered commitments are suitable, necessary and proportionate and should be made legally binding, as set out in the draft Decision.



4.   

The Advisory Committee (16 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s draft Decision that, in light of the offered commitments, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003



5.   

The Advisory Committee (16 Member States) recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.




ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6860/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114616
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid








C_202404270EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4270


4.7.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114616
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/4270)








Date of adoption of the decision


25.6.2024




Aid number


SA.114616




Member State


Italy




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TCTF: Amendments to the scheme SA.103289, as amended by SA.104962 and SA.110596




Legal basis


Legge n. 178/2020 (legge di bilancio 2021 , art. 1 commi 165 -168)




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


 




Budget


Overall budget: 2 902 750  EUR
Annual budget: 2 902 750  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


1.7.2024 - 31.12.2024




Economic sectors


 




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministero del lavoro e delle politiche sociali




via veneto, 56 - Roma








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4270/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as of 1 April 2024 (Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, State aid, interest, reimbursement of aid








C_202404353EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4353


4.7.2024






EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as of 1 April 2024
         


(Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004
               
                (1)
)


(C/2024/4353)

Base rates are calculated in accordance with the Chapter on the method for setting reference and discount rates of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines as amended by ESA’s Decision No 788/08/COL of 17 December 2008. To obtain the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins shall be added to the base rate in accordance with the State Aid Guidelines.
Base rates have been determined as follows:








 


Iceland


Liechtenstein


Norway




1.4.2024 –


9,91 


1,67 


4,73 






(1)  
            OJ L 139, 25.5.2006, p. 37 and EEA Supplement to the OJ No. 26/2006, 25.5.2006, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4353/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Fixing a continuation of a general review hearing – Case No 07 KO.2016.672
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: EFTA Secretariat
Subjects: European Economic Area, Liechtenstein, bankruptcy, claim, insurance, judicial review








C_202405191EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5191


22.8.2024






Fixing a continuation of a general review hearing
Case No 07 KO.2016.672
(C/2024/5191)







Bankrupt company:


Gable Insurance AG in Konkurs, 9490 Vaduz




 


represented by the bankruptcy administrator Batliner Wanger Batliner Rechtsanwälte AG, Am Schrägen Weg 2, 9490 Vaduz




in the matter of:


Bankruptcy proceedings




The general review hearing concerning the claims submitted will be continued on
Wednesday, 30 October 2024 at 9:00 a.m. in hearing room 5
at this Court.
Princely Court of Justice


Vaduz, 4 July 2024.

Stefan ROSENBERGER
               

Judge at the Princely Court of Justice






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5191/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
CaseC-283/23, Marhon: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – Belgium) – Criminal proceedings against FB, JL Sàrl (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of laws – Transport – Road transport – Directive 2014/31/EU – Scope – Non-automatic weighing instruments for the purpose of determining the mass of vehicles – Use of weighing instruments for the purposes of applying national criminal legislation)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carriage of goods, criminal law, harmonisation of standards, market approval, measuring equipment, road transport, weight and size








C_202404937EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4937


19.8.2024






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – Belgium) – Criminal proceedings against FB, JL Sàrl


(CaseC-283/23,
                (1)
Marhon)
                (2)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Harmonisation of laws - Transport - Road transport - Directive 2014/31/EU - Scope - Non-automatic weighing instruments for the purpose of determining the mass of vehicles - Use of weighing instruments for the purposes of applying national criminal legislation)
(C/2024/4937)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties in the main proceedings

FB, JL Sàrl

Intervening party: Procureur du Roi près du Tribunal de Première Instance d’Eupen

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(1) of Directive 2014/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of non-automatic weighing instruments
must be interpreted as meaning that that directive applies to non-automatic weighing instruments where those instruments are used, by the judicial or police authorities, to determine the mass of a vehicle, for the purposes of applying national criminal legislation.


(1)  
            OJ C 278, 7.8.2023.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4937/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-375/23, Meislev: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret – Denmark) – EN v Udlændingenævnet (Reference for a preliminary ruling – EEC-Turkey Association Agreement – Decision No 1/80 – Article 13 – Standstill clause – Scope – Concept of new restriction – National legislation introducing more restrictive conditions for obtaining a permanent residence permit)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Türkiye, association agreement (EU), foreign national, free movement of persons, free movement of workers, freedom of movement, migrant worker, residence permit








C_202404938EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4938


19.8.2024






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret – Denmark) – EN v Udlændingenævnet


(Case C-375/23,
                (1)
Meislev
                (2)
)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Decision No 1/80 - Article 13 - Standstill clause - Scope - Concept of ‘new restriction’ - National legislation introducing more restrictive conditions for obtaining a permanent residence permit)
(C/2024/4938)
Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Højesteret

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: EN

Defendant: Udlændingenævnet

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey
must be interpreted as meaning that legislation of a Member State which makes the obtaining of a permanent residence permit, by a Turkish worker legally resident in that Member State and falling within the scope of Article 6(1) of that decision, subject to stricter conditions than those which applied at the time when that decision entered into force in that Member State does not constitute a ‘new restriction’, within the meaning of Article 13 of that decision, since it does not adversely affect the exercise, by Turkish nationals legally residing in that Member State, of their right to freedom of movement in the territory of that Member State.


(1)  
            OJ C 296, 21.8.2023.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4938/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11580 – EDF / GENERALI / PARCOLOG)
Date: 2024-07-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, economic concentration, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy production, energy transport, insurance, logistics, merger control, storage








C_202404501EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4501


12.7.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11580 – EDF / GENERALI / PARCOLOG)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/4501)

On 4 July 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11580. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4501/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)