do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-385/23, Finnair (Fuel gauge design defect): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus – Finland) – Matkustaja A v Finnair Oyj (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation for passengers in the event of long delay or cancellation of flights – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Extraordinary circumstances – Technical failures caused by a hidden design defect revealed by the manufacturer after cancellation of the flight – System for measuring the quantity of fuel in the aircraft)
Date: 2024-06-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air safety, aircraft, carriage of passengers, carrier, civil aviation, indemnification, traveller








C_202404568EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4568


29.7.2024






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus – Finland) – Matkustaja A v Finnair Oyj


(Case C-385/23,
                (1)
Finnair (Fuel gauge design defect))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 5(3) - Compensation for passengers in the event of long delay or cancellation of flights - Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation - Extraordinary circumstances - Technical failures caused by a hidden design defect revealed by the manufacturer after cancellation of the flight - System for measuring the quantity of fuel in the aircraft)
(C/2024/4568)
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Matkustaja A

Defendant: Finnair Oyj

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91,
must be interpreted as meaning that the occurrence of an unexpected and unprecedented technical failure affecting a new aircraft model recently put into service which results in the air carrier cancelling a flight is covered by the concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’, within the meaning of that provision, where the manufacturer of that aircraft recognises, after that cancellation, that that failure was caused by a hidden design defect concerning all aircraft of the same type and impinging on flight safety.


(1)  
            OJ C 314, 4.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4568/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-737/22, BibMedia: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret – Denmark) – Staten og Kommunernes Indkøbsservice A/S v BibMedia A/S (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Award of public works, public supply and public service contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 18 – Principles of equal treatment and transparency – Article 46 – Division of a contract into lots – Opportunity for the tenderer which submitted the second most economically advantageous tender to be awarded a lot on the terms of the most economically advantageous tender)
Date: 2024-06-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative transparency, award of contract, equal treatment, public procurement, services contract, supplies contract, tendering, works contract








C_202404561EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4561


29.7.2024






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret – Denmark) – Staten og Kommunernes Indkøbsservice A/S v BibMedia A/S


(Case C-737/22,
                (1)
BibMedia)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Award of public works, public supply and public service contracts - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 18 - Principles of equal treatment and transparency - Article 46 - Division of a contract into lots - Opportunity for the tenderer which submitted the second most economically advantageous tender to be awarded a lot on the terms of the most economically advantageous tender)
(C/2024/4561)
Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Staten og Kommunernes Indkøbsservice A/S

Defendant: BibMedia A/S

Operative part of the judgment

Article 18(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC
must be interpreted as meaning that the principles of equal treatment and transparency set out in that provision do not preclude, in a procedure for the award of a public contract divided into lots, the tenderer which has submitted the second most economically advantageous tender from being awarded, in accordance with the terms set out in the procurement documents, a lot on the condition that that tenderer accepts to deliver the supplies and perform the services relating to that lot at the same price as that offered by the tenderer which submitted the most economically advantageous tender and which has, therefore, been awarded another, larger lot of that contract.


(1)  
            OJ C 63, 20.2.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4561/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1119/23 R-RENV: Order of the Vice-President of the General Court of 13 June 2024 – Lagardère v Commission (Interim relief – Competition – Concentrations – Request for information – Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Application for interim measures – Prima facie case words – Weighing up of interests)
Date: 2024-06-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, audiovisual industry, data protection, economic concentration, merger control








C_202404729EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4729


5.8.2024






Order of the Vice-President of the General Court of 13 June 2024 – Lagardère v Commission


(Case T-1119/23 R-RENV)

(Interim relief - Competition - Concentrations - Request for information - Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Application for interim measures - Prima facie case words - Weighing up of interests)
(C/2024/4729)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Lagardère SA (Paris, France) (represented by: D. Théophile, G. Aubron and C. Bocket, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Caro de Sousa, B. Cullen and D. Viros, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2023) 6429 final of 19 September 2023 relating to a procedure pursuant to Article 11(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Case M.11184 – Vivendi/Lagardère), as amended by Commission Decision C(2023) 7464 final of 27 October 2023, and, second, as a precautionary measure, an order that the Commission retain all of the documents concerned by the contested decision and which may be relevant to the Commission’s investigation.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures in so far as it relates to documents provided to the Commission on 30 January 2024.










2.


The operation of Commission Decision C(2023) 6429 final of 19 September 2023 relating to a procedure pursuant to Article 11(3) of Council Regulation EC No 139/2004 (Case M.11184 – Vivendi/ Lagardère), as amended by Commission Decision C(2023) 7463 final of 27 October 2023 is suspended, in so far as it concerns documents which were not provided to the Commission on 30 January 2024.










3.


Lagardère SA is ordered to request that the persons concerned by Decision C(2023) 6429 final, as amended by Commission Decision C(2023) 7463 final, take all necessary steps to ensure that the documents referred to in the annex to that decision, which have not yet been provided to the Commission, are retained in a format that guarantees the integrity and inalterability of those documents.










4.


The application is dismissed as to the remainder.










5.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4729/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-703/22: Order of the General Court of 13 June 2024 – Everblacks Towage v Commission (Madeira Free Zone) (State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Concept of existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Disappearance of the interest in bringing proceedings in the course of proceedings – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2024-06-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, reimbursement of aid, tax exemption, tax relief








C_202404590EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4590


29.7.2024






Order of the General Court of 13 June 2024 – Everblacks Towage v Commission (Madeira Free Zone)


(Case T-703/22)
                (1)

(State aid - Madeira Free Zone - Aid scheme implemented by Portugal - Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme - Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Disappearance of the interest in bringing proceedings in the course of proceedings - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/4590)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Everblacks Towage – Serviços Marítimos, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: A. Ferreira Correia and R. da Palma Borges, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Barcew and P. Caro de Sousa, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Article 1 and Article 4(1) of Commission Decision (EU) 2022/1414 of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) – Regime III (OJ 2022 L 217, p. 49).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 24, 23.1.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4590/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-33/24, ROSAS: Order of the President of the Court of 13 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – ROSAS Logisztikai Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
Date: 2024-06-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: customs formalities, free circulation








C_202405415EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5415


16.9.2024






Order of the President of the Court of 13 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – ROSAS Logisztikai Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága


(Case C-33/24, ROSAS)
                (1)

(C/2024/5415)
Language of the case: Hungarian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5415/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)