do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114165
Date: 2024-06-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Abruzzi, Italy, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid








C_202403678EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3678


11.6.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114165
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3678)








Date of adoption of the decision


30.5.2024




Aid number


SA.114165




Member State


Italy




Region


Abruzzo




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Reintroduzione del caso SA.108490 (2023/N) - Regime Abruzzo TCTF per il sostegno alla transizione verso nuovi assetti imprenditoriali e produttivi post crisi bellica




Legal basis


Draft of the Determination of scrolling of the ranking . See also ex Determinazione DPH/48 of 22 November 2023 (Giunta Regionale, Abruzzo).




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy, SMEs




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 5 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 5 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 30.6.2024




Economic sectors


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid




Name and address of the granting authority







Regione Abruzzo - Giunta regionale - Dipartimento Sviluppo economico – Turismo




Via Passolanciano, 75 - 65124 Pescara








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3678/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 10 June 2024
Date: 2024-06-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202403696EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3696


11.6.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            10 June 2024
         
(C/2024/3696)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0756 




JPY


Japanese yen


168,74 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4592 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84565 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3330 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9637 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5120 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,636 




HUF


Hungarian forint


394,15 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3240 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9769 




TRY


Turkish lira


34,8697 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6304 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4801 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4043 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7595 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4548 




KRW


South Korean won


1 479,33 




ZAR


South African rand


20,1228 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7957 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 529,81 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0779 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,243 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,544 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,7200 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,7531 




INR


Indian rupee


89,8004 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3696/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11419 – PAVAO VUJNOVAC / FORTENOVA GROUP)
Date: 2024-06-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: agri-foodstuffs, consumer goods, economic concentration, fruit, merger control, property leasing, rail transport, urban infrastructure, vegetable, wholesale selling








C_202407124EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7124


27.11.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11419 – PAVAO VUJNOVAC / FORTENOVA GROUP)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7124)

On 11 June 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11419. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7124/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11530 – CVC / MONBAKE)
Date: 2024-06-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: bakery, consultancy, economic concentration, frozen product, investment company, merger control, pastry-making, public limited company








C_202404051EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4051


25.6.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11530 – CVC / MONBAKE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/4051)

On 11 June 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11530. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4051/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-420/24, Sindicatul Drumarilor Elie Radu: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Iași (Romania) lodged on 11 June 2024 – Sindicatul Drumarilor Elie Radu, in the name and on behalf of its member BZ v Compania Națională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA – Direcția Regională de Drumuri și Poduri Iași
Date: 2024-06-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: commuting, labour law, legal working time, overtime








C_202405604EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5604


30.9.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Iași (Romania) lodged on 11 June 2024 – Sindicatul Drumarilor ‘Elie Radu’, in the name and on behalf of its member BZ v Compania Națională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA – Direcția Regională de Drumuri și Poduri Iași


(Case C-420/24, Sindicatul Drumarilor ‘Elie Radu’)

(C/2024/5604)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Iași

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant and applicant at first instance: Sindicatul Drumarilor ‘Elie Radu’, in the name and on behalf of its member BZ

Respondent and defendant at first instance: Compania Națională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA – Direcția Regională de Drumuri și Poduri Iași

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 2(1) of [Directive 2003/88] (1) be interpreted as meaning that the periods during which a worker (i) travels outside normal working hours to another place, other than his or her fixed or habitual place of work, in order to carry out his or her activity or duties there, in accordance with his or her employer’s instructions, and (ii) makes the return journey, constitute ‘working time’?










2.


Must Article 31(2) of [the Charter] and Article 6(b) of [Directive 2003/88] be interpreted as precluding a provision of national legislation under which neither the hours corresponding to a worker’s travel to another place, other than his or her fixed or habitual place of work, in order to carry out his or her activity or duties there, in accordance with his or her employer’s instructions, nor the hours corresponding to the return journey, are to be taken into account in determining whether the threshold of average weekly working time for the calculation of overtime has been reached, in relation to the national definition of overtime, understood exclusively as ‘work performed outside the normal weekly working hours’?






(1)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5604/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-300/24: Action brought on 11 June 2024 – Geos Atlas v EUCAP Somalia
Date: 2024-06-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Somalia, award of contract, consortium, equal treatment, fact-finding mission, public procurement, tendering, transparency in decision-making








C_202404735EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4735


5.8.2024






Action brought on 11 June 2024 – Geos Atlas v EUCAP Somalia


(Case T-300/24)

(C/2024/4735)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Geos Atlas Holding Ltd. (Balzan, Malta) (represented by: L. Vidal, lawyer)

Defendant: EUCAP Somalia (Mogadishu, Somalia)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the decision made by EUCAP Somalia on 24 May 2024 which ruled on the inadmissibility of the tender submitted by the consortium of companies of which the applicant is the leader, in the context of call for tenders PROC-ECS-2023-023-R;










—


order EUCAP Somalia to undertake a further assessment of all the tenders received in the context of call for tenders PROC-ECS-2023-023-R, including the tender submitted by the consortium of companies of which the applicant is the leader;










—


order the European Commission to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging manifest error in law in the adoption of the contested decision, on the ground that it was adopted by the defendant on the basis of a partial interpretation of a selection criterion recognised as nonetheless crucial.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the subsequent justifications put forward by the defendant are inadmissible and unfounded. In that regard, the applicant submits, first, that the defendant is not entitled to subsequently add the ground justifying the contested decision and, secondly, that the subsequent grounds put forward are based on a manifest error of fact.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging the infringement of the principle of equality affecting the procedure of the award of contract that culminated in the contested decision. According to the applicant, the defendant did not respect its obligation of transparency, as a contracting entity, and which implies that all the terms and conditions of the award procedure are formulated in a clear, precise and unequivocal manner, and that it provides all candidates with the technical information relevant to a proper understanding of the contract notice.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4735/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-405/24, L.: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 11 June 2024 – L. s.c. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej
Date: 2024-06-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, VAT, exemption from customs duties, import (EU), import tax, residence, tax exemption








C_202405302EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5302


9.9.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 11 June 2024 – L. s.c. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej


(Case C-405/24, L.)

(C/2024/5302)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: L. s.c.

Respondent: Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej

Question referred

Must the provisions of Article 143(b) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) […] and Article 1 of Directive 2006/79 of 5 October 2006 on the exemption from taxes of imports of small consignments of goods of a non-commercial character from third countries (2) […] in the context of recital (3) of Directive 2006/79 and Article 25 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 of 16 November 2009 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty (3) […] be interpreted as being contrary to a regulation such as Article 52(1) of the ustawa z dnia 11 marca 2004 r. o podatku od towarów i usług (Law of 11 March 2004 on Value Added Tax) (Dz. U 2018, item 2174, as amended), according to which the importation of goods placed in a consignment sent from the territory of a third country by an individual and intended for an individual residing in the territory of a Member State of the European Union other than the territory of the country where the importation takes place is not exempt from VAT?


(1)  
            OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ 2006 L 286, p. 15.

(3)  
            OJ 2009 L 324, p. 23.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5302/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-221/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 June 2024 – European Commission v Deutsche Telekom AG (Appeal – Competition – Articles 266 and 340 TFEU – Judgment reducing the amount of a fine imposed by the European Commission – Repayment by the Commission of the amount unduly collected – Obligation to pay interest – Characterisation – Compensation at a standard rate for loss of enjoyment of the unduly paid amount of the fine – Rate applicable)
Date: 2024-06-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU competition policy, Slovakia, control of restrictive practices, damages, dominant position, interest, sanction (EU), transmission network








C_202404434EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4434


22.7.2024






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 June 2024 – European Commission v Deutsche Telekom AG


(Case C-221/22 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Articles 266 and 340 TFEU - Judgment reducing the amount of a fine imposed by the European Commission - Repayment by the Commission of the amount unduly collected - Obligation to pay interest - Characterisation - Compensation at a standard rate for loss of enjoyment of the unduly paid amount of the fine - Rate applicable)
(C/2024/4434)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: D. Calleja Crespo, N. Khan, B. Martenczuk, P. Rossi and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Deutsche Telekom AG (represented by: C. von Köckritz, P. Lohs and U. Soltész, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 198, 16.5.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4434/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11546 – UNICREDIT / ALPHA BANK ROMANIA)
Date: 2024-06-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Romania, banking, credit institution, economic concentration, financial services, merger control








C_202403860EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3860


17.6.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11546 – UNICREDIT / ALPHA BANK ROMANIA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3860)

On 11 June 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11546. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3860/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)