do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-402/24, Sewel: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 10 June 2024 – BL v Dr A, acting as liquidator of Luftfahrtgesellschaft Walter mbH
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: collective dismissal, employment service, labour law








C_202405216EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5216


2.9.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 10 June 2024 – BL v Dr A, acting as liquidator of Luftfahrtgesellschaft Walter mbH


(Case C-402/24, Sewel)
                (1)

(C/2024/5216)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant, appellant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: BL

Defendant, respondent and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Dr A, acting as liquidator of Luftfahrtgesellschaft Walter mbH

Questions referred







1.


Is the purpose of the collective redundancy notification fulfilled, and a penalty therefore unnecessary, if the national employment agency does not object to an – objectively incorrect – collective redundancy notification and thus considers itself sufficiently well-informed to be able to perform its tasks within the time limits laid down in Article 4 of Council Directive 98/59/EC (2) of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies?
Does that apply, in any event, where the achievement of the purpose of Article 3 of Directive 98/59/EC is ensured by a national provision of employment promotion law and/or the national employment agency has a duty to investigate on its own initiative?










2.


If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative: Can the purpose of Article 3 of Directive 98/59/EC still be fulfilled if a collective redundancy notification that is incorrect or has not been given at all can be corrected, supplemented or given at a later stage after receipt of the notice of dismissal?










3.


If, in the event that a collective redundancy notification is incorrect or has not been given, the standstill period in accordance with Article 4(1) of Directive 98/59/EC should be the penalty for errors in the notification, what scope of application still remains for Article 6 of Directive 98/59/EC in that respect?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (OJ 1998 L 225, p. 16).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5216/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-404/24, Dimnev: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 10 June 2024 – Criminal proceedings against KP
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: charge, criminal proceedings, penalty, presumption of innocence, proof, right to justice








C_202404956EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4956


19.8.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 10 June 2024 – Criminal proceedings against KP


(Case C-404/24, Dimnev)
                (1)

(C/2024/4956)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Prosecutor in the criminal proceedings

Sofiyska gradska prokuratura

Accused person

KP

Question referred

Does Article 6(1), read in conjunction with recitals 22 and 23, of Directive (EU) 2016/343, (2) read in conjunction with the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter, preclude a national law whereby a statement by the public prosecutor that he does not support the charge does not release the court from the duty to give judgment on the substance of the case, with the result that it hands down a conviction in respect of part of the unsupported charge?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings (OJ 2016 L 65, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4956/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1601 of 30 May 2024 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers banned from operating or subject to operational restrictions within the Union (Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1601, 31 May 2024)
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: air safety, air traffic control, airline, carrier, civil aviation, common transport policy, third country, transport licence








L_202490342EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/1601


10.6.2024






Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1601 of 30 May 2024 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers banned from operating or subject to operational restrictions within the Union

(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1601, 31 May 2024
)


On page 2, recital 7:
for:


                  ‘Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft programme (“sAFA”)’,

read:


                  ‘Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft programme (“SAFA”)’.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2024/1601/corrigendum/2024-06-10/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Taking stock of the clean transition dialogues.
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: Secretariat-General
Subjects: EU energy policy, EU environmental policy, business policy, carbon neutrality, clean technology, climate change, economic transition, green economy, regulatory policy, social dialogue (EU), social partners

TAKING STOCK OF  
THE CLEAN TRANSITION 
DIALOGUES 

10 April 2024

The European Green Deal was designed as the EU’s compass to make Europe the first climate-
neutral continent in the world. It aims at transforming Europe into a clean, resource-efficient, 
and competitive economy. 

To ensure its smooth implementation, the Commission has launched a series of Clean Transition 
Dialogues with key industrial sectors. It is crucial the European industry remains competitive 
and the transition is socially fair and inclusive for all. Through these Dialogues, the Commission 
is working closely with industry to build a business model fit for a decarbonised economy. 
Now that the regulatory framework is in place, we will continue to strengthen collaboration 
with  industry  and  social  partners  to  implement  the  European  Green  Deal  in  the  most 
effective way.

Highlights  

Today’s  Communication  highlights  a  number  of  key  building  blocks  that  have  been  identified  through  the 
Dialogues which could support a reinforced industrial approach to deliver on the European Green Deal: 

Delivering an effective and simplified regulatory framework for businesses 
to deliver on the transition

Taking action on energy prices to ensure abundant and affordable clean 
energy

Building modern infrastructure as a backbone for EU industry 

Unlocking finance for the transition 

Leveraging the clean Single Market in a  
globally competitive environment

Timeline of the Clean Transition Dialogues  

13 September 2023
President von der Leyen launched the Clean Transition 
Dialogues series during the 2023 State of the Union address

10 October 2023
First Clean Transition Dialogue, on Hydrogen

30 November 2023
Energy intensive industries 

23 February 2024
Critical raw materials 

14 March 2024
Forest-based bioeconomy

22 March 2024
Steel

22 February 2024
Clean tech industry

26 February 2024
Energy infrastructure 

15 March 2024
Cities

8 April 2024
Clean Mobility

10 April 2024
Communication taking stock of 
the Clean Transition Dialogues

Dialogue continues 
The Commission will pursue the implementation  
of the European Green Deal through continued  
Clean Transition Dialogues

© European Union, 2024
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2024
The reuse policy of European Commission documents is implemented by Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission 
documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Unless otherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International 
(CC-BY 4.0) licence.

PDF 

 ISBN 978-92-68-14442-8    DOI 10.2792/734136   KA-09-24-218-EN-N
Case T-299/24: Action brought on 10 June 2024 – KHG v EUIPO – Panther Deutschland (Baltic Breeze)
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, furniture industry, registered trade mark, textile product, trade-mark law








C_202404487EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4487


22.7.2024






Action brought on 10 June 2024 – KHG v EUIPO – Panther Deutschland (Baltic Breeze)


(Case T-299/24)

(C/2024/4487)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: KHG GmbH & Co. KG (Schönefeld, Germany) (represented by: D. Gehnen and K. Ritzman, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Panther Deutschland GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Baltic Breeze – Application No 18 404 835

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2024 in Case R 1462/2023-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and, if it intervenes in the proceedings, the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4487/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-403/24, PRVO PLINARSKO DRUŠTVO: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 10 June 2024 – PRVO PLINARSKO DRUŠTVO d.o.o. v Gazprom export LLC, Privredna banka Zagreb d.d.
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, higher court, indemnification, institutional cooperation, legal person, right to justice, ruling








C_202405399EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5399


16.9.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 10 June 2024 – PRVO PLINARSKO DRUŠTVO d.o.o. v Gazprom export LLC, Privredna banka Zagreb d.d.


(Case C-403/24, PRVO PLINARSKO DRUŠTVO)

(C/2024/5399)
Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske

Parties to the main proceedings


Party seeking security of a claim at first instance – respondent: PRVO PLINARSKO DRUŠTVO d.o.o.

Parties opposing security of a claim at first instance – appellants: Gazprom export LLC, Privredna banka Zagreb d.d.

Questions referred







1.


Can the rule laid down in the second part of the first sentence and in the second sentence of Article 177(3) of the Sudski poslovnik (Rules of Procedure of the Courts), which provides that ‘a case before a court of second instance shall be deemed to be closed on the date on which the decision is sent from the court office, after the case has been returned by the Registration Service. The Registration Service shall be required to return the file to the court office as promptly as possible after receipt thereof. The decision shall then be notified within a further period of eight days’ be considered compatible with Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 of the Charter?










2.


Must the courts in civil proceedings, when adopting decisions, take account of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 of 7 December 2020 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses, (1) with all annexes, and Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 of 7 December 2020 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses, (2) with all annexes, having regard to all the circumstances of the specific case in which, in the absence of this decision, there would have been a transfer of EUR 35 000 000,00 from the account of a commercial company in a Member State of the European Union to the account of a commercial company in the Russian Federation, it being almost impossible, as things stand at present, for a commercial company from the European Union to obtain compensation for the termination of a contractual relationship by a commercial company in the Russian Federation?






(1)  
            OJ 2020 L 410 I, p. 13.

(2)  
            OJ 2020 L 410 I, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5399/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1038/23: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2024 – UB v Frontex
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: competition (EU), paramilitary force, principle of legal certainty, recruitment, transparency in decision-making








C_202404612EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4612


29.7.2024






Order of the General Court of 10 June 2024 – UB v Frontex


(Case T-1038/23)
                (1)

(C/2024/4612)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/1310, 11.12.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4612/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 7 June 2024
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202403248EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3248


10.6.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            7 June 2024
         
(C/2024/3248)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0898 




JPY


Japanese yen


169,52 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4613 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85120 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3075 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9696 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,4865 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,577 




HUF


Hungarian forint


388,92 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2880 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9763 




TRY


Turkish lira


35,1650 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6345 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4902 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5095 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7596 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4653 




KRW


South Korean won


1 489,97 




ZAR


South African rand


20,4821 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8916 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 646,42 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1123 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,786 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,756 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,7158 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,4943 




INR


Indian rupee


90,8890 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3248/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-412/24, Fauré Le Page: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 10 June 2024 – Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS, Fauré Le Page Paris SAS v Goyard ST-Honoré SAS
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: advertising malpractice, consumer protection, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202405306EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5306


9.9.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 10 June 2024 – Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS, Fauré Le Page Paris SAS v Goyard ST-Honoré SAS


(Case C-412/24, Fauré Le Page)

(C/2024/5306)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS, Fauré Le Page Paris SAS

Respondent: Goyard ST-Honoré SAS

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 3(1)(g) of Directive 2008/95/EC (1) of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks be interpreted as meaning that a reference to a fanciful date in a trade mark conveying false information on the age, reliability and know-how of the manufacturer of the goods and, consequently, on one of the intangible characteristics of those goods is sufficient to establish the existence of actual deceit or a sufficiently serious risk that the consumer will be deceived?










2.


If the answer to the first question is in the negative, must that article be interpreted as meaning?






(a)


that a trade mark may be regarded as deceptive where there is a likelihood that consumers of the goods and services designated by the trade mark will believe that the proprietor of that trade mark has been producing those goods for centuries, thereby conferring on them a prestigious image, whereas that is not the case?










(b)


that, in order to establish the existence of actual deceit or a sufficiently serious risk that the consumer will be deceived, on which a finding that a trade mark is deceptive depends, the trade mark must constitute a sufficiently specific designation of potential characteristics of the goods and services for which it is registered, so that the targeted consumer is led to believe that the goods and services possess certain characteristics which they do not in fact possess?










(1)  Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (Codified version) (OJ 2008 L 299, p. 25).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5306/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Arab Republic of Egypt pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Egypt, GATT, United Kingdom, agreement (EU), fresh vegetable, fruit vegetable, refrigerated product, revision of an agreement, tariff preference, tariff quota, withdrawal from the EU








L_202401670EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/1670


10.6.2024






Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Arab Republic of Egypt pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union

The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Arab Republic of Egypt pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (1), signed at Brussels on 20 December 2023, entered into force on 2 May 2024.


(1)  The text of the Agreement is published in OJ L, 2024/1360, 31.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree/2024/1360/oj.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/notice/2024/1670/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-298/24: Action brought on 10 June 2024 – DoDo Services v EUIPO – doqo (doqo)
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, computer equipment, registered trade mark, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_202404486EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4486


22.7.2024






Action brought on 10 June 2024 – DoDo Services v EUIPO – doqo (doqo)


(Case T-298/24)

(C/2024/4486)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: DoDo Services s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: J. Matzner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: doqo (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark doqo – Application for registration No 18 650 822
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 April 2024 in Case R 1921/2023-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4486/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-589/23: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2024 – UA v Frontex
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: competition (EU), paramilitary force, principle of legal certainty, recruitment, transparency in decision-making








C_202404610EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4610


29.7.2024






Order of the General Court of 10 June 2024 – UA v Frontex


(Case T-589/23)
                (1)

(C/2024/4610)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/1307, 11.12.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4610/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1037/23: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2024 – UB v Frontex
Date: 2024-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: competition (EU), paramilitary force, principle of legal certainty, recruitment, transparency in decision-making








C_202404611EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4611


29.7.2024






Order of the General Court of 10 June 2024 – UB v Frontex


(Case T-1037/23)
                (1)

(C/2024/4611)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/1309, 11.12.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4611/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)