do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-381/23, Geterfer: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Mönchengladbach-Rheydt – Germany) – ZO v JS (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction in matters relating to maintenance obligations – Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 – Article 12(1) – Lis pendens – Article 13 – Related actions – Concept)
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belgium, Germany, age of majority, child, general legal principle, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, judicial proceedings, maintenance obligation








C_202404438EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4438


22.7.2024






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Mönchengladbach-Rheydt – Germany) – ZO v JS


(Case C-381/23,
                (1)
Geterfer
                (2)
)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction in matters relating to maintenance obligations - Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 - Article 12(1) - Lis pendens - Article 13 - Related actions - Concept)
(C/2024/4438)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Mönchengladbach-Rheydt

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ZO

Defendant: JS

Operative part of the judgment

Article 12(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations
must be interpreted as meaning that the conditions for recognition of a situation of lis pendens laid down in that provision, under which proceedings must have the same cause of action and must be brought between the same parties, are not satisfied when, at the time a claim is brought before a court of one Member State by a child – who has in the meantime become an adult – for payment of maintenance from his or her mother, a claim has already been brought before a court of another Member State by the mother seeking compensation from the child’s father for accommodation and maintenance of that child, since the applicants’ actions do not have the same end in view and do not relate to the same period. The absence of a situation of lis pendens, within the meaning of Article 12(1) of Regulation No 4/2009, does not, however, preclude the application of Article 13 of that regulation if the actions at issue are sufficiently closely connected for them to be regarded as related within the meaning of Article 13(3) of that regulation, with the result that, where it is not the court first seised, the referring court may stay the proceedings.


(1)  
            OJ C 329, 18.9.2023.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any of the parties to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4438/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-547/22, INGSTEEL: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava II – Slovakia) – INGSTEEL spol. s. r. o. v Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 2(1)(c) – Compensation awarded to a tenderer unlawfully excluded from a procedure for the award of a public contract – Scope – Loss of opportunity)
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil liability proceedings, damages, equal treatment, public procurement, tendering








C_202404435EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4435


22.7.2024






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava II – Slovakia) – INGSTEEL spol. s. r. o. v Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie


(Case C-547/22,
                (1)
INGSTEEL)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts - Directive 89/665/EEC - Article 2(1)(c) - Compensation awarded to a tenderer unlawfully excluded from a procedure for the award of a public contract - Scope - Loss of opportunity)
(C/2024/4435)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Okresný súd Bratislava II

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: INGSTEEL spol. s. r. o.

Defendant: Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1)(c) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007,
must be interpreted as precluding national legislation or a national practice which excludes the possibility, as a matter of principle, for a tenderer excluded from a procedure for the award of a public contract because of an unlawful decision of the contracting authority, of being compensated for the damage suffered as a result of the loss of the opportunity to participate in that procedure with a view to obtaining the contract concerned.


(1)  
            OJ C 432, 14.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4435/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11553 – CENTRAL / BERLIN PROPERTY)
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Berlin, Germany, catering industry, economic concentration, merchandising, merger control, property development, property market, real property, retail trade








C_202403861EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3861


18.6.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11553 – CENTRAL / BERLIN PROPERTY)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3861)

On 6 June 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11553. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3861/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-35/24: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2024 – Devo v EUIPO – Capgemini España (DEVO) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Withdrawal of the opposition – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer system, consultancy, data processing, data protection, information technology, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_202404597EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4597


29.7.2024






Order of the General Court of 6 June 2024 – Devo v EUIPO – Capgemini España (DEVO)


(Case T-35/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/4597)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Devo, Inc. (Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States) (represented by: P. Fenech and S. Galea, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Capgemini España, SL (Madrid, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 October 2023 (Case R 336/2023-2).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/2051, 18.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4597/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-441/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 June 2024 – Ryanair DAC v European Commission, Kingdom of Spain, French Republic (Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Aid scheme notified by the Kingdom of Spain – Recapitalisation fund to support strategic undertakings amid the COVID-19 pandemic – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Decision by the European Commission not to raise objections – Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination – Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services)
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, State aid, aid to undertakings, air transport, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, equal treatment, freedom to provide services, right of establishment








C_202404432EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4432


22.7.2024






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 June 2024 – Ryanair DAC v European Commission, Kingdom of Spain, French Republic


(Case C-441/21 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Article 107(3)(b) TFEU - Aid scheme notified by the Kingdom of Spain - Recapitalisation fund to support strategic undertakings amid the COVID-19 pandemic - Temporary Framework for State aid measures - Decision by the European Commission not to raise objections - Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy - Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination - Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services)
(C/2024/4432)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Ryanair DAC (represented initially by: V. Blanc, F.-C. Laprévote, E. Vahida, avocats, I.-G. Metaxas Maranghidis, dikigoros, D. Pérez de Lamo and S. Rating, abogados, and subsequently by F.-C. Laprévote, E. Vahida, avocats, I.-G. Metaxas Maranghidis, dikigoros, D. Pérez de Lamo and S. Rating, abogados)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and F. Tomat, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by: S. Centeno Huerta and I. Herranz Elizalde, and subsequently by A. Gavela Llopis and I. Herranz Elizalde, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented initially by: T. Stéhelin and N. Vincent, and subsequently by T. Stéhelin, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 382, 20.9.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4432/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-25/24: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2024 – Devo v EUIPO – Capgemini España (DEVO) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Withdrawal of the opposition – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer system, consultancy, data processing, data protection, information technology, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_202404596EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4596


29.7.2024






Order of the General Court of 6 June 2024 – Devo v EUIPO – Capgemini España (DEVO)


(Case T-25/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/4596)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Devo, Inc. (Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States) (represented by: P. Fenech and S. Galea, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Capgemini España, SL (Madrid, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 October 2023 (Case R 337/2023-2).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/2050, 18.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4596/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-398/24, Pome: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 6 June 2024 – A v B
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: economic activity, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, natural person








C_202404848EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4848


12.8.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 6 June 2024 – A v B


(Case C-398/24, Pome)
                (1)

(C/2024/4848)
Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Riigikohus

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant and appellant: A

Defendant and respondent: B

Question referred

Is the fact that the validity of an agreement conferring jurisdiction is subject to the condition that the natural persons who have concluded it are acting in the course of economic and professional activity, as provided for in Paragraph 106(1)(1) of the Estonian Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that an agreement conferring jurisdiction concluded between natural persons is to be null and void if it infringes Paragraph 104(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, under which a dispute between natural persons which is to be heard by a court pursuant to an agreement conferring jurisdiction must be connected with the economic or professional activity of both parties, a matter relating to the substantive validity of an agreement conferring jurisdiction within the meaning of the first sentence in fine of Article 25(1) (‘unless the agreement is null and void as to its substantive validity under the law of that Member State’) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast)?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4848/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.112221
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Estonia, State aid, control of State aid, processing industry








C_202403552EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3552


6.6.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.112221
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3552)








Date of adoption of the decision


6.5.2024




Aid number


SA.112221




Member State


Estonia




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TCTF: Support for connection to the transmission and distribution networks of renewable electricity generating installations in industrial sites




Legal basis


Regulation of November 28, 2022, No. 98 ‘Conditions and procedures for granting support to accelerate the deployment of renewable electricity production equipment in industrial areas’; Foreign Relations Act; Government of the Republic Regulationm of November 29, 2021, No. 108 "“Organization of implementation of recovery and resilience plan and provision of support general conditions




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 9 100 000  EUR
Annual budget: 9 100 000  EUR




Intensity


100,0 %




Duration


Until 30.6.2024




Economic sectors


MANUFACTURING




Name and address of the granting authority







Keskkonnainvesteeringute Keskus (Environmental Investment Centre)




Narva mnt 7A, Tallinn








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3552/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11567 – MSI / FINHOLD / SALCEF)
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: building industry, consultancy, economic concentration, financial services, holding company, merger control, provision of services, rail network, transport infrastructure, underground railway








C_202403851EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3851


17.6.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11567 – MSI / FINHOLD / SALCEF)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3851)

On 6 June 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11567. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3851/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-27/24: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2024 – UT v Commission
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, competition (EU), information technology, information technology applications, information technology profession, job vacancy, recruitment








C_202404613EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4613


29.7.2024






Order of the General Court of 6 June 2024 – UT v Commission


(Case T-27/24)
                (1)

(C/2024/4613)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1876, 11.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4613/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-516/23: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2024 – Lucaccioni v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Social security – Occupational disease – Request for recognition of aggravation of an occupational disease – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, occupational disease, staff regulations (EU)








C_202404595EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4595


29.7.2024






Order of the General Court of 6 June 2024 – Lucaccioni v Commission


(Case T-516/23)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Social security - Occupational disease - Request for recognition of aggravation of an occupational disease - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/4595)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Arnaldo Lucaccioni (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Silvestri, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 7 September 2022 rejecting his request for recognition of the aggravation of his occupational disease.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Mr Arnaldo Lucaccioni shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/662, 13.11.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4595/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and Iceland on supplementary rules in relation to the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund, for the period 2021 to 2027
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU migration policy, EU visa policy, Iceland, Schengen Agreement, agreement (EU), border control, external border of the EU, fund (EU)








L_202401649EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/1649


6.6.2024






Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and Iceland on supplementary rules in relation to the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund, for the period 2021 to 2027

The Agreement between the European Union and Iceland on supplementary rules in relation to the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund, for the period 2021 to 2027 entered into force on 1 May 2024, the procedure provided for in Article 13(2) of the Agreement having been completed on 29 April 2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/info/2024/1649/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)