do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11503 – VITOL / SARAS)
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: distributor, economic concentration, electrical energy, energy market, merger control, oil industry, petroleum product, primary product, wholesale trade, wind energy








C_202403868EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3868


18.6.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11503 – VITOL / SARAS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3868)

On 6 June 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11503. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3868/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11493 – WÜRTH GROUP / IDG01)
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: bolt and screw industry, distributor, economic concentration, electrical equipment, heating, merger control, plumbing equipment, wholesale trade








C_202403852EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3852


17.6.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11493 – WÜRTH GROUP / IDG01)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3852)

On 6 June 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11493. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3852/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 5 June 2024
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202403246EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3246


6.6.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            5 June 2024
         
(C/2024/3246)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0872 




JPY


Japanese yen


169,72 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4592 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85048 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3275 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9704 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,4750 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,654 




HUF


Hungarian forint


391,73 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3045 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9755 




TRY


Turkish lira


35,2316 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6353 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4867 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4904 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7577 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4657 




KRW


South Korean won


1 491,34 




ZAR


South African rand


20,5868 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8795 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 762,62 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1077 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,938 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,906 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,7259 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,1919 




INR


Indian rupee


90,7080 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3246/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-785/21: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2024 – SC Ha Ha Ha Production v EUIPO – The Smiley Company (SMILEY) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark SMILEY – Absolute ground for refusal – No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, film production, music, performing arts, recording, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202404589EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4589


29.7.2024






Order of the General Court of 6 June 2024 – SC Ha Ha Ha Production v EUIPO – The Smiley Company (SMILEY)


(Case T-785/21)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark SMILEY - Absolute ground for refusal - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/4589)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: SC Ha Ha Ha Production SRL (Cãlinești, Romania) (represented by: O. Anghel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: The Smiley Company SPRL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Fontaine, lawyer)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 September 2021, and of that board’s decision of 21 October 2021 (Case R 2936/2019-5).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by SC Ha Ha Ha Production SRL and by The Smiley Company SPRL.






(1)  
            OJ C 109, 7.3.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4589/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-297/24: Action brought on 6 June 2024 – Boguslayev v Council
Date: 2024-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, damages, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, presumption of innocence, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy








C_202404734EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4734


5.8.2024






Action brought on 6 June 2024 – Boguslayev v Council


(Case T-297/24)

(C/2024/4734)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Boguslayev (Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine) (represented by: S. Bonifassi, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/847 of 12 March 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in so far as it extends the application of the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/432 of 25 February 2023 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/429 of 25 February 2023;










—


annul Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/849 of 12 March 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in so far as it extends the application of the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/432 of 25 February 2023 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/429 of 25 February 2023;










—


order the Council to pay the provisional sum of EUR 1 000 000 in respect of the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to effective judicial protection and of the obligation to state reasons.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging error of assessment in the application of Article 3(1)(a) and (e) of Regulation (EU) 269/2014 to the applicant.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the applicant’s fundamental rights, in particular his right to property and to respect for his private and family life, and the presumption of innocence.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4734/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)