do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-134/21: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Malacalza Investimenti and Malacalza v ECB (Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Decisions taken by the European Central Bank (ECB) concerning Banca Carige – Articles 4 and 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Legitimate expectations – Conflict of interests – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to property – Plea of illegality)
Date: 2024-06-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, banking supervision, capital increase, equal treatment, indemnification, operation of the Institutions, principle of proportionality, share, shareholder








C_202404460EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4460


22.7.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Malacalza Investimenti and Malacalza v ECB


(Case T-134/21)
                (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Decisions taken by the European Central Bank (ECB) concerning Banca Carige - Articles 4 and 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Legitimate expectations - Conflict of interests - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Right to property - Plea of illegality)
(C/2024/4460)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicants: Malacalza Investimenti Srl (Genoa, Italy), Vittorio Malacalza (Genoa) (represented by: L. Boggio, S. Carbone and A. D’Angelo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: R. Bax and A. Pizzolla, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, P. Messina and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 268 TFEU, the applicants seek compensation in respect of the harm which they claim to have suffered as a result of the unlawful conduct of the European Central Bank (ECB) in the exercise of its supervisory function of Banca Carige between 2014 and 2019.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Malacalza Investimenti Srl and Mr Vittorio Malacalza to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 163, 3.5.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4460/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-188/22: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Crédit agricole and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy – Supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Setting of prudential requirements – Irrevocable payment commitments – Force of res judicata – Misuse of powers – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of sound administration – Proportionality)
Date: 2024-06-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, abuse of power, bank resolution, company in difficulties, credit institution, financial supervision, principle of proportionality








C_202404464EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4464


22.7.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Crédit agricole and Others v ECB


(Case T-188/22)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB - Setting of prudential requirements - Irrevocable payment commitments - Force of res judicata - Misuse of powers - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of sound administration - Proportionality)
(C/2024/4464)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Crédit agricole SA (Montrouge, France) and the 63 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville and M. Trabucchi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: K. Lackhoff, D. Segoin and F. Bonnard, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment, first, of point 1.5 and points 3.5.1 to 3.5.8 of Decision ECB-SMM-2022-FRCAG-5 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 2 February 2022, including the annexes thereto, in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken in relation to the irrevocable payment commitments (‘the IPCs’) concerning deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds, and, second, of point 1.6 and points 3.5.1 to 3.5.8 of Decision ECB-SSM—022-FRCAG-123 of the ECB of 21 December 2022, including the annexes thereto, in so far as it prescribes measures to be taken in relation to ICPs concerning deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Crédit agricole SA and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 213, 30.5.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4464/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-429/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Insights v EUIPO – Geert Hofstede (HOFSTEDE INSIGHTS) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark hofstede insights – Earlier national word mark and earlier national trade name HOFSTEDE INSIGHTS – Earlier national trade name and earlier national company name Hofstede Insights – Earlier national trade name and earlier national company name Hofstede Insights Group – Domain name hofstede-insights.com – Domain name hofstede-insights.net – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Grounds included for the sake of completeness – Plea in law ineffective)
Date: 2024-06-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, business management, consultancy, economics, education, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202404331EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4331


15.7.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Insights v EUIPO – Geert Hofstede (HOFSTEDE INSIGHTS)


(Case T-429/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark hofstede insights - Earlier national word mark and earlier national trade name HOFSTEDE INSIGHTS - Earlier national trade name and earlier national company name Hofstede Insights - Earlier national trade name and earlier national company name Hofstede Insights Group - Domain name ‘hofstede-insights.com’ - Domain name ‘hofstede-insights.net’ - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Grounds included for the sake of completeness - Plea in law ineffective)
(C/2024/4331)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Hofstede Insights Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: A. Sevillano Orbegozo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Geert Hofstede BV (Velp, Netherlands) (represented by: L. van der Veer, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 April 2023 (Case R 2128/2022-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Hofstede Insights Oy to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Geert Hofstede BV;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4331/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-500/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Enterprise Holdings v EUIPO – Qommute (COMMUTE WITH ENTERPRISE) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark COMMUTE WITH ENTERPRISE – Earlier EU word mark Qommute – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-06-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet site, carriage of passengers, commuting, information system, provision of services, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law, vehicle rental








C_202404333EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4333


15.7.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Enterprise Holdings v EUIPO – Qommute (COMMUTE WITH ENTERPRISE)


(Case T-500/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark COMMUTE WITH ENTERPRISE - Earlier EU word mark Qommute - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/4333)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Enterprise Holdings, Inc. (Saint-Louis, Missouri, United States) (represented by: M. Forde, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Qommute (Marseille, France) (represented by S. Sioën-Gallina, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 June 2023 (Case R 989/2022-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Enterprise Holdings, Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Qommute;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 338, 25.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4333/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-182/22: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Deutsche Bank and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Setting of prudential requirements – Irrevocable payment commitments – Action for annulment – No interest in bringing proceedings – Partial inadmissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality)
Date: 2024-06-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, banking supervision, financial requirements, financial supervision, principle of proportionality








C_202404461EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4461


22.7.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Deutsche Bank and Others v ECB


(Case T-182/22)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB - Setting of prudential requirements - Irrevocable payment commitments - Action for annulment - No interest in bringing proceedings - Partial inadmissibility - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality)
(C/2024/4461)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Deutsche Bank AG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany), BHW Bausparkasse AG (Hamelin, Germany), norisbank GmbH (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and M. Weber, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: K. Lackhoff, M. Prokop and F. Bonnard, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, first, the applicants seek the partial annulment of Decision ECB-SSM-2022-DEDEB-6 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 2 February 2022 establishing prudential requirements, including Annexes I and II thereto, with regard to the requirements imposed on them, and, second, Deutsche Bank and BHW Bausparkasse seek the partial annulment of Decision ECB-SSM-2022-DEDEB-44 of the ECB of 21 December 2022 establishing prudential requirements, including Annexes I and II thereto, with regard to the requirements imposed on them.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses as inadmissible the action brought by Deutsche Bank AG seeking the annulment of the measures imposed on an individual basis under paragraph 1.3 of Decision ECB-SSM-2022-DEDEB-6 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 2 February 2022;










2.


Dismisses as inadmissible the action brought by norisbank GmbH seeking the annulment of the measures imposed on an individual basis under paragraph 1.3 of Decision ECB-SSM-2022-DEDEB-6 of the ECB of 2 February 2022;










3.


Dismisses the action as unfounded as to the remainder;










4.


Orders Deutsche Bank, BHW Bausparkasse AG and norisbank to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 244, 27.6.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4461/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 4 June 2024
Date: 2024-06-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202403245EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3245


5.6.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            4 June 2024
         
(C/2024/3245)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0865 




JPY


Japanese yen


168,29 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4590 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85143 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3755 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9703 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,4890 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,755 




HUF


Hungarian forint


392,28 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3005 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9750 




TRY


Turkish lira


35,2217 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6364 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4860 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4901 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7624 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4640 




KRW


South Korean won


1 495,71 




ZAR


South African rand


20,2986 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8630 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 680,40 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1087 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,854 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,733 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,7284 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,5326 




INR


Indian rupee


90,6925 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3245/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Recommendation (Euratom) 2024/1112 of 18 April 2024 on clinical audits of medical radiological practices carried out pursuant to Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1112, 22 April 2024)
Date: 2024-06-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: audit, health control, ionising radiation, medical diagnosis, occupational safety, radiation protection, radiobiology, safety standard, therapeutics








L_202490333EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/1112


5.6.2024






Corrigendum to Commission Recommendation (EU) 2024/1112 of 18 April 2024 on clinical audits of medical radiological practices carried out pursuant to Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom

(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1112, 22 April 2024
)


The title of the act is changed to:


                     ‘Commission Recommendation (Euratom) 2024/1112 of 18 April 2024 on clinical audits of medical radiological practices carried out pursuant to Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom’
                  



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2024/1112/corrigendum/2024-06-05/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-123/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – VA v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Family allowances – Dependent child allowance – Education allowance – Decisions to terminate certain allowances – Conditions for granting – Concept of end of education – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration – Recovery of undue payment – First paragraph of Article 85 of the Staff Regulations – Responsibility)
Date: 2024-06-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, dependant, education grant, equal treatment, family benefit, indemnification, length of studies, staff regulations (EU), tax relief








C_202404470EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4470


22.7.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – VA v Commission


(Case T-123/23)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Dependent child allowance - Education allowance - Decisions to terminate certain allowances - Conditions for granting - Concept of ‘end of education’ - Equal treatment - Principle of sound administration - Recovery of undue payment - First paragraph of Article 85 of the Staff Regulations - Responsibility)
(C/2024/4470)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: VA (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decisions of the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the European Commission of 11 May 2022 removing his entitlement to receive, with effect from 1 July 2021, dependent child and education allowances and the tax abatement relating to the dependent child allowance, and of 13 June 2022 announcing the recovery, pursuant to Article 85 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, of those financial entitlements and, second, compensation for the harm which he claims to have suffered as a result.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Orders that the decisions of the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the European Commission of 11 May 2022 removing the entitlement of VA to receive, with effect from 1 July 2021, dependent child and education allowances and the tax abatement relating to those allowances, and of 13 June 2022 announcing the recovery, pursuant to Article 85 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, of those financial entitlements are annulled in so far as they concern those entitlements for the month of July 2021;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by VA.






(1)  
            OJ C 134, 17.4.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4470/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-295/24: Action brought on 5 June 2024 – Skechers USA v EUIPO (JUST SLIP IN)
Date: 2024-06-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202404343EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4343


15.7.2024






Action brought on 5 June 2024 – Skechers USA v EUIPO (JUST SLIP IN)


(Case T-295/24)

(C/2024/4343)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Skechers USA, Inc. II (Manhattan Beach, California, United States) (represented by: J. Bogatz, Y. Stone and J. Feigl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark JUST SLIP IN – Application for registration No 18 837 440

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2024 in Case R 67/2024-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the duty to provide a statement of reasons pursuant to Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the principle of equality as laid down in Article 20 in conjunction with Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘Charter’);










—


Infringement of the right to good administration as laid down in Article 41(1) of the Charter.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4343/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-499/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Enterprise Holdings v EUIPO – Qommute (COMMUTE WITH ENTERPRISE) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark COMMUTE WITH ENTERPRISE – Earlier EU word mark Qommute – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-06-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, carriage of passengers, consultancy, registered trade mark, social media, trade-mark law, vehicle rental








C_202404332EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4332


15.7.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Enterprise Holdings v EUIPO – Qommute (COMMUTE WITH ENTERPRISE)


(Case T-499/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark COMMUTE WITH ENTERPRISE - Earlier EU word mark Qommute - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/4332)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Enterprise Holdings, Inc. (Saint-Louis, Missouri, United States) (represented by: M. Forde, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Qommute (Marseille, France) (represented by S. Sioën-Gallina, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 June 2023 (Case R 1015/2022-5).

Operative part of the judgment.

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Enterprise Holdings, Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Qommute;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 338, 25.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4332/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)