do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-391/24, Nolgers: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 4 June 2024 – Criminal proceedings against LZ
Date: 2024-06-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belgium, EU national, Netherlands, conditional discharge, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, jurisdiction, medical institution, therapeutics








C_202405599EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5599


30.9.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 4 June 2024 – Criminal proceedings against LZ


(Case C-391/24, Nolgers)
                (1)

(C/2024/5599)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

LZ
Other party: Openbaar Ministerie

Questions referred







1.


Is Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA (2) to be interpreted as meaning that if, in the context of the ‘making available’ of a convicted person to the sentencing court (terbeschikkingstelling), Belgium delivers a judgment granting the convicted person supervised release with special conditions, and that judgment is forwarded by the competent Belgian authority, together with the certificate referred to in the Framework Decision, to the competent authority in the Netherlands, the Netherlands must recognise and enforce that judgment by, inter alia, monitoring compliance with the special conditions, while taking into account the fact that the convicted person holds Netherlands nationality and wishes to return to the Netherlands?










2.


Does this also apply when a special condition is imposed requiring the convicted person to undergo inpatient treatment in the Netherlands for his sexual problems and to be transferred from prison to a closed institution in the Netherlands?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions (OJ 2008 L 337, p. 102).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5599/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-292/24: Action brought on 4 June 2024 – Beauty Brands Concept v EUIPO – dm-drogerie markt (EVELINE PROFESSIONAL)
Date: 2024-06-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, cosmetic product, food supplement, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, service, trade-mark law








C_202404341EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4341


15.7.2024






Action brought on 4 June 2024 – Beauty Brands Concept v EUIPO – dm-drogerie markt (EVELINE PROFESSIONAL)


(Case T-292/24)

(C/2024/4341)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Beauty Brands Concept sp. z o. o. (Lesznowola, Poland) (represented by: S. Gogulski and M. Stępkowski, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark EVELINE PROFESSIONAL – Application for registration No 17 981 948

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2024 in Case R 1086/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order the EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, including those incurred in the proceedings before the EUIPO.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council read in conjunction with Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4341/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to the Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11535 – APG ASSET MANAGEMENT / STONEPEAK / EUNETWORKS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/3513, 31 May 2024)
Date: 2024-06-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, China, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, transmission network








C_202490036EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3513


4.6.2024






Corrigendum to the Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11535 – APG ASSET MANAGEMENT / STONEPEAK / EUNETWORKS) – Candidate case for simplified procedure

(
Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/3513, 31 May 2024
)


On page 1, point 1, third indent:
for:


                  ‘euNetworks, Cayman Islands’,

read:


                  ‘euNetworks Group Limited, United Kingdom’.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3513/corrigendum/2024-06-04/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11470 – BASF / HARBOUR ENERGY / ASSETS OF WINTERSHALL DEA)
Date: 2024-06-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: carbon capture and storage, chemical industry, company with share capital, economic concentration, gas industry, merger control, oil industry








C_202403873EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3873


18.6.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11470 – BASF / HARBOUR ENERGY / ASSETS OF WINTERSHALL DEA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3873)

On 4 June 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11470. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3873/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-293/24: Action brought on 4 June 2024 – Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik v EUIPO – Lavalle Martínez (LavalleGlass)
Date: 2024-06-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, ceramics, glass, household article, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202404342EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4342


15.7.2024






Action brought on 4 June 2024 – Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik v EUIPO – Lavalle Martínez (LavalleGlass)


(Case T-293/24)

(C/2024/4342)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ (Kütahya, Türkiye) (represented by: M. López Camba, E. Seijo Veiguela and J. Vicente Martínez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Joaquín Lavalle Martínez (Son Caliu, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark LavalleGlass – Application for registration No 18 605 751
         

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 April 2024 in Case R 1310/2023-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and Joaquín Lavalle Martínez to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4342/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)