do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-542/23: Order of the General Court of 3 June 2024 – Uss v Council (Action for annulment – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court – No individual concern – Regulatory act entailing implementing measures – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-06-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, international sanctions, natural person








C_202404477EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4477


22.7.2024






Order of the General Court of 3 June 2024 – Uss v Council


(Case T-542/23)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources - Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court - No individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/4477)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Artem Alexandrovich Uss (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: R. Moeyersons, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen, agent, and B. Maingain, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1094 of 5 June 2023, amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 146, p. 20) and Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1089 of 5 June 2023, amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 146, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


There is no longer any need to rule on the application to intervene submitted by the Republic of Estonia.










3.


Mr Artem Alexandrovich shall pay the costs, with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.










4.


Mr Artem Alexandrovich, the Council and the Republic of Estonia shall each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/344, 30.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4477/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-103/23 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 June 2024 – Trasta Komercbanka AS v European Central Bank, Republic of Latvia, European Commission, Ivan Fursin, C & R Invest SIA, Figon Co. Ltd, GCK Holding Netherlands BV, Rikam Holding SA (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of the parties – No independent representative – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-06-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU banking union, Latvia, bank, banking supervision, claim, indemnification, interest, law of succession, right to justice, trade licence








C_202405395EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5395


16.9.2024






Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 June 2024 – Trasta Komercbanka AS v European Central Bank, Republic of Latvia, European Commission, Ivan Fursin, C & R Invest SIA, Figon Co. Ltd, GCK Holding Netherlands BV, Rikam Holding SA


(Case C-103/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Representation of the parties - No independent representative - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/5395)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Trasta Komercbanka AS

Other parties to the proceedings: Ivan Fursin, C & R Invest SIA, Figon Co. Ltd, GCK Holding Netherlands BV, Rikam Holding SA (represented by: O. Behrends, Rechtsanwalt), European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: F. Bonnard, C. Hernández Saseta and A. Pizzolla, acting as Agents), Republic of Latvia, European Commission (represented initially by A. Nijenhuis, A. Steiblytė and D. Triantafyllou, and subsequently by A. Steiblytė and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Trasta Komercbanka AS shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).










3.


Mr Ivan Fursin, C & R Invest SIA, Figon Co. Ltd, GCK Holding Netherlands BV and Rikam Holding SA shall bear their own costs.










4.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 155, 2.5.2023



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5395/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11528 – PAI PARTNERS / BLUEGEM / BEAUTYNOVA)
Date: 2024-06-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, cosmetics industry, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, toiletries








C_202403982EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3982


21.6.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11528 – PAI PARTNERS / BLUEGEM / BEAUTYNOVA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3982)

On 3 June 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11528. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3982/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11488 – NEXANS / GRUPPO LTC)
Date: 2024-06-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical engineering, electricity supply, energy distribution, merger control








C_202407474EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7474


18.12.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11488 – NEXANS / GRUPPO LTC)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7474)

On 3 June 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11488. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7474/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11472 – HYDRO / NORTHVOLT / HYDROVOLT JV)
Date: 2024-06-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: aluminium, economic concentration, electric vehicle, electricity storage device, electronic waste, merger control, metal waste, mining of ore, plastic waste, waste recycling








C_202403684EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3684


7.6.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11472 – HYDRO / NORTHVOLT / HYDROVOLT JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3684)

On 3 June 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11472. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3684/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020 (OJ L, 2024/1252, 3.5.2024)
Date: 2024-06-03
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: aerospace industry, healthcare industry, import (EU), information technology industry, raw material, security of supply, surveillance concerning imports, sustainable development, value chain, waste recycling








L_202490330EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/90330


3.6.2024






Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020
(
Official Journal of the European Union, L, 2024/1252, 3 May 2024
)

On page 38, in Article 27(6) and (7)(a); on page 39, in Article 28(2); on page 42, in Article 31(2); on page 52, in Article 44(1); and on page 53, in Article 47:







for:





                           ‘
                           24 November 2026
                           ’,












read:





                           ‘
                           24 November 2025
                           ’.





On page 53, in Article 48(1); and on page 54, in Article 49(2):







for:





                           ‘
                           24 May 2028
                           ’,












read:





                           ‘
                           24 May 2029
                           ’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1252/corrigendum/2024-06-03/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-289/24: Action brought on 3 June 2024 – Brasserie Nationale and Munhowen v Commission
Date: 2024-06-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Luxembourg, beer, beverage industry, economic concentration, merger control, restriction on competition, rights of the defence, use of languages








C_202404484EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4484


22.7.2024






Action brought on 3 June 2024 – Brasserie Nationale and Munhowen v Commission


(Case T-289/24)

(C/2024/4484)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Brasserie Nationale (formerly Brasserie Funck Bricher and Brasserie Bofferding) (Bascharage, Luxembourg), Munhowen SA (Ehlerange, Luxembourg) represented by: J.-L. Schiltz and G. Parleani, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


declare the present direct action, brought against the decision of the European Commission of 14 March 2024 in the Case Munhowen-Brasserie Nationale v Boissons Heintz, No C (2024) 1788 final, admissible,










—


annul in its entirety the decision of the European Commission of 14 March 2024, in the Case Munhowen-Brasserie Nationale v Boissons Heintz, No C (2024) 1788 final, with all the legal consequences that entails.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on eight pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of the language regime vitiating the procedure ab initio.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging failure to comply with the first time limit provided for in Article 22 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 22(2) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 as a result of failure to provide information to the undertakings concerned without delay.










4.


Fourth plea, alleging infringement of the procedural time limits laid down in Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 as a result of late communication of its decision – including to the undertakings concerned.










5.


Fifth plea, alleging failure to observe the principles of the rights of the defence, of equality of arms, of fairness of the procedure and of legitimate expectations.










6.


Sixth plea, alleging that there was no plausible analysis as regards trade between Member States being affected.










7.


Seventh plea, alleging that there was no plausible analysis as regards a threat of competition within the territory of Luxembourg being significantly affected.










8.


Eighth plea, alleging that the Commission was wrong to accept the referral on account of the absence of a merger control system at national level.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4484/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-543/23: Order of the General Court of 3 June 2024 – Kesaev v Council (Action for annulment – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court – No individual concern – Regulatory act entailing implementing measures – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-06-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, international sanctions, natural person








C_202404478EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4478


22.7.2024






Order of the General Court of 3 June 2024 – Kesaev v Council


(Case T-543/23)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources - Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court - No individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/4478)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Igor Albertovich Kesaev (Usovo, Russia) (represented by: R. Moeyersons and A. De Jonge, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1094 of 5 June 2023, amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 146, p. 20) and Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1089 of 5 June 2023, amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 146, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Mr Igor Albertovich Kesaev shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/345, 30.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4478/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 31 May 2024
Date: 2024-06-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202402552EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2552


3.6.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            31 May 2024
         
(C/2024/2552)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0852 




JPY


Japanese yen


170,52 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4588 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85365 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,4210 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9818 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,3830 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,709 




HUF


Hungarian forint


388,83 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2645 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9767 




TRY


Turkish lira


34,9691 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6315 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4804 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4838 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7696 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4663 




KRW


South Korean won


1 501,11 




ZAR


South African rand


20,2927 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8577 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 641,72 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1080 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,604 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,925 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6418 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,4387 




INR


Indian rupee


90,5255 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2552/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Statement by the Commission on the Review Process under Article 29 of the Association Agreement on the occasion of the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2024/1392 of the European Parliament and of the Council on temporary trade-liberalisation measures supplementing trade concessions applicable to Ukrainian products under the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part
Date: 2024-06-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Ukraine, agricultural product, anti-dumping duty, association agreement (EU), import (EU), import price, liberalisation of trade, originating product, tariff exemption, tariff quota








C_202403550EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3550


3.6.2024






Statement by the Commission on the Review Process under Article 29 of the Association Agreement on the occasion of the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2024/1392 of the European Parliament and of the Council on temporary trade-liberalisation measures supplementing trade concessions applicable to Ukrainian products under the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part
(C/2024/3550)

The Commission confirms that, as soon as the new ATMs are adopted by the co-legislators, it will take the necessary steps under Article 29 of the Association Agreement to pursue, through consultations with Ukraine, the process of reciprocal tariff liberalisation.
The Commission will closely involve the European Parliament and will keep it informed of the progress of those consultations with Ukraine. The Commission will take due account of possible comments of the European Parliament in that respect.
The Commission recalls that these working modalities do not constitute a precedent for review clauses in any other agreement and do not deviate from Article 218 TFEU.
The outcome of this process will provide economic certainty and stable trade to both Ukraine and the EU, to farmers and businesses. This will also be an important step in the reconstruction of Ukraine and further integration into the EU internal market, as part of the country’s future accession to the Union.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3550/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)