do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.113513
Date: 2024-05-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Ireland, State aid, control of State aid, financial services








C_202403396EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3396


29.5.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.113513
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3396)








Date of adoption of the decision


7.5.2024




Aid number


SA.113513




Member State


Ireland




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Proposed Prolongation of the Restructuring and Stabilisation Scheme for the Credit Union Sector in Ireland under the Credit Union and Co-operation with the Overseas Regulations Act 2012 from 1 May to 31 October 2024




Legal basis


Credit Union and Co-operation with the Overseas Regulations Act 2012




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Equity instruments




Budget


Overall budget: 280 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


1.5.2024 - 31.10.2024




Economic sectors


Financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding




Name and address of the granting authority


The Minister for Finance
Department of Finance, First Floor, Block 1, Miesian Plaza 50 – 58 Lower Baggot Street, Dublin 2, Ireland




Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3396/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.110923
Date: 2024-05-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Spain, State aid, control of State aid, telecommunications








C_202403393EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3393


29.5.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.110923
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3393)








Date of adoption of the decision


25.4.2024




Aid number


SA.110923




Member State


Spain




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TRTEL - Programa UNICO – Bono social (MRR)




Legal basis


Real Decreto 1134/2023, de 19 de diciembre, por el que se modifica el Real Decreto 989/2021, de 16 de noviembre, por el que se aprueba la concesión directa a las comunidades autónomas y a las ciudades de Ceuta y Melilla de ayudas para la ejecución del programa de emisión de bonos digitales para colectivos vulnerables, en el marco del Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia.Adenda al Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia. https://planderecuperacion.gob.es/sites/default/files/2023-10/02102023_adenda_plan_recuperacion_documento_completo.pdf





Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Social support to individual consumers




Form of aid


Other




Budget


Overall budget: 30 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2024




Economic sectors


Telecommunications




Name and address of the granting authority


Secretaria de Estado de Telecomunicaciones y Transformación Digital, Dña. María González Veracruz
c/ Poeta Joan Maragall 41, 28071 Madrid




Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3393/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 28 May 2024
Date: 2024-05-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202402549EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2549


29.5.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            28 May 2024
         
(C/2024/2549)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0882 




JPY


Japanese yen


170,54 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4616 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85080 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,4660 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9908 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,4070 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,655 




HUF


Hungarian forint


382,78 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2483 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9759 




TRY


Turkish lira


35,0223 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6314 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4820 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4994 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7648 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4659 




KRW


South Korean won


1 477,78 




ZAR


South African rand


19,9443 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8842 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 495,81 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1077 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,083 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,823 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6141 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,1116 




INR


Indian rupee


90,5150 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2549/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-720/21, Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (Polish extraordinary appeal): Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of court or tribunal – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-05-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, courts and tribunals, independence of the judiciary








C_202404940EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4940


19.8.2024






Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich


(Case C-720/21,
                (1)
Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (Polish extraordinary appeal))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 267 TFEU - Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ - Criteria - Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) - Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/4940)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich

Intervening parties: M. M., E. M., X Bank SA

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych) (Supreme Court (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs), Poland), made by decision of 17 November 2021, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  
            OJ C 128, 21.3.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4940/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-43/22, Prokurator Generalny (Polish extraordinary appeal II): Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Prokurator Generalny (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of court or tribunal – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-05-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, courts and tribunals, independence of the judiciary








C_202404942EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4942


19.8.2024






Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Prokurator Generalny


(Case C-43/22,
                (1)
Prokurator Generalny (Polish extraordinary appeal II))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 267 TFEU - Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ - Criteria - Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) - Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/4942)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Prokurator Generalny

Intervening parties: D. J., D[X]. J., Ł. J., S. J., Wojewódzkie Pogotowie Ratunkowe w K.

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych) (Supreme Court (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs), Poland), made by decision of 22 December 2021, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  
            OJ C 198, 16.5.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4942/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-777/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Penguin Random House v EUIPO – Ediciones Literarias Independientes (PLAN B) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark PLAN B – Earlier trade name Ediciones Plan B – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-05-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, book trade, electronic device, electronic publishing, office supplies, paper, recording medium, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_202404327EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4327


15.7.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Penguin Random House v EUIPO – Ediciones Literarias Independientes (PLAN B)


(Case T-777/22)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative mark PLAN B - Earlier trade name Ediciones Plan B - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/4327)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial, SAU (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. F. Crespo Carrillo and E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ediciones Literarias Independientes, SL (Malaga, Spain) (represented by: B. Martínez Hulin, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 September 2022 (Case R 2015/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial, SAU, to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 71, 27.2.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4327/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-49/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Angelidis v Parliament (Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Withholding of an amount from the pension – Right to be heard – Liability)
Date: 2024-05-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, administrative sanction, damages, disciplinary proceedings, pension scheme, rights of the defence, staff regulations (EU)








C_202404328EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4328


15.7.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Angelidis v Parliament


(Case T-49/23)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary penalty - Withholding of an amount from the pension - Right to be heard - Liability)
(C/2024/4328)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Angel Angelidis (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Maes and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr, K. Zejdová and I. Lázaro Betancor, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks (i) the annulment of the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 15 July 2022 by which the Secretary-General imposed a disciplinary penalty on him (‘the contested decision’), (ii) the withdrawal of the contested decision from his personal file, (iii) reimbursement of the sums deducted from his retirement pension on the basis of the contested decision, including default interest as from the date of the first deduction, and (iv) compensation for the damage which he claims to have suffered due to the contested decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 15 July 2022 imposing a withholding of EUR 600 per month from the pension of Mr Angel Angelidis for a period of one year pursuant to Article 9(2) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 127, 11.4.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4328/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-766/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Canel Ferreiro v Council (Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Reprimand – Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service – Articles 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations – Competence of the author of the act – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
Date: 2024-05-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, administrative sanction, disciplinary proceedings, duties of civil servants, staff regulations (EU)








C_202404326EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4326


15.7.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Canel Ferreiro v Council


(Case T-766/22)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary penalty - Reprimand - Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service - Articles 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations - Competence of the author of the act - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of good administration - Impartiality - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
(C/2024/4326)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Maria Canel Ferreiro (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: N. Maes, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and I. Demoulin, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment (i) of ‘administrative investigation EN-2101’ and the report of that administrative investigation of the Council of the European Union of 28 May 2021, (ii) of the Council’s decision of 25 November 2021 imposing on her a disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand and (iii) of the decision of 1 September 2022 rejecting her complaint.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Council of the European Union of 25 November 2021 imposing a reprimand on Maria Canel Ferreiro;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the Council to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 45, 6.2.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4326/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T 79/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Chiquita Brands v EUIPO – Jara 2000 (CHIQUITA QUEEN) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CHIQUITA QUEEN – Earlier EU figurative mark Red Queen – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-05-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, fresh fruit, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202404330EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4330


15.7.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Chiquita Brands v EUIPO – Jara 2000 (CHIQUITA QUEEN)


(Case T 79/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark CHIQUITA QUEEN - Earlier EU figurative mark Red Queen - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/4330)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Chiquita Brands LLC (Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States) (represented by: R. Dissmann and L. Jones, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Jara 2000, SL (Murcia, Spain) (represented by: M. Salas Martín, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 December 2022 (Case R 1811/2021-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 December 2022 (Case R 1811/2021-2);










2.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Chiquita Brands LLC, including the costs necessarily incurred by the latter for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO;










3.


Orders Jara 2000, SL to bear its own costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.






(1)  
            OJ C 121, 3.4.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4330/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Cases T-200/22 and T-314/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Poland v Commission (Environment – Lignite mining activities at an open-cast mine – Turów lignite mine (Poland) – Law governing the institutions – Failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of debts by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Removal of the case in the main proceedings from the register – No retroactive effect on the interim measures ordered – Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2024-05-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Czechia, Lower Silesia province, claim, coal mining, debt, lignite, mining operation, periodic penalty payment, sanction (EU)








C_202404322EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4322


15.7.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Poland v Commission


(Cases T-200/22 and T-314/22)
                (1)

(Environment - Lignite mining activities at an open-cast mine - Turów lignite mine (Poland) - Law governing the institutions - Failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures - Periodic penalty payment - Recovery of debts by offsetting - Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 - Removal of the case in the main proceedings from the register - No retroactive effect on the interim measures ordered - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2024/4322)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà, O. Verheecke and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its actions under Article 263 TFEU, the Republic of Poland seeks the annulment, in Case T-200/22, of the decisions of the European Commission of 7 and 8 February 2022 and 16 and 31 March 2022 and, in Case T-314/22, of the Commission’s decision of 16 May 2022, by which the Commission recovered, by way of offsetting, the amounts payable by the Republic of Poland in respect of the daily penalty payment ordered by the Vice-President of the Court in her order of 20 September 2021, Czech Republic v Poland (C-121/21 R, EU:C:2021:752), for the periods between, first, 20 September 2021 and 17 January 2022 and, secondly, 18 January 2022 and 3 February 2022.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Joins Cases T-200/22 and T-314/22 for the purposes of the judgment;










2.


Dismisses the actions;










3.


Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 237, 20.6.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4322/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)