do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-124/23: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 - VB v ECB (Civil service – ECB staff – Remuneration – Daily subsistence allowance – Refusal to grant the daily subsistence allowance – Articles 4.1.1 and 4.5.1 of the ECB Staff Rules – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Responsibility)
Date: 2024-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, allowances and expenses, damages, principle of legal certainty, staff regulations (EU)








C_202403770EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3770


24.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 - VB v ECB


(Case T-124/23)
                (1)

(Civil service - ECB staff - Remuneration - Daily subsistence allowance - Refusal to grant the daily subsistence allowance - Articles 4.1.1 and 4.5.1 of the ECB Staff Rules - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Responsibility)
(C/2024/3770)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: VB (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: D. Camilleri Podestà and D. Nessaf, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 4 April 2022 rejecting his request to receive the daily subsistence allowance and, secondly, compensation for the damage which he claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders VB to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3770/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-755/22: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 – TG v Commission (Civil service – Contract staff – Social security – Article 72 of the Staff Regulations – General implementing provisions for the reimbursement of medical expenses – Refusal to recognise the status of serious illness – Criteria – Opinion of the medical officer – Specific and thorough examination – Liability)
Date: 2024-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, health expenditure, illness, indemnification, medical report, staff regulations (EU)








C_202403765EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3765


24.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 – TG v Commission


(Case T-755/22)
                (1)

(Civil service - Contract staff - Social security - Article 72 of the Staff Regulations - General implementing provisions for the reimbursement of medical expenses - Refusal to recognise the status of serious illness - Criteria - Opinion of the medical officer - Specific and thorough examination - Liability)
(C/2024/3765)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: TG (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Hohenecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 11 March 2022 refusing to recognise her condition as a serious illness and, secondly, compensation in respect of the non-material harm she claims to have suffered as a result.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders TG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 24, 23.1.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3765/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-339/24 P: Appeal brought on 8 May 2024 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2024 in Case T-184/23, Puma v EUIPO – Société d'équipements de boulangerie pâtisserie (BERTRAND PUMA La griffe boulangère)
Date: 2024-05-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, bread-making, engine, food processing, industrial electric machinery, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202406240EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6240


28.10.2024






Appeal brought on 8 May 2024 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2024 in Case T-184/23, Puma v EUIPO – Société d'équipements de boulangerie pâtisserie (BERTRAND PUMA La griffe boulangère)


(Case C-339/24 P)

(C/2024/6240)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Puma SE (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 18 September 2024, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Puma SE should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6240/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-28/22: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 – Ryanair v Commission (Condor; restructuring aid) (State aid – German air transport market – Restructuring aid granted by Germany to an airline – Changes to the terms of loans granted by Germany and the partial write-off of debts – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Safeguarding of procedural rights – Serious difficulties – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Point 67 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Burden sharing)
Date: 2024-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, admissibility, aid for restructuring, aid to undertakings, airline, company in difficulties, control of State aid








C_202403761EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3761


24.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 – Ryanair v Commission (Condor; restructuring aid)


(Case T-28/22)
                (1)

(State aid - German air transport market - Restructuring aid granted by Germany to an airline - Changes to the terms of loans granted by Germany and the partial write-off of debts - Decision not to raise any objections - Action for annulment - Locus standi - Admissibility - Safeguarding of procedural rights - Serious difficulties - Article 107(3)(c) TFEU - Point 67 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty - Burden sharing)
(C/2024/3761)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, S. Rating and I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Barcew, V. Bottka and J. Ringborg, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller, P.-L. Krüger and J. Buhl, acting as Agents), Condor Flugdienst GmbH (Neu Isenburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Rosenfeld, S. Lünenbürger, A. Birnstiel and S. Blazek, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2021) 5729 final of 26 July 2021 on State aid SA.63203 (2021/N) – Germany – Restructuring aid for Condor.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Decision C(2021) 5729 final of 26 July 2021 on State aid SA.63203 (2021/N) – Germany – Restructuring aid for Condor;










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ryanair DAC;










3.


Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and Condor Flugdienst GmbH to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 109, 7.3.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3761/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-393/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 – Max Heinr. Sutor v SRB (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
Date: 2024-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU)








C_202403758EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3758


24.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 – Max Heinr. Sutor v SRB


(Case T-393/21)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions - Obligation to state reasons - Plea of illegality - Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
(C/2024/3758)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Max Heinr. Sutor OHG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Glos, M. Rätz, H.-U. Klöppel and M. Meisgeier, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: J. Kerlin, C. De Falco and T. Wittenberg, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2021/22 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Decision SRB/ES/2021/22 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as it concerns Max Heinr. Sutor OHG;










2.


Maintains the effects of Decision SRB/ES/2021/22, in so far as it concerns Max Heinr., until the entry into force, within a reasonable period which cannot exceed six months from the date of delivery of the present judgment, of a new decision of the SRB fixing the ex ante contribution to the Single Resolution Fund of that institution for the 2021 contribution period;










3.


Orders the SRB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Max Heinr. Sutor OHG.






(1)  
            OJ C 349, 30.8.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3758/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11529 – ABU DHABI FUTURE ENERGY COMPANY / MUFG / TERRA-GEN POWER HOLDINGS II)
Date: 2024-05-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: clean technology, economic concentration, energy industry, energy production, investment company, merger control, provision of services, renewable energy, urbanisation, water management








C_202403242EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3242


21.5.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11529 – ABU DHABI FUTURE ENERGY COMPANY / MUFG / TERRA-GEN POWER HOLDINGS II)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3242)

On 8 May 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11529. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3242/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-411/23: Order of the General Court of 8 May 2024 – YS v Council and Commission (Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of European Prosecutors – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by Greece – Rules applicable to the appointment of European Prosecutors – Action for failure to act – No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations – Inadmissibility – Action for annulment – Challenge to the nomination by the Member State – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Public Prosecutor's Office, Greece, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, admissibility, appointment of members, public prosecutor's department








C_202403777EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3777


24.6.2024






Order of the General Court of 8 May 2024 – YS v Council and Commission


(Case T-411/23)
                (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 - Appointment of European Prosecutors - Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by Greece - Rules applicable to the appointment of European Prosecutors - Action for failure to act - No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations - Inadmissibility - Action for annulment - Challenge to the nomination by the Member State - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/3777)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: YS (represented by: S. Pappas, D.-A. Pappa and A. Pappas, lawyers)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Meyer, K. Pleśniak and K. Pavlaki, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: T. Adamopoulos, J. Baquero Cruz and F. Blanc, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action, the applicant seeks, in essence, (i) annulment, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, of Council Decision (EU) 2023/1335 of 27 June 2023 appointing the European Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (OJ 2023 L 166, p. 116) and (ii) a declaration, on the basis of Article 265 TFEU, that the Commission unlawfully refrained from bringing proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations against the Hellenic Republic.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


YS shall bear the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2023/22 of 9.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3777/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-207/23: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 – Sta Grupa v EUIPO – Axis (VAPIX) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark VAPIX – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence)
Date: 2024-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audiovisual equipment, film industry, information technology applications, measuring equipment, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_202403771EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3771


24.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 – Sta Grupa v EUIPO – Axis (VAPIX)


(Case T-207/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark VAPIX - Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Assessment of the evidence)
(C/2024/3771)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sta Grupa AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: I. Stankeviča, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Axis AB (Lund, Sweden) (represented by: J. Norderyd, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 February 2023 (Case R 1098/2022-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Sta Grupa AS, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay the costs incurred by Axis AB;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 216, 19.6.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3771/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1208 of 16 November 2023 amending Directive 2000/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the methods to measure airborne noise emitted by equipment for use outdoors (Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1208, 2 May 2024)
Date: 2024-05-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: machinery, noise level, noise pollution, noise protection, pollution control, technical regulations








L_202490290EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/1208


8.5.2024






Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1208 of 16 November 2023 amending Directive 2000/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the methods to measure airborne noise emitted by equipment for use outdoors

(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1208, 2 May 2024
)


On page 4, in the Annex, in point 1.1(b) of Part A of the new Annex III to Directive 2000/14/EC:
for:


                  ‘
                  LpA
 = 10 lg (0,3 × 100,1 LpA,0 % + 0,7 × 100,1 LpA,100 %)’,

read:


                  ‘
                  LpA
 = 10 lg (0,3 × 100,1 LpA, 0 % + 0,7 × 100,1 LpA,100 %)’.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2024/1208/corrigendum/2024-05-08/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-436/23: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 – Daimler Truck v EUIPO (CERTIFIED) (EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark CERTIFIED – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, financial services, insurance, maintenance, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, vehicle parts, wholesale trade








C_202403774EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3774


24.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 – Daimler Truck v EUIPO (CERTIFIED)


(Case T-436/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark CERTIFIED - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/3774)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Daimler Truck AG (Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany) (represented by: P. Kohl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 May 2023 (Case R 2533/2022-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 329, 18.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3774/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-243/24: Action brought on 8 May 2024 – Ehrenreiter v EUIPO – Podersdorf Tourismus- und Freizeitbetriebsgesellschaft (PODOBEACH)
Date: 2024-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, cultural event, footwear industry, leisure, marketing, parking area, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202403797EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3797


24.6.2024






Action brought on 8 May 2024 – Ehrenreiter v EUIPO – Podersdorf Tourismus- und Freizeitbetriebsgesellschaft (PODOBEACH)


(Case T-243/24)

(C/2024/3797)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Johannes Ehrenreiter (Podersdorf, Austria) (represented by: S. Salomonowitz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Podersdorf Tourismus- und Freizeitbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. (Podersdorf am See, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark PODOBEACH – Application No 18 461 013
         

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2024 in Case R 790/2023-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


amend the contested decision to the effect that the opposition is upheld in its entirety and the EU trade mark application is refused;










—


in the alternative, annul the contested decision and give a new decision, or remit the case to the Board of Appeal for re-examination;










—


in the event that the case is remitted to the Board of Appeal, rule that that Board of Appeal must issue a decision consistent with the legal interpretation given by the General Court;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3797/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)