do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-239/24: Action brought on 7 May 2024 – Belaz-upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belaz Holding v Council
Date: 2024-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, fundamental rights, international sanctions, legal person, proof








C_202403793EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3793


24.6.2024






Action brought on 7 May 2024 – Belaz-upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belaz Holding v Council


(Case T-239/24)

(C/2024/3793)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: OAO Belaz-upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belaz Holding (Zhodino, Belarus) (represented by: N. Tuominen and L. Engelen, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/768 of 26 February 2024 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (1), and Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/769 of 26 February 2024 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (2), insofar as they concern and affect the applicant.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging the illegality of Article 2(5) of Regulation No 765/2006 and Article 4(1)(b) of Decision 2012/642, as amended by the contested acts (hereafter, “Criterion 4(1)(b)”).










2.


Second plea in law, alleging in the alternative an error of assessment in the application of Criterion 4(1)(b) and a failure to comply with the burden of proof.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging violation of the applicant’s fundamental rights.






(1)  OJ L 2024/768.

(2)  OJ L 2024/769.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3793/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-217/22, Ministero dell’Interno: Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Bologna – Italy) – OV v Ministero dell’Interno, Dipartimento per le Libertà civili e l'Immigrazione – Unità Dublino
Date: 2024-05-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU migration policy, appeal, return migration, right of asylum, right to information, right to justice








C_202404455EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4455


22.7.2024






Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Bologna – Italy) – OV v Ministero dell’Interno, Dipartimento per le Libertà civili e l'Immigrazione – Unità Dublino


(Case C-217/22, Ministero dell’Interno)
                (1)

(C/2024/4455)
Language of the case: Italian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 222, 7.6.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4455/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
Date: 2024-05-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, chromium, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, metal coating, oxide








C_202402981EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2981


7.5.2024






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
                (1)
)


(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/2981)


Decision granting an authorisation














Reference of the decision
 (2)




Date of decision




Substance name




Holder of the authorisation




Authorisation number




Authorised use




Date of expiry of review period




Reasons for the decision





C(2024) 2596


30 April 2024


chromium trioxide (EC No 215-607-8; CAS No 1333-82-0)


Cristina S.r.l. a socio unico, Via G. Fava 56, 28024 Gozzano, Novara, Italy


REACH/24/5/0


Electroplating of different types of substrates to achieve functional surfaces with high durability and a bright or matt silvery appearance for sanitary applications


22 September 2028


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.






(1)  
            OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu)



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2981/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-115/22, NADA and Others: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängige Schiedskommission Wien – Austria) – SO (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court or tribunal – National arbitration committee competent to combat doping in sport – Criteria – Independence of the body making the reference – Principle of effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
Date: 2024-05-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: data protection, data-processing law, disclosure of information, medical data, performance drugs, personal data, professional sport, protection of privacy, sporting event








C_202403720EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3720


24.6.2024






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängige Schiedskommission Wien – Austria) – SO


(Case C-115/22, NADA and Others)
                (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Admissibility - Article 267 TFEU - Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ - National arbitration committee competent to combat doping in sport - Criteria - Independence of the body making the reference - Principle of effective judicial protection - Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
(C/2024/3720)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Unabhängige Schiedskommission Wien

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: SO

Interested parties: Nationale Anti-Doping Agentur Austria GmbH (NADA), Österreichischer Leichtathletikverband (ÖLV), World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)

Operative part of the judgment

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängige Schiedskommission Wien (Independent Arbitration Committee, Vienna, Austria), made by decision of 21 December 2021, is inadmissible.


(1)  
            OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3720/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Council Decision (EU) 2024/1327 of 7 May 2024 appointing a member, proposed by the Italian Republic, of the Committee of the Regions
Date: 2024-05-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Italy, appointment of members, member of the Committee of the Regions








L_202401327EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/1327


14.5.2024







            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2024/1327
         
of 7 May 2024
         
appointing a member, proposed by the Italian Republic, of the Committee of the Regions


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (EU) 2019/852 of 21 May 2019 determining the composition of the Committee of the Regions (1),


Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 300(3) of the Treaty, the Committee of the Regions is to consist of representatives of regional and local bodies who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly.












(2)


On 6 October 2021, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2021/1834 (2), appointing six members and four alternate members, proposed by the Italian Republic, of the Committee of the Regions.












(3)


Mr Arno KOMPATSCHER was appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions until 31 October 2023. A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has therefore become vacant.












(4)


The Italian Government has proposed Mr Arno KOMPATSCHER, representative of a regional body who holds a regional authority electoral mandate, Presidente della Provincia autonoma di Bolzano (President of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano), as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2025,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Arno KOMPATSCHER, representative of a regional body who holds an electoral mandate, Presidente della Provincia autonoma di Bolzano (President of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano), is hereby appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2025.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 7 May 2024.


For the Council


The President

M.-C. LEROY
            





(1)  
            OJ L 139, 27.5.2019, p. 13.

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2021/1834 of 6 October 2021 appointing six members and four alternate members, proposed by the Italian Republic, of the Committee of the Regions (OJ L 372, 20.10.2021, p. 11).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/1327/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11388 – HYDRO ENERGI / MIRACL / REIN JV)
Date: 2024-05-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: aluminium, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, metallurgical industry, provision of services, solar energy, wind energy








C_202403228EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3228


16.5.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11388 – HYDRO ENERGI / MIRACL / REIN JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3228)

On 7 May 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11388. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3228/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-255/24: Action brought on 7 May 2024 – Nouwen v Council
Date: 2024-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, access to EU information, disclosure of information, economic policy, electronic mail, financial policy, international relations








C_202404336EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4336


15.7.2024






Action brought on 7 May 2024 – Nouwen v Council


(Case T-255/24)

(C/2024/4336)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Martijn Frederik Nouwen (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Weijers, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Council decision of 7 March 2024 under the reference SGS 24/00008 not to grant (partial) access to e-mail messages requested by the applicant under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001;










—


order the Council to pay the costs of the applicant under Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court and to pay the costs of any interveners.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant puts forward three pleas in law in support of the action.






1.


First plea in law, alleging the incomplete or careless review of the application, or, at least, an insufficient statement of reasons therefor.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging the unjustified refusal to grant access to the declined e-mail messages, or at least an insufficient statement of reasons for the decision to do so:






(i)


incomplete review by the Council










(ii)


incorrect factual framework










(iii)


no risk of undermining international relations










(iv)


no risk of undermining the financial or economic policy










(v)


abuse of power.














3.


Third plea in law, alleging the unjustified refusal to grant partial access or, at least, an insufficient statement of reasons for the decision to do so.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4336/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11505 – CVC / EMMA / MAILSTEP)
Date: 2024-05-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronic commerce, investment company, logistics, merger control, provision of services








C_202403222EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3222


15.5.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11505 – CVC / EMMA / MAILSTEP)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3222)

On 7 May 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11505. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3222/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-338/24, Sanofi Pasteur: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Rouen (France) lodged on 7 May 2024 – LF v Sanofi Pasteur SA
Date: 2024-05-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to the courts, defective product, indemnification, limitation of legal proceedings, producer's liability, trauma








C_202404716EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4716


5.8.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Rouen (France) lodged on 7 May 2024 – LF v Sanofi Pasteur SA


(Case C-338/24, Sanofi Pasteur)

(C/2024/4716)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Rouen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: LF

Defendant: Sanofi Pasteur SA

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 13 of Directive 85/374/EEC (1) of 25 July 1985, as interpreted by the judgment of 25 April 2002 (Maria Victoria Gonzalez Sanchez v Medicina Asturiana SA. C-183/00), according to which an injured person may rely on systems of contractual or non-contractual liability having a different basis from that put in place by the directive, be interpreted to mean that the victim of a defective product may seek compensation for his or her injury from the producer under a general system of fault-based liability, relying in particular on the fact that the product has been allowed to remain in circulation, a failure to exercise vigilance with respect to the risks associated with the product or, more generally, a safety defect in that product.?










2.


Is Article 11 of Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985, under which the rights conferred on the victim by that directive are extinguished upon the expiry of a period of 10 years from the date on which the harmful product was put into circulation, incompatible with the provisions of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in that it deprives a victim suffering from a progressive injury caused by a defective product from the right of access to a court?










3.


Can Article 10 of Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 which determines the date on which the three-year limitation period begins to run as ‘the day on which the plaintiff became aware, or should reasonably have become aware, of the damage’, be interpreted as meaning that the period starts to run only on the day on which the whole of the damage is known, in particular by the establishment of a stabilisation date, defined as the moment from which the condition of the victim of physical injury is no longer evolving – meaning that, where a medical condition is progressive, the limitation period does not start to run – rather than as the day when the damage has clearly appeared and can be linked to the defective product, regardless of its subsequent development?






(1)  Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products (OJ 1985 L 210, p. 29).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4716/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-240/24: Action brought on 7 May 2024 – MAZ-upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belavtomaz v Council
Date: 2024-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, fundamental rights, international sanctions, legal person, proof








C_202403794EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3794


24.6.2024






Action brought on 7 May 2024 – MAZ-upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belavtomaz v Council


(Case T-240/24)

(C/2024/3794)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: OAO Minskii Avtomobilnyi Zavod - upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belavtomaz (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: N. Tuominen and L. Engelen, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/768 of 26 February 2024 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (1), and Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/769 of 26 February 2024 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (2), insofar as they concern and affect the applicant.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging the illegality of Article 2(5) of Regulation No 765/2006 and Article 4(1)(b) of Decision 2012/642, as amended by the contested acts (hereafter, “Criterion 4(1)(b)”).










2.


Second plea in law, alleging in the alternative an error of assessment in the application of Criterion 4(1)(b) and a failure to comply with the burden of proof.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging violation of the applicant’s fundamental rights.






(1)  OJ L 2024/768.

(2)  OJ L 2024/769.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3794/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-238/24: Action brought on 7 May 2024 – Karić v Council
Date: 2024-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, right to an effective remedy








C_202403792EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3792


24.6.2024






Action brought on 7 May 2024 – Karić v Council


(Case T-238/24)

(C/2024/3792)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Bogoljub Karić (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: W. Julié and A. Beauchemin, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/769 of 26 February 2024
                   (1), insofar as it maintains the name of the Applicant in Annex I to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine;










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/768 of 26 February 2024
                   (2), insofar as it maintains the Applicant’s name in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine;










—


order the Council of the European Union to bear the full costs and expenses of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging violation of the right to effective judicial protection and the obligation to state reasons.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging the errors of assessment.






(1)  
            OJ L, 2024/769, 27.2.2024.

(2)  
            OJ L, 2024/768, 27.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3792/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-280/22, Kinderrechtencoalitie Vlaanderen and Liga voor Mensenrechten: Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State – Belgium) – vzw Kinderrechtencoalitie Vlaanderen, vzw Liga voor Mensenrechten v Belgian State
Date: 2024-05-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: biometrics, data protection, data-processing law, digitisation, electronic component, identity document, personal data, protection of privacy, residence permit








C_202404456EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4456


22.7.2024






Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State – Belgium) – vzw Kinderrechtencoalitie Vlaanderen, vzw Liga voor Mensenrechten v Belgian State


(Case C-280/22, Kinderrechtencoalitie Vlaanderen and Liga voor Mensenrechten)
                (1)

(C/2024/4456)
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 318, 22.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4456/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)