do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-236/24: Action brought on 6 May 2024 – Ponsatí i Obiols v Parliament
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, parliamentary immunity








C_202403791EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3791


24.6.2024






Action brought on 6 May 2024 – Ponsatí i Obiols v Parliament


(Case T-236/24)

(C/2024/3791)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Clara Ponsatí i Obiols (Waterloo, Belgium) (represented by: G. Boye and S. Bekaert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decisions announced in the Parliament on 26 February and 10 April 2024 declaring inadmissible the requests for the defence of the immunities of Ms Ponsatí pursuant to Article 9 (1)(a)and (2) of Protocol No 7 announced in the Parliament on 29 March 2023 (2023/2039(IMM)) and 11 September 2023 (2023/2191(IMM));










—


Order the defendant to pay all costs of these proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the decisions announced in the Parliament on 26 February and 10 April 2024 declaring inadmissible the requests for the defence of the immunities announced in the Parliament on 29 March and 11 September 2023 infringed Rules 9(4) and (9) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, as well as Articles 39(2) and 41(1) of the Charter, in connection with Articles 232 and 343 TFEU and Article 9 of Protocol No 7, as they were adopted by an incompetent body within the Parliament.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the decisions announced in the Parliament on 26 February and 10 April 2024, declaring inadmissible the requests for the defence of the immunities announced in the Parliament on 29 March and 11 September 2023, infringed Rules 7(3) and 9 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, as well as Articles 39(2) and 41(1) and (2) of the Charter, in connection with Articles 232 and 343 TFEU and Article 9 of Protocol No 7, as Rule 7(3) was not applicable to those requests and therefore the applicant was unlawfully deprived of her rights in those immunity procedures.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3791/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11387 – VOLVO / WESTPORT / JV)
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Canada, bus, commercial vehicle, construction equipment, economic concentration, engine, joint venture, merger control, motor vehicle industry, vehicle parts








C_202403210EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3210


15.5.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11387 – VOLVO / WESTPORT / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3210)

On 6 May 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11387. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3210/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-344/24 P: Appeal brought on 6 May 2024 by Christos Papasotiriou against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 5 March 2024 in Case T-552/23, Papasotiriou and Thomadaki v Council and Commission
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: North Macedonia, fundamental rights, indemnification, international agreement, lawyer








C_202500045EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/45


6.1.2025






Appeal brought on 6 May 2024 by Christos Papasotiriou against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 5 March 2024 in Case T-552/23, Papasotiriou and Thomadaki v Council and Commission


(Case C-344/24 P)

(C/2025/45)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Appellant: Christos Papasotiriou (represented by: Ch. Papasotiriou, dikigoros)

Other parties to the proceedings: Marika Thomadaki, Council of the European Union and European Commission
By order of 11 November 2024, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly inadmissible and ordered the appellant to bear his own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/45/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-333/24 P: Appeal brought on 6 May 2024 by Sumol + Compal Marcas SA against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2024 in Case T-279/23, Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202405070EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5070


26.8.2024






Appeal brought on 6 May 2024 by Sumol + Compal Marcas SA against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2024 in Case T-279/23, Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO


(Case C-333/24 P)

(C/2024/5070)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Sumol + Compal Marcas SA (represented by: A. de Sampaio, advogada)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 19 July 2024, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Sumol + Compal Marcas SA should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5070/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11478 – GUNVOR / EVE / BBE)
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Basque Country, Spain, economic concentration, electrical industry, electricity supply, energy industry, energy production, hydrocarbon, merger control, oil industry








C_202403212EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3212


15.5.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11478 – GUNVOR / EVE / BBE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3212)

On 6 May 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11478. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3212/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-235/24: Action brought on 6 May 2024 – Zver v Commission
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commissioner, Slovenia, abuse of power, access to EU information, administrative procedure, correspondence, electronic mail, general legal principle, infringement of EU law








C_202404093EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4093


8.7.2024






Action brought on 6 May 2024 – Zver v Commission


(Case T-235/24)

(C/2024/4093)
Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties


Applicant: Milan Zver (Destrnik, Slovenia) (represented by: J. Stušek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Commission’s decision of 7 March 2024, by which the applicant’s request for access was rejected in part;










—


order the defendant immediately to disclose to the applicant, or to grant the applicant access to, all of the requested documents, including email correspondence relating to the organisation of the visit of the Vice-President of the European Commission, Věra Jourová, to Slovenia, which took place from 1 to 3 March 2023;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, (1) in particular Articles 6, 7 and 8 thereof, as well as general principles of administrative procedure.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of substantive rules of EU law, more specifically due to the incorrect application of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging a misuse of power by the defendant.






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4093/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-237/24: Action brought on 6 May 2024 – DV v Frontex
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: conflict of interest, dismissal, legality, probationary period, right to justice, rights of the defence, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)








C_202404481EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4481


22.7.2024






Action brought on 6 May 2024 – DV v Frontex


(Case T-237/24)

(C/2024/4481)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: DV (represented by: S. Pappas and A. Pappas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul i) the decision of 27 June 2023, by which Frontex’s Deputy Fundamental Rights Officer, in the capacity of the Appointing Authority by sub-delegation, dismissed the applicant at the end of her probationary period (‘the first contested decision’), and ii) the decision of Frontex’s Fundamental Rights Officer of 26 January 2024 to reject the complaint against the abovementioned decision of 27 June 2023 submitted by the applicant pursuant to Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations (‘the second contested decision’);










—


order the defendant to bear its costs as well as the applicant’s costs for the current proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on eight pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the Fundamental Rights Officer was not competent to adopt the probationary period report [infringement of Article 14(3) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (‘CEOS’)] and that the sub-delegation by the Fundamental Rights Officer of his powers as Appointing Authority to his deputy is unlawful (conflict of interest).










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the Fundamental Rights Officer was not competent to adopt the second contested decision (partiality).










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that Frontex infringed the applicant’s right to be heard, as enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’).










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the first contested decision infringes the obligation to state reasons.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging that the first contested decision is vitiated by errors of fact and manifest error of assessment;










6.


Sixth plea in law, alleging that the Fundamental Rights Officer failed to properly exercise his competence as reporting officer, in violation of Article 14 CEOS.










7.


Seventh plea in law, alleging that the reasoning of the second contested decision, by which the applicant’s complaint was rejected, is illegal.










8.


Eighth plea in law, alleging that the right to an impartial and fair treatment, as enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter, has been infringed.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4481/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 3 May 2024
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202402518EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2518


6.5.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            3 May 2024
         
(C/2024/2518)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0744 




JPY


Japanese yen


164,62 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4583 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85573 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,6398 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9744 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7080 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,025 




HUF


Hungarian forint


388,95 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3290 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9761 




TRY


Turkish lira


34,7482 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6330 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4682 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3961 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7952 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4527 




KRW


South Korean won


1 460,24 




ZAR


South African rand


19,8952 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7798 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 247,67 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0927 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,392 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,516 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,4916 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,2086 




INR


Indian rupee


89,6710 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2518/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-335/24 P: Appeal brought on 6 May 2024 by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 6 March 2024 in Case T-652/22, Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO – MHCS (Shade of the Colour Orange)
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, champagne, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202500520EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/520


3.2.2025






Appeal brought on 6 May 2024 by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 6 March 2024 in Case T-652/22, Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO – MHCS (Shade of the Colour Orange)


(Case C-335/24 P)

(C/2025/520)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (represented by: M. Kefferpütz and K. Wagner, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, MHCS
By order of 2 October 2024, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/520/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
WITHDRAWAL OF COMMISSION PROPOSALS
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: proposal (EU)








C_202403117EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3117


6.5.2024






WITHDRAWAL OF COMMISSION PROPOSALS
(C/2024/3117)


List of withdrawn proposals








Document


Inter-institutional procedure


Title





A European Green Deal





COM(2022)305 final*


2022/0196 (COD)


Proposal for a REGULATION of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sustainable use of plant protection products and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/2115




COM(2021)74 final


2021/0040 (NLE)


Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the International Civil Aviation Organization as regards notification of differences to Annex 6, Part II, to the Convention on International Civil Aviation




COM(2020)247 final


2020/0120 (NLE)


Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the International Civil Aviation Organization as regards notification of differences to Annexes 1 and 6 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation related to COVID-19 pandemic





An Economy that works for People





COM(2021)569 final


2021/0429 (APP)


Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027




COM(2017)824 final


2017/0335 (CNS)


Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE laying down provisions for strengthening fiscal responsibility and the medium-term budgetary orientation in the Member States





Promoting our European Way of Life





COM(2019)110 final


2019/0060 (NLE)


Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Bosnia and Herzegovina on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Bosnia and Herzegovina




COM(2018)611 final


2018/0318 (NLE)


Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion of the status agreement between the European Union and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia




The Commission has approved the withdrawal of those pending proposals during its 2488th meeting (27 March 2024). Reasons for withdrawing the listed proposals are provided in COM(2023)638 final of 17 October 2023 (Annex IV) while for the proposal marked with a ‘*’, the reason is that no agreement was foreseeable, in view of the rejection of the proposal by the European Parliament (P9_TA(2023)0424) and the lack of progress of the discussions in the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3117/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-330/24, Celní jednatelství Zelinka: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 6 May 2024 – Celní jednatelství Zelinka s. r. o. v Generální ředitelství cel
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: customs debt, customs drawback, tariff nomenclature








C_202404954EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4954


19.8.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 6 May 2024 – Celní jednatelství Zelinka s. r. o. v Generální ředitelství cel


(Case C-330/24, Celní jednatelství Zelinka)

(C/2024/4954)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Celní jednatelství Zelinka s. r. o.

Defendant: Generální ředitelství cel

Question referred

Must the term ‘
            omyl
            ’ [error] in [the Czech version of] Article 116(7) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that a customs debt is to be reinstated only in the event that the repayment of customs duty occurred due to an unintentional act on the part of the customs authority, or can error under that article extend to an incorrect assessment by the customs authority as to the tariff classification of the goods?


(1)  
            OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4954/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-334/24 P: Appeal brought on 06 May 2024 by DEC Technologies BV against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 06 March 2024 in Case T-59/23, DEC Technologies v EUIPO – Tehnoexport (DEC FLEXIBLE TECHNOLOGIES)
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, air conditioning, heating, metal product, registered trade mark, thermal insulation, trade-mark law, tube








C_202405967EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5967


14.10.2024






Appeal brought on 06 May 2024 by DEC Technologies BV against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 06 March 2024 in Case T-59/23, DEC Technologies v EUIPO – Tehnoexport (DEC FLEXIBLE TECHNOLOGIES)


(Case C-334/24 P)

(C/2024/5967)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: DEC Technologies BV (represented by: R. Brtka, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Tehnoexport d.o.o. Inđija
By order of 03 September 2024, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that DEC Technologies BV should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5967/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
Date: 2024-05-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: acid, chemical product, chromium, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, metal coating








C_202402978EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2978


6.5.2024






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
                (1)
)


(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/2978)


Decision granting an authorisation














Reference of the decision
 (2)




Date of decision




Substance name




Holder of the authorisation




Authorisation number




Authorised use




Date of expiry of review period




Reasons for the decision





C(2024) 2556


30 April 2024


Acids generated from chromium trioxide and their oligomers EC No. 231-801-5
CAS No. 7738-94-5


Neoperl GmbH, Klosterrunsstr. 9-11, 79379, Müllheim, Germany


REACH/24/4/0


In functional electroplating of brass-made sanitary articles with the specific purpose of obtaining a final Cr(0) coating that provides a surface with high durability and chemical resistance


16 February 2031


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.






(1)  
            OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2978/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)