do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-215/24: Action brought on 24 April 2024 – Rigo Trading v EUIPO (Device of a wavy rectangular)
Date: 2024-04-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building materials, equal treatment, furniture industry, miscellaneous industries, precision engineering, principle of legal certainty, registered trade mark, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_202403624EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3624


17.6.2024






Action brought on 24 April 2024 – Rigo Trading v EUIPO (Device of a wavy rectangular)


(Case T-215/24)

(C/2024/3624)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Rigo Trading SA (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: H. Held, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark (Device of a wavy rectangular) – International registration designating the European Union No 1700702

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2024 in Case R 2150/2023-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and refer the case back to EUIPO;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 20 and Article 41(1) and (2)(a) and (c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), relating to the right to be heard and to the principles of good administration, legal certainty and equal treatment.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3624/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
P9_TA(2024)0335 – Withdrawal of the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty – European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 April 2024 on the draft Council decision on the withdrawal of the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty (06509/2024 – C9-0059/2024 – 2023/0273(NLE)) (Consent)
Date: 2024-04-24
Institutions: Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: climate change policy, energy cooperation, energy policy, international charter, investment policy, multilateral agreement, revision of an agreement, sustainable development, withdrawal from an agreement








C_202503761EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3761


17.9.2025






P9_TA(2024)0335

Withdrawal of the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty


European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 April 2024 on the draft Council decision on the withdrawal of the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty (06509/2024 – C9-0059/2024 – 2023/0273(NLE))


(Consent)

(C/2025/3761)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the draft Council decision (06509/2024),










—


having regard to the Energy Charter Treaty, signed in Lisbon on 17 December 1994, and in particular Article 47 thereof,










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 194(2) and 207(4), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0059/2024),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the joint deliberations of the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy under Rule 58 of the Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A9-0176/2024),










1.


Gives its consent to the withdrawal of the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty;










2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Contracting Parties of the Energy Charter Treaty.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3761/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-289/24 P: Appeal brought on 24 April 2024 by Société Air France and Air France-KLM against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 7 February 2024 in Case T-146/22, Ryanair v Commission (KLM II; COVID-19)
Date: 2024-04-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Netherlands, State aid, aid to undertakings, airline, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, group of companies, parent company, subsidiary








C_202403599EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3599


17.6.2024






Appeal brought on 24 April 2024 by Société Air France and Air France-KLM against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 7 February 2024 in Case T-146/22, Ryanair v Commission (KLM II; COVID-19)


(Case C-289/24 P)

(C/2024/3599)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Société Air France, Air France-KLM (represented by: J. Derenne and D. Vallindas, avocats, A. Álvarez Vidal, abogada)

Other parties to the proceedings: Ryanair DAC, European Commission, French Republic, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV

Form of order sought

The appellants claim that the Court should:






—


set aside the judgment under appeal;










—


make use of its power under the second sentence of the first paragraph of Article 61 of the Statute of the Court to give final judgment in the matter and dismiss the action for annulment lodged in Case T-146/22;










—


alternatively, refer the case back to the General Court for consideration of the pleas not already assessed; and










—


order Ryanair DAC to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and of those in first instance, if it gives final judgment in the matter, or reserve the costs of the present proceedings, if it refers the case back to the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellants rely on three pleas in law.
First, the General Court applied an incorrect standard for the determination of the aid beneficiary within a corporate group and, therefore, wrongly concluded that Air France-KLM (the holding) and Air France could not be excluded from the beneficiary of the aid measure at issue.
Second, the General Court substituted its own assessment of the determination of the aid beneficiary without adequately establishing a manifest error of assessment of the contested decision of the Commission.
Third, the General Court committed an error in law in its interpretation of the notions of indirect advantage and secondary effects in the state aid field.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3599/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-514/14: Judgment of the General Court of 24 April 2024 – Hispavima v Commission
Date: 2024-04-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, State aid, contract terms, control of State aid, hire purchase, indemnification, investment, powers of the institutions (EU), principle of legal certainty, reimbursement of aid








C_202403605EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3605


17.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 24 April 2024 – Hispavima v Commission


(Case T-514/14)
                (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by the Spanish authorities in favour of certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors - Tax scheme applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) - Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its partial recovery - Partial disappearance of the subject matter of the dispute - No need to adjudicate in part - New aid - Legitimate expectations - Recovery - Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market - Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities)
(C/2024/3605)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Hispavima (Murcia, Spain) (represented by: A. Barba, M. López Ridruejo and A. Picón Franco, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Carpi Badía and P. Němečková, acting as Agents, and by M. Segura Catalán, lawyer)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision 2014/200/EU of 17 July 2013 on the aid scheme SA.21233 C/11 (ex NN/11, ex CP 137/06) implemented by Spain – Tax scheme applicable to certain finance lease agreements also known as the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (OJ 2014 L 114, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Rules that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as it is directed against Article 1 of Commission Decision 2014/200/EU of 17 July 2013 on the aid scheme SA.21233 C/11 (ex NN/11, ex CP 137/06) implemented by Spain – Tax scheme applicable to certain finance lease agreements, also known as the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’, inasmuch as it designates the economic interest groupings and their investors as the sole recipients of the aid referred to in that decision, and Article 4(1) of that decision, inasmuch as it orders the Kingdom of Spain to recover in full the amount of the aid referred to in that decision from the economic interest groupings’ investors which benefited from it;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3605/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Special report 06/2024: The Facility for Refugees in Turkey – Beneficial for refugees and host communities, but impact and sustainability not yet ensured
Date: 2024-04-24
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU financial instrument, EU migration policy, Türkiye, aid evaluation, aid to refugees, foreign aid, migration control, refugee








C_202402645EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2645


24.4.2024






Special report 06/2024:

            ‘The Facility for Refugees in Turkey – Beneficial for refugees and host communities, but impact and sustainability not yet ensured’
         
(C/2024/2645)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 06/2024: ‘The Facility for Refugees in Turkey – Beneficial for refugees and host communities, but impact and sustainability not yet ensured’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2024-06



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2645/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)