do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-585/23: Order of the General Court of 22 April 2024 – Mylan Ireland v Commission
Date: 2024-04-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, correspondence, judgment of the Court (EU)








C_202403473EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3473


10.6.2024






Order of the General Court of 22 April 2024 – Mylan Ireland v Commission


(Case T-585/23)
                (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to correspondence between the Commission and Biogen and any document prepared by the Commission or Biogen relating to the interpretation and the consequences to be drawn from a judgment of the Court of Justice - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/3473)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mylan Ireland Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: K. Roox, T. De Meese, J. Stuyck and C. Dumont, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: Ș. Ciubotaru and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the implied decision of the European Commission of 8 July 2023, as confirmed by its express reply of 11 August 2023, rejecting an application for access to documents made by the applicant on 19 April 2023 under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action, in so far as it seeks the annulment of the implied decision of the European Commission of 8 July 2023 refusing an application for access to documents made by Mylan Ireland Ltd on 19 April 2023 under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.










2.


The action is dismissed as to the remainder.










3.


The European Commission shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/772, 20.11.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3473/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 19 April 2024
Date: 2024-04-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202402235EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2235


22.4.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            19 April 2024
         
(C/2024/2235)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0653 




JPY


Japanese yen


164,68 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4622 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85620 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,6640 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9680 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7650 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,267 




HUF


Hungarian forint


395,30 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3300 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9764 




TRY


Turkish lira


34,7304 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6622 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4666 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3443 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8105 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4510 




KRW


South Korean won


1 469,09 




ZAR


South African rand


20,4793 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7139 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 325,08 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0959 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,373 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,288 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6165 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,4819 




INR


Indian rupee


88,9228 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2235/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-277/24, Adjak: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu (Poland) lodged on 22 April 2024 – M.B. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu
Date: 2024-04-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, board of directors, ownership, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence, rule of law, tax collection, tax law








C_202404446EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4446


22.7.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu (Poland) lodged on 22 April 2024 – M.B. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu


(Case C-277/24, Adjak)
                (1)

(C/2024/4446)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: M.B.

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu

Questions referred

Are Articles 205 and 273 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (2) in conjunction with Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (the rule of law, respect for human rights), as well as Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the right to property), Article 41 thereof (the right to good administration) and Article 47 thereof (the right to an effective remedy and the right to a fair trial), and (as guaranteed under EU law) the principle of proportionality, the right to a fair hearing and the rights of the defence, to be interpreted as precluding national legislation and the national practice based thereon which deny a natural person (a member of the Management Board of a legal person) – who may be jointly and severally liable for the VAT debt of the legal person with all his or her private assets – the right to participate actively in the procedure for determining that legal person’s tax debt in the form of a final decision of the tax authority, while at the same time that natural person, in separate proceedings seeking to determine his or her joint and several liability for the legal person’s VAT debt, is deprived of an adequate means of effectively challenging the findings and assessments which have been made previously concerning the existence or the amount of that legal person’s tax debt and which are set out in the final decision of the tax authority issued previously without the participation of that natural person, which decision therefore constitutes a precedent in those proceedings under a national provision confirmed by national practice?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4446/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)