do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-209/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Yadex International v EUIPO – Armada Gida (doyum)
Date: 2024-04-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cereal product, dried product, foodstuff, fruit, preserved product, registered trade mark, rice, tea, trade-mark law








C_202403466EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3466


10.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Yadex International v EUIPO – Armada Gida (doyum)


(Case T-209/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark doyum - Earlier national word mark Doyum - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the goods - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/3466)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Yadex International GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: P. Kohl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Armada Gida Ticaret Sanayi AŞ (Akdeniz, Türkiye)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 February 2023 (Case R 1436/2022-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Yadex International GmbH and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to each bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 216, 19.6.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3466/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-6/23: Order of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – UC v Council
Date: 2024-04-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, international sanctions, natural person








C_202403470EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3470


10.6.2024






Order of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – UC v Council


(Case T-6/23)
                (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States - Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list of persons, entities and bodies concerned - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2024/3470)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: UC (represented by: P. Bekaert and S. Bekaert, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M.-C. Cadilhac, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/2398 of 8 December 2022 implementing Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2022 L 316 I, p. 7) and, secondly, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2397 of 8 December 2022 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2022 L 316 I, p. 1), in so far as those acts concern him.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.










2.


UC shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.






(1)  
            OJ C 104, 20.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3470/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-272/24, Tribunalul Galați: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 17 April 2024 – HZ v Tribunalul Galați
Date: 2024-04-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: arrangement of working time, independence of the judiciary, judge, labour shortage, overtime, paid leave, pay








C_202405491EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5491


23.9.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 17 April 2024 – HZ v Tribunalul Galați


(Case C-272/24, Tribunalul Galați)

(C/2024/5491)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel București

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: HZ

Respondent: Tribunalul Galați

Question referred

Must the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, in conjunction with Article 2 TEU, points 5 and 7 of the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers and Articles 3, 5, 6 and 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, be interpreted, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, as meaning that the principle of judicial independence precludes national legislation that prohibits the payment of overtime worked by a judge owing to staff shortages at the court where he or she works, in a situation in which compensation solely by time off in lieu corresponding to the amount of overtime worked outside normal working hours, and on weekly rest days and public holidays, if applied, would have a negative effect on the annual leave provided for by law?


(1)  
            OJ 2003 L 299, p.9.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5491/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-49/22: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Romania v Commission
Date: 2024-04-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, administrative check, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, eligibility criteria, grassland, principle of proportionality








C_202403455EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3455


10.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Romania v Commission


(Case T-49/22)
                (1)

(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by Romania - Deficiencies in administrative checks - Overlap between two investigations - Article 34(6) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 - Fallow land and temporary grassland - Article 44 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Error of assessment)
(C/2024/3455)
Language of the case: Romanian

Parties


Applicant: Romania (represented by: E. Gane, L.-E. Baţagoi, O.-C. Ichim and R. Antonie, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Biolan, A. Sauka and J. Aquilina, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, Romania seeks the annulment in part of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2020 of 17 November 2021 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2021 L 413, p. 10), in so far as that decision concerns the expenditure incurred by that Member State under the EAGF and the EAFRD during the financial years 2018 and 2019, in an amount of EUR 178 320 110,85.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Romania to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 138, 28.3.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3455/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-126/22: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Coinbase v EUIPO – Coinbase Global (coinbase)
Date: 2024-04-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, education, exchange transaction, financial services, foreign exchange market, investment company, newspaper, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, virtual currency








C_202403457EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3457


10.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Coinbase v EUIPO – Coinbase Global (coinbase)


(Case T-126/22)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark coinbase - International registration of the earlier word mark COINBASE - International registration of the earlier figurative mark coinbase exchange - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of the goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/3457)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Coinbase, Inc., (Oakland, California, United States) (represented by: A. Nordemann and M. Maier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Coinbase Global OÜ (Tallinn, Estonia)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 December 2021 (Case R 1097/2021-4)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Coinbase, Inc., to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 171, 25.4.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3457/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.113201
Date: 2024-04-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy, State aid, control of State aid, farming sector, fishing industry, forestry policy








C_202402702EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2702


17.4.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.113201
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/2702)








Date of adoption of the decision


27.3.2024




Aid number


SA.113201




Member State


Italy




Region


Friuli-Venezia Giulia




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TCTF: Regime quadro per i settori agricolo, forestale, della pesca e acquacoltura in conformità del Quadro temporaneo di crisi (quarta modifica del regime SA.102522 (2022/N))




Legal basis


Legge regionale 1° aprile 2020, n. 5 "Ulteriori misure urgenti per far fronte all’emergenza epidemiologica da COVID - 19 e alle conseguenze del conflitto russo-ucraino nel comparto agricolo e agroalimentare (art. 12, comma 2 bis e 2 ter)




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Direct grant, Loan/ Repayable advances




Budget


Overall budget: 150 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 30.6.2024




Economic sectors


AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING




Name and address of the granting authority


Regione autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia - Direzione centrale risorse agroalimentari, forestali e ittiche
Via Sabbadini 31 - 33100 Udine




Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2702/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-255/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Escobar v EUIPO (Pablo Escobar)
Date: 2024-04-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, beverage, clothing, financial services, foodstuff, miscellaneous industries, presumption of innocence, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202403467EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3467


10.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Escobar v EUIPO (Pablo Escobar)


(Case T-255/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark Pablo Escobar - Absolute ground for refusal - Trade mark contrary to public policy and to accepted principles of morality - Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Presumption of innocence)
(C/2024/3467)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Escobar Inc. (Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, United States) (represented by: D. Slopek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 February 2023 (Case R 1364/2022-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 252, 17.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3467/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-782/22: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Cogebi and Cogebi v Council
Date: 2024-04-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, import (EU), international sanctions, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence, trade restriction








C_202403462EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3462


10.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Cogebi and Cogebi v Council


(Case T-782/22)
                (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Prohibition on purchasing, importing or transferring, directly or indirectly, in the European Union, goods which generate significant revenues for Russia as listed in Annex XXI to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 - Mica products - Action for annulment - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures which directly affects the legal situation of importers - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Right of access to the file - Freedom to conduct a business - Proportionality)
(C/2024/3462)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Cogebi (Brussels, Belgium), Cogebi, a.s., (Tábor, Czech Republic) (represented by: H. over de Linden, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and E. Nadbath, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Estonia (represented by: M. Kriisa, acting as Agent), European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, M. Carpus Carcea and L. Puccio, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Article 3i of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1), as amended by Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1904 of 6 October 2022 (OJ 2022 L 259I, p. 3), in so far as Regulation 2022/1904 inserts CN code 6814 (worked mica and articles of mica) into the list of goods which generate significant revenues for the Russian Federation as listed in Annex XXI to Regulation No 833/2014 and whose direct or indirect purchase, import or transfer in the European Union is prohibited by Article 3i of that regulation.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Cogebi and Cogebi, a.s. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the interim proceedings;










3.


Orders the European Commission and the Republic of Estonia to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 35, 30.1.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3462/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-344/22: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Stichting Nationaal Kritisch Platform Windenergie v Commission
Date: 2024-04-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU energy policy, EU environmental policy, Netherlands, admissibility, climate change policy, infringement of EU law, national planning








C_202403459EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3459


10.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Stichting Nationaal Kritisch Platform Windenergie v Commission


(Case T-344/22)
                (1)

(Environment - Netherlands Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030 - Request for internal review - Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Rejection of the request - Application for annulment - Error of assessment - Action for failure to act - No invitation to act - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/3459)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Stichting Nationaal Kritisch Platform Windenergie (Schettens, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Byrne, Barrister-at-Law)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: O. Denkov and J. Etienne, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: L. Vétillard and J. Himmanen, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action, the applicant seeks, first and principally, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, annulment of the decision of the European Commission notified by letter of 1 April 2022 rejecting the request for internal review which it submitted on 15 December 2021 and, secondly, in the alternative, on the basis of Article 265 TFEU, a finding that the Commission unlawfully failed to act in accordance with the purpose of its request of 13 December 2021 concerning the integrated national energy and climate plan of the Kingdom of the Netherlands covering the period 2021-2030.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Stichting Nationaal Kritisch Platform Windenergie to bear, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 311, 16.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3459/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
Date: 2024-04-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, chromium, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, metallurgical industry, oxide








C_202402513EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2513


17.4.2024






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
                (1)
)


(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/2513)


Decision granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2024) 2086


10 April 2024


Chromium trioxide
EC No. 215-607-8, CAS No. 1333-82-0
Sodium dichromate
EC No. 234-190-3, 616-541-6, CAS No. 7789-12-0, 10588-01-9


ArcelorMittal France, Immeuble ‘le Cézanne’, 6 rue André Campra, 93200 Saint-Denis, France;


REACH/24/1/0


Use of chromium trioxide for passivation of electrolytic tinplate


31 December 2027


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.




REACH/24/1/1


Use of sodium dichromate for passivation of electrolytic tinplate


31 December 2027




REACH/24/1/2


Use of chromium trioxide for electrolytic chromium coating of steel, also known as tin free steel


31 December 2028




ArcelorMittal España S.A., Residencia La Granda, 33418 Gozón, Asturias, Spain.


REACH/24/1/3


Use of chromium trioxide for passivation of electrolytic tinplate


31 December 2027




REACH/24/1/4


Use of sodium dichromate for passivation of electrolytic tinplate


31 December 2027




REACH/24/1/5


Use of chromium trioxide for electrolytic chromium coating of steel, also known as tin free steel


31 December 2028






(1)  
            OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2513/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-288/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Unilab v EUIPO – Cofares (Healthily)
Date: 2024-04-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, dietary product, food supplement, medical device, medical plant, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, therapeutics, trade-mark law








C_202403468EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3468


10.6.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Unilab v EUIPO – Cofares (Healthily)


(Case T-288/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Healthily - Earlier EU figurative mark Healthies - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Legitimate expectations)
(C/2024/3468)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Unilab LP (Rockville, Maryland, United States) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Misztal and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Cofares, Sociedad Cooperativa Farmaceutica Española (Madrid, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 March 2023 (Case R 1959/2022-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Unilab LP and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own respective costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 252, 17.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3468/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)