do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-513/23: Order of the General Court of 9 April 2024 – Heraeus Electronics v EUIPO – Welco (WELCO)
Date: 2024-04-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, powder metallurgy, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202403335EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3335


3.6.2024






Order of the General Court of 9 April 2024 – Heraeus Electronics v EUIPO – Welco (WELCO)


(Case T-513/23)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark WELCO - Earlier EU figurative mark WELCO - No recording of the change in ownership of the contested trade mark in the EU trade mark register - No locus standi - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/3335)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Heraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KG (Hanau, Germany) (represented by: A. Ebert-Weidenfeller and H. Förster, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Welco spol. s r. o. (Uherský Brod, Czech Republic) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 June 2023 (Case R 2409/2022-2).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Heraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KG shall bear its own costs before the General Court and pay those incurred by Welco spol. s r. o.










3.


The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/37, 9.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3335/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-252/24, Prisum Healthcare: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 9 April 2024 – Prisum Healthcare S.R.L. v Autoritatea Vamală Română
Date: 2024-04-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, food supplement, iron, non-alcoholic beverage, prepared foodstuff, specification of tariff heading








C_202404444EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4444


22.7.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 9 April 2024 – Prisum Healthcare S.R.L. v Autoritatea Vamală Română


(Case C-252/24, Prisum Healthcare)

(C/2024/4444)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel București

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Prisum Healthcare S.R.L.

Defendant: Autoritatea Vamală Română

Question referred

Is the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, (1) as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) 2022/1998 of 20 September 2022, (2) to be interpreted as meaning that:






 


a food preparation in liquid form containing iron (in the form of ferrous sulphate), a vitamin complex, mineral salts, vegetable extracts, natural fruit extracts, other nutritive substances, honey, sugar and glucose syrup, which is consumed as such in doses of 2 teaspoons per day, is marketed in 200 ml plastic bottles, is intended for specific use in the formation of haemoglobin and red blood cells and has the function of a food supplement that contributes to the balance of health, the general well-being of the body and the normal functioning of the immune system falls within heading 2202 of the abovementioned Combined Nomenclature in so far as its liquid form has the effect of excluding it from the classification under heading 2106?






(1)  
            OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1998 of 20 September 2022 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2022 L 282, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4444/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-254/24 P: Appeal brought on 9 April 2024 by Dexia, formerly Dexia Crédit Local, against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 24 January 2024 in Case T-405/21, Dexia Crédit Local v SRB
Date: 2024-04-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, equal treatment, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU), principle of proportionality








C_202403319EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3319


3.6.2024






Appeal brought on 9 April 2024 by Dexia, formerly Dexia Crédit Local, against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 24 January 2024 in Case T-405/21, Dexia Crédit Local v SRB


(Case C-254/24 P)

(C/2024/3319)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Dexia, formerly Dexia Crédit Local (represented by: H. Gilliams, advocaat, J.-M. Gollier, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: Single Resolution Board, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside in part the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 24 January 2024, Dexia Crédit Local v SRB (T-405/21, ECLI:EU:T:2024:33), in so far as, while declaring void the decision of the Single Resolution Board (‘SRB’) of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the ex ante 2021 contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, with reference SRB/ES/2021/22 (‘the decision of the SRB’), that judgment temporarily maintains the effects of that decision;










—


annul the decision of the SRB; and










—


order the SRB to pay the costs of the proceedings (including the proceedings before the General Court).





Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of its appeal, the appellant relies on four grounds of appeal.






1.


First ground of appeal relating to the General Court’s finding that Articles 5, 69 and 70 of Regulation No 806/2014 (1) satisfy the conditions of Article 114(1) TFEU.










2.


Second ground of appeal relating to the General Court’s finding that Articles 69 and 70 of Regulation No 806/2014 do not constitute fiscal provisions within the meaning of Article 114(2) TFEU.










3.


Third ground of appeal relating to the General Court’s finding that the way in which the appellant was treated does not breach the principle of equality.










4.


Fourth ground of appeal relating to the General Court’s finding that the way in which the appellant was treated does not breach the principle of proportionality.






(1)  Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3319/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand
Date: 2024-04-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: New Zealand, free-trade agreement, trade agreement (EU)








L_202401062EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/1062


9.4.2024






Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand

The Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand (1), signed in Brussels on 9 July 2023, will enter into force on 1 May 2024.


(1)  
            https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202400866



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/notice/2024/1062/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-22/22, T. (Audiovisual programmes for children): Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – T. S.A. / Przewodniczący Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of court or tribunal – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-04-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, courts and tribunals, independence of the judiciary








C_202403729EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3729


24.6.2024






Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – T. S.A. / Przewodniczący Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji


(Case C-22/22,
                (1)
T. (Audiovisual programmes for children))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 267 TFEU - Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ - Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) - Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/3729)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: T. S.A.

Respondent: Przewodniczący Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych) (Supreme Court (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs), Poland), made by decision of 15 December 2021, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  
            OJ C 198, 16.5.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3729/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-253/24, Pelavi: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di Appello di L’Aquila (Italy) lodged on 9 April 2024 – Ministero della Giustizia v NZ
Date: 2024-04-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: allowances and expenses, judge, labour law, paid leave, staff assessment, temporary employment








C_202404952EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4952


19.8.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di Appello di L’Aquila (Italy) lodged on 9 April 2024 – Ministero della Giustizia v NZ


(Case C-253/24, Pelavi)
                (1)

(C/2024/4952)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte di Appello di L’Aquila

Parties to the main proceedings


Defendant and appellant: Ministero della Giustizia

Applicant and respondent: NZ

Questions referred







1.


Do Articles 31(1) and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC (2) and Clause 4 of the Framework Agreement on Fixed-term Work preclude national legislation which provides that an honorary judge, who may be classified as a ‘worker’ and a ‘fixed-term worker’ and who is confirmed in post until the age of 70, forfeits the right to paid leave for the period prior to the confirmation?










2.


Does Clause 5(1) of the Framework Agreement on Fixed-term Work preclude national legislation which, as a measure aimed at penalising the misuse of fixed-term contracts, provides for the confirmation in post of the honorary judge until the age of 70, after passing a non-competitive assessment procedure, and – in the event of failing the assessment procedure – provides for an allowance, in both cases requiring a waiver of any rights previously accrued?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4952/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
C-628/23, AXA Bank Europe and Others: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék – Hungary) – YG, NI v AXA Bank Europe SA, OTP Bank Nyrt., OTP Faktoring Követeléskezelő Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-04-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, admissibility, consumer protection, dealer, interpretation of the law, supplier, unfair terms of contract








C_202403732EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3732


24.6.2024






Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék – Hungary) – YG, NI v AXA Bank Europe SA, OTP Bank Nyrt., OTP Faktoring Követeléskezelő Zrt.


(C-628/23
                (1)
, AXA Bank Europe and Others)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/3732)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Budapest Környéki Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: YG, NI

Defendants: AXA Bank Europe SA, OTP Bank Nyrt., OTP Faktoring Követeléskezelő Zrt.

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék (Budapest Regional Court, Hungary), by decision of 21 September 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/628.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3732/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 8 April 2024
Date: 2024-04-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202402225EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2225


9.4.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            8 April 2024
         
(C/2024/2225)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0823 




JPY


Japanese yen


164,43 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4588 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85795 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,4675 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9807 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5905 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,354 




HUF


Hungarian forint


390,78 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2773 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9681 




TRY


Turkish lira


34,8481 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6433 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4715 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4761 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7984 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4607 




KRW


South Korean won


1 468,37 




ZAR


South African rand


20,1574 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8282 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 217,66 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1425 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,204 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,769 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,4806 




MXN


Mexican peso


17,8053 




INR


Indian rupee


90,1590 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2225/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)