do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-192/24: Action brought on 8 April 2024 – Association des producteurs de sel marin de l’Ile de Ré v Commission
Date: 2024-04-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, Occitanie, Portugal, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, restriction on competition, salt








C_202403347EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3347


3.6.2024






Action brought on 8 April 2024 – Association des producteurs de sel marin de l’Ile de Ré v Commission


(Case T-192/24)

(C/2024/3347)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Association des producteurs de sel marin de l’Ile de Ré (Ars-en-Ré, France) (represented by: T. Lachacinski and F. Fajgenbaum, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that it has jurisdiction;










—


declare the applicant’s application for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/423 (1) of 31 January 2024 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Fleur de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ (PGI)) admissible;










—


annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/423 of 31 January 2024 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Fleur de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ (PGI));










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those raised in Case T-190/24, Comptoir Sel Solaire v Commission.


(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/423 of 31 January 2024 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ (PGI)) (OJ L 2024/423).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3347/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-188/24: Action brought on 8 April 2024 – Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin v Commission
Date: 2024-04-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU control, control of restrictive practices, disclosure of information, pneumatic tyre, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, subsidiary








C_202404334EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4334


15.7.2024






Action brought on 8 April 2024 – Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin v Commission


(Case T-188/24)

(C/2024/4334)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin (Clermont-Ferrand, France) (represented by: E. Sarrazin, J. Brousseau and J.-P. Gunther, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


principally:






—


annul the decision of the European Commission in Case AT.40863 – Hoops (now ‘Replacement tyres’) of 10 January 2024 ordering Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin and all its subsidiaries to submit to an inspection under Article 20(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002;










—


annul all measures taken by the European Commission in the course of the inspection; in particular, annul the inspection and return all the documents seized during the inspection to Michelin;














—


in the alternative:






—


order a measure of organisation of procedure within the meaning of Article 89 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union requesting that the European Commission produce the information and indicia that it claims to have in its possession as the basis for Decision AT.40863 – Hoops (now ‘Replacement tyres’) of 10 January 2024;










—


on the basis of the information and indicia produced by the European Commission, annul the decision of the European Commission in Case AT.40863 – Hoops of 10 January 2024 and all measures taken by the European Commission in the course of the inspection;










—


order the European Commission to pay all the costs.









Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 20(4) of Regulation No 1/2003 and of fundamental rights on the ground that the decision contains an inadequate statement of reasons.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to the inviolability of the home on the ground that the decision is arbitrary and disproportionate.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4334/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-187/24: Action brought on 8 April 2024 – Biif v EUIPO – Eddies Pizza (Caprizza)
Date: 2024-04-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, bread, catering industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202403183EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3183


21.5.2024






Action brought on 8 April 2024 – Biif v EUIPO – Eddies Pizza (Caprizza)


(Case T-187/24)

(C/2024/3183)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Biif Srl (Bergamo, Italy) (represented by: F. Musella, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eddies Pizza, SL (Palafrugell, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Caprizza – Application for registration No 18 434 530
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 February 2024 in Case R 1077/2023-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


reject opposition No. 003151820 in its entirety;










—


alternatively, refer the case to the First Board of Appeal EUIPO for review;










—


order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs of the double-level proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3183/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-193/24: Action brought on 8 April 2024 – Terras de Sal - Comércio e Transformação de Sel Marinho Tradicional v Commission
Date: 2024-04-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, Occitanie, Portugal, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, restriction on competition, salt








C_202403348EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3348


3.6.2024






Action brought on 8 April 2024 – Terras de Sal - Comércio e Transformação de Sel Marinho Tradicional v Commission


(Case T-193/24)

(C/2024/3348)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Terras de Sal - Comércio e Transformação de Sel Marinho Tradicional (Castro Marim, Portugal) (represented by: T. Lachacinski and F. Fajgenbaum, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that it has jurisdiction;










—


declare the applicant’s application for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/423 (1) of 31 January 2024 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Fleur de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ (PGI)) admissible;










—


annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/423 of 31 January 2024 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Fleur de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ (PGI));










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those raised in Case T-190/24, Comptoir Sel Solaire v Commission.


(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/423 of 31 January 2024 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ (PGI)) (OJ L 2024/423).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3348/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-191/24: Action brought on 8 April 2024 – Association pour la Promotion du Sel Artisanal v Commission
Date: 2024-04-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, Occitanie, Portugal, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, restriction on competition, salt








C_202403346EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3346


3.6.2024






Action brought on 8 April 2024 – Association pour la Promotion du Sel Artisanal v Commission


(Case T-191/24)

(C/2024/3346)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Association pour la Promotion du Sel Artisanal (Guérande, France) (represented by: T. Lachacinski and F. Fajgenbaum, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that it has jurisdiction;










—


declare the applicant’s application for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/423 (1) of 31 January 2024 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Fleur de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ (PGI)) admissible;










—


annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/423 of 31 January 2024 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Fleur de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ (PGI));










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those raised in Case T-190/24, Comptoir Sel Solaire v Commission.


(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/423 of 31 January 2024 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue’ (PGI)) (OJ L 2024/423).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3346/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 5 April 2024
Date: 2024-04-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202402224EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2224


8.4.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            5 April 2024
         
(C/2024/2224)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0841 




JPY


Japanese yen


164,10 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4590 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85773 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5260 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9793 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,6118 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,286 




HUF


Hungarian forint


390,10 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2835 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9677 




TRY


Turkish lira


34,6312 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6461 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4702 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4868 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8001 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4608 




KRW


South Korean won


1 464,09 




ZAR


South African rand


20,1710 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8421 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 192,63 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1462 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,268 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,743 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,4633 




MXN


Mexican peso


17,9104 




INR


Indian rupee


90,3283 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2224/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-558/23, Dramanova: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against IC (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Intellectual property – Act adversely affecting intellectual property rights – Criminal and administrative penalties – Principle of legality of criminal offences and penalties)
Date: 2024-04-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative offence, administrative sanction, case-law (EU), legality, offence, penalty, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202403731EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3731


24.6.2024






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against IC


(Case C-558/23,
                (1)
Dramanova)
                (2)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Manifest inadmissibility - Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law - Intellectual property - Act adversely affecting intellectual property rights - Criminal and administrative penalties - Principle of legality of criminal offences and penalties)
(C/2024/3731)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Rayonen sad Lukovit

Parties in the main criminal proceedings

IC

Interested party: Rayonna prokuratura Lovech, TO Lukovit

Operative part of the order







1.


The first and second questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the Rayonen sad Lukovit (District Court, Lukovit, Bulgaria), by decision of 6 September 2023, are manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
must be interpreting as meaning that the principle of the legality of criminal offences and penalties does not preclude national legislation which provides, where a trade mark is used in the course of trade without the consent of the holder of the exclusive right to that mark, that the same conduct may be categorised both as an administrative and as a criminal offence, without that legislation including criteria allowing a distinction to be drawn between, on the one hand, the administrative offence, and, on the other, the criminal offence, the constituent elements of the offence being described in identical terms in the criminal law and the law on trade marks.






(1)  OJ C, C/2023/644.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3731/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)