Case C-232/24, Kosmiro: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 27 March 2024 – A Oy
Date: 2024-03-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, claim, credit, financial services, provision of services, tax exemption, tax law, taxpayer








C_202403447EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3447


10.6.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 27 March 2024 – A Oy


(Case C-232/24, Kosmiro)
                (1)

(C/2024/3447)
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: A Oy

Intervener: Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö

Questions referred







1.


Where a factoring company acquires from a client invoiced debts not yet due so that the default risk relating to those debts is transferred from that client to that company (factoring taking the form of a sale of debts, ‘trade factoring’):






(a)


is the factoring commission which is charged by that company consisting of a percentage of each invoiced debts covered by the agreement, to be regarded as an adjustment to the purchase price of the acquisition of the debts or as another item outside the scope of the VAT Directive, (2) or










(b)


are Articles 2(1)(c) and 9 of the VAT Directive to be interpreted as meaning that that same company provides its client, in return for the factoring commission referred to in question 1(a) above, with a supply of services for reward falling within the scope of the VAT Directive?














2.


Is the fixed arrangement fee which is charged to the client for setting up and activating the factoring arrangement in the context of trade factoring to be regarded as a consideration for the supply to the client of a service falling within the scope of the VAT Directive?










3.


Where the fees referred to in questions 1 and 2 above which are charged in the context of trade factoring are to be regarded as a consideration for a supply of services falling within the scope of the VAT Directive:






(a)


is Article 135(1)(b) of the VAT Directive, relating to the granting of credit, or Article 135(1)(d) of that directive, relating to transactions concerning payments or debts, to be interpreted as meaning that the factoring commission or the arrangement fee charged to the client are to be regarded as consideration for the supply of a tax-exempt service, or










(b)


is Article 135(1)(d) of the VAT Directive to be interpreted as meaning that it is the consideration for debt collection, which is to be regarded as a taxable supply of services, or, as the consideration for another taxable service?














4.


Where a factoring company finances its client by granting it credit so that that client’s invoiced debts is used as collateral for the finance provided by that company (factoring taking the form of financing guaranteed by invoices, ‘invoice factoring’):






(a)


is Article 135(1)(b) of the VAT Directive, relating to the granting of credit, or Article 135(1)(d) of that directive, relating to transactions concerning payments or debts, to be interpreted as meaning that the factoring commission charged to the client, consisting of a percentage of each invoiced debt covered by the agreement, and the fixed arrangement fee for setting up and activating the factoring agreement must be regarded, at least in part, as a consideration for the supply of a tax-exempt service, or










(b)


is Article 135(1)(d) of the VAT Directive to be interpreted as meaning that it is the consideration for debt collection, which is to be regarded as a taxable supply of services, or the consideration for another taxable service?














5.


If the factoring commission or arrangement fee charged in the context of trade factoring or invoice factoring is to be wholly regarded, on the basis of the answer to question 3 or 4 above, as the consideration for a taxable service-, is the taxation of that service in application of the VAT Directive so clear and unconditional such that, where the taxable person so requests, that taxation be recognised as having direct effect even though the exemption from VAT provided for by the national VAT law covers, besides the granting of credit, other financing arrangements?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3447/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)