do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-395/21: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2024 – DZ Hyp v SRB
Date: 2024-03-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, discretionary power, equal treatment, financing method, financing plan, judicial review, principle of proportionality, right to an effective remedy








C_202402944EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2944


6.5.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2024 – DZ Hyp v SRB


(Case T-395/21)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions - Duty to state reasons - Effective judicial protection - Equal treatment - Principle of proportionality - SRB’s discretion - Plea of illegality - Commission’s discretion - Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
(C/2024/2944)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: DZ Hyp AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: J. Kerlin, T. Wittenberg and D. Ceran, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, F. Louis, P. Gey and L. Hesse, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2021/22 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as that decision concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Decision SRB/ES/2021/22 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as it concerns DZ Hyp AG;










2.


Maintains the effects of Decision SRB/ES/2021/22, in so far as it concerns DZ Hyp AG, until the entry into force, within a reasonable period which cannot exceed six months from the date of delivery of the present judgment, of a new decision of the SRB fixing the ex ante contribution to the Single Resolution Fund of that institution for the 2021 contribution period;










3.


Orders the SRB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by DZ Hyp AG;










4.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 349, 30.8.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2944/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-390/21: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2024 – DZ Bank v SRB
Date: 2024-03-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, discretionary power, equal treatment, financing method, financing plan, judicial review, principle of proportionality, right to an effective remedy








C_202402940EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2940


6.5.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2024 – DZ Bank v SRB


(Case T-390/21)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions - Duty to state reasons - Effective judicial protection - Equal treatment - Principle of proportionality - SRB’s discretion - Plea of illegality - Commission’s discretion - Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
(C/2024/2940)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: J. Kerlin, T. Wittenberg and D. Ceran, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, F. Louis, P. Gey and L. Hesse, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2021/22 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as that decision concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Decision SRB/ES/2021/22 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as it concerns DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main;










2.


Maintains the effects of Decision SRB/ES/2021/22, in so far as it concerns DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, until the entry into force, within a reasonable period which cannot exceed six months from the date of delivery of the present judgment, of a new decision of the SRB fixing the ex ante contribution to the Single Resolution Fund of that institution for the 2021 contribution period;










3.


Orders the SRB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main;










4.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 349, 30.8.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2940/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-640/22: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2024 – Westpole Belgium v Parliament
Date: 2024-03-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, consortium, information technology industry, provision of services, public procurement, services contract, tendering








C_202402946EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2946


6.5.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2024 – Westpole Belgium v Parliament


(Case T-640/22)
                (1)

(Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - External provision of IT services - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and awarding of lot to other tenderers - Exclusion criteria - No final judgment or final administrative decision establishing an infringement of competition law - Abnormally low tender)
(C/2024/2946)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Westpole Belgium (Vilvoorde, Belgium) (represented by: A. Vercruysse, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: K. Wójcik and E. Taneva, Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decisions of the European Parliament of 3 October 2022 to award lot No 7 of the contract entitled ‘PE/ITEC ITS 19 – External Provision of IT Services’ to three other tenderers and not to award that lot to a consortium of which it is part and, before a ruling is given, the production of documents relating to the examination of the tenders by the contracting authority having regard to both a ‘possible exclusion situation’ and the prices proposed.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Westpole Belgium to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.






(1)  
            OJ C 451, 28.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2946/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee – Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2021/522, (EU) 2021/1057, (EU) 2021/1060, (EU) 2021/1139, (EU) 2021/1229, and (EU) 2021/1755 as regards the changes to the amounts of funds for certain programmes and funds
Date: 2024-03-20
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: EU programme, EU regional policy, European social policy, budgetary reserve (EU), commitment of expenditure, fisheries policy, fund (EU), multiannual financial framework, public health, public sector








C_202403385EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3385


31.5.2024







Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee


Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2021/522, (EU) 2021/1057, (EU) 2021/1060, (EU) 2021/1139, (EU) 2021/1229, and (EU) 2021/1755 as regards the changes to the amounts of funds for certain programmes and funds



(COM(2024) 100 final – 2024/0060 (COD))


(C/2024/3385)







Referral(s)


Council of the European Union, 12.3.2024
European Parliament, referral expected on 1.4.2024




Legal basis


Articles 43(2), 114, 164, 168(5), 175, 177 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union




Section responsible


Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion




Adopted at plenary


20.3.2024




Plenary session No


586




Outcome of vote
(for/against/abstentions)


212/0/4




Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion Mid-term revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework adopted on 20 September 2023
          (1), it decided not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.


Brussels, 20 March 2024.


The President


of the European Economic and Social Committee

Oliver RÖPKE
               





(1)  
            OJ C, C/2023/867, 8.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/867/oj.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3385/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-216/24, Asociación Petón do Lobo: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia (Spain) lodged on 20 March 2024 – Asociación Petón do Lobo v Dirección Xeral de Planificación Enerxética e Recursos Naturais
Date: 2024-03-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: building permit, environmental impact, environmental protection, industrial project








C_202403896EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3896


1.7.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia (Spain) lodged on 20 March 2024 – Asociación Petón do Lobo v Dirección Xeral de Planificación Enerxética e Recursos Naturais


(Case C-216/24, Asociación Petón do Lobo)

(C/2024/3896)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Asociación Petón do Lobo

Defendant: Dirección Xeral de Planificación Enerxética e Recursos Naturais (de la Vicepresidencia Primeira e Consellería de Economía, Empresa e Innovación de la Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia)

Other parties: Eurus Desarrollos Renovables, S.L.U., Asociación Eólica de Galicia (EGA)

Questions referred







1.


What is the meaning of the expression 
                        ‘main reports and advice’
                      used in Article 6(3) of Directive 2011/92/EU? (1)











2.


Do the reports referred to in Article 37(2) of Law 21/2013, which the competent body must request, correspond to those mentioned in Article 6(3) of Directive 2011/92/EU?










3.


Do Articles 36, 37 and 38 of State Law 21/2013 and Articles 33 and 34 of Galician Autonomous Community Law 8/2009 run counter to the requirement, laid down in Article 6(3) of Directive 2011/92/EU, to ensure that the main sectoral reports issued are made available to the members of the public concerned so as to enable them, within a period of not less than 30 days, to exercise their right under paragraph 4 of that provision to make their representations and participate in the process of taking the decision on the application for development consent for the project before that decision has been adopted?






(1)  Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ 2012 L 26, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3896/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-540/23: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2024 – Sandhold v EUIPO – Grupo de Bodegas Vinartis (PATAPOUF)
Date: 2024-03-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202402951EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2951


6.5.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2024 – Sandhold v EUIPO – Grupo de Bodegas Vinartis (PATAPOUF)


(Case T-540/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark PATAPOUF - Earlier EU word mark PATA NEGRA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/2951)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sandhold BV (Leiden, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Spiegeler, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Grupo de Bodegas Vinartis, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks partial annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 June 2023 (Case R 2553/2022-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 223, 23.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2951/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-217/24 P: Appeal brought on 20 March 2024 by TO against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 11 January 2024 in Case T-417/23, TO v EEA
Date: 2024-03-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European official, allowances and expenses, damages, expatriate worker, indemnification, interest, staff regulations (EU), work contract








C_202405205EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5205


2.9.2024






Appeal brought on 20 March 2024 by TO against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 11 January 2024 in Case T-417/23, TO v EEA


(Case C-217/24 P)

(C/2024/5205)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: TO (represented by: É. Boigelot, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Environment Agency (EEA)
By order of 23 July 2024, the Court (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded and ordered TO to bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5205/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-392/21: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2024 – Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale v SRB
Date: 2024-03-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, discretionary power, equal treatment, financing method, financing plan, judicial review, principle of proportionality, right to an effective remedy








C_202402942EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2942


6.5.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2024 – Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale v SRB


(Case T-392/21)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions - Duty to state reasons - Effective judicial protection - Equal treatment - Principle of proportionality - SRB’s discretion - Plea of illegality - Commission’s discretion - Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
(C/2024/2942)
Language of the case: Germany

Parties


Applicant: Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: J. Kerlin, T. Wittenberg and D. Ceran, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, F. Louis, P. Gey and L. Hesse, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2021/22 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as that decision concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Decision SRB/ES/2021/22 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as it concerns Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale;










2.


Maintains the effects of Decision SRB/ES/2021/22, in so far as it concerns Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, until the entry into force, within a reasonable period which cannot exceed six months from the date of delivery of the present judgment, of a new decision of the SRB fixing the ex ante contribution to the Single Resolution Fund of that institution for the 2021 contribution period;










3.


Orders the SRB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale;










4.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 349, 30.8.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2942/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-215/24, Fira: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto – Juízo Local Criminal de Vila Nova de Gaia (Portugal) lodged on 20 March 2024 – Criminal proceedings against YX
Date: 2024-03-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, enforcement of ruling, imprisonment, jurisdiction, residence, suspension of sentence








C_202403744EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3744


24.6.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto – Juízo Local Criminal de Vila Nova de Gaia (Portugal) lodged on 20 March 2024 – Criminal proceedings against YX


(Case C-215/24, Fira)
                (1)

(C/2024/3744)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto – Juízo Local Criminal de Vila Nova de Gaia

Party to the main proceedings

YX

Questions referred









1.


After having refused to execute a European arrest warrant pursuant to Article 4(6) of Framework Decision 2002/584 on the ground of the place of residence of the convicted individual, and after having recognised the sentencing judgment, may the executing State rely on the application of its domestic law and its jurisdiction as the executing State to suspend the actual custodial sentence imposed by the issuing State, when the procedure for enforcement of that judgment has already begun?












2.


May the judicial authority of the executing State amend the decision of the judicial authority of the issuing State where that decision has become res judicata, other than in the cases provided for in Article 8 and Article 17(1) and (2) of Framework Decision 2008/909?












3.


Should Article 17(1) of Framework Decision 2008/909 be interpreted as meaning that it allows the executing State to grant a suspension of the actual custodial sentence, by applying the conditions of its domestic law, where the competent authorities of the issuing State have not done so in accordance with their law?




In the event that the previous questions are answered in the affirmative:








4.


In view of the provisions of Articles 12, 13 and 17(3) of Framework Decision 2008/909, should the Spanish judicial authorities (the executing State) have informed the issuing State in advance of their views on the possibility of suspending the custodial sentence imposed on the requested person?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3744/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission Decision of 20 March 2024 on public holidays in 2025 for officials and other servants of the European Union serving in Brussels and Luxembourg
Date: 2024-03-20
Institutions: Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security, European Commission
Subjects: EU institution, public holiday








C_202402219EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2219


22.3.2024







            COMMISSION DECISION
         
of 20 March 2024
         
on public holidays in 2025 for officials and other servants of the European Union serving in Brussels and Luxembourg
(C/2024/2219)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (CEOS), laid down by Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), and in particular Article 61 of the Staff Regulations and Articles 16 and 91 of the CEOS,


Having regard to the joint rules establishing the list of public holidays of officials of the European Communities (2), and in particular Article 1(3) thereof,


Having regard to the opinion of the Staff Committee,


Having regard to the opinion of the Staff Regulations Committee,


Having regard to the opinion of the Heads of Administration,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 61 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and Articles 16 and 91 of the CEOS, the list of public holidays in 2025 for officials and other servants of the European Union serving in Brussels and Luxembourg should be adopted.












(2)


In 2025, Easter Sunday falls on 20 April.












(3)


In 2025, 24 December falls on a Wednesday.





HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:



Sole Article
The public holidays in 2025 for staff serving in Brussels and Luxembourg are as follows:






1 January


New Year’s Day




2 January


Day after New Year’s Day




17 April


Maundy Thursday




18 April


Good Friday




21 April


Easter Monday




1 May


Labour Day




9 May


Anniversary of the Declaration by Robert Schuman in 1950




29 May


Ascension Day




30 May


Day after Ascension Day




9 June


Whit Monday




23 June*


Luxembourg National Holiday






*


for staff serving in Luxembourg








21 July**


Belgian National Holiday






**


for staff serving in Brussels








15 August


Assumption




24 December
to
31 December


6 end-of-year days





TOTAL 2025




18 days









Done at Brussels, 20 March 2024.


For the Commission


Commissioner

Johannes HAHN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.

(2)  SEC(66) 3621.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2219/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)