do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates – 13 March 2024
Date: 2024-03-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202401933EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1933


14.3.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            13 March 2024
         
(C/2024/1933)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0939 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,83 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4573 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85451 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,1930 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9599 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,4805 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,273 




HUF


Hungarian forint


396,90 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2860 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9683 




TRY


Turkish lira


35,1136 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6542 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4756 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5574 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7770 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4581 




KRW


South Korean won


1 439,01 




ZAR


South African rand


20,4535 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8678 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 039,08 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1282 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,583 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,036 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,4506 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,3472 




INR


Indian rupee


90,5940 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1933/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-210/24, AESTE: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi (Spain) lodged on 14 March 2024 – Asociación de Empresas de Servicios para la Dependencia (AESTE) v Ayuntamiento de Ortuella
Date: 2024-03-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, collective agreement, collective bargaining, free competition, freedom to provide services, restriction on competition, services contract, tendering, wage cost








C_202404074EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4074


8.7.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi (Spain) lodged on 14 March 2024 – Asociación de Empresas de Servicios para la Dependencia (AESTE) v Ayuntamiento de Ortuella


(Case C-210/24, AESTE)

(C/2024/4074)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Asociación de Empresas de Servicios para la Dependencia (AESTE)

Defendant: Ayuntamiento de Ortuella

Question referred

Is a criterion for awarding a contract for services, such as that described, which:






—


assesses the increase in the total payroll cost above that determined by the collective agreement applicable to the sector, which the tenderer proposes to apply to the individuals performing the contract, and










—


obliges the successful tenderer, following collective bargaining with the workers’ representatives, to specify the precise form that the pay increase is to take, and to seek to formalise a collective agreement applicable to the staff assigned to the contract,
suitable for identifying the most economically advantageous tender, as required by Article 67(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU? (1)





Does such an award criterion conflict with the freedom to provide services or restrict free competition, contrary to Article 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Directives 2014/24/EU and 96/71/EC? (2)

Does such an award criterion infringe the right of collective bargaining recognised in Article 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?


(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

(2)  Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ 1997 L 18, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4074/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-398/23: Order of the General Court of 14 March 2024 – Bodegas Aguiuncho v EUIPO – Mar de Frades (ALBARIÑO mar de ons)
Date: 2024-03-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wine








C_202402953EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2953


6.5.2024






Order of the General Court of 14 March 2024 – Bodegas Aguiuncho v EUIPO – Mar de Frades (ALBARIÑO mar de ons)


(Case T-398/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Cancellation of the earlier mark upon expiry of the registration - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/2953)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Bodegas Aguiuncho, SL (Sanxenxo, Spain) (represented by: J. Diez Roig, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Mar de Frades, SL (Cartagena, Spain) (represented by: I. Sempere Massa, J. Schmitt and V. Balaguer Fuentes, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 May 2023 (Case R 0164/2023-1).

Operative part of the order









1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.












2.


Mar de Frades, SL shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Bodegas Aguiuncho, SL. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 314, 4.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2953/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-454/22: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 March 2024 – European Commission v Republic of Latvia (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive (EU) 2018/1972 – European Electronic Communications Code – Failure to transpose and notify transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum and a penalty payment – Criteria for determining the amount of the penalty)
Date: 2024-03-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Internet, information technology, national implementing measure, provision of services, regulation of telecommunications, sanction (EU), trans-European network, transmission network, universal service








C_202403043EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3043


13.5.2024






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 March 2024 – European Commission v Republic of Latvia


(Case C-454/22)
                (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 258 TFEU - Directive (EU) 2018/1972 - European Electronic Communications Code - Failure to transpose and notify transposition measures - Article 260(3) TFEU - Application for the imposition of a lump sum and a penalty payment - Criteria for determining the amount of the penalty)
(C/2024/3043)
Language of the case: Latvian

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: U. Małecka, L. Malferrari, E. Manhaeve and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: J. Davidoviča and K. Pommere, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to adopt, by the expiry of the period prescribed in the reasoned opinion, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code and, consequently, by failing to notify those provisions to the European Commission, the Republic of Latvia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 124(1) of that directive;










2.


Orders the Republic of Latvia to pay to the Commission a lump sum in the a\mount of EUR 300 000;










3.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










4.


Orders the Republic of Latvia to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission.






(1)  
            OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3043/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-576/23,  Elite Games: Order of the Court of 14 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Iaşi – Romania) – Elite Games SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Vaslui, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Answer clearly deducible from the case-law – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Annex III, point 7 – Member States’ option to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – Right of admission to amusement parks – Concept of ‘amusement parks’)
Date: 2024-03-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT rate, automatic game, leisure park, tax relief








C_202402718EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2718


29.4.2024






Order of the Court of 14 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Iaşi – Romania) – Elite Games SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Vaslui, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi


(Case C-576/23,
                (1)
Elite Games)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Answer clearly deducible from the case-law - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 98 - Annex III, point 7 - Member States’ option to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services - Right of admission to amusement parks - Concept of ‘amusement parks’)
(C/2024/2718)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Iaşi

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Elite Games SRL

Defendants: Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Vaslui, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi

Operative part of the order

Article 98(2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, read in conjunction with point 7 of Annex III thereto,
must be interpreted as meaning that:
the installation, in a defined area within commercial spaces or shopping centres, of amusement machines for individual or collective use and operated by means of tokens purchased from the holder or, where appropriate, after payment of a fee to the holder, does not fall within the concept of ‘amusement parks’ within the meaning of that point 7. Consequently, the services giving access to them do not qualify for the reduced rate of value added tax which Member States are entitled to apply to admission fees for amusement parks.


(1)  Date lodged: 18 September 2023
         


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2718/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)