do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11483 – MSD HOSPITALITY / ARC CAPITAL / AUBERGE RESORTS)
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Central America, France, Greece, Italy, North America, catering industry, economic concentration, hotel industry, investment company, merger control








C_202402187EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2187


14.3.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11483 – MSD HOSPITALITY / ARC CAPITAL / AUBERGE RESORTS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/2187)

On 7 March 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11483. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2187/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.110639Text with EEA relevance.
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia, State aid, control of State aid, culture, publishing, software








C_202401975EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1975


7.3.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.110639
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/1975)







Date of adoption of the decision


5.2.2024




Aid number


SA.110639




Member State


Germany




Region


Nordrhein-Westfalen




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Förderung digitaler Spiele durch das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen [NW]




Legal basis


Förderleitlinien der Film- und Medienstiftung NRW GmbH für die Förderung von digitalen Spielen und interaktiven Inhalten




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Culture




Form of aid


Direct grant, Loan/ Repayable advances




Budget


Overall budget: 12 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 4 000 000  EUR




Intensity


80,0  %s




Duration


Until 31.12.2026




Economic sectors


Software publishing




Name and address of the granting authority







Film- und Medienstiftung NRW GmbH




Kaistraße 14, 40221 Düsseldorf








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1975/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-582/22,  Die Länderbahn and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln – Germany) – Die Länderbahn GmbH DLB, Prignitzer Eisenbahn GmbH, Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Access to railway infrastructure – Charges – Article 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Powers – Review of the infrastructure charges whose period of application has expired – Power to declare invalidity with effect ex tunc and to order the reimbursement of charges)
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: charges for use of infrastructure, civil code, equal treatment, intra-EU transport, judicial review, national law, rail transport, transport infrastructure








C_202402906EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2906


6.5.2024






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln – Germany) – Die Länderbahn GmbH DLB, Prignitzer Eisenbahn GmbH, Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany


(Case C-582/22,
                (1)
Die Länderbahn and Others)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Rail transport - Directive 2012/34/EU - Access to railway infrastructure - Charges - Article 56 - Single national regulatory body for the railway sector - Powers - Review of the infrastructure charges whose period of application has expired - Power to declare invalidity with effect ex tunc and to order the reimbursement of charges)
(C/2024/2906)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Die Länderbahn GmbH DLB, Prignitzer Eisenbahn GmbH, Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn GmbH

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Intervening party: DB Netz AG

Operative part of the judgment









1.


Article 56(1), (6) and (9) of Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area must be interpreted as precluding a Member State’s legislation which excludes any power of the regulatory body, before which a claim is made based on paragraph 1 of that article, from reviewing the lawfulness of the infrastructure charges whose period of application has expired and to declare their invalidity with effect ex tunc.












2.


Article 56(9) of Directive 2012/34 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not require the regulatory body to be able to order itself the reimbursement of infrastructure charges when national law, subject to compliance with the principles of equivalence and effectiveness, confers that power to civil courts.






(1)  
            OJ C 441, 21.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2906/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.111319Text with EEA relevance.
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Greece, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid








C_202401974EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1974


7.3.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.111319
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/1974)







Date of adoption of the decision


2.2.2024




Aid number


SA.111319




Member State


Greece




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Greece — TCTF: Subsidy scheme to non-household electricity consumers up to 35 kVA, operating as bakeries or on an agricultural tariff (reintroduction of scheme SA.103978, as amended by SA.106574)




Legal basis


draft Joint Ministerial Decision amending the Joint Decision ΥΠΕΝ/ΔΗΕ/152/4/2.1.2023 of the Ministers of Finance, Environment and Energy and Rural Development and Food on the ‘Granting of a subsidy from the Energy Transition Fund for the invoiced consumption of electricity for non-household electricity consumption with a capacity of up to 35 kVA, electricity consumers who have a main activity with activity code number (SMR) 10.71, and electricity consumers with agricultural use’




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


 




Intensity


 




Duration


1.2.2022 — 30.6.2024




Economic sectors


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid




Name and address of the granting authority







Renewable Energy Sources Operator & Guarantees of Origin (DAPEEP SA)




Kastoros 72, Piraeus 18545, Greece








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1974/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.109932
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Mazovia province, Poland, State aid, control of State aid, sea fishing








C_202401976EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1976


7.3.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.109932
(C/2024/1976)







Date of adoption of the decision


21.12.2023




Aid number


SA.109932




Member State


Poland




Region


Miasto Warszawa




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Pomoc indywidualna dla Arctic Navigations Sp. z o.o.




Legal basis


Art. 24b ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 6 grudnia 2006 r. o zasadach prowadzenia polityki rozwoju (Dz. U. z 2021r. poz. 1057, z późn. zm.); Draft grant agreement under the action programme for a financial contribution from the Brexit Adjustment Reserve in the part dedicated to companies dependent on fishing activities due to Brexit restrictions




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case
Arctic Navigations sp. z o.o., ul. Parkowa 13/17/125, 00-759 Warszawa, Polska, https://arcticnavigations.pl




Objective


Fisheries and aquaculture




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 4 810 465  PLN
Annual budget: 4 810 465  PLN




Intensity


100,0  %




Duration


Until 31.12.2023




Economic sectors


Marine fishing




Name and address of the granting authority







Łódzka Specjalna Strefa Ekonomiczna S.A.




ul. Ks. Bp. W. Tymienieckiego 22G, 90-349 Łódź








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1976/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-184/24, Sidi Bouzid: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 7 March 2024 – AF, in his own name and as person exercising parental responsibility over the child BF v Ministero dell’Interno – U.T.G. – Prefettura di Milano
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU migration policy, administrative sanction, aid to refugees, asylum seeker, basic needs, family relationship, foreign national, international protection, public institution








C_202403446EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3446


10.6.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 7 March 2024 – AF, in his own name and as person exercising parental responsibility over the child BF v Ministero dell’Interno – U.T.G. – Prefettura di Milano


(Case C-184/24, Sidi Bouzid)
                (1)

(C/2024/3446)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: AF, in his own name and as person exercising parental responsibility over the child BF

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno – U.T.G. – Prefettura di Milano

Question referred

Does Article 20 of Directive 2013/33/EU, (2) and the principles set out by the Court of Justice in its judgments of 12 November 2019 in Case C-233/2018 and 1 August 2022 in Case C-422/2021 – in so far as they preclude the administrative authority of the Member State from ordering, as a sanction, the withdrawal of reception measures where that decision would be detrimental to the basic vital needs of the foreign national applying for international protection and of his family – preclude national legislation which permits, following a reasoned individual assessment, relating also to the necessity and proportionality of the measure, withdrawal of reception, not for sanctioning reasons, but because the conditions for being granted it are no longer met, in particular, on account of the foreign national’s refusal, on grounds which do not relate to covering basic vital needs and protecting human dignity, to agree to the transfer to another accommodation centre, designated by the administrative authority on account of objective organisational needs and guaranteeing, under the responsibility of the administrative authority itself, that the material reception conditions equivalent to those enjoyed at the centre of origin will be maintained, where the refusal to transfer and subsequent decision ordering the withdrawal place the foreign national in the position of being unable to meet basic needs of personal and family life?


(1)  The name of the present case is fictitious. It does not correspond to the real name of any of the parties to the proceedings.

(2)  Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast) (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 96).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3446/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)