do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-479/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2024 - OC v European Commission (Appeal – Actions for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Alleged unlawful conduct of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Press release from OLAF – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Article 3, point 1 – Concepts of ‘personal data’ and of ‘identifiable natural person’ – Investigations conducted by OLAF – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Presumption of innocence – Right to good administration)
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Anti-fraud Office, confidentiality, data protection, dissemination of information, indemnification, personal data, press release, presumption of innocence








C_202402904EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2904


6.5.2024






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2024 - OC v European Commission


(Case C-479/22 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Actions for damages - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Alleged unlawful conduct of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) - Press release from OLAF - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies - Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 - Article 3, point 1 - Concepts of ‘personal data’ and of ‘identifiable natural person’ - Investigations conducted by OLAF - Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 - Presumption of innocence - Right to good administration)
(C/2024/2904)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Appellant: OC (represented by: I. Ktenidis, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. Adamopoulos, J. Baquero Cruz, F. Blanc Simonetti and A. Bouchagiar, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 4 May 2022, OC v Commission (T-384/20, EU:T:2022:273), in so far as, by that judgment, the General Court rejected the form of order of the action seeking an order that the European Commission pay compensation for the damage resulting from the infringement by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of its obligations under Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC, of the principle of the presumption of innocence and of the right to good administration;










2.


Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;










3.


Refers Case T-384/20 back to the General Court of the European Union;










4.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 340, 5.9.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2904/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Council Decision (EU) 2024/854 of 7 March 2024 extending the term of office of the Deputy Executive Director of the European Union Intellectual Property Office
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European Union Intellectual Property Office, administrator, managing director








L_202400854EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series L













2024/854


12.3.2024







            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2024/854
of 7 March 2024
         
extending the term of office of the Deputy Executive Director of the European Union Intellectual Property Office


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (1), and in particular Article 158(6) thereof,


Whereas:


On 21 November 2023, the Management Board of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) after consultation of the EUIPO Executive Director decided to propose to the Council the extension of the term of office of Mr Andrea DI CARLO as Deputy Executive Director of the EUIPO for an additional period of five years, as from 1 November 2024,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The term of office of Mr Andrea DI CARLO as Deputy Executive Director of the EUIPO is hereby extended for a five-year period starting on 1 November 2024 and ending on 31 October 2029.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 7 March 2024.


For the Council


The President

D. CLARINVAL
            





(1)  
            OJ L 154, 16.6.2017, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/854/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 6 March 2024
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202401631EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1631


7.3.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            6 March 2024
         
(C/2024/1631)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0874 




JPY


Japanese yen


162,67 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4544 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85498 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,2555 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9619 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,4680 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,359 




HUF


Hungarian forint


392,95 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3018 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9706 




TRY


Turkish lira


34,5173 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6667 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4770 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5088 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7812 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4578 




KRW


South Korean won


1 450,41 




ZAR


South African rand


20,5388 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8281 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 069,52 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1456 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,731 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,820 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,3750 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,3532 




INR


Indian rupee


90,0560 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1631/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11405 – ULTIMA / BTB)
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy industry, holding company, innovation, maritime shipping, mass media, merger control, real estate business, real estate market, steel








C_202402218EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2218


18.3.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11405 – ULTIMA / BTB)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/2218)

On 7 March 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11405. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2218/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-725/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 March 2024 – AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot, AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK ‘Azot’ v European Commission, Fertilizers Europe (Appeal – Dumping – Imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Initiation of an investigation – Sufficient evidence)
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Russia, anti-dumping duty, chemical fertiliser, chemical salt, import (EU), organic fertiliser, originating product








C_202402908EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2908


6.5.2024






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 March 2024 – AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot, AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK ‘Azot’ v European Commission, Fertilizers Europe


(Case C-725/22 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Dumping - Imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Initiation of an investigation - Sufficient evidence)
(C/2024/2908)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot, AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK ‘Azot’ (represented by: initially, T. Martin Brieu and A. de Moncuit, avocats, and P. Vander Schueren, advocate, and subsequently, E. Gergondet, N. Mizulin, A. de Moncuit and A. Nosowicz, avocats, and P. Vander Schueren, advocate)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková, G. Luengo and J. Zieliński, acting as Agents), Fertilizers Europe, (represented by: B. O’Connor and M. Hommé, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK ‘Azot’ to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Fertilizers Europe and by the European Commission.






(1)  
            OJ C 94, 13.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2908/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11395 – MYTILINEOS / VOLTERRA)
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electricity supply, energy industry, energy production, gas supply, merger control, metallurgical industry, retail trade, wholesale trade








C_202402199EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2199


14.3.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11395 – MYTILINEOS / VOLTERRA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/2199)

On 7 March 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11395. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2199/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-341/22,  Feudi di San Gregorio Aziende Agricole: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione - Italy) – Feudi di San Gregorio Aziende Agricole SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Right to deduct VAT – Concept of taxable person – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Principle of proportionality – Non-operating company – National legislation denying the right of deduction, refund or offsetting of input VAT)
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, commercial transaction, principle of legal certainty, tax rebate, tax relief, taxpayer, value of trade








C_202402903EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2903


6.5.2024






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione - Italy) – Feudi di San Gregorio Aziende Agricole SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate


(Case C-341/22,
                (1)
Feudi di San Gregorio Aziende Agricole)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Right to deduct VAT - Concept of taxable person - Principle of fiscal neutrality - Principle of proportionality - Non-operating company - National legislation denying the right of deduction, refund or offsetting of input VAT)
(C/2024/2903)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Feudi di San Gregorio Aziende Agricole SpA

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 9(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that it may not lead to a person being denied the status of taxable person for value added tax (VAT) where that person, during a given tax period, carries out transactions that are subject to VAT and the economic value of which does not reach the threshold prescribed by national legislation, which corresponds to the return that can reasonably be expected from the assets held by that person.










2.


Article 167 of Directive 2006/112 and the principles of VAT neutrality and of proportionality must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which the taxable person is denied the right to deduct input VAT on account of the transactions subject to output VAT carried out by that taxable person being considered insufficient.






(1)  
            OJ C 303, 8.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2903/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2020/1783 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2020 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (taking of evidence) (OJ L 405, 2.12.2020)
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: cross-border cooperation, evidence, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, judicial inquiry, new technology, video communications




L_202490158EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series L













2020/1783


7.3.2024






Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2020/1783 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2020 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (taking of evidence)

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 405 of 2 December 2020
)








1.


On page 34, Annex I, Form N, field 2




for:







‘2.


Reference No of the requested court (*1):





read:







‘2.


Reference No of the requested court/central body/competent authority (*2):











2.


On page 34, Annex I, Form N, field 4




for:







‘4.


Name of the requested court (*3):





read:







‘4.


Name of the requested court/central body/competent authority (*4):







(*1)  This item is optional.’,

(*2)  This item is optional.’.

(*3)  This item is optional.’,

(*4)  This item is optional.’.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/1783/corrigendum/2024-03-07/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) of 28 February 2024 establishing a list of geographical indications protected under Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council to be filed as applications for international registration pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/1904, 1 March 2024)
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, World Intellectual Property Organisation, alcoholic beverage, consumer information, designation of origin, international agreement, labelling, product designation








C_202490013EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C














7.3.2024






Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) of 28 February 2024 establishing a list of geographical indications protected under Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council to be filed as applications for international registration pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/1904, 1 March 2024
)


The following Annex is added to the Decision:



‘ANNEX

List of the geographical indications protected in the Union in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/787 (geographical indications) to be filed as applications for international registration pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1753

Italy






—


Grappa veneta / Grappa del Veneto (GI)






                  ’.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1220/corrigendum/2024-03-07/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-185/24, Tudmur: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Germany) lodged on 7 March 2024 – RL v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, EU migration policy, asylum seeker, cruel and degrading treatment, international protection, resettlement of persons, right of asylum








C_202403893EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3893


1.7.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Germany) lodged on 7 March 2024 – RL v Bundesrepublik Deutschland


(Case C-185/24, Tudmur)
                (1)

(C/2024/3893)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: RL

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Questions referred







1.


Is the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (2) to be interpreted as meaning that there are systemic flaws in the asylum procedure and the reception conditions for applicants in the Member State primarily designated as responsible, resulting in a risk of inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, where that Member State refuses in principle to (take back or) take charge of asylum seekers, for an indefinite period of time, on account of a State-ordered suspension of the acceptance of transfers?










2.


If Question 1 is to be answered in the negative, is the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 to be interpreted as meaning that the rules of EU law on the determination of the facts, which require the establishment of objective, reliable, specific and properly updated information on the asylum procedure and the reception conditions for applicants to be transferred, are restricted where the adjudicating court cannot obtain that information and would be able to determine only a hypothetical set of facts because the Member State in question refuses in principle to (take back or) take charge of asylum seekers, for an indefinite period of time, on account of a State-ordered suspension of the acceptance of transfers?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3893/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-187/24 P: Appeal brought on 7 March 2024 by Mr Peter Fass against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 11 January 2024 in Case T-1058/23, Peter Fass v Federal Republic of Germany and European Commission
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: action for failure to act, infringement procedure (EU), jurisdiction, preliminary ruling procedure








C_202406904EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6904


25.11.2024






Appeal brought on 7 March 2024 by Mr Peter Fass against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 11 January 2024 in Case T-1058/23, Peter Fass v Federal Republic of Germany and European Commission


(Case C-187/24 P)

(C/2024/6904)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Peter Fass (represented by: T. Gerspacher, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: Federal Republic of Germany, European Commission
By order of 4 October 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Ninth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellant to bear his own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6904/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-707/22,  Minister van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat and Avrotros: Order of the President of the Court of 7 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State – Netherlands) – Minister van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat v AVROTROS in the presence of: Bestuur van de Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland, Royal Schiphol Group NV v Schiphol Nederland BV
Date: 2024-03-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aviation security, civil aviation, confidentiality, disclosure of information, exchange of information, freedom of expression, transport accident








C_202403453EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3453


10.6.2024






Order of the President of the Court of 7 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State – Netherlands) – Minister van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat v AVROTROS in the presence of: Bestuur van de Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland, Royal Schiphol Group NV v Schiphol Nederland BV


(Case C-707/22,
                (1)
Minister van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat and Avrotros)

(C/2024/3453)
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 189, 30.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3453/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)