do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-1182/23 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 29 February 2024 – Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals v Commission
Date: 2024-02-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: drug surveillance, generic drug, market approval








C_202402628EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2628


22.4.2024






Order of the President of the General Court of 29 February 2024 – Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals v Commission


(Case T-1182/23 R)

(Interim relief - Medicinal products for human use - Marketing authorisation for ‘Dimethyl fumarate Neuraxpharm - dimethyl fumarate’ - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
(C/2024/2628)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: K. Roox, T. De Meese, J. Stuyck and C. Dumont, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Spina and E. Mathieu, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Decision C(2023) 8921 final of 13 December 2023 revoking Commission Implementing Decision C(2022) 3254 final of 13 May 2022 granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Union procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 1), as amended, for ‘Dimethyl fumarate Neuraxpharm – dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim relief is refused.










2.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2628/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-161/24, OSA: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně (Czech Republic) lodged on 29 February 2024 – OSA - Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže
Date: 2024-02-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: copyright, dominant position, hotel industry, monopoly, radio equipment, television








C_202403736EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3736


24.6.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně (Czech Republic) lodged on 29 February 2024 – OSA - Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže


(Case C-161/24, OSA)

(C/2024/3736)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Krajský soud v Brně

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: OSA - Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s.

Defendant: Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže

Questions referred







1.


Can Article 102(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that the conduct of a collective management company that has a de facto monopoly in a Member State and charges accommodation facility operators prices for the provision of a licence to make copyrighted works available by means of television and radio receivers located in rooms intended for the accommodation of private guests, which do not take into account the actual occupancy of the individual rooms of the accommodation facilities concerned, amount to an abuse of a dominant position, within the meaning of that article?










2.


If the first question is answered in the affirmative, must such a practice be assessed in terms of (a) the application of unfair trading conditions or (b) the application of excessive prices?




If the correct standard is the application of unfair trading conditions, what is the specific test to be applied in assessing it?
If the correct standard is the application of excessive prices, what is the specific test to be applied – the general ‘
            United Brands test’ or a particular modified version thereof?






3.


In establishing an infringement of Article 102(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in relation to the conduct referred to in the first question, is it necessary to prove actual or potential adverse effects on competition (including effects on consumer welfare and the exploitative effects of the dominant entity’s conduct)?










4.


In establishing an infringement of Article 102(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in relation to the conduct referred to in the first question, is it necessary to prove that the conduct has a substantial effect on trade between EU Member States, or is it sufficient to have a reasonable assumption that such an effect might occur and it is not necessary to examine its actual extent?






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3736/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Joint declaration by the European Parliament and the Council on the appropriate budgetary nomenclature for the Ukraine Facility
Date: 2024-02-29
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: EU aid, European integration, European neighbourhood policy, Ukraine, accession to the European Union, economic reconstruction, economic reform, investment, investment aid, macro-financial assistance








C_202401968EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1968


29.2.2024






Joint declaration by the European Parliament and the Council on the appropriate budgetary nomenclature for the Ukraine Facility
(C/2024/1968)

Without prejudice to the prerogatives of the budgetary authority in the framework of the annual budgetary procedure and to the Commission’s powers to establish the draft budget, the European Parliament and the Council invite the Commission to propose the creation of at least one budget line for Pillar I of the Ukraine Facility, two budget lines under Pillar II, including for the provisioning of the Common Provisioning Fund for the Ukraine Guarantee established under Chapter IV of the Ukraine Facility Regulation, three budget lines under Pillar III for the Union accession assistance and other measures, the borrowing costs subsidies and the provisioning of the Common Provisioning Fund – Legacy, and a specific budget line for technical and administrative assistance expenditure for the implementation of the Facility.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1968/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
EFTA Surveillance Authority communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
Date: 2024-02-29
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_202401893EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1893


29.2.2024






EFTA Surveillance Authority communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(C/2024/1893)







Member State


Iceland




Concerned routes


Flight routes:






1.


Reykjavík – Hornafjörður – Reykjavík








Period of validity of the contract


1 September 2024 – 31 August 2027 with a possibility of two years extension.




Deadline for submission of tenders


Two months from public information notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union





Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained







Vegagerðin




Suðurhrauni 3




210 Garðabæ




ICELAND




Contact: Ólafur Þór Leifsson, othl@vegagerdin.is
Tel. +354 8921516.
https://tendsign.is/






—


Áætlunarflug á Íslandi - Sérleyfi fyrir Vegagerðina: Reykjavík – Hornafjörður – Reykjavík










—


Concession in Air routes for Vegagerdin (The Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration (IRCA)): Reykjavík – Hornafjördur – Reykjavík










ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1893/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission relating to the exceptional nature of the Ukraine Facility
Date: 2024-02-29
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Commission, European Parliament
Subjects: EU aid, European integration, European neighbourhood policy, Ukraine, accession to the European Union, economic reconstruction, economic reform, investment, investment aid, macro-financial assistance








C_202401969EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1969


29.2.2024






Joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission relating to the exceptional nature of the Ukraine Facility
(C/2024/1969)

The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission share the view that the Ukraine Facility is an exceptional medium-term instrument of high geopolitical importance adapted to the uncertainty and unprecedented challenges of supporting a country at war with direct implications for the security of the Union. As a result, the Ukraine Facility provides a balance between flexibility and programmability of the Union's response to address Ukraine's financing gap, recovery, reconstruction and modernisation needs, while supporting Ukraine's reform effort as part of its accession path to the Union. The objectives, financing and governance arrangements agreed for the Ukraine Facility respond to the exceptional and specific context and challenges in relation to which this particular Facility has been adopted.
This solution for Ukraine should not therefore be considered as a precedent for future instruments of economic assistance to third countries.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1969/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-131/24: Action brought on 29 February 2024 – CR v Commission
Date: 2024-02-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, pension scheme, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)








C_202402640EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2640


22.4.2024






Action brought on 29 February 2024 – CR v Commission


(Case T-131/24)

(C/2024/2640)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: CR (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of 4 May 2023 containing the notice fixing the applicant's pension rights;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant puts forward one principal plea in law and a plea in the alternative.
Principally, the applicant alleges a failure to adhere to the scope of the provisions of the transitional regime contained in Articles 21, 22 and 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’).
In the light of the case-law on the scope of Articles 21, 22 and 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations and Article 1 of the Annex to the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union intended to preserve the acquired rights and legitimate expectations of ‘staff employed’ at the time of the reform, Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations can only be interpreted as being intended to govern the situation of a succession of periods of affiliation to the pension scheme, as a member of the temporary or contract staff and then as an official, where there was a break in those periods of affiliation. However, the applicant did not ‘resume active employment’ when she was appointed as an official, but simply continued the same activities while remaining affiliated to the same pension scheme, common to temporary and contract staff and to officials.
In the alternative, the applicant raises an objection of illegality in respect of Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2640/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-584/22,  Kiwi Tours: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – QM v Kiwi Tours GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Package travel and linked services – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 12(2) – Right of a traveller to terminate a package travel contract without paying a termination fee – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – Spread of COVID-19 – Consequences significantly affecting the performance of the package or the carriage of passengers to the destination – Foreseeability of the occurrence of those consequences at the date of the declaration of termination – Events occurring after the termination date but before the start of the package)
Date: 2024-02-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carriage of passengers, consumer protection, coronavirus disease, epidemic, package travel, provision of services, termination of a contract








C_202402574EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2574


22.4.2024






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – QM v Kiwi Tours GmbH


(Case C-584/22,
                (1)
Kiwi Tours)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Package travel and linked services - Directive (EU) 2015/2302 - Article 12(2) - Right of a traveller to terminate a package travel contract without paying a termination fee - Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances - Spread of COVID-19 - Consequences significantly affecting the performance of the package or the carriage of passengers to the destination - Foreseeability of the occurrence of those consequences at the date of the declaration of termination - Events occurring after the termination date but before the start of the package)
(C/2024/2574)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: QM

Defendant: Kiwi Tours GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/2302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC,
must be interpreted as meaning that, to determine whether ‘unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances’ which have consequences ‘significantly affecting the performance of the package, or which significantly affect the carriage of passengers to the destination’, within the meaning of that provision, account must be taken only of the situation prevailing on the date on which that traveller terminated his or her travel contract.


(1)  
            OJ C 441, 21.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2574/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) – amending budget No 1 (OJ C 308, 31.8.2023)
Date: 2024-02-29
Institutions: European Union Agency for Railways
Subjects: EU expenditure, amending budget, budgetary resources, financial year, general budget (EU), publication of accounts








C_202490005EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C














29.2.2024






Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) – amending budget No 1

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 308 of 31 August 2023
)


On page 5, Expenditure, Chapters 3 and 5:
for:


EXPENDITURE













Title
Chapter


Heading


2023 appropriations


Amending budget No 1/2023


New amount




Commitments


Payments


Commitments


Payments


Commitments


Payments




‘3




EXPENSES RELATING TO PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC MISSIONS



 


 


 


 


 


 




3 0


OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE – STRATEGIC STATEMENTS


 


 


 


 


 


 




 


Non-differentiated appropriations


1 863 180 


1 863 180 


 


 


1 863 180 


1 863 180 




3 1


OTHER OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE


 


 


 


 


 


 




 


Non-differentiated appropriations


785 964 


785 964 


 


 


785 964 


785 964 




 



Title 3 — Total




2 649 144 




2 649 144 



 


 



2 649 144 




2 649 144 






5




EXPENDITURE RELATING TO GRANT, CONTRIBUTION AND SERVICE-LEVEL AGREEMENTS



 


 


 


 


 


 




5 0


GRANT, CONTRIBUTION AND SERVICE-LEVEL AGREEMENTS


 


 


 


 


 


 




 


Differentiated appropriations


250 000 


250 000 


 


 


250 000 


250 000 




 



Title 5 — Total




250 000 




250 000 



 


 



250 000 




250 000 





 



GRAND TOTAL




38 140 188 




38 140 188 




1 189 051 




1 189 051 




39 329 239 




39 329 239 ’





read:


EXPENDITURE













Title
Chapter


Heading


2023 appropriations


Amending budget No 1/2023


New amount




Commitments


Payments


Commitments


Payments


Commitments


Payments




‘3




EXPENSES RELATING TO PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC MISSIONS



 


 


 


 


 


 




3 0


OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE – STRATEGIC STATEMENTS


 


 


 


 


 


 




 


Non-differentiated appropriations


1 863 179 


1 863 179 


 


 


1 863 179 


1 863 179 




3 1


OTHER OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE


 


 


 


 


 


 




 


Non-differentiated appropriations


785 964 


785 964 


 


 


785 964 


785 964 




 



Title 3 — Total




2 649 143 




2 649 143 



 


 



2 649 143 




2 649 143 






5




EXPENDITURE RELATING TO GRANT, CONTRIBUTION AND SERVICE-LEVEL AGREEMENTS



 


 


 


 


 


 




5 0


GRANT, CONTRIBUTION AND SERVICE-LEVEL AGREEMENTS


 


 


 


 


 


 




 


Differentiated appropriations


p.m.


p.m.


 


 


p.m.


p.m.




 



Title 5 — Total




0




0



 


 



0




0





 



GRAND TOTAL




37 890 187 




37 890 187 




1 189 051 




1 189 051 




39 079 238 




39 079 238 ’







ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-388/21,  B: Order of the President of the Court of 29 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt – Germany) – A v B
Date: 2024-02-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: approval, damages, market approval, motor vehicle, motor vehicle pollution, pollution control, purchase, technical standard, vehicle parts








C_202403164EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3164


21.5.2024






Order of the President of the Court of 29 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt – Germany) – A v B


(Case C-388/21,
                (1)
B)

(C/2024/3164)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 382, 20.9.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3164/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-11/23,  Eventmedia Soluciones: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil nº 1 de Palma de Mallorca – Spain) – Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1) and (3) – Article 7(1) – Compensation to air passengers in the event of cancellation of flights – Nature and basis of the right to compensation – Transfer to a company of the passengers’ claim against the air carrier – Contractual clause that prohibits such a transfer – Article 15 – Exclusion of waiver)
Date: 2024-02-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carriage of passengers, carrier, civil aviation, claim, consumer protection, damages, traveller, unfair terms of contract








C_202402579EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2579


22.4.2024






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Palma de Mallorca – Spain) – Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU


(Case C-11/23,
                (1)
Eventmedia Soluciones)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 5(1) and (3) - Article 7(1) - Compensation to air passengers in the event of cancellation of flights - Nature and basis of the right to compensation - Transfer to a company of the passengers’ claim against the air carrier - Contractual clause that prohibits such a transfer - Article 15 - Exclusion of waiver)
(C/2024/2579)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Palma de Mallorca

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Eventmedia Soluciones SL

Defendant: Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU

Operative part of the judgment









1.


Article 5(1)(c) and Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, read in conjunction with Article 7(1) thereof,
must be interpreted as meaning that, in the event of cancellation of a flight, the right of air passengers to obtain the compensation referred to in those provisions from the operating air carrier and the corresponding obligation of that air carrier to pay that compensation arise directly from that regulation.












2.


Article 15 of Regulation No 261/2004
must be interpreted as precluding the inclusion, in a contract of carriage, of a clause that prohibits the transfer of rights enjoyed by air passengers against the operating air carrier by virtue of the provisions of that regulation.






(1)  
            OJ C 155, 2.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2579/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11385 – PERMIRA / BLACKSTONE / ADEVINTA)
Date: 2024-02-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Internet, advertising, economic concentration, investment, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_202402082EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2082


7.3.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11385 – PERMIRA / BLACKSTONE / ADEVINTA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/2082)

On 29 February 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11385. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2082/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)