do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11458 – MEIF7 / INFRACAPITAL / LMI)
Date: 2024-02-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy grid, investment, investment company, merger control, renewable energy, subsidiary, urban infrastructure








C_202402209EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2209


15.3.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11458 – MEIF7 / INFRACAPITAL / LMI)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/2209)

On 26 February 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11458. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2209/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 23 February 2024
Date: 2024-02-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202401148EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1148


26.2.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            23 February 2024
         
(C/2024/1148)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0834 




JPY


Japanese yen


162,91 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4544 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85340 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,1545 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9522 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,3890 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,354 




HUF


Hungarian forint


388,47 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3118 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9744 




TRY


Turkish lira


33,6842 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6467 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4587 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4760 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7445 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4553 




KRW


South Korean won


1 440,95 




ZAR


South African rand


20,8672 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7972 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 907,87 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1759 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,562 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


39,013 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,3831 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,5089 




INR


Indian rupee


89,8170 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1148/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.108576Text with EEA relevance.
Date: 2024-02-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, State aid, carriage of passengers, control of State aid, land transport, urban transport








C_202401715EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1715


26.2.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.108576
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/1715)








Date of adoption of the decision


30.11.2023




Aid number


SA.108576




Member State


France




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


RATP — Aide visant à compenser les dommages liés à la pandémie de COVID-19




Legal basis


Décret no 2023-1117 du 30 novembre 2023 portant création d'une aide pour les services réguliers de transport public de personnes routiers et guidés urbains particulièrement affectés par la crise sanitaire de 2020




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


Régie autonome des Transports Parisiens (RATP)




Objective


Compensation of damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 51 413 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


From 1.12.2023




Economic sectors


Urban and suburban passenger land transport




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la relance




139 rue de Bercy 75572 Paris Cedex 12








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1715/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-153/24 P: Appeal brought on 26 February 2024 by Good Services Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2023 in Case T-382/22, Good Services v EUIPO – ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
Date: 2024-02-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, broadcasting, communications industry, gaming, registered trade mark, telecommunications, television, trade-mark law








C_202404950EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4950


19.8.2024






Appeal brought on 26 February 2024 by Good Services Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2023 in Case T-382/22, Good Services v EUIPO – ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)


(Case C-153/24 P)

(C/2024/4950)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Good Services Ltd (represented by: J.J. Marín López, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office and ITV Studios Global Distribution
By order of 31 May 2024, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly inadmissible and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4950/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-115/24: Action brought on 26 February 2024 – CN v Commission
Date: 2024-02-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, dependant, disabled person, family benefit, staff regulations (EU)








C_202402637EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2637


22.4.2024






Action brought on 26 February 2024 – CN v Commission


(Case T-115/24)

(C/2024/2637)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: CN (represented by: N. De Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the Appointing Authority’s decision of 8 May 2023 (Ares(2023)3230522) refusing to grant a double dependent child allowance to the appellant;










—


set aside, in so far as is necessary, the specific reply rejecting the claim notified by the Appointing Authority on 29 November 2023;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.








1.


First plea in law, alleging an error of law and an infringement of Article 67(3) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union in so far as the Appointing Authority applied Article 9-1 of the European disability rating scale rather than Article 11 of that scale.












2.


Second plea in law, alleging that there was no specific and thorough examination and that there was a manifest error of assessment in that the file demonstrates that there are significant burdens connected with the disability of the applicant’s daughter.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2637/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11402 – BNP PARIBAS CARDIF / BCC VITA) – Candidate case for simplified procedure
Date: 2024-02-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, economic concentration, insurance company, life assurance, merger control








C_202401749EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1749


26.2.2024






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11402 – BNP PARIBAS CARDIF / BCC VITA)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/1749)


1.   
On 16 February 2024, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


BNP Paribas Cardif S.A. (‘BNPP Cardif’, France), controlled by BNP Paribas S.A. (‘BNPP’),










—


BCC Vita S.p.A. (‘BCC Vita’, Italy), controlled by ICCREA Banca S.p.A. (‘ICCREA’).




BNPP Cardif will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of BCC Vita.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


BNPP Cardif designs, develops and markets savings and protection offers to insure people, their projects and their assets,










—


BCC Vita, incorporated in Italy, is active in the provision of life insurance products in Italy.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified treatment for certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11402 – BNP PARIBAS CARDIF / BCC VITA
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1749/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-147/24, Safi: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag (Netherlands) lodged on 26 February 2024 – V v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid
Date: 2024-02-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU national, child, dependant, family migration, foreign national, freedom of movement, illegal migration, residence permit, return migration








C_202403587EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3587


17.6.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag (Netherlands) lodged on 26 February 2024 – V v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid


(Case C-147/24, Safi)
                (1)

(C/2024/3587)
Language of the case: Netherlands

Referring court

Rechtbank Den Haag

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: V

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 20 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that it is not excluded that a third-country parent must be granted a derived right of residence in the Member State of which his or her minor child is a national and where his or her child resides without having made use of his or her citizenship rights, while that third-country parent has a right of residence in another Member State?
If it is not excluded that a third-country parent must be granted a derived right of residence in the Member State of which his or her minor child is a national and where his or her child resides without having made use of his or her citizenship rights, while that third-country parent has a right of residence in another Member State:










2.


Having regard to Article 5(a) and (b) of Directive 2008/115 and Article 6(2) of Directive 2008/115, (2) does it follow from Article 20 TFEU, where a relationship of dependency exists, such as that which provides grounds for the grant of a derived right of residence under Article 20 TFEU, that there is an obligation on the decision-making authority to ascertain whether the exercise of the right of free movement and residence is in the best interests of the child, and whether the exercise of family life can continue, before instructing the third-country parent to move immediately to the Member State where he or she holds a residence permit or other authorisation offering a right to stay, and should these factors be taken into account when assessing the application for a derived right of residence?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3587/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2023/2405 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 on ensuring a level playing field for sustainable air transport (ReFuelEU Aviation) (Official Journal of the European Union L, 2023/2405, 31 October 2023)
Date: 2024-02-26
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: air quality, air transport, aviation fuel, biofuel, greenhouse gas, reduction of gas emissions, supply, sustainable mobility








L_202490126EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series L













2023/2405


26.2.2024






Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2023/2405 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 on ensuring a level playing field for sustainable air transport (ReFuelEU Aviation)

(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2023/2405, 31 October 2023
)


On page 15, Article 4(2), point (a):
for:






‘(a)


the values regarding the energy content of all relevant fuels shall be those referred to in Article 27(2), points (f) and (g) of, and Annex III to, Directive (EU) 2018/2001 or relevant international aviation standards regarding fuels not included in that Annex; and’,




read:






‘(a)


the values regarding the energy content of all relevant fuels shall be those referred to in Article 27(2), points (g) and (h) of, and Annex III to, Directive (EU) 2018/2001 or relevant international aviation standards regarding fuels not included in that Annex; and’.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2405/corrigendum/2024-02-26/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11431 – PERMIRA / HG / GGW)
Date: 2024-02-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, broker, economic concentration, financial services, holding company, insurance, investment company, merger control








C_202401955EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1955


4.3.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11431 – PERMIRA / HG / GGW)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/1955)

On 26 February 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11431. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1955/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-505/23: Order of the General Court of 26 February 2024 – Thomas Henry v EUIPO – Shanghai Chengzhi Enterprise Service Center (MATE)
Date: 2024-02-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, aerated drink, beer, fruit juice, mineral water, registered trade mark, syrup, trade-mark law








C_202402626EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2626


22.4.2024






Order of the General Court of 26 February 2024 – Thomas Henry v EUIPO – Shanghai Chengzhi Enterprise Service Center (MATE)


(Case T-505/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative EU mark MATE - Absolute ground for invalidity - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2024/2626)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Thomas Henry GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, D. Mienert, J. Si-Ha Selbmann and K. Uzman, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Shanghai Chengzhi Enterprise Service Center (Shanghai, China)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 June 2023 (Case R 2364/2022-4).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C, C/2023/33, 9.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2626/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-152/24 P: Appeal brought on 26 February 2024 by Good Services Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2023 in Case T-381/22, Good Services v EUIPO – ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
Date: 2024-02-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, measuring equipment, recording equipment, registered trade mark, scientific apparatus, software, trade-mark law








C_202404949EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4949


19.8.2024






Appeal brought on 26 February 2024 by Good Services Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2023 in Case T-381/22, Good Services v EUIPO – ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)


(Case C-152/24 P)

(C/2024/4949)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Good Services Ltd (represented by: J.J. Marín López, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office and ITV Studios Global Distribution
By order of 31 May 2024, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly inadmissible and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4949/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-154/24 P: Appeal brought on 26 February 2024 by Good Services Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2023 in Case T-383/22, Good Services v EUIPO – ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
Date: 2024-02-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, broadcasting, communications industry, gaming, registered trade mark, telecommunications, television, trade-mark law








C_202404951EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4951


19.8.2024






Appeal brought on 26 February 2024 by Good Services Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2023 in Case T-383/22, Good Services v EUIPO – ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)


(Case C-154/24 P)

(C/2024/4951)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Good Services Ltd (represented by: J.J. Marín López, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office and ITV Studios Global Distribution
By order of 31 May 2024, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly inadmissible and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4951/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)