do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-766/22,  Allane: Order of the President of the Court of 19 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht München – Germany) – WD v Allane SE
Date: 2024-02-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, distance selling, financial services, termination of a contract, vehicle rental








C_202403168EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3168


21.5.2024






Order of the President of the Court of 19 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht München – Germany) – WD v Allane SE


(Case C-766/22,
                (1)
Allane)

(C/2024/3168)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 112, 27.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3168/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur dated 19 February 2024 in the case of Margrét Rósa Kristjánsdóttir v the Icelandic State (Case E-3/24)
Date: 2024-02-19
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, board of directors, civil liability, collective dismissal, labour law, right of action, wage earner, worker information, workers' representation








C_202403939EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3939


20.6.2024






Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur dated 19 February 2024 in the case of Margrét Rósa Kristjánsdóttir v the Icelandic State
(Case E-3/24)
(C/2024/3939)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court, dated 19 February 2024, from Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur (Reykjavik District Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 20 February 2024, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Margrét Rósa Kristjánsdóttir v the Icelandic State, on the following questions:

1.   

Can board members of a legal entity that operates in the public interest fall within the concept of ‘worker’ within the meaning of Council Directive 98/59/EC, for deciding the number of workers deemed to be employed by such a legal entity, for the purpose of calculating the minimum for collective redundancy (10 % or 30 workers), as stated in point (i)(a) of paragraph 1 of Article 1 of the Directive?



2.   

Does Article 6 of Directive 98/59/EC, regarding that EEA States shall ensure that representatives of workers and/or workers themselves can have at their disposal administrative and/or judicial procedures in order to ensure that the obligations laid down in this Directive are fulfilled, entail other or further requirements than those that EEA States prescribe in general for liability for damages resulting from infringements of the rules inherent in the Directive?




ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3939/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/697 of 19 February 2024 approving amendments to the specification for a Protected Designation of Origin or a Protected Geographical Indication (Rubicone (PGI))
Date: 2024-02-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Emilia-Romagna, Italy, designation of origin, fruit product, labelling, product designation, red wine, rosé wine, sparkling wine, white wine, wine of superior quality








L_202400697EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series L













2024/697


26.2.2024







            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2024/697
of 19 February 2024
         
approving amendments to the specification for a Protected Designation of Origin or a Protected Geographical Indication (‘Rubicone’ (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Commission has examined the application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the Protected Geographical Indication ‘Rubicone’, forwarded by Italy in accordance with Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(2)


The Commission has published the application for the approval of the amendments to the specification in the Official Journal of the European Union (2), as required by Article 97(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(3)


No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(4)


The amendments to the specification should therefore be approved in accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(5)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Rubicone’ (PGI) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 February 2024.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/1308/oj

(2)  
            OJ C, C/2023/433, 24.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/433/oj



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2024/697/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-395/23: Order of the General Court of 19 February 2024 – Eckes-Granini Group and International Beer Breweries v EUIPO – Capri Sun (PRISUN)
Date: 2024-02-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beer, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202402625EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2625


22.4.2024






Order of the General Court of 19 February 2024 – Eckes-Granini Group and International Beer Breweries v EUIPO – Capri Sun (PRISUN)


(Case T-395/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/2625)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Eckes-Granini Group GmbH (Nieder-Olm, Germany), International Beer Breweries Ltd (Ashkelon, Israel) (represented by: J. Wachsmuth, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Capri Sun AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Franke and S. Frese, lawyers)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 April 2023 (Case R 1057/2022-2).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Eckes-Granini Group GmbH and International Beer Breweries Ltd shall bear their own costs and pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).










3.


Capri Sun AG shall bear its own costs and pay half of the costs incurred by EUIPO.






(1)  
            OJ C 304, 28.8.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2625/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/632 of 19 February 2024 launching the European Union maritime security operation to safeguard freedom of navigation in relation to the Red Sea crisis (EUNAVFOR ASPIDES)
Date: 2024-02-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU military mission, Red Sea, deterrent, freedom of navigation, maritime economy, maritime safety, maritime shipping, piracy








L_202400632EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series L













2024/632


20.2.2024







            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2024/632
of 19 February 2024
         
launching the European Union maritime security operation to safeguard freedom of navigation in relation to the Red Sea crisis (EUNAVFOR ASPIDES)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/583 of 8 February 2024 on a European Union maritime security operation to safeguard freedom of navigation in relation to the Red Sea crisis (EUNAVFOR ASPIDES) (1),


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 8 February 2024, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2024/583 on a European Union maritime security operation to safeguard freedom of navigation in relation to the Red Sea crisis (EUNAVFOR ASPIDES).












(2)


On 14 February 2024, the Political and Security Committee agreed that the Operation Plan (OPLAN), including the Rules of Engagement, for EUNAVFOR ASPIDES should be approved.












(3)


Following the recommendation of the EU Operation Commander, EUNAVFOR ASPIDES should be launched on 19 February 2024,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The OPLAN, including the Rules of Engagement, for EUNAVFOR ASPIDES is hereby approved.


Article 2
EUNAVFOR ASPIDES shall be launched on 19 February 2024.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 19 February 2024.


For the Council


The President

J. BORRELL FONTELLES
            





(1)  
            OJ L, 2024/583, 12.2.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/583/oj



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/632/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11376 – ONEX / R&Q ACCREDITED) – Candidate case for simplified procedure
Date: 2024-02-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance, investment company, merger control








C_202401621EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1621


19.2.2024






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11376 – ONEX / R&Q ACCREDITED)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/1621)


1.   
On 9 February 2024, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Onex Corporation, (‘Onex’, Canada),










—


Randall & Quilter America Holdings Inc. (‘R&Q Accredited’, USA), controlled by R&Q Insurance Holdings Limited.




Onex will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of R&Q Accredited.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Onex is a private equity investment firm,










—


R&Q Accredited is a non-life global specialty insurance company operating as a program manager, providing A-rated insurance capacity across the U.S., the UK, and Europe.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified treatment for certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11376 – ONEX / R&Q ACCREDITED
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1621/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
Date: 2024-02-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France, Ile-de-France, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_202401644EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1644


19.2.2024






Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/1644)







Member State


France




Route concerned


Le-Puy-en-Velay – Paris (Orly)




Original date of entry into force of the public service obligation


2007




Date of entry into force of the changes


1 September 2024




Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


Order of 22 December 2023 amending the Order of 22 March 2022 imposing public service obligations on scheduled air services between Le Puy-en-Velay (Loudes) and Paris (Orly) NOR: TREA2335499A
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
For further information, please contact:





Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile




DTA/SDS1




50 rue Henry Farman




75720 Paris CEDEX 15




FRANCE




Tel. +33 158094321






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1644/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-109/24: Action brought on 19 February 2024 – CL v Commission
Date: 2024-02-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, damages, disabled person, occupational disease, staff regulations (EU)








C_202403073EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3073


13.5.2024






Action brought on 19 February 2024 – CL v Commission


(Case T-109/24)

(C/2024/3073)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: CL (represented by: N. Flandin, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the present application for annulment admissible and well founded;










—


annul the decision of the appointing authority of 11 January 2023 inasmuch as it declares that the total permanent invalidity of the applicant is not occupational in origin;










—


so far as necessary, annul the decision of the appointing authority of 10 February 2023 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant against the decision of 11 January 2023;










—


order the defendant to pay damages;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.








1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the second paragraph of Article 25 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, and a failure to comply with the obligation to state reasons.












2.


Second plea in law, alleging the illegality of the invalidity decision and of the contested decision due to irregularities affecting the conditions under which the opinion of the Invalidity Committee was given.












3.


Third plea in law, alleging the illegality of the invalidity decision and of the contested decision due to a manifest error of assessment relating to an incorrect understanding of the concept of occupational disease.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3073/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-94/24: Action brought on 19 February 2024 — Airbnb v EUIPO — Airtasker (AIRBNB)
Date: 2024-02-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, digital content, digital distribution, on line data service, property leasing, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, travel, travel agency








C_202402449EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2449


8.4.2024





Action brought on 19 February 2024 — Airbnb v EUIPO — Airtasker (AIRBNB)
(Case T-94/24)
(C/2024/2449)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Airbnb, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: M. Maier and A. Nordemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Airtasker Pty Ltd (Sydney, Australia)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark AIRBNB — European Union trade mark No 9 376 468

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 December 2023 in Joined Cases R 886/2022-2 and R 893/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in relation to the services, as circumscribed by the applicant, in respect of which the trade mark was revoked;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2449/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)