do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-109/24 P: Appeal brought on 8 February 2024 by Viviane Van Oosterwijck against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2023 in Case T-622/22, Van Oosterwijck v Commission
Date: 2024-02-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European official, equal treatment, marriage, married person, staff regulations (EU), survivor's benefit








C_202406071EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6071


21.10.2024






Appeal brought on 8 February 2024 by Viviane Van Oosterwijck against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2023 in Case T-622/22, Van Oosterwijck v Commission


(Case C-109/24 P)

(C/2024/6071)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Viviane Van Oosterwijck (represented by: F. Moyse, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union
By order of 3 September 2024, the Court (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellant to bear her own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6071/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-519/22,  MAX7 Design: Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 8 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – MAX7 Design Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
Date: 2024-02-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, principle of proportionality, right of establishment, tax collection, tax law, taxpayer








C_202403166EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3166


21.5.2024






Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 8 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – MAX7 Design Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága


(Case C-519/22,
                (1)
MAX7 Design)

(C/2024/3166)
Language of the case: Hungarian
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 432, 14.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3166/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-724/21: Order of the General Court of 8 February 2024 — IL and Others v Parliament
Date: 2024-02-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, coronavirus disease, disease prevention, epidemic, equal treatment, health certificate, personal data, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, public building








C_202402335EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2335


2.4.2024





Order of the General Court of 8 February 2024 — IL and Others v Parliament
(Case T-724/21) (1)

(C/2024/2335)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 148. 4.4.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2335/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11412 – CVC / DIF) – Candidate case for simplified procedure
Date: 2024-02-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, investment, investment company, merger control








C_202401436EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1436


8.2.2024






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11412 – CVC / DIF)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/1436)


1.   
On 31 January 2024, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


CVC Capital Partners SICAV-FIS S.A. (‘CVC’, Luxembourg),










—


DIF Management Holding B.V. and its subsidiaries (‘DIF’, Netherlands).




CVC will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of DIF.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


CVC is part of the CVC Network, a private equity and investment advisory firm, which provides investment advice to, and/or manages investments on behalf of, certain funds and investment vehicles with assets under management globally,










—


DIF is an independent infrastructure equity fund manager with assets under management, primarily across Europe, the Americas and Australasia.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified treatment for certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11412 - CVC / DIF
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1436/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-66/24: Action brought on 8 February 2024 — Lidl v EUIPO — Liquidleds Lighting (LED light bulbs)
Date: 2024-02-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, lighting equipment








C_202402321EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2321


2.4.2024





Action brought on 8 February 2024 — Lidl v EUIPO — Liquidleds Lighting (LED light bulbs)
(Case T-66/24)
(C/2024/2321)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Lidl Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG (Anzig, Germany) (represented by: T. Dolde, C. Zimmer and M. Hawkins, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Liquidleds Lighting Corp. (Taipei, Taiwan)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design LED light bulbs — Community design No 3 619 881-0003

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 November 2023 in Case R 2336/2022-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and/or the other party before the Board of Appeal (assuming it intervenes in the proceedings) to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2321/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-566/22,  Inkreal: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud – Czech Republic) – Inkreal s.r.o. v Dúha reality s.r.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 25 – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Parties to a contract established in the same Member State – Jurisdiction of the courts of another Member State to settle disputes arising from that contract – International element)
Date: 2024-02-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, contract, establishment, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction








C_202402276EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2276


2.4.2024





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud — Czech Republic) — Inkreal s.r.o. v Dúha reality s.r.o.
(Case C-566/22, (1) Inkreal)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Scope - Article 25 - Agreement conferring jurisdiction - Parties to a contract established in the same Member State - Jurisdiction of the courts of another Member State to settle disputes arising from that contract - International element)
(C/2024/2276)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Inkreal s.r.o.

Defendant: Dúha reality s.r.o.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 25(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
must be interpreted as meaning that an agreement conferring jurisdiction by which the parties to a contract who are established in the same Member State agree on the jurisdiction of the courts of another Member State to settle disputes arising out of that contract is covered under that provision, even if that contract has no other connection with that other Member State.


(1)  
            OJ C 432, 14.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2276/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-105/24, Questore della Provincia di Ragusa and Ministero dell’Interno -II: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 8 February 2024 – Questore della Provincia di Ragusa, Ministero dell’Interno v M.A.
Date: 2024-02-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: asylum seeker, detention before trial, guarantee, international protection, principle of proportionality, right of asylum








C_202402930EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2930


6.5.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 8 February 2024 – Questore della Provincia di Ragusa, Ministero dell’Interno v M.A.


(Case C-105/24, Questore della Provincia di Ragusa and Ministero dell’Interno -II)

(C/2024/2930)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: Questore della Provincia di Ragusa, Ministero dell’Interno

Respondent: M.A.

Question referred

Do Articles 8 and 9 of Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection, (1) having regard also to the objectives set out in recitals 15 and 20 thereof, preclude national legislation which provides, as an alternative measure to the detention of the applicant (who has not handed over his or her passport or other equivalent document), for the provision of a financial guarantee, the amount of which is established as a fixed rate (a single amount set at EUR 4 938,00 for 2023, to be paid individually, by means of a bank guarantee or surety insurance policy) rather than as a variable amount, without allowing for any adjustment of the amount on the basis of the individual situation of the applicant or for the possibility of providing that guarantee through the intervention of third parties, even in the context of family solidarity, thus imposing rules capable of obstructing the use of the alternative measure by those who do not have adequate resources, and precluding the adoption of a reasoned decision which examines and assesses on a case-by-case basis the reasonableness and proportionality of such a measure in relation to the situation of the applicant?


(1)  
            OJ 2013 L 180, p. 96.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2930/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11403 – MASSMUTUAL / MUBADALA / KIINTEISTO)
Date: 2024-02-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: disability insurance, economic concentration, insurance company, investment, life assurance, logistics, merger control, pension scheme, service, storage








C_202401632EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1632


19.2.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11403 – MASSMUTUAL / MUBADALA / KIINTEISTO)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/1632)

On 8 February 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11403. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1632/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)