do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-228/23: Order of the General Court of 7 February 2024 – Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma v Commission
Date: 2024-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: admissibility, drug surveillance, generic drug, judgment of the Court (EU), market approval








C_202402623EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2623


22.4.2024






Order of the General Court of 7 February 2024 – Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma v Commission


(Case T-228/23)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Dimethyl fumarate Polpharma - dimethyl fumarate - Letter of the Commission drawing conclusions from a judgment of the Court of Justice - Measure not actionable - Inadmissibility - Hypothetical acts - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/2623)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A. (Starogard Gdański, Poland) (represented by: K. Roox, T. De Meese, J. Stuyck, M. Van Nieuwenborgh and C. Dumont, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Valero and E. Mathieu, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision contained in the letter of the European Commission of 17 March 2023, with reference SANTE.DDG1.B.5/AL/mmc (2023) 2915860, concerning the interpretation and the consequences of the judgment of 16 March 2023, Commission and Others v Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma (C-438/21 P to C-440/21 P, EU:C:2023:213).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible in so far as it is directed against the decision contained in the letter of the European Commission of 17 March 2023, with reference SANTE.DDG1.B.5/AL/mmc (2023) 2915860, concerning the interpretation and consequences of the judgment of 16 March 2023, Commission and Others v Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma (C-438/21 P to C-440/21 P, EU:C:2023:213).










2.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible in so far as it is directed against any decisions taken after the decision contained in the letter of the European Commission of 17 March 2023, with reference SANTE.DDG1.B.5/AL/mmc (2023) 2915860, concerning the interpretation and the consequences of the judgment of 16 March 2023, Commission and Others v Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma (C-438/21 P to C-440/21 P, EU:C:2023:213), to the extent that they perpetuate and/or replace that decision, including any follow-up regulatory actions, in so far as they relate to the applicant.










3.


Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, including the costs relating to the interim proceedings.






(1)  
            OJ C 235, 3.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2623/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.109250
Date: 2024-02-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, State aid, animal production, control of State aid, crop production, farming sector, permanent crop








C_202401305EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1305


7.2.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.109250
(C/2024/1305)







Date of adoption of the decision


18.12.2023




Aid number


SA.109250




Member State


France




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Aides aux investissements portant sur des infrastructures hydrauliques agricoles




Legal basis


Articles L. 621-1 et suivants, L.696-1 et D.696-1 à D.696-3 du code rural et de la pêche maritimeArticles L. 1511-1 et suivants et L.3232-1-2 du code général des collectivités territorialesTitre 1 du livre 2 et titres 2 et 8 du livre 1 du code de l'environnementInstruction du Gouvernement du 7 mai 2019 relative au projet de territoire pour la gestion de l’eau Instruction du 17 janvier 2023 portant additif à l’instruction du Gouvernement du 07 mai 2019 relative au projet de territoire pour la gestion de l’eau




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas




Form of aid


Direct grant, Repayable advances, Guarantee




Budget


Overall budget: 420 000 000  EUR




Intensity


100,0  %




Duration


Until 31.12.2029




Economic sectors


Growing of non-perennial crops, Growing of perennial crops, Plant propagation, Animal production, Mixed farming




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministère de l'agriculture et de la souveraineté alimentaire




3 rue Barbet de Jouy 75349 Paris 07 SP








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1305/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-792/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Quatrotec Electrónica v EUIPO — Woxter Technology (WOXTER) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark WOXTER — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Proof of genuine use — Assessment of the evidence)
Date: 2024-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audiovisual equipment, electrical equipment, measuring equipment, registered trade mark, scientific apparatus, trade-mark law








C_202402301EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2301


2.4.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Quatrotec Electrónica v EUIPO — Woxter Technology (WOXTER)
(Case T-792/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark WOXTER - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Admissibility of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Proof of genuine use - Assessment of the evidence)
(C/2024/2301)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Quatrotec Electrónica, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, J.L. Rodríguez-Fuensalida y Carnicero, P. Ramells Higueras, A. Figuerola Moure and P. Muñoz Moreno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Woxter Technology Co. Ltd (Causeway Bay, Hong Kong, China)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 September 2022 (Case R 323/2022-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Quatrotec Electrónica, SL to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 45, 6.2.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2301/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.105381Text with EEA relevance.
Date: 2024-02-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy production, renewable energy








C_202401313EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1313


7.2.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.105381
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/1313)







Date of adoption of the decision


7.12.2023




Aid number


SA.105381




Member State


France




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


France — TCTF — Régime de soutien à deux parcs éoliens flottants en mer dans le golfe du Lion




Legal basis


Code de l'énergie




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Renewable energy, Environmental protection




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 4 120 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


 




Economic sectors


Production of electricity




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministère de la transition écologique, Direction générale de l’énergie et du climat, Bureau des énergies renouvelables hydrauliques et marines




DGEC, Tour Séquoia, 1 place Carpeaux, La Défense








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1313/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-227/23: Order of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Mylan Ireland v Commission (Action for annulment — Medicinal products for human use — Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Dimethyl fumarate Mylan — dimethyl fumarate — Letter of the Commission drawing conclusions from a judgment of the Court of Justice — Measure not actionable — Inadmissibility — Hypothetical acts — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: admissibility, drug surveillance, generic drug, market approval








C_202402315EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2315


2.4.2024





Order of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Mylan Ireland v Commission
(Case T-227/23) (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Dimethyl fumarate Mylan — dimethyl fumarate - Letter of the Commission drawing conclusions from a judgment of the Court of Justice - Measure not actionable - Inadmissibility - Hypothetical acts - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/2315)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mylan Ireland Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: K. Roox, T. De Meese, J. Stuyck, M. Van Nieuwenborgh and C. Dumont, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Valero and E. Mathieu, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision contained in the letter of the European Commission of 17 March 2023, with reference SANTE.DDG1.B.5/AL/mmc (2023) 2914698, concerning the interpretation and the consequences of the judgment of 16 March 2023, Commission and Others v Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma (C-438/21 P to C-440/21 P, EU:C:2023:213).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible in so far as it is directed against the decision contained in the letter of the European Commission of 17 March 2023, with reference SANTE.DDG1.B.5/AL/mmc (2023) 2914698, concerning the interpretation and consequences of the judgment of 16 March 2023, Commission and Others v Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma (C-438/21 P to C-440/21 P, EU:C:2023:213).










2.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible in so far as it is directed against any decisions taken after the decision contained in the letter of the European Commission of 17 March 2023, with reference SANTE.DDG1.B.5/AL/mmc (2023) 2914698, concerning the interpretation and the consequences of the judgment of 16 March 2023, Commission and Others v Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma (C-438/21 P to C-440/21 P, EU:C:2023:213), to the extent that they perpetuate and/or replace that decision, including any follow-up regulatory actions, in so far as they relate to the applicant.










3.


Mylan Ireland Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, including the costs relating to the interim proceedings.






(1)  
            OJ C 223, 26.6.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2315/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11389 – ASPO / OP / ESL)
Date: 2024-02-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Baltic Sea region, Finland, bulk product, economic concentration, investment, investment company, load, maritime transport, merger control








C_202403263EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3263


21.5.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11389 – ASPO / OP / ESL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/3263)

On 7 February 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11389. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3263/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-99/24, Chmieka: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Koszalinie (Poland) lodged on 7 February 2024 – G.M.K.-Z.B.M. v S.O.
Date: 2024-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: appeal, civil proceedings, claim, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, residence








C_202403310EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3310


3.6.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Koszalinie (Poland) lodged on 7 February 2024 – G.M.K.-Z.B.M. v S.O.


(Case C-99/24, Chmieka)
                (1)

(C/2024/3310)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Koszalinie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: G.M.K.-Z.B.M.

Defendant: S.O.

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 66 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (2) be interpreted as meaning that the ‘institution of legal proceedings’ means the lodging of an application by an applicant in a procedural matter or the lodging, by the defendant, of a request for review of the case after the definitive conclusion thereof?










2.


Must the provisions of Chapter II of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (3) or the provisions of Chapter II of [Regulation No 1215/2012] be interpreted as meaning that a person domiciled in one Member State may be sued in the courts of another Member State for payment of remuneration for the non-contractual use of immovable property situated in that other Member State?






(1)  The present case has been given a fictitious name which does not correspond to the real name of any of the parties to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.

(3)  
            OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3310/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-80/23: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Beauty Biosciences v EUIPO — Société de Recherche Cosmétique (BEAUTYBIO) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark BEAUTYBIO — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))
Date: 2024-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202402304EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2304


2.4.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Beauty Biosciences v EUIPO — Société de Recherche Cosmétique (BEAUTYBIO)
(Case T-80/23) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark BEAUTYBIO - Absolute grounds for invalidity - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))
(C/2024/2304)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Beauty Biosciences LLC (Dallas, Texas, United States) (represented by: D. Mărginean, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Société de Recherche Cosmétique SARL (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Wilhelm, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 December 2022 (Case R 1038/2022-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Beauty Biosciences LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Société de Recherche Cosmétique SARL during the proceedings before the Court;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 127, 11.4.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2304/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-302/23: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Weinart Handelsgesellschaft v EUIPO — Donnafugata (KABI) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark KABI — Earlier EU figurative mark Kabir DONNAFUGATA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202402308EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2308


2.4.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Weinart Handelsgesellschaft v EUIPO — Donnafugata (KABI)
(Case T-302/23) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark KABI - Earlier EU figurative mark Kabir DONNAFUGATA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/2308)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Weinart Handelsgesellschaft mbH, (Geisenheim, Germany) (represented by: M. Heinrich, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Donnafugata Srl (Marsala (Italy))

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 March 2023 (Case R 2064/2022-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 252, 17.7.2023



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2308/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-563/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — VP v Cedefop (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contract — Non-renewal of a contract for an indefinite period — Article 266 TFEU — Decision adopted in compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Measures necessary to comply with a judgment delivered in an action for annulment)
Date: 2024-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, full-time employment, indemnification, servant (EU), temporary employment, termination of employment








C_202402298EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2298


2.4.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — VP v Cedefop
(Case T-563/22) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Fixed-term contract - Non-renewal of a contract for an indefinite period - Article 266 TFEU - Decision adopted in compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Measures necessary to comply with a judgment delivered in an action for annulment)
(C/2024/2298)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: VP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (represented by: A. Guillerme, T. Bontinck and L. Burguin, lawyers)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, the annulment of the decision of the Executive Director of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) of 17 December 2021 and the decision of Cedefop’s Appeals Committee of 17 June 2022 and, second, compensation of EUR 100 000 for the non-material damage she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders VP to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop).






(1)  
            OJ C 424, 7.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2298/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)