do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-755/22, Nárokuj: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud Praha-západ — Czech Republic) — Nárokuj s.r.o. v EC Financial Services, a.s. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2008/48/EC — Credit agreements for consumers — Article 8 — Obligation of a creditor to check a consumer’s creditworthiness — Regularisation of a breach due to full performance of the credit agreement — Article 23 — Effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties — Credit agreement void and creditor’s entitlement to payment of the agreed interest forfeited — No harmful consequences for the consumer — Holding creditors accountable and preventing irresponsible practices when granting credit to consumers)
Date: 2024-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer credit, consumer protection, interest, termination of a contract








C_202401513EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1513


26.2.2024





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud Praha-západ — Czech Republic) — Nárokuj s.r.o. v EC Financial Services, a.s.
(Case C-755/22, (1) Nárokuj)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 2008/48/EC - Credit agreements for consumers - Article 8 - Obligation of a creditor to check a consumer’s creditworthiness - Regularisation of a breach due to full performance of the credit agreement - Article 23 - Effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties - Credit agreement void and creditor’s entitlement to payment of the agreed interest forfeited - No harmful consequences for the consumer - Holding creditors accountable and preventing irresponsible practices when granting credit to consumers)
(C/2024/1513)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Okresní soud Praha-západ

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Nárokuj s.r.o.

Defendant: EC Financial Services, a.s.

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 8 and 23 of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC
must be interpreted as not precluding, where the creditor has failed to fulfil its obligation to examine the consumer’s creditworthiness, that creditor from being penalised, in accordance with national law, by the consumer credit agreement being void and its entitlement to payment of the agreed interest being forfeited, even though that agreement has been fully performed by the parties and the consumer has not suffered any harmful consequences as a result of that failure to fulfil the obligation.


(1)  
            OJ C 94, 13.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1513/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11271 – FS INVESTMENTS / KKR / WITTUR)
Date: 2024-01-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance, investment company, lift, merger control








C_202400994EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/994


17.1.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11271 – FS INVESTMENTS / KKR / WITTUR)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/994)

On 11 January 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11271. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/994/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-361/22, Inditex: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) v Buongiorno Myalert SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 6(1)(c) — Limitation of the effects of the trade mark — Use of a trade mark to indicate the intended purpose of a product or service — Directive (EU) 2015/2436 — Article 14(1)(c))
Date: 2024-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: goods and services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202401504EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1504


26.2.2024





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) v Buongiorno Myalert SA
(Case C-361/22, (1) Inditex)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Trade marks - Directive 2008/95/EC - Article 6(1)(c) - Limitation of the effects of the trade mark - Use of a trade mark to indicate the intended purpose of a product or service - Directive (EU) 2015/2436 - Article 14(1)(c))
(C/2024/1504)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex)

Defendant: Buongiorno Myalert SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(1)(c) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks
must be interpreted as meaning that it covers use of the trade mark in the course of trade by a third party for the purpose of identifying or referring to, in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters, goods or services as those of the proprietor of that trade mark only when such use of the trade mark is necessary to indicate the intended purpose of a product marketed by that third party or of a service offered by that party.


(1)  
            OJ C 368, 26.9.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1504/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-523/22,  Apelativen sad Veliko Tarnovo: Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2024 – (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad Veliko Tarnovo – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against UT
Date: 2024-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: bank deposit, banking supervision, credit, credit institution, financial supervision, trade licence








C_202402419EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2419


8.4.2024





Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2024 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad Veliko Tarnovo — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against UT
(Case C-523/22, (1) Apelativen sad Veliko Tarnovo)
(C/2024/2419)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 424, 7.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2419/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-122/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024 — Dyson Ltd, Dyson Technology Ltd, Dyson Operations Pte Ltd, Dyson Manufacturing Sdn Bhd, Dyson Spain SLU, Dyson Austria GmbH, Dyson sp. z o.o., Dyson Ireland Ltd, Dyson GmbH, Dyson SAS, Dyson Srl, Dyson Sweden AB, Dyson Denmark ApS, Dyson Finland Oy, Dyson BV v European Commission (Appeal — Energy — Directive 2010/30/EU — Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products — Delegated regulation of the European Commission supplementing that directive — Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners — Annulment — Actions for damages — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Requirement of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Manifest and grave disregard for the limits of discretion — Relevant factors in the case of the absence of any discretion)
Date: 2024-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU energy label, consumer information, damages, energy consumption, equal treatment, household electrical appliance, labelling, right to justice, testing








C_202401500EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1500


26.2.2024





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024 — Dyson Ltd, Dyson Technology Ltd, Dyson Operations Pte Ltd, Dyson Manufacturing Sdn Bhd, Dyson Spain SLU, Dyson Austria GmbH, Dyson sp. z o.o., Dyson Ireland Ltd, Dyson GmbH, Dyson SAS, Dyson Srl, Dyson Sweden AB, Dyson Denmark ApS, Dyson Finland Oy, Dyson BV v European Commission
(Case C-122/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Energy - Directive 2010/30/EU - Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products - Delegated regulation of the European Commission supplementing that directive - Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners - Annulment - Actions for damages - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Requirement of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Manifest and grave disregard for the limits of discretion - Relevant factors in the case of the absence of any discretion)
(C/2024/1500)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Dyson Ltd, Dyson Technology Ltd, Dyson Operations Pte Ltd, Dyson Manufacturing Sdn Bhd, Dyson Spain SLU, Dyson Austria GmbH, Dyson sp. z o.o., Dyson Ireland Ltd, Dyson GmbH, Dyson SAS, Dyson Srl, Dyson Sweden AB, Dyson Denmark ApS, Dyson Finland Oy, Dyson BV (represented by: E. Batchelor, M. Healy and T. Selwyn Sharpe, avocats and Solicitors)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by J.-F. Brakeland, B. De Meester and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Dyson Ltd and the 14 other appellants to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  
            OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1500/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-473/22, Mylan: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the markkinaoikeus (Finland)) — Mylan AB v Gilead Sciences Finland Oy, Gilead Biopharmaceutics Ireland UC, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual and industrial property — Medicinal product for human use — Supplementary protection certificate (SPC) — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 9(7) — Placing on the market of products infringing SPC rights — Provisional measures ordered on the basis of an SPC — Subsequent invalidity of the SPC and revocation of the measures — Consequences — Right to appropriate compensation for losses caused by the provisional measures — Liability of the applicant for those measures for losses caused by them — National legislation providing for strict liability)
Date: 2024-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Finland, indemnification, intellectual property, judicial proceedings, medicinal product








C_202401509EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1509


26.2.2024





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the markkinaoikeus (Finland)) — Mylan AB v Gilead Sciences Finland Oy, Gilead Biopharmaceutics Ireland UC, Gilead Sciences Inc.
(Case C-473/22, (1) Mylan)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual and industrial property - Medicinal product for human use - Supplementary protection certificate (SPC) - Directive 2004/48/EC - Article 9(7) - Placing on the market of products infringing SPC rights - Provisional measures ordered on the basis of an SPC - Subsequent invalidity of the SPC and revocation of the measures - Consequences - Right to appropriate compensation for losses caused by the provisional measures - Liability of the applicant for those measures for losses caused by them - National legislation providing for strict liability)
(C/2024/1509)
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Markkinaoikeus

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Mylan AB

Defendants: Gilead Sciences Finland Oy, Gilead Biopharmaceutics Ireland UC, Gilead Sciences Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9(7) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights
must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which provides for a mechanism for compensation for any injury caused by a provisional measure, within the meaning of that provision, based on a system of strict liability of the applicant for those measures, in the context of which the court is entitled to adjust the amount of damages by taking into account the circumstances of the case, including whether the defendant played a part in the occurrence of the injury.


(1)  
            OJ C 389, 10.10.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1509/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/326 of 11 January 2024 approving a Union amendment to the product specification for the protected geographical indication (Ser koryciński swojski)
Date: 2024-01-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Podlachia province, Poland, cows’ milk cheese, designation of origin, fresh cheese, labelling, product designation








L_202400326EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series L













2024/326


16.1.2024







            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2024/326
of 11 January 2024
         
approving a Union amendment to the product specification for the protected geographical indication (‘Ser koryciński swojski’)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, in conjunction with Article 53(2) thereof, the Commission has examined Poland’s application for the approval of a Union amendment to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Ser koryciński swojski’, registered under Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 728/2012 (2).












(2)


The Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.












(3)


As no reasoned statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendment to the product specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The Union amendment to the product specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union in respect of the protected geographical indication ‘Ser koryciński swojski’ is hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 11 January 2024.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/1151/oj

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 728/2012 of 7 August 2012 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Ser koryciński swojski (PGI)) (OJ L 213, 10.8.2012, p. 7, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2012/728/oj).

(3)  
            OJ C 337, 25.9.2023, p. 17.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2024/326/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-417/23: Order of the General Court of 11 January 2024 — TO v EEA (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Remuneration — Installation allowance — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Decision which was not contested in time — Conditional undertaking given in the context of an amicable settlement — Request for payment of installation allowance based on Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Inadmissibility — Application for injunction — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
Date: 2024-01-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, allowances and expenses, damages, expatriate worker, indemnification, interest, staff regulations (EU), work contract








C_202402041EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2041


18.3.2024





Order of the General Court of 11 January 2024 — TO v EEA
(Case T-417/23) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Remuneration - Installation allowance - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Decision which was not contested in time - Conditional undertaking given in the context of an amicable settlement - Request for payment of installation allowance based on Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Inadmissibility - Application for injunction - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
(C/2024/2041)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: TO (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Environment Agency (represented by: O. Cornu, acting as Agent, supported by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By her application based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant requests in essence, in the first place, that the European Environment Agency (EEA) is ordered to pay, first, an amount of EUR 2 950, corresponding to the advance on the installation allowance deducted from the sums paid to her in compliance with the judgment of 11 June 2019, TO v EEA (T-462/17, not published, EU:T:2019:397), together with an annual interest rate of 5 % from 1 August 2019 and, secondly, an amount of EUR 22 000 as compensation for the material and non-material harm that she has suffered. In the second place, the applicant requests to be provided with an explanation to understand the additional deduction of EUR 500 that appeared on her pay slip for the month of August 2019 and, where appropriate, that she is reimbursed this amount if that recovery is unfounded.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed in part due to the manifest lack of jurisdiction of the General Court to hear and determine it, in part for being inadmissible, and in part for manifestly lacking any foundation in law.










2.


TO is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C/2023/50, 9.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2041/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-220/23, Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie — Poland) — R. sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Support for renewable energy — Obligation to supply electricity from renewable energy sources — Aid compatible with the internal market — Prior notification of the aid — Article 108(3) TFEU — Possibility of imposing a pecuniary penalty for a breach of the supply obligation that occurred before that notification)
Date: 2024-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, administrative sanction, control of State aid, renewable energy








C_202401665EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1665


4.3.2024





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie — Poland) — R. sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki
(Case C-220/23, (1) Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State aid - Support for renewable energy - Obligation to supply electricity from renewable energy sources - Aid compatible with the internal market - Prior notification of the aid - Article 108(3) TFEU - Possibility of imposing a pecuniary penalty for a breach of the supply obligation that occurred before that notification)
(C/2024/1665)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: R. sp. z o.o.

Respondent: Prezes Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki

Operative part of the order

The last sentence of Article 108(3) TFEU, together with Article 4(3) TEU, must be interpreted as precluding a pecuniary penalty being imposed on an undertaking for breaching an obligation forming part of a State aid measure implemented before the European Commission adopted the final decision in which it found that aid to be compatible with the internal market, where the breach in question occurred before that decision was adopted.


(1)  Date lodged: 5.4.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1665/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-594/21,  Sixt Leasing: Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main – Germany) – VB v Sixt Leasing SE
Date: 2024-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, distance selling, financial services, hire purchase, provision of services, termination of a contract, vehicle rental








C_202402417EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2417


8.4.2024





Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — VB v Sixt Leasing SE
(Case C-594/21, (1) Sixt Leasing)
(C/2024/2417)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 490, 6.12.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2417/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)