do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-322/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 January 2024 — VN v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Family allowances — Payment to the parent with custody of the child — Error of law — Legitimate expectations)
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, custody, dependant, family benefit, remuneration of work








C_202402027EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2027


18.3.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 10 January 2024 — VN v Commission
(Case T-322/23) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Payment to the parent with custody of the child - Error of law - Legitimate expectations)
(C/2024/2027)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: VN (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, the annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 4 August 2022, providing for the payment of the full amount of the family allowances to the mother of his child, and the annulment of the decision of 8 September 2022 ordering the payment of the household allowance, dependent child allowance and pre-school allowance to the mother of his child, and, secondly, the payment of the full amount due in respect of those allowances, less the sums he has already received.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders VN to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 261, 24.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2027/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information note regarding the entry into force of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Madagascar and the Implementing Protocol thereto (2023-2027)
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Madagascar, agreement (EU), fishing agreement, fishing area, fishing rights, protocol to an agreement, sea fishing, sustainable fisheries








L_202400240EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series L













2024/240


10.1.2024






Information note regarding the entry into force of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Madagascar and the Implementing Protocol thereto (2023-2027)

Following signature on 30 June 2023, the European Union and the Republic of Madagascar notified on 11 December 2023 and 12 December 2023 respectively, that they had finalised their internal procedures to conclude the Agreement and the implementing Protocol (1).
Therefore, the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement and the implementing Protocol thereto between the European Union and the Republic of Madagascar enters into force on 12 December 2023 pursuant to Article 17(1) of the Agreement and Article 18(1) of the Protocol.


(1)  
            OJ L 182, 19.7.2023, p. 25.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/info/2024/240/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-754/22 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2024 – OG, OH, OI, OJ v European Commission (Appeal – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2288 and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/503 – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – EU Digital COVID Certificate – Freedom of movement of persons – Restrictions – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, border control, coronavirus disease, epidemic, free movement of persons, health certificate, health control, internal border of the EU, vaccination, young person








C_202402402EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2402


8.4.2024





Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2024 — OG, OH, OI, OJ v European Commission
(Case C-754/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2288 and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/503 - Regulation (EU) 2021/953 - EU Digital COVID Certificate - Freedom of movement of persons - Restrictions - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Appeal manifestly unfounded)
(C/2024/2402)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellants: OG, OH, OI, OJ (represented by: D. Gómez Fernández, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and E. Montaguti, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.










2.


OG, OH, OI and OJ shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  
            OJ C 94, 13.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2402/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Spain, catch by species, catch quota, crustacean, fishing area, fishing rights, sea fishing








C_202400693EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/693


10.1.2024






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(C/2024/693)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


13.12.2023




Duration


13.12.2023 – 31.12.2023




Member State


Spain




Stock or Group of stocks


NEP/*9U30




Species


Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus)




Zone


Functional unit 30 of division 9a




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


21/TQ194






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/693/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 9 January 2024
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202400601EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/601


10.1.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            9 January 2024
         
(C/2024/601)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0940 




JPY


Japanese yen


157,63 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4577 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85938 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,2115 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9313 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,3080 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,594 




HUF


Hungarian forint


378,83 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3448 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9716 




TRY


Turkish lira


32,7533 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6339 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4613 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5499 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7526 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4557 




KRW


South Korean won


1 442,62 




ZAR


South African rand


20,4380 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8381 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 006,39 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0800 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,308 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,252 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,3475 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,4514 




INR


Indian rupee


90,9195 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/601/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-630/22, Kirchliches Krankenhaus: Order of the President of the Court of 10 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — JK v Kirchliches Krankenhaus
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: equal treatment, freedom of religious beliefs, job access, medical institution, religious discrimination, termination of employment, work contract








C_202402018EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2018


18.3.2024





Order of the President of the Court of 10 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — JK v Kirchliches Krankenhaus
(Case C-630/22, (1) Kirchliches Krankenhaus)
(C/2024/2018)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 15, 16.1.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2018/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-15/24: Action brought on 10 January 2024 — IServ v EUIPO — Jordanova and Others (IServ)
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cloud computing, computer equipment, consultancy, maintenance, registered trade mark, software, telecommunications, trade-mark law, traineeship








C_202401557EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1557


26.2.2024





Action brought on 10 January 2024 — IServ v EUIPO — Jordanova and Others (IServ)
(Case T-15/24)
(C/2024/1557)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: IServ GmbH (Braunschweig, Germany) (represented by: M. Wille, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nadja Jordanova (Russe, Bulgaria), Victoria Dorovska (Sofia, Bulgaria), Stefan Jordanov (Russe)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark IServ — Application for registration No 18 641 803

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2023 in Case R 1556/2023-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


uphold the Opposition Division’s decision, rejecting the opposition;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 26 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1557/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-16/24: Action brought on 10 January 2024 — IServ v EUIPO — Jordanova and Others (IServ)
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cloud computing, computer equipment, consultancy, maintenance, registered trade mark, software, telecommunications, trade-mark law, traineeship








C_202401558EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1558


26.2.2024





Action brought on 10 January 2024 — IServ v EUIPO — Jordanova and Others (IServ)
(Case T-16/24)
(C/2024/1558)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: IServ GmbH (Braunschweig, Germany) (represented by: M. Wille, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nadja Jordanova (Russe, Bulgaria), Victoria Dorovska (Sofia, Bulgaria), Stefan Jordanov (Russe)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark IServ — Application for registration No 18 641 804

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2023 in Case R 1557/2023-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


uphold the Opposition Division’s decision, rejecting the opposition;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 26 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/626.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1558/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-504/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 January 2024 — Levantur v EUIPO — Fantasia Hotels & Resorts (Fantasia BAHIA PRINCIPE HOTELS & RESORTS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative trade mark Fantasia BAHIA PRINCIPE HOTELS & RESORTS — Earlier national trade name FANTASIA HOTELES — Relative ground for invalidity — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering industry, hotel industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202402020EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2020


18.3.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 10 January 2024 — Levantur v EUIPO — Fantasia Hotels & Resorts (Fantasia BAHIA PRINCIPE HOTELS & RESORTS)
(Case T-504/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative trade mark Fantasia BAHIA PRINCIPE HOTELS & RESORTS - Earlier national trade name FANTASIA HOTELES - Relative ground for invalidity - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
(C/2024/2020)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Levantur, SA (Murcia, Spain) (represented by: G. Marín Raigal, E. Armero Lavie, C. Caballero Pastor and J. Oria Sousa-Montes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, J. Ivanauskas and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Fantasia Hotels & Resorts, SL (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: J. Vicente Martínez and J. Erdozain López, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 May 2022 (Case R 1000/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Levantur, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Fantasia Hotels & Resorts, SL.






(1)  
            OJ C 380, 3.10.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2020/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-734/21: Order of the General Court of 10 January 2024 — The Chord Company v EUIPO — AVSL Group (CHORD)
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audiovisual equipment, electrical equipment, electronic equipment, musical instrument, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202402060EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2060


18.3.2024





Order of the General Court of 10 January 2024 — The Chord Company v EUIPO — AVSL Group (CHORD)
(Case T-734/21) (1)

(C/2024/2060)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2060/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-159/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 January 2024 — VN v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Sick leave — Unjustified absence — Salary deduction — Principle of impartiality — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Force majeure — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, absenteeism, damages, pay cut, sick leave








C_202402026EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2026


18.3.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 10 January 2024 — VN v Commission
(Case T-159/23) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Sick leave - Unjustified absence - Salary deduction - Principle of impartiality - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Force majeure - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)
(C/2024/2026)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: VN (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, the annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 6 July 2022 that declared him absent from work without justification on 10 June 2022, thus leading to a deduction from his salary of one day and, secondly, compensation in respect of the damage he claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders VN to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2026/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-11/24: Action brought on 10 January 2024 — Puma v EUIPO — Li Puma (LaZZarO by Li Puma)
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, waste recycling








C_202401555EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1555


26.2.2024





Action brought on 10 January 2024 — Puma v EUIPO — Li Puma (LaZZarO by Li Puma)
(Case T-11/24)
(C/2024/1555)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Luca Gottardo Li Puma (Turin, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark LaZZarO by Li Puma — Application for registration No 18 317 353

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 October 2023 in Case R 2290/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1555/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.107200Text with EEA relevance.
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Spain, State aid, audiovisual industry, control of State aid, film industry, performing arts, programmes industry, television








C_202400671EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/671


10.1.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.107200
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/671)







Date of adoption of the decision


24.11.2023




Aid number


SA.107200




Member State


Spain




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


HAC — Deducción de la cuota líquida del impuesto sobre sociedades para producciones audiovisuales (GUIPUZCOA)




Legal basis


Deducción fiscal para inversiones y gastos en producciones de obras audiovisuales y para espectáculos en vivo de artes escénicas y musicales, y participación en su financiación. Proyectos de artículos 66 bis y 66 ter de la Norma Foral 2/2014, de 17 de enero, del Impuesto sobre sociedadesdel Territorio Histórico de Gipuzkoa.




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Culture




Form of aid


Tax allowance




Budget


Overall budget: 150 000 000  EUR




Intensity


60,0  %




Duration


Until 31.12.2028




Economic sectors


Motion picture, video and television programme production activities, Performing arts




Name and address of the granting authority







TERRITORIO HISTÓRICO DE GIPUZKOA




Errotaburu Pasealekua 2 4a planta DONOSTIA-20018








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/671/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-18/24: Action brought on 10 January 2024 — US v Commission
Date: 2024-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, abuse of power, damages, staff assessment








C_202402048EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2048


18.3.2024





Action brought on 10 January 2024 — US v Commission
(Case T-18/24)
(C/2024/2048)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: US (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


admit the present action as procedurally valid and declare it to be well founded and substantiated;










—


consequently, annul the contested inadmissibility decision and the contested report, or otherwise declare them null and void;










—


award the applicant the sum of EUR 50 884,71 by way of compensation for material damage and the sum of EUR 5 000 by way of compensation for non-material damage;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action seeking the annulment of his staff report for the 2022 appraisal exercise, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging an error of fact.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging misuse of powers.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2048/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)