do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-233/22: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Islentyeva v Council (Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Prohibition on any non-Russian-registered aircraft owned, chartered or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in, taking off from, or overflying the territory of the European Union — Article 4e of Decision 2014/512/CFSP — Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Article 3d of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 — Lack of locus standi — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-12-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, aircraft, economic sanctions, international sanctions, jurisdiction, natural person, right of action








C_202401691EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1691


4.3.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Islentyeva v Council
(Case T-233/22) (1)

(Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Prohibition on any non-Russian-registered aircraft owned, chartered or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in, taking off from, or overflying the territory of the European Union - Article 4e of Decision 2014/512/CFSP - Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court - Article 3d of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 - Lack of locus standi - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/1691)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Ekaterina Islentyeva (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Moyse and V. Sulea, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and M.-C. Cadilhac, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission, (represented by J.-F. Brakeland, C. Giolito, K. Simonsson, M. Carpus Carcea and B. Sasinowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/335 of 28 February 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 57, p. 4) and, secondly, of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/334 of 28 February 2022 amending Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 57, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ms Ekaterina Islentyeva and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs;










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 237, 20.6.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1691/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-423/22: Order of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Sutor Bank v SRB
Date: 2023-12-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank resolution, company in difficulties, credit institution, equal treatment, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU), investment company, principle of proportionality








C_202402063EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2063


18.3.2024





Order of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Sutor Bank v SRB
(Case T-423/22) (1)

(C/2024/2063)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 359, 19.9.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2063/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1168/23: Action brought on 20 December 2023 — Richards Brothers Group v EUIPO — Masia Puigmoltó (EL CABRÓN)
Date: 2023-12-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202401260EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1260


12.2.2024





Action brought on 20 December 2023 — Richards Brothers Group v EUIPO — Masia Puigmoltó (EL CABRÓN)
(Case T-1168/23)
(C/2024/1260)
Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties


Applicant: Richards Brothers Group (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: T. de Haan and V. Wellens, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Masia Puigmoltó, SL (Castellet i la Gornal, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark EL CABRÓN — Application for registration No 18 480 398

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2023 in Case R 257/2023-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant in respect of the proceedings before the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1260/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-564/22: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Pierre Balmain v EUIPO — Story Time (Representation of a lion’s head encircled by rings forming a chain) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a lion’s head encircled by rings forming a chain — Earlier national figurative mark representing a lion’s head encircled by dots — Relative ground for refusal — Distinctive character of the earlier mark — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2023-12-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, precious metal, precious stones, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202401695EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1695


4.3.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Pierre Balmain v EUIPO — Story Time (Representation of a lion’s head encircled by rings forming a chain)
(Case T-564/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a lion’s head encircled by rings forming a chain - Earlier national figurative mark representing a lion’s head encircled by dots - Relative ground for refusal - Distinctive character of the earlier mark - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/1695)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Pierre Balmain (Paris, France) (represented by: J.M. Iglesias Monravá and S. Mainar Roger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Story Time sp. z o.o. (Poznań, Poland)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 June 2022 (Case R 96/2022-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 June 2022 (Case R 96/2022-4);










2.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Pierre Balmain.






(1)  
            OJ C 424, 7.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1695/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-273/23: Order of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Impossible Foods v EUIPO — Société des produits Nestlé (IMPOSSIBLE)
Date: 2023-12-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, baby food, dietary product, food additive, food supplement, foodstuff, protein products, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202402066EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2066


18.3.2024





Order of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Impossible Foods v EUIPO — Société des produits Nestlé (IMPOSSIBLE)
(Case T-273/23) (1)

(C/2024/2066)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 252, 17.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2066/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-369/22: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Heßler v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Tax for the benefit of the European Union — Tax abatement — Article 3(4) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 — Abatement for a dependent child — Conditions for granting — Concept of ‘dependent child’ — Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Claim for annulment — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Partial inadmissibility — Unlimited jurisdiction)
Date: 2023-12-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, dependant, family benefit, remuneration of work, staff regulations (EU), tax relief








C_202401693EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1693


4.3.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Heßler v Commission
(Case T-369/22) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Tax for the benefit of the European Union - Tax abatement - Article 3(4) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 - Abatement for a dependent child - Conditions for granting - Concept of ‘dependent child’ - Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Claim for annulment - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Partial inadmissibility - Unlimited jurisdiction)
(C/2024/1693)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Michael Heßler (Mannebach, Germany) (represented by: I. Steuer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, in essence, the annulment of the decisions of the European Commission refusing his requests for a tax abatement for each of his two daughters and, secondly, an order that the Commission grant him, with retroactive effect from 1 August 2021 and for as long as the conditions are satisfied, the tax abatement in question and an order that the Commission pay interest on the sums not paid.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Michael Heßler and the European Commission to each bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1693/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-64/21: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Mainova v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity and gas markets — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market — Concept of ‘single concentration’ — Definition of the market — Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition — Manifest errors of assessment — Duty of diligence — Misuse of powers)
Date: 2023-12-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU competition policy, Germany, economic concentration, electrical industry, energy market, gas industry, merger control, restriction on competition, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_202401688EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1688


4.3.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Mainova v Commission
(Case T-64/21) (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - German electricity and gas markets - Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market - Concept of ‘single concentration’ - Definition of the market - Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition - Manifest errors of assessment - Duty of diligence - Misuse of powers)
(C/2024/1688)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Mainova AG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: C. Schalast, H. Löschan and Y. Salamati, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen and C. Zois, acting as Agents, and F. Haus, L. Rundel and F. Schmidt, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: E.ON SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Grave, C. Barth and D.-J. dos Santos Goncalves, lawyers), RWE AG (Essen) (represented by: U. Scholz, J. Ziebarth and J. Siegmund, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 6530 final of 17 September 2019 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case M.8870 — E.ON/Innogy).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mainova AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and RWE AG.






(1)  
            OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1688/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.108571Text with EEA relevance.
Date: 2023-12-20
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, State aid, carriage of goods, control of State aid, road transport








C_202301578EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1578


20.12.2023






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.108571
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2023/1578)







Date of adoption of the decision


12.10.2023




Aid number


SA.108571




Member State


Italy




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TCTF: Reintroduction of the incentive measure SA.103752 Emergency Support Scheme for Haulage Operators using liquefied natural gas (LNG) as fuel




Legal basis


DECREE-LAW No. 17 of 1 March 2022 Urgent measures for the containment of electricity and natural gas costs, the development of renewable energies and the relaunch of industrial policies. And the implementing provision is the inter-ministerial Decree No 413 of 22 December 2022.




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Tax advantage or tax exemption




Budget


Overall budget: 25 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 25 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2023




Economic sectors


Freight transport by road




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministry of sustainable infrastructures and mobility




Piazzale di Porta Pia, 1 ROMA (Italy)








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1578/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-59/21: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — eins energie in sachsen v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity and gas markets — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Period of analysis — Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition — Manifest errors of assessment — Undertakings — Duty of diligence)
Date: 2023-12-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU competition policy, Germany, economic concentration, electrical industry, energy market, gas industry, merger control, restriction on competition, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_202401683EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1683


4.3.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — eins energie in sachsen v Commission
(Case T-59/21) (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - German electricity and gas markets - Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market - Obligation to state reasons - Concept of ‘single concentration’ - Right to effective judicial protection - Right to be heard - Definition of the market - Period of analysis - Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition - Manifest errors of assessment - Undertakings - Duty of diligence)
(C/2024/1683)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG (Chemnitz, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke and T. Heymann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen and J. Szczodrowski, acting as Agents, and T. Funke and A. Dlouhy, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: E.ON SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Grave, C. Barth and D.-J. dos Santos Goncalves, lawyers), RWE AG (Essen) (represented by: U. Scholz, J. Ziebarth and J. Siegmund, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 6530 final of 17 September 2019 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case M.8870 — E.ON/Innogy).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and RWE AG.






(1)  
            OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1683/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)