do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates – 30 November 2023
Date: 2023-12-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202300800EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/800


1.12.2023






Euro exchange rates (1)


            30 November 2023
         
(C/2023/800)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0931 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,19 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4548 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86368 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,4308 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9562 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7200 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,292 




HUF


Hungarian forint


380,75 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3490 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9718 




TRY


Turkish lira


31,5441 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6542 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4870 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5384 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7762 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4602 




KRW


South Korean won


1 418,78 




ZAR


South African rand


20,5703 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8008 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 981,14 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0933 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,623 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,494 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,3984 




MXN


Mexican peso


19,0235 




INR


Indian rupee


91,1143 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/800/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2023-12-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, two-wheeled vehicle








C_202301260EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1260


1.12.2023






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(C/2023/1260)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Bicycles


The People’s Republic of China
Indonesia
Malaysia
Sri Lanka
Tunisia
Cambodia
Pakistan
The Philippines


Anti-dumping duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1379 of 28 August 2019 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China as extended to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines, whether declared as originating in these countries or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
(OJ L 225, 29.8.2019, p. 1)


30.8.2024






(1)  
            OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1260/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-574/22, CI and Others (Drug precursors): Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 December 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against CI, VF, DY (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Drug precursors — Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA — Article 2(1)(d) — Person involved in the transport and distribution of precursors used for the illicit production or manufacture of drugs — Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 — Scheduled substances — Article 2 — Concept of ‘operator’ — Article 8(1) — Circumstances suggesting that scheduled substances might be diverted for the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances — Obligation to notify those circumstances — Concept of ‘circumstance’ — Scope)
Date: 2023-12-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: criminal law, drug traffic, narcotic








C_202401386EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1386


19.2.2024





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 December 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against CI, VF, DY
(Case C-574/22, (1) CI and Others (Drug precursors))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Drug precursors - Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA - Article 2(1)(d) - Person involved in the transport and distribution of precursors used for the illicit production or manufacture of drugs - Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 - Scheduled substances - Article 2 - Concept of ‘operator’ - Article 8(1) - Circumstances suggesting that scheduled substances might be diverted for the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances - Obligation to notify those circumstances - Concept of ‘circumstance’ - Scope)
(C/2024/1386)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Parties to the main criminal proceedings

CI, VF, DY

Interested party: Sofiyska gradska prokuratura

Operative part of the order

Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1258/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013,
must be interpreted as not applying to a situation in which a person is in possession, in the context of an illegal activity, of scheduled substances of category 3 of Annex I to that regulation. The fact that that person was in possession of such substances without a licence or registration is irrelevant in that regard.


(1)  
            OJ C 424, 7.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1386/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-174/22, EV (Drug precursors): Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 December 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against EV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Drug precursors — Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA — Article 2(1)(d) — Person involved in the transport and distribution of precursors used for the illicit production or manufacture of drugs — Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 — Scheduled substances — Article 2 — Concept of ‘operator’ — Article 8(1) — Circumstances suggesting that scheduled substances might be diverted for the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances — Obligation to notify those circumstances — Concept of ‘circumstance’ — Scope)
Date: 2023-12-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: criminal law, drug traffic, narcotic








C_202401385EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1385


19.2.2024





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 December 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against EV
(Case C-174/22, (1) EV (Drug precursors))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Drug precursors - Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA - Article 2(1)(d) - Person involved in the transport and distribution of precursors used for the illicit production or manufacture of drugs - Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 - Scheduled substances - Article 2 - Concept of ‘operator’ - Article 8(1) - Circumstances suggesting that scheduled substances might be diverted for the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances - Obligation to notify those circumstances - Concept of ‘circumstance’ - Scope)
(C/2024/1385)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria)

Party to the main criminal proceedings

EV

Interested party: Varhovna kasatsionna prokuratura

Operative part of the order

Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1258/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013,
must be interpreted as not applying to a situation in which a person is in possession, in the context of an illegal activity, of scheduled substances of category 3 of Annex I to that regulation. The fact that that person was in possession of such substances without a licence or registration is irrelevant in that regard.


(1)  
            OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1385/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11311 – CAI / BANQUE DEGROOF PETERCAM) – Candidate case for simplified procedure
Date: 2023-12-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: banking, economic concentration, insurance company, investment company, merger control








C_202301357EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1357


1.12.2023






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11311 – CAI / BANQUE DEGROOF PETERCAM)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2023/1357)


1.   
On 23 November 2023, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


CA Indosuez S.A. (‘CAI’, France), controlled by Crédit Agricole S.A. (France),










—


Banque Degroof Petercam SA/NV (‘Degroof Petercam’, Belgium).




CAI will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Degroof Petercam.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


CAI provides banking, insurance and asset servicing to corporate clients, institutional clients, banks and brokers,










—


Degroof Petercam provides private banking, investment banking, asset management and asset services for retail and institutional clients.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified treatment for certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11311 – CAI / BANQUE DEGROOF PETERCAM
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1357/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1130/23: Action brought on 1 December 2023 — Smart Kid v Commission
Date: 2023-12-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, right to information








C_202400968EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/968


29.1.2024





Action brought on 1 December 2023 — Smart Kid v Commission
(Case T-1130/23)
(C/2024/968)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Smart Kid S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: Z. Kiedacz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the implied decision of the European Commission of 22 September 2023 adopted in the case examined by the European Commission under ref. EASE 2023/2923 rejecting Smart Kid’s request of 17 May 2023 for access to public documents, submitted on the basis of Regulation No 1049/2001;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law alleging infringement of Article 15(3) TFEU in conjunction with Articles 1 and 2 of Regulation No 1049/2001. (1)







—


Article 15(3) TFEU in conjunction with Articles 1 and 2 of Regulation No 1049/2001 provide for the right of any legal person having its registered office in a Member State to access documents of the Union’s bodies, in accordance with the general principles and limits governing the exercise of that right, which are set out in that regulation. The adoption by the European Commission of the implied rejection decision for the purposes of Article 8(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001, manifestly infringes that right.














2.


Second plea in law alleging that the Commission infringed the obligation to state reasons.






—


As is apparent from Article 296(2) TFEU, legal acts adopted by EU institutions must state the reasons on which they are based. The statement of reasons must be appropriate to the act at issue and must disclose in a clear and unequivocal fashion the reasoning followed by the institution which adopted the act. As regards the Commission’s adoption of the implied rejection decision for the purposes of Article 8(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001, that decision was not accompanied by any reasons, which manifestly infringes the obligation to state reasons.










(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/968/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1136/23: Action brought on 1 December 2023 — Lianopoulou v Commission
Date: 2023-12-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, indemnification, interest, promotion, staff assessment








C_202401871EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1871


11.3.2024





Action brought on 1 December 2023 — Lianopoulou v Commission
(Case T-1136/23)
(C/2024/1871)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Anastasia Lianopoulou (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Quraishi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


vary or, alternatively, annul the contested rejection decision of 1 September 2023 taken by [confidential] (1) in its capacity as appointing authority and declare that complaint [confidential] is well founded, and consequently, vary or, alternatively, annul the initial decision taken on 30 January 2023;










—


rule that the applicant is entitled to the restoration of her career path including all missed advancements and the corresponding material compensation including interest from the theoretical date of disbursement and late payment interest;










—


rule that the applicant suffered non-material harm equivalent to 12 months of her average pay for the last year of service, or, alternatively, any other amount to be decided by the Court;










—


order the appointing authority to pay all the costs and expenses of the present proceedings, inter alia the costs relating to the expert opinion;










—


order the Commission to pay the legal fees that the applicant had to pay in order to assert her rights, costs and legal fees.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, relying on the principle that compensation must be provided in full. The applicant asserts that the contested decision is not reasoned or that that reasoning is incorrect. Since the absence of professional assessments in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 was not attributable to the applicant, it should be held that the Commission was at fault.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the non-material harm arises from the misconduct of the defendant and from the annulled initial decision.






(1)  Confidential data redacted.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1871/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)