do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-12/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Beauty Boutique v EUIPO — Lightningbolt Europe (Representation of a lightning bolt) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a lightning bolt — Earlier EU figurative mark representing a lightning bolt — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2023-11-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing industry, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202400953EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/953


29.1.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Beauty Boutique v EUIPO — Lightningbolt Europe (Representation of a lightning bolt)
(Case T-12/23) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a lightning bolt - Earlier EU figurative mark representing a lightning bolt - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/953)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Beauty Boutique sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Nowakowski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Lightningbolt Europe SA (São Cosme Vale, Portugal) (represented by: P. Sousa e Silva, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 October 2022 (Case R 668/2022-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Beauty Boutique sp. z o.o. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Lightningbolt Europe SA for the purposes of the proceedings before the General Court;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 94, 13.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/953/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
Date: 2023-11-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical compound, chemical product, chromium, engine, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, metal coating








C_202301180EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1180


29.11.2023






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
                (1)
)


(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2023/1180)


Decision granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2023) 7636


22 Novembre 2023


Chromium trioxide
EC No. 215-607-8, CAS No. 1333-82-0


Eaton S.R.L., Corso Francesco Ferrucci 112, 10138, Torino, Italy


REACH/23/25/0


Functional chrome plating of engine valves and valve actuation (‘lash adjusters’)


31 December 2030


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.




Eaton Automotive Systems sp.zoo, Rudawka 83, 43-382 Bielsko-Biala, Poland


REACH/23/25/1






(1)  
            OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1180/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1124/23: Action brought on 29 November 2023 — Dyadema v EUIPO — Pegador (PEGADOR)
Date: 2023-11-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202400966EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/966


29.1.2024





Action brought on 29 November 2023 — Dyadema v EUIPO — Pegador (PEGADOR)
(Case T-1124/23)
(C/2024/966)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Dyadema Srl (San Zenone degli Ezzelini, Italy) (represented by: F. Celluprica, F. Fischetti and F. De Bono, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pegador GmbH (Emsdetten, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PEGADOR — Application for registration No 18 511 714

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2023 in Case R 331/2023-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs relating to the earlier stages of the proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/966/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-513/20: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Asempre v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Postal service — Compensation for universal postal service — Professional association — Lack of individual concern — No substantial effect on the competitive position — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-11-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, State aid, business tax, control of State aid, postal service, professional association, property tax, services of general interest, tax exemption, universal service








C_202400940EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/940


29.1.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Asempre v Commission
(Case T-513/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Postal service - Compensation for universal postal service - Professional association - Lack of individual concern - No substantial effect on the competitive position - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/940)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Asociación Profesional de Empresas de Reparto y Manipulado de Correspondencia (Asempre) (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I. Igartua Arregui, M. Troncoso Ferrer and J. Silva Cabaleiro, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Carpi Badía and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Sociedad Estatal Correos y Telégrafos SA (represented by: D. Sarmiento Ramírez Escudero and A. Pérez Hernández, lawyers), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: L. Aguilera Ruiz, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 3108 final of 14 May 2020, concerning State aid SA.50872 (2020/NN) — Compensation to Correos under the universal service obligation, 2011-2020.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action as inadmissible;










2.


Orders the Asociación Profesional de Empresas de Reparto y Manipulado de Correspondencia (Asempre) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by Sociedad Estatal Correos y Telégrafos, SA.










3.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/940/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.108080
Date: 2023-11-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Ireland, State aid, aquaculture, control of State aid, sea fishing








C_202301218EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1218


29.11.2023






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.108080
(C/2023/1218)







Date of adoption of the decision


18.10.2023




Aid number


SA.108080




Member State


Ireland




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Brexit — Pelagic Fisheries Support Scheme




Legal basis


Pelagic Fisheries Support Scheme




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Fisheries and aquaculture, Aid for categories of measures covered by block exemption (FIBER, GBER)




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 25 600 000  EUR
Annual budget: 25 600 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2023




Economic sectors


Fishing




Name and address of the granting authority







Bord Iascaigh Mhara




Crofton Road Dun Laoghaire Co Dublin A96 E5A0








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1218/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-53/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — TVR Automotive v EUIPO — TVR Italia (TVR) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark TVR — Earlier EU figurative mark TVR ITALIA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Right to fair legal process — Legitimate expectations)
Date: 2023-11-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, aeronautical industry, clothing, footwear industry, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, shipbuilding, trade-mark law, two-wheeled vehicle, vehicle parts








C_202400955EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/955


29.1.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — TVR Automotive v EUIPO — TVR Italia (TVR)
(Case T-53/23) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark TVR - Earlier EU figurative mark TVR ITALIA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Right to fair legal process - Legitimate expectations)
(C/2024/955)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: TVR Automotive Ltd (Walliswood, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: TVR Italia Srl (Milan, Italy)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 October 2022 (Case R 1493/2018-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders TVR Automotive Ltd and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 112, 27.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/955/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
CaseC-762/22: Order of the President of the Court of 29 November 2023 — European Commission v Republic of Latvia
Date: 2023-11-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: health risk, infringement of EU law, ionising radiation, national implementing measure, occupational safety, radiation protection, safety standard








C_202401249EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1249


12.2.2024





Order of the President of the Court of 29 November 2023 — European Commission v Republic of Latvia
(CaseC-762/22) (1)

(C/2024/1249)
Language of the case: Latvian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 54, 13.2.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1249/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-661/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Claro v EUIPO — Claranet Europe (Claro) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Claro — Earlier EU word mark CLARANET — Relative ground for invalidity — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2023-11-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_202400950EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/950


29.1.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Claro v EUIPO — Claranet Europe (Claro)
(Case T-661/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Claro - Earlier EU word mark CLARANET - Relative ground for invalidity - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2024/950)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Claro SA (São Paulo, Brazil) (represented by: J. Ferreira Sardinha, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Claranet Europe Ltd (Saint Helier, Jersey) (represented by: M. Forde, Solicitor)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 August 2022 (Case R 1674/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Claro SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Claranet Europe Ltd;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 7, 9.1.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/950/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-506/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — CrossFit v EUIPO — Pitk Pelotas (CROSSWOD EQUIPMENT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark CROSSWOD EQUIPMENT — Earlier EU word marks and international registration of a word mark CROSSFIT — Earlier EU word mark CROSS — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Non-similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2023-11-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_202400734EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/734


22.1.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — CrossFit v EUIPO — Pitk Pelotas (CROSSWOD EQUIPMENT)
(Case T-506/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark CROSSWOD EQUIPMENT - Earlier EU word marks and international registration of a word mark CROSSFIT - Earlier EU word mark CROSS - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Non-similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2024/734)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: CrossFit LLC (Boulder, Colorado, United States) (represented by: D. Mărginean, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Pitk Pelotas, SL (Noain, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 June 2022 (Case R 325/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders CrossFit LLC and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 389, 10.10.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/734/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-19/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group (Shape of a scooter) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a scooter — Absolute ground for invalidity — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001))
Date: 2023-11-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law, two-wheeled vehicle








C_202400944EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/944


29.1.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group (Shape of a scooter)
(Case T-19/22) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Three-dimensional EU trade mark - Shape of a scooter - Absolute ground for invalidity - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001))
(C/2024/944)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Piaggio & C. SpA (Pontedera, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci and B. La Tella, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, D. Gája and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group Co. Ltd (Taizhou, China) (represented by: M. Spolidoro, M. Gurrado, L. Mendola and M. Balestriero, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 October 2021 (Case R 359/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 October 2021 (Case R 359/2021-5);










2.


Orders EUIPO and Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group Co. Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Piaggio & C. SpA.






(1)  
            OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/944/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-107/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Myforest Foods v EUIPO (MYBACON) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark MYBACON — Absolute ground for refusal — Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public — Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2023-11-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, food substitute, mushroom-growing, prepared foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202400957EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/957


29.1.2024





Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Myforest Foods v EUIPO (MYBACON)
(Case T-107/23) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark MYBACON - Absolute ground for refusal - Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public - Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/957)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Myforest Foods Co. (Green Island, New York, United States) (represented by: P. Martini-Berthon, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Myforest Foods Co., seeks annulment of the Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 December 2022 (Case R 1201/2022-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders each party to bear its own costs.







(1)  
            OJ C 134, 17.4.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/957/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.104476
Date: 2023-11-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Czechia, State aid, animal production, control of State aid, crop production, hunting, service








C_202301219EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1219


29.11.2023






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.104476
(C/2023/1219)







Date of adoption of the decision


3.8.2023




Aid number


SA.104476




Member State


Czechia




Region


Czechia




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Předcházení, minimalizace a náprava škod způsobených vybranými zvláště chráněnými druhy živočichů, OPŽP 2021-2027




Legal basis








1)


Program Životní prostředí 2021-2027 2) Pravidla pro žadatele a příjemce podpory v Operačním programu Životní prostředí pro období 2021-2027 3) 41. výzva Ministerstva životního prostředí k podávání žádostí o poskytnutí podpory v rámci ‘Operačního programu Životní prostředí 2021–2027’ podporovaných z Fondu soudržnosti








Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Environmental protection




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 80 000 000  CZK
Annual budget: 10 000 000  CZK




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2029




Economic sectors


Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministerstvo životního prostředí, Řídicí orgán Operačního programu Životní prostředí




Ministerstvo životního prostředí, Vršovická 1442/65, 100 10 Praha 10








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1219/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)