do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-374/22, Commissioner-General for Refugees and Stateless Persons (Family Unity): Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — XXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2011/95/EU — Standards for granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status — Father of minor refugee children born in Belgium — Father not a ‘family member’ within the meaning of Article 2(j) of that directive — Application for the grant of international protection, as a derived right, submitted by that father — Rejection — No obligation on Member States to recognise the right of the person concerned to obtain that protection if he does not individually qualify for it — Article 23(2) of that directive — Inapplicability)
Date: 2023-11-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belgium, aid to refugees, child of migrant, family, family reunification, international protection, refugee








C_202400611EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/611


15.1.2024





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — XXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides
(Case C-374/22, (1) Commissioner-General for Refugees and Stateless Persons (Family Unity))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2011/95/EU - Standards for granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status - Father of minor refugee children born in Belgium - Father not a ‘family member’ within the meaning of Article 2(j) of that directive - Application for the grant of international protection, as a derived right, submitted by that father - Rejection - No obligation on Member States to recognise the right of the person concerned to obtain that protection if he does not individually qualify for it - Article 23(2) of that directive - Inapplicability)
(C/2024/611)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: XXX

Defendant: Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides

Operative part of the judgment

Article 23 of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted,
must be interpreted as not requiring the Member States to grant the parent of a child who has refugee status in a Member State the right to international protection in that Member State.


(1)  
            OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/611/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11341 – BFM / SP / BRASOL)
Date: 2023-11-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Brazil, consultancy, economic concentration, energy industry, holding company, investment, investment company, merger control, provision of services, renewable energy








C_202301422EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1422


4.12.2023






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11341 – BFM / SP / BRASOL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2023/1422)

On 23 November 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11341. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1422/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-326/23: Order of the General Court of 23 November 2023 — D’Agostino v ECB (Actions for damages — Economic and monetary policy — Statement by the President of the ECB during a press conference — Division of powers between the bodies of the ECB — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Causal link — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2023-11-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: capital depreciation, damages, division of powers, indemnification, loss, president of an institution, price of securities, public statement, securities








C_202400746EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/746


22.1.2024





Order of the General Court of 23 November 2023 — D’Agostino v ECB
(Case T-326/23) (1)

(Actions for damages - Economic and monetary policy - Statement by the President of the ECB during a press conference - Division of powers between the bodies of the ECB - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Causal link - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2024/746)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Aldo D’Agostino (Napoli, Italy) (represented by: Mr De Siena, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: O. Heinz, M. Ioannidis, L. Cardone and M. Szablewska, Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the damage he allegedly suffered following a statement by the President of the European Central Bank (ECB) made on 12 March 2020.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.










2.


Mr Aldo D’Agostino shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 278, 7.8.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/746/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-210/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 November 2023 — Ryanair DAC v European Commission, French Republic (Appeal — State aid — Article 107(2)(b) TFEU — French air transport market — Aid scheme notified by the French Republic — Deferral of the payment of airline taxes and charges to support airlines amid the COVID-19 pandemic — Temporary Framework for State aid measures — Decision by the European Commission not to raise objections — Aid intended to make good the damage suffered as a result of an exceptional occurrence — Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination — Free provision of services)
Date: 2023-11-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, State aid, aid to undertakings, airline, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, equal treatment, freedom to provide services, principle of proportionality, tax relief








C_202400603EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/603


15.1.2024





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 November 2023 — Ryanair DAC v European Commission, French Republic
(Case C-210/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Article 107(2)(b) TFEU - French air transport market - Aid scheme notified by the French Republic - Deferral of the payment of airline taxes and charges to support airlines amid the COVID-19 pandemic - Temporary Framework for State aid measures - Decision by the European Commission not to raise objections - Aid intended to make good the damage suffered as a result of an exceptional occurrence - Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination - Free provision of services)
(C/2024/603)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Ryanair DAC (represented by: V. Blanc, F.-C. Laprévote and E. Vahida, avocats, I.-G. Metaxas Maranghidis, dikigoros, D. Pérez de Lamo and S. Rating, abogados)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, C. Georgieva, S. Noë and F. Tomat, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented initially by A.-L. Desjonquères, P. Dodeller, T. Stéhelin and N. Vincent, and subsequently by A.L. Desjonquères, T. Stéhelin and N. Vincent, and finally by A.-L. Desjonquères and T. Stéhelin, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 297, 26.7.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/603/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 of 4 October 2019 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures and correcting that Regulation (OJ L 44, 18.2.2020)
Date: 2023-11-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Environment, European Commission
Subjects: classification, dangerous substance, environmental protection, labelling, packaging, public health, technological change








L_202390120EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series L













2020/217


23.11.2023






Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 of 4 October 2019 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures and correcting that Regulation

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 44 of 18 February 2020
)


On page 6, in Annex II inserting row EUH 211 in Part 3 of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, in the third column of the table, in the row concerning ‘RO’:
for:


                  ‘Atenție! Se pot forma picături respirabile periculoase la pulverizare. Nu respirați prin pulverizare sau ceață.’,

read:


                  ‘Atenție! La pulverizare, se pot forma picături respirabile periculoase. Nu inspirați vaporii, ceața sau aerosolii.’.

On page 6, in Annex II inserting row EUH 211 in Part 3 of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, in the third column of the table, in the row concerning ‘ES’:
for:


                  ‘¡Atención! Al rociar pueden formarse gotas respirables peligrosas. No respirar el aerosol.’,

read:


                  ‘¡Atención! Al rociar pueden formarse gotas respirables peligrosas. No respirar el aerosol o la niebla.’.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2020/217/corrigendum/2023-11-23/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-758/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 November 2023 — Ryanair DAC, Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Measures implemented by the Republic of Austria for Klagenfurt Airport, Ryanair and other airlines using that airport — Decision declaring the aid measures to be incompatible in part with the internal market — Article 85(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union — Evidence submitted to the General Court after the written part of the procedure has been closed — Admissibility — Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Article 17(1) and (2) — Powers of the European Commission to recover aid — Limitation period — Degree of precision with respect to actions that interrupt that period — Obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence — Data relevant for determining the amount of aid to recover)
Date: 2023-11-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, Carinthia, State aid, airline, airport, carriage of passengers, control of State aid, powers of the institutions (EU), reimbursement of aid








C_202400604EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/604


15.1.2024





Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 November 2023 — Ryanair DAC, Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission
(Case C-758/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Measures implemented by the Republic of Austria for Klagenfurt Airport, Ryanair and other airlines using that airport - Decision declaring the aid measures to be incompatible in part with the internal market - Article 85(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union - Evidence submitted to the General Court after the written part of the procedure has been closed - Admissibility - Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Article 17(1) and (2) - Powers of the European Commission to recover aid - Limitation period - Degree of precision with respect to actions that interrupt that period - Obligation to state reasons - Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence - Data relevant for determining the amount of aid to recover)
(C/2024/604)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Ryanair DAC, Airport Marketing Services Ltd (represented by: B. Byrne, Solicitor, S. Rating, abogado, and E. Vahida, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck, A. Bouchagiar and J. Ringborg, and subsequently by A. Bouchagiar and J. Ringborg, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Ryanair DAC and Airport Marketing Services Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 51, 31.1.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/604/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 22 November 2023
Date: 2023-11-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202300925EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/925


23.11.2023






Euro exchange rates (1)


            22 November 2023
         
(C/2023/925)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0911 




JPY


Japanese yen


162,25 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4547 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87030 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3900 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9640 




ISK


Iceland króna


153,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7020 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,480 




HUF


Hungarian forint


380,60 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3625 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9708 




TRY


Turkish lira


31,4546 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6618 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4959 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5061 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8065 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4622 




KRW


South Korean won


1 418,10 




ZAR


South African rand


20,3008 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8015 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 023,45 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,1042 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,698 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,379 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,3402 




MXN


Mexican peso


18,7421 




INR


Indian rupee


90,9030 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/925/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-653/22, J. P. Mali: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — J.P. Mali Kerékpárgyártó és Forgalmazó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Article 42(1) — Obligation on the Member States to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties for failure to comply with the customs legislation — Incorrect declaration of the country of origin of the imported goods — National legislation providing for a fine corresponding to 50 % of the shortfall in customs duties — Principle of proportionality)
Date: 2023-11-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, customs debt, customs formalities, customs harmonisation, principle of proportionality








C_202400615EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/615


15.1.2024





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — J.P. Mali Kerékpárgyártó és Forgalmazó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
(Case C-653/22, (1) J. P. Mali)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 - Article 42(1) - Obligation on the Member States to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties for failure to comply with the customs legislation - Incorrect declaration of the country of origin of the imported goods - National legislation providing for a fine corresponding to 50 % of the shortfall in customs duties - Principle of proportionality)
(C/2024/615)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: J.P. Mali Kerékpárgyártó és Forgalmazó Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part of the judgment

Article 42(1) of Regulation No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which provides, in the event of a shortfall in customs duties caused by the supply of incorrect information in a customs declaration relating to goods imported into the European Union, for an administrative fine which corresponds, in principle, to 50 % of that shortfall and which is imposed notwithstanding the good faith of and precautions taken by the operator concerned, since that rate of 50 % is significantly lower than that provided for in the case of bad faith on the part of that operator and is, moreover, considerably reduced in certain situations specified in that legislation, including the situation in which the operator acting in good faith corrects its customs declaration before the post-clearance control has been completed.


(1)  
            OJ C 45, 6.2.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/615/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1096/23: Action brought on 23 November 2023 — Lotus Bakeries v EUIPO (Combination of colours red and white)
Date: 2023-11-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, coffee, confectionery, confectionery product, dairy ice cream, pastry-making, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202400755EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/755


22.1.2024





Action brought on 23 November 2023 — Lotus Bakeries v EUIPO (Combination of colours red and white)
(Case T-1096/23)
(C/2024/755)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Lotus Bakeries (Lembeke, Belgium) (represented by: C. Gommers, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union trade mark (Colour representing the combination of colours red and white) — Application for registration No 18 659 684

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 September 2023 in Case R 730/2023-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


refers the trade mark at issue back to the EUIPO for examination;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs including the costs in the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Articles 4 and 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the principles of proportionality and of equal treatment.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/755/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-713/23, Wojewoda Mazowiecki: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 23 November 2023 — JC-T, MT v Wojewoda Mazowiecki
Date: 2023-11-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU national, LGBTIQ persons, civil register, marriage, married person, protection of privacy, surname








C_202402009EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/2009


18.3.2024





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 23 November 2023 — JC-T, MT v Wojewoda Mazowiecki
(Case C-713/23, Wojewoda Mazowiecki)
(C/2024/2009)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: JC-T, MT

Defendant: Wojewoda Mazowiecki

Question referred

Must the provisions of Article 20(2)(a) and Article 21(1) TFEU, read in conjunction with Article 7 and Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 2(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (1) be interpreted as precluding the competent authorities of a Member State, where a citizen of the Union who is a national of that State has contracted a marriage with another citizen of the Union (a person of the same sex) in a Member State in accordance with the legislation of that State, from refusing to recognise that marriage certificate and transcribe it into the national civil registry, which prevents those persons from residing in that State with the marital status of a married couple and under the same surname, on the grounds that the law of the host Member State does not provide for same-sex marriage?


(1)  
            OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2009/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)