do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-427/22, BG (Grant of loans without approval): Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against BG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential requirements for credit institutions — Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Points 1 and 42 of Article 4(1) — Definitions — Concepts of ‘credit institution’ and ‘authorisation’ — Grant of loans without approval)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: bank deposit, credit, credit institution, financial supervision








C_202400522EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/522


8.1.2024





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against BG
(Case C-427/22, (1) BG (Grant of loans without approval))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential requirements for credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 - Points 1 and 42 of Article 4(1) - Definitions - Concepts of ‘credit institution’ and ‘authorisation’ - Grant of loans without approval)
(C/2024/522)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria)

Party to the main criminal proceedings

BG

other party: Varhovna kasatsionna prokuratura

Operative part of the judgment

Point 1(a) of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019,
must be interpreted as meaning that an undertaking falls within the concept of ‘credit institution’, within the meaning of point 1 of that Article 4(1), only where its activity consists, cumulatively, of taking deposits or other repayable funds from the public and of granting credits for its own account, it being specified that those deposits or other funds taken from the public are intended for granting credits, although it cannot be ruled out that credits may also be granted from funds that come from other sources.


(1)  
            OJ C 408, 24.10.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/522/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-422/22, Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu v TE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Migrant workers — Social security — Legislation applicable — Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 — Articles 5, 6 and 16 — A1 certificate — Inaccuracy of the particulars — Withdrawal on the initiative of the issuing institution — Obligation for the issuing institution to initiate a dialogue and conciliation procedure with the competent authority of the host Member State — None)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative cooperation, form, migrant worker, social security legislation, social-security harmonisation








C_202400521EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/521


8.1.2024





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu v TE
(Case C-422/22, (1) Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Migrant workers - Social security - Legislation applicable - Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 - Articles 5, 6 and 16 - A1 certificate - Inaccuracy of the particulars - Withdrawal on the initiative of the issuing institution - Obligation for the issuing institution to initiate a dialogue and conciliation procedure with the competent authority of the host Member State - None)
(C/2024/521)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu

Defendant: TE

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 5, 6 and 16 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 465/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012
         
must be interpreted as meaning that the institution that issued an A1 certificate which, following a review of its own motion of the evidence on which the issue of that certificate is based, finds that evidence to be incorrect, may withdraw that certificate without first initiating the dialogue and conciliation procedure laid down in Article 76(6) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation No 465/2012, with the competent institutions of the Member States concerned with a view to determining the national legislation applicable.


(1)  
            OJ C 380. 3.10.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/521/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11230 – RENAULT / GEELY / JV)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, financial services, light-duty vehicle, merger control, motor vehicle industry








C_202301098EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1098


21.11.2023






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11230 – RENAULT / GEELY / JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2023/1098)

On 16 November 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11230. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1098/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-203/23, Bandundu: Order of the Court of (Ninth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — PL v État belge, represented by the Secrétaire d’État à la Loterie nationale, l’Asile et la Migration (Request for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: foreign national, illegal migration, international protection, residence permit, return migration, right of asylum








C_202400478EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/478


3.1.2024





Order of the Court of (Ninth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — PL v État belge, represented by the Secrétaire d’État à la Loterie nationale, l’Asile et la Migration
(Case C-203/23, (1) Bandundu (2))
(Request for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/478)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: PL

Defendant: État belge, represented by the Secrétaire d’État à la Loterie nationale, l’Asile et la Migration

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the tribunal de première instance de Liège (Court of First Instance, Liège, Belgium), by decision of 10 December 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  Date lodged: 28.3.2023.

(2)  The name of the present case is fictitious. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/478/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-595/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 November 2023 — Jean-Marc Colombani v European External Action Service (Appeal — Civil service — Official of the European External Action Service (EEAS) — Selection procedures — Post of Director for Middle East and North Africa — Post of Head of the EU Delegation to Canada — Decisions rejecting the applications of that official — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility of the claim for annulment of one of those rejection decisions — Amicable settlement excluding the possibility of challenging the appointment decisions taken in the context of those selection procedures — Inseparable nature of those rejection decisions and those appointment decisions — Rejection of the claim for annulment of the other rejection decision and, consequently, dismissal of that action in its entirety)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Canada, European official, Middle East, North Africa, Union delegation, admissibility, competition (EU), diplomatic profession, managing director, recruitment








C_202400527EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/527


8.1.2024





Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 November 2023 — Jean-Marc Colombani v European External Action Service
(Case C-595/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Official of the European External Action Service (EEAS) - Selection procedures - Post of Director for Middle East and North Africa - Post of Head of the EU Delegation to Canada - Decisions rejecting the applications of that official - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility of the claim for annulment of one of those rejection decisions - Amicable settlement excluding the possibility of challenging the appointment decisions taken in the context of those selection procedures - Inseparable nature of those rejection decisions and those appointment decisions - Rejection of the claim for annulment of the other rejection decision and, consequently, dismissal of that action in its entirety)
(C/2024/527)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Jean-Marc Colombani (represented by: N. de Montigny, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spáč, acting as Agents, and by L. Lence de Frutos and Troncoso Ferrer, abogados)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Jean-Marc Colombani to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 482, 19.12.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/527/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
C-688/23 P: Appeal brought on 16 November 2023 by Grzegorz Wyrębski against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 6 September 2023 in Case T-312/22, QC and Others v EUIPO – Wyrębski (RED BRAND CHICKEN)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, frozen product, poultry, poultrymeat, preserved product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202404837EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4837


12.8.2024






Appeal brought on 16 November 2023 by Grzegorz Wyrębski against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 6 September 2023 in Case T-312/22, QC and Others v EUIPO – Wyrębski (RED BRAND CHICKEN)


(C-688/23 P)

(C/2024/4837)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Appellant: Grzegorz Wyrębski (represented by: A. Skup, radca prawny)

Other parties to the proceedings: QC, QD, QE, European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 8 May 2024 the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) ordered that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4837/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-366/22, Viterra Hungary: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék (Pécs High Court) — Hungary) — Viterra Hungary Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff headings — Headings 2304 and 2309 — Soya meal)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, animal feedingstuffs, food safety, food technology, human nutrition, meal, soya bean, soya bean oil, specification of tariff heading, transgenic plant








C_202400518EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/518


8.1.2024





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék (Pécs High Court) — Hungary) — Viterra Hungary Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
(Case C-366/22, (1) Viterra Hungary)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff headings - Headings 2304 and 2309 - Soya meal)
(C/2024/518)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Pécsi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Viterra Hungary Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature, set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version resulting from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1821 of 6 October 2016,
must be interpreted as meaning that a product imported in the form of pellets or granules, which is obtained following the extraction of soya-bean oil using a solvent and heat treatment to remove that solvent so that the product can be mixed, after being physically ground, with a compound for animal consumption, comes under heading 2304 of that nomenclature.


(1)  
            OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/518/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-349/22, Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Tax on imported second-hand vehicles): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — NM v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 110 TFEU — Internal taxation — Prohibition of discriminatory taxation — Tax on vehicles — Second-hand vehicles imported from other Member States — Application of different tax rates depending on the date of registration of a vehicle in Portugal)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Portugal, environmental standard, equal treatment, motor car, national law, tax relief, used goods, vehicle registration, vehicle tax








C_202400516EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/516


8.1.2024





Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — NM v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
(Case C-349/22, (1) Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Tax on imported second-hand vehicles)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 110 TFEU - Internal taxation - Prohibition of discriminatory taxation - Tax on vehicles - Second-hand vehicles imported from other Member States - Application of different tax rates depending on the date of registration of a vehicle in Portugal)
(C/2024/516)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: NM

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the judgment

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding, on the date of release for consumption in a Member State of a vehicle that was registered for the first time in another Member State, a vehicle tax from being calculated in accordance with the rules applicable on that date, when an earlier version of the legislation relating to that tax, which would lead to the application of a lower tax and from which similar vehicles with the same relevant characteristics as that vehicle, but which were registered for the first time in the first Member State, were able to benefit, was in force when the vehicle was first registered, if and to the extent that the amount of tax levied on that imported vehicle exceeds the amount of the residual value of the tax incorporated in the value of similar domestic vehicles on the domestic market for second-hand vehicles.


(1)  
            OJ C 359, 19.9.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/516/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
C-689/23 P: Appeal brought on 16 November 2023 by Grzegorz Wyrębski against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 6 September 2023 in Case T-316/22, QC and Others v EUIPO – Wyrębski (BLUE BRAND CHICKEN)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, frozen product, poultry, poultrymeat, preserved product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202404838EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/4838


12.8.2024






Appeal brought on 16 November 2023 by Grzegorz Wyrębski against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 6 September 2023 in Case T-316/22, QC and Others v EUIPO – Wyrębski (BLUE BRAND CHICKEN)


(C-689/23 P)

(C/2024/4838)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Appellant: Grzegorz Wyrębski (represented by: A. Skup, radca prawny)

Other parties to the proceedings: QC, QD, QE, European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 8 May 2014 the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) ordered that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4838/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-700/23 P: Appeal brought on 16 November 2023 by Cayago Tec GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 6 September 2023 in Case T-377/22, Cayago Tec v EUIPO – iAqua (Shenzhen)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, pleasure craft








C_202403434EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/3434


10.6.2024






Appeal brought on 16 November 2023 by Cayago Tec GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 6 September 2023 in Case T-377/22, Cayago Tec v EUIPO – iAqua (Shenzhen)


(Case C-700/23 P)

(C/2024/3434)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Cayago Tec GmbH (represented by: J. Güell Serra, lawyer)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office and iAqua (Shenzhen) Ltd
By order of 5 March 2024, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) did not allow the appeal to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3434/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-17/23 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 – Asociación Liberum and Others v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeal – Public health – Regulation (EU) 2022/1034 – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – EU digital COVID certificate – Free movement of persons – Restrictions – Action for annulment – No locus standi or interest in bringing proceedings – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: coronavirus disease, epidemic, free movement of persons, public health, right of action, vaccination








C_202402278EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/2278


2.4.2024





Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 — Asociación Liberum and Others v European Parliament, Council of the European Union
(Case C-17/23 P) (1)

(Appeal - Public health - Regulation (EU) 2022/1034 - Regulation (EU) 2021/953 - EU digital COVID certificate - Free movement of persons - Restrictions - Action for annulment - No locus standi or interest in bringing proceedings - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Appeal manifestly unfounded)
(C/2024/2278)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellants: Asociación Liberum, Begoña Alonso Zulueta, Julia Gomis Perez and other parties (full list in the Appeal) (represented by: F. Feliù Pamplona and L. M. Pardo Rodríguez, abogados)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos and E. Paladini, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: H. Marcos Fraile, Z. Šustr and M. Moore, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.










2.


The Asociación Liberum and the other appellants listed in the annex are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.






(1)  
            OJ C 104, 20.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2278/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11329 – KIA / OTPP / SEACUBE)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Canada, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, pension scheme, rental business, teacher, transport infrastructure, waterway transport








C_202301210EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/1210


23.11.2023






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11329 – KIA / OTPP / SEACUBE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2023/1210)

On 16 November 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11329. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1210/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)