Case C-458/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 November 2023 — Robert Roos, Anne-Sophie Pelletier, Francesca Donato, Virginie Joron, Robert Jan Rooken, Christine Anderson, Annika Bruna, Silvia Limmer, Joachim Kuhs, Marcellinus Jacobus Richardus Laurentius De Graaf, Mathilde Androuet, Bernhard Zimniok, Nicolaus Fest v European Parliament, IC, Rosa D’Amato, Claude Gruffat, Damien Carême, Benoît Biteau (Appeal — Public health — Access to the buildings of the European Parliament — Obligation to present a valid EU digital COVID-19 certificate — Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament — Rules of Procedure of the Parliament — Article 25 — Concept of ‘power to determine its internal organisation’ — Article 8(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Protection of personal data — Concept of a measure ‘laid down by law’ — Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 — Articles 5 and 6 — Concept of ‘Union law’ — Inclusion of the internal rules of a Union institution or body)
Date: 2023-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Parliament, coronavirus disease, data protection, data-processing law, disease prevention, epidemic, health certificate, health control, parliamentary immunity, personal data








C_202400523EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/523


8.1.2024





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 November 2023 — Robert Roos, Anne-Sophie Pelletier, Francesca Donato, Virginie Joron, Robert Jan Rooken, Christine Anderson, Annika Bruna, Silvia Limmer, Joachim Kuhs, Marcellinus Jacobus Richardus Laurentius De Graaf, Mathilde Androuet, Bernhard Zimniok, Nicolaus Fest v European Parliament, IC, Rosa D’Amato, Claude Gruffat, Damien Carême, Benoît Biteau
(Case C-458/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Public health - Access to the buildings of the European Parliament - Obligation to present a valid EU digital COVID-19 certificate - Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament - Rules of Procedure of the Parliament - Article 25 - Concept of ‘power to determine its internal organisation’ - Article 8(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Protection of personal data - Concept of a measure ‘laid down by law’ - Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 - Articles 5 and 6 - Concept of ‘Union law’ - Inclusion of the internal rules of a Union institution or body)
(C/2024/523)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellants: Robert Roos, Anne-Sophie Pelletier, Francesca Donato, Virginie Joron, Robert Jan Rooken, Christine Anderson, Annika Bruna, Silvia Limmer, Joachim Kuhs, Marcellinus Jacobus Richardus Laurentius De Graaf, Mathilde Androuet, Bernhard Zimniok, Nicolaus Fest (represented by: P. de Bandt, R. Gherghinaru, and V. Heinen, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: IC, Rosa D’Amato, Claude Gruffat, Damien Carême, Benoît Biteau; European Parliament (represented by: S. Alves, A.-M. Dumbrăvan, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Robert Roos and the other appellants to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 340, 5.9.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/523/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)