do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia
Date: 2023-11-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Tunisia, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_202300693EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2023/693


10.11.2023






Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia
(C/2023/693)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia.
The Council has received information from the Tunisian authorities that will be considered within the framework of the annual review of the restrictive measures concerning all persons listed in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.The persons concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information that relates to them, before 20 November 2023, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.


(1)  
            OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

(2)  
            OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/693/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-662/23, Izmir: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 9 November 2023 — State Secretary for Justice and Security v X
Date: 2023-11-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: asylum seeker, international protection, right of asylum








C_202401241EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series C













C/2024/1241


12.2.2024





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 9 November 2023 — State Secretary for Justice and Security v X
(Case C-662/23, Izmir (1))
(C/2024/1241)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: State Secretary for Justice and Security

Defendant: X

Questions referred







1.








(a)


Can the determining authority make use of its power to extend the 6-month decision period, in the event of a large number of applications for international protection being lodged at the same time, within the meaning of point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) of the Procedures Directive (2) if the increase in the large number of applications for international protection occurs gradually over a certain period of time and, as a result, it is very difficult in practice to conclude the procedure within the 6-month time limit? How should ‘simultaneously’ be interpreted in this context?










(b)


What criteria should be used to assess whether there is a ‘large number’ of applications for international protection, as referred to in point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) of the Procedures Directive?














2.


Is there a time limit on the period during which there must be an increase in the number of applications for international protection in order still to fall within the scope of point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) of the Procedures Directive? And, if so, how long might this period last?










3.


When assessing whether it is very difficult in practice to conclude the procedure within the 6-month time limit referred to in point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) of the Procedures Directive — partly in the light of Article 4(1) of the Procedures Directive — may account be taken of circumstances that cannot be traced back to the increase in the number of applications for international protection, such as the circumstance that the determining authority has to deal with backlogs that already existed before the increase in the number of applications for international protection or with a lack of staff capacity?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1241/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)